119: How to Have the Best Fight of Your Life with Lindley Gentile, LMFT

How are your fighting skills? Most couples could use a LOT of work in this area, and I have just the person to help us! I’m thrilled to be joined by a great friend, Lindley Gentile, for today’s episode. She’s a Licensed Marriage and Family Therapist who recently wrote an ebook titled, How to Have the Best Fight of Your Life. Listen to our conversation about this thought-provoking topic and learn why looking for right and wrong is the WORST way to handle conflict. 

Show Highlights:

  • Lindley’s motivation to write this book? Because many (most!) couples seek therapy around communication issues

  • Fighting well leads to being seen well.

  • The need to uplevel your fighting skill set beyond being “right or wrong”

  • Ways in which we are fighting wrong

  • Making the shift from arguing about who’s right to witnessing one another

  • The fable of the elephant can teach us about being open to another’s experience.

  • The value of “I” statements over “You” statements

  • Withdrawing physically and emotionally during conflict vs. the skill of asking for a pause

  • Fight, flight, or freeze

  • The WWC framework: witness, witness, and collaborate

Resources and Links:

Connect with Lindley Gentile and Austin Couples Concierge: Website, Instagram, and book

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC 0:05

    Hello, you sentient balls of stardust. This is your host, KC Davis. This is the struggle care podcast, and I am really excited to have Len Lee Gentile back in the studio with me today. She is a licensed marriage and family therapist. She is one of my best friends for a long time, and I still feel like I never know if I'm pronouncing your name, your married name, correctly, because you got married a few years ago. Yes, you are. It's beautiful. Okay, all right. Well, Lindley Gentile, I asked you to come on today because you have recently written this sort of like mini book, and it's called how to fight. What is it called? I'm very prepared, as you can tell.

    Lindley 0:57

    okay.

    KC 0:57

    So I've brought Lily on today because she has recently written a little mini ebook, and it's called How to have the best fight of your life, which I love the title of that. And I'm curious, like, as a marriage therapist, like, what led you to write this little book? Like, did you just because, to me as a therapist, the only time I've ever, like, gone to write down things is because it is something I have had to repeat to every single client over and over and over. And over and over. And I just wanted to be like, here read this. So I'm curious if something has come up. You just hit the nail on the head.

    Lindley 1:28

    It is the number one reason clients reach out for therapy, and they use it under the words, we need to learn how to better communicate. What they really mean is we need to learn how to talk about things that are uncomfortable. We don't know how to communicate about things that are uncomfortable, about opposing views, about uncomfortable emotions. And so my business partner, Jessica Worthington, and I, we've been doing this for a long time with couples, and we came up with this recipe that just works. It just works. And I started teaching clients, fighting is the way that you fall in love. What led you to fall in love in the beginning is you felt seen. You felt heard my partner gets me. That's what leads to love in the beginning, right? And when we don't know how to fight well, we don't know how to be seen well, we don't know how to validate our partners Well, which means we're not taking these opportunities to fall in love again and again and again. So yes, it'll save you from uncomfortable conversations now. But the real point in learning how to fight well is you want to continue to fall in love with your partner again and again and again over time. This is really making sense to me, because you fall in love because you come to someone and you don't know them, and then you get to know them, and you learn new things about them, and in that though you feel seen and accepted, but once you know someone and you know them, well, there is no new like novelty and Discovery, except when there's a disagreement,

    KC 3:21

    because those are really your prime opportunities to go, I don't get this. Let me go through the process of understanding you and seeing you and learning about you and then deciding to love what I see, which makes sense. That's

    Speaker 1 3:37

    a learned skill set, and I find that 99% of the couples that come to see me, they've not up leveled that skill set yet, right? We up level so many things in our lives. We up level the foods we eat, the drinks we drink, our investments, our careers, but we so rarely up level our tool set and marriage. And so most people are still fighting the very, I'm going to say, juvenile way, right? But it's just like the way that occurs to most humans, which is right or wrong, who is right, who is wrong, right? And so we get lost in trying to over explain ourselves and to justify why we did what we did, we get defensive, and that really robs us of this opportunity to be curious and learn about our partner.

    KC 4:33

    So you have, in your book, you have four ways that we are fighting wrong, like four ways we're doing it wrong, four ways we are, like, getting in our own way, and I want to kind of talk about that. So the first one is, you say ignoring the problem. And I love that this is what you start with, because I do think that there's this idea that, Oh, we never fight, so we must be good because we never conflict, so that must be a good relationship, right? But how many times is it that we're actually just. Uh, avoiding issues and burying things and just harboring resentment or, like, not having boundaries. Like, is that kind of what you were alluding to

    Speaker 1 5:08

    there? Yeah, it's most people have gotten it into their minds. The most common analogy I hear, it feels like I am an attorney who's going to have to give a closing argument, and I've got to get my facts correct and my data in line, and I've got to get all my points and, you know, Cross my T's and.my i's and before I kind of sit down with my partner and tell them why I did what I did or defend what I did, and that is so overwhelming to me that I would prefer to sweep the problem under the rug and move on. That's just easier. Let me

    KC 5:42

    tell you that that really resonates with me. I think it especially resonates with people who are partnered with someone who is smarter than them,

    Lindley 5:52

    or just better at arguing. Yeah, I

    KC 5:53

    guess that's what I mean. I don't mean smart like, I'm a smart person and I'm good at arguing. Michael is better. Is an attorney. He is, like, gifted IQ, like he is always going to out argue me, just on, like, the points and the closing argument, or whatever, whatever. And so I do feel that temptation of like, I would honestly just rather say I'm sorry for something that isn't even my fault so we can reconcile the relationship and move on. Because I'm overwhelmed with the idea of having to, like, in PowerPoint presentation, closing argument together in such a water tight way that he can't poke you know what I mean? And like, so I do. I don't even sometimes bother to, like, bring something up that actually matters to me.

    Speaker 1 6:33

    And here's the thing, we are no longer going to have to present a closing argument, because the point of arguing in this new up leveled way is witnessing one another. It's not about right or wrong. There isn't such thing as a right or wrong. There are always many realities that live side by side. So when you can get out of this idea of right or wrong and move into the point of this argument is actually witnessing one another. You no longer have to gather that closing argument. So

    KC 7:07

    that really helps me on the flip side of it, because, you know, it's funny, like when I talk about, okay, Michael can out argue me, but at the same time, like I can out argue many of my friends and family members. So like, people have told me the same thing about me. It's like, I don't want to tell you something bothered me because we have to have an inquisition about it. And in my head, though, I'm not thinking I need to be right, what I'm thinking is I'm happy to believe the truth, but like, you're gonna have to demonstrate it to me. And so I'm pushing back really hard, not even necessarily because I'm trying to be like a butt head, but because I'm like, but you're not making the case. Well, how can I switch my opinion if you're not making the case? Of course, I care about you, but like, you're not making the case. And my poor friend is just like, I'm it's just exhausted, Casey, I don't know like, and so for me, when I'm that person hearing that, my job isn't to change my mind or to like accept their reality over mine, but is just to witness their reality. Also helps me when I'm the person that is like doing too much of the closing argument, if that makes sense,

    Speaker 1 8:15

    absolutely, we want to move people away from finding a singular truth, and instead understanding that many truths can hold hands, the point is not finding the one truth, it's witnessing all the truths that live side by side.

    KC 8:37

    So then your second tip really hit me between the eyes. Okay, this is the next mistake that people make. You say, offering additional information to clarify what really happened. If they only knew X, they wouldn't be so upset. And it's you say, although this may be true, they will not be able to integrate the information you are offering until they feel heard. I always think this, and this is also why, like, we'll have a disagreement, and the disagreement would be over. But then I'll get to my bedroom and I'll be like, but wait a second, and I'll think of my next point, and I'll like, barge back in over and over, because I really do think, like, Wait, if I just give you this one more piece of information about, you know, whatever, whatever, whatever. And that one really struck me, like, this urge, or almost compulsion, to clarify, clarify, clarify. And I get stuck with this. Like, okay, if you're not understanding me, I must just not be like, saying it clear enough. So let me say it harder, louder, clearer. Like, yes,

    Speaker 1 9:33

    I heard this story once on the internet. It was such a great analogy. The man was talking about, imagine you walk up on your partner or a loved one or a friend, and they're currently drowning in a body of water, and they are in crisis mode. They're going, they're bobbing up and down, and you're saying, didn't you read the rules on this sign? Let me read the. Rules to you, had you have known the rules, you wouldn't be in this situation. And don't you know that it's not smart to swim after 10pm Surely, if you understand that it's not good to swim at dark, you wouldn't be in this situation. Meanwhile, our partner, right? They don't need more facts. They actually don't need any of that data. They don't need you to recount any of that to them. They would like you to see that they are struggling and to throw them a life raft at best. All right, your

    KC 10:28

    next tip is have a grown up tantrum. And I feel like you put this so well, because as someone who just wrote a whole book about relationships, I was struggling to put this in the succinct of a way, and you basically just say, yeah, like having a grown up tantrum, yelling, name calling, pouting, they won't lead to a mature relationship, and they won't evoke the admiration of your partner. God, that sentence is so powerful. It's like it's not effective. It's not only not effective in changing someone's mind, but like, the way that it wears down the trust and admiration when we lash out like that,

    Speaker 1 11:02

    absolutely I like the word admiration. I also want to use the word attraction. We often think it's our job. It's our partner's job to remain attracted to us. It's their job to remain attracted to me. It's their job to admire me. It's their job to respect me. I like to think it's my job to be admirable. It's my job to be respectful. It's my job to be attractive so that my partner wants to draw near me. It's really hard to expect our partners to maintain the desire to want to draw near us when that's what we're modeling

    KC 11:44

    when we're shitty, to be near Correct, yeah, okay, I love that. And then their last one is toxic positivity. So talk to us about that. Yeah.

    Speaker 1 11:55

    Well, you and I had many discussions about this, but I actually believe that the point of an emotion is to give you a gift. It is to give you direction and information on where to go next in life and how to advocate for your needs. If you expect to only feel comfortable ones, right? I only want to there's a spectrum of emotions, but I only want to stay on this end, happy, silly, playful, and I only want my partner to be happy, silly, playful. We are not answering the door for many, many other important messengers, right? We can still gifts from pain, shame, anxiousness, anger. They're all here to give us really important data. The most mentally healthy people allow themselves to feel all the emotions on the spectrum, right? We don't want to just focus on those super pleasant ones. We want to welcome even the unpleasant because they have a very important purpose in our life. They're like a GPS. They direct us where to go next. And Dr Susan, David, she's an incredible writer. She's an amazing TED talk. Um, she says, you know, the price of admission to a meaningful life is being uncomfortable. It's feeling those uncomfortable emotions. So if we know that they create meaning and they give us gifts, why would we want to shut them down in our partner or rob our partner of having that experience, and why would we want to shut them down on ourselves?

    KC 13:27

    Yeah, that's good. Okay, so I said four. I know the list is more than four. There's like six other ones here, but you'll have to go get the ebook to read the rest of them, because I want to ask some questions. Moving on to sort of like solutions, right? So, okay, those are some strategies that don't work. Of course, there are more of them, but I want to kind of move into this idea of witnessing. Can you talk to us about, like, where, how that's different than how a lot of us go into you mentioned like, like, how do like shifting from, you know, who's right? Let's prove it to each other to witnessing. What does that transition look

    Speaker 1 14:03

    like? Absolutely. Let me start with a story. It's an old fable that I think will really help people understand witnessing. There is an old, ancient fable about an elephant, a village who has never experienced an elephant. They can see an elephant coming from a very far distance through the forest and a group of brothers. They're adventurers. They say, Hey, how about we go check out the elephant in the forest and we'll report back to the village what an elephant is like. The three brothers take off for the forest. What's important to know about the three brothers is that they're without sight, so they are exploring the elephant, taking in, you know, with their hands and sensory information. And one of the brothers says an elephant is exactly like a long thin rope, just like a long thin rope. And brother number two begins yelling at him, that is not the truth. The truth is that the elephant. Is like a sturdy tree trunk. And they're going back and forth about who has the right truth. And the third brother comes in and says, You guys are idiots. An elephant is like a thin paper fan. So obviously, what's happening is we have one brother at the tell, one at the trunk, one at the ear. Everybody is screaming about who has the truth. And in reality, everybody has a piece of the truth, but it takes curiosity and it takes openness to hear what the partner is experiencing to get the complete truth right. So I always ask people to embrace this fable of the elephant and remember that multiple realities are true at once. It depends on your childhood, right? It depends on your life experiences, and if you're at the tail or the trunk or the ear, what information you're taking in. But when you can be curious about how do I talk about the ear and also witness my partner explaining the tell, because when we have both of these parts, then we have a more complete truth. So that

    KC 16:07

    makes sense to me. I want to kind of explore a connected sort of part to that. That you talk about is you talk about using I statements. And I feel like this is one of those, like old therapy advices about, you know, like, always use I statements, nobody can make you feel anything. And it's one of those advices that, like, I think has some really important truth, but it's been so over prescribed that people's eyes kind of glaze over. So can you talk about, like, what is the real purpose of using the I statements, like, what does that mean? Are there ways that we can, like, Use I statements that, like, kind of defeats the purpose and like, what really is the heart or the intention of that? So first explain what it is, in case someone doesn't know, sure. So

    Speaker 1 16:53

    let's just talk about the elephant, right? An I statement is, I am experiencing a long, thin rope. I can't possibly tell my partner what they are experiencing. They're at a different part of the elephant that wouldn't be productive. I don't know what they're experiencing. I actually need to open my ears to know that, right? So that's what it is, is we only say the word I I felt embarrassed when this statement was said. We do not say You humiliated me when you made that joke, right? So we only want to talk about the part of the elephant we are personally experiencing. So we say the word I now throw away all the old therapy language, and just think about it like this, when we say the word you, we unintentionally activate our partners amygdala. It's the part of their brain that wants to defend, defend, defend, defend, defend. Okay, so we just immediately and subconsciously, we're not aware of it, and they're not aware of it, but immediately our partners defense system will come online, and they will now have no choice but to defend when we say, I am experiencing this, I am feeling this, I am noticing this, it actually triggers The part of our partner's brain that wants to care give and wants to step closer to us. So we're inviting them to come closer when we use you statements, you did this, and this was your reality, and this is why you did it. We are inviting them to push away.

    KC 18:40

    And, you know, one of the things that I appreciate about I statements, that I think has gotten lost when it comes to pop psychology is that people envision that when you use I statements, that it basically like, permits mistreatment and abuse. Because, like, you know that I think the first thing that comes up is like, Okay, but what if they were, like, purposefully humiliating me? And I'm trying to point out that, like, that's not okay behavior yet, like, but to me, what I have noticed is that, like, best case scenario, right? Let's say I'm at a dinner party and my husband makes a joke, and he thinks he's being funny. He thinks that this is going to be light hearted, and it really embarrasses me. Best case scenario, me saying I was really embarrassed, like you said that because he loves me, that clicks in this caregiving, like, oh my god, the person I love is in pain, and it allows him to go, oh gosh, I participated in that pain, and I didn't mean to, and I'm so sorry, but if I say like, you embarrass me. Even though he loves me, even though he's a good man, and even though I know he has the maturity and the skills to hear past that and put his defensiveness down, he's still going to feel that like, oh gosh, she's against. And it kicks in his own, like, I want to be loved, she's going to reject me. And I'm not saying like, Oh, it's my responsibility to take care of that stuff for her, but I'm just saying, like, best case scenario, this is a person that I love who loves me, and I know that I can help them hear me by using this language, and that will allow us to come closer. Now it even works in the worst case scenario, because what if I'm married to someone who is genuinely malicious, and they knew they were saying something to humiliate me, and it was maybe even like the language they used, no court of law in the land would ever be like, there's no way he didn't intend to humiliate you, even in that scenario, if I lead with you, purposefully humiliated me. I have now put us exactly where he wants us to be, which is in a you prove it, I prove it. You're always coming after me. You always do like I'm setting up the kind of conflict that a malicious person is very good at having, very good at manipulating, very good at gaslighting through but like, if I say I was so embarrassed when you said that, and I have laid myself out vulnerably and said I'm in pain, and his reaction to that is, well, that's your fault. That tells me everything I need to know about this person's character. There's nothing I can do to, like, force them to care about my pain, no matter how much, like you said, clarifying information I give. But it's just a powerful boundaries, because he, if he's malicious, if he's manipulative, he's gonna try and drag me into those conflicts. Well, you're just too sensitive, maybe, but it really, really hurt me. Well, that's not my fault. Didn't say it was I said it really, really embarrassed me. Well, all I'm doing, you know, you always do this. I don't know what that means, but I'm just saying, like, if you keep it on the subject of, I'm not even saying what you did didn't motive. Like, I'm not even saying any of that stuff to, like, throw us into this big fight. I'm literally just restating I was really hurt by that, and you watch them flounder on the line of being incapable of empathy, of being unwilling to be loving, and there's nothing they can do, you've literally just held up this mirror, and that way, it is more powerful to address things that are obviously malicious by not going there and staying on the I statements, I

    Speaker 1 22:28

    agree wholeheartedly. We're either going to lead ourselves to a productive conflict or we're going to reveal information about our partner that we desperately need anyways to make some tough decisions.

    KC 22:41

    Yeah, it's like we're either gonna lead ourselves to a productive resolution or we're gonna lead ourselves to a productive non resolution. Yes, that's the power of i statements like I refuse to be thrown into other arguments, to where by the time we're done arguing, I don't even know what we've started talking about, and we never actually address you know what I mean? So I just, man, I really, like when you really do understand the purpose of the i statement, it's really much more powerful than what pop psychology has made it about. You know? Well, I can't make you feel anything. Didn't say you could. I just said that I did. And in fact, most of the time when you make jokes about me, I feel that same

    Lindley 23:19

    way. I wholeheartedly agree.

    KC 23:21

    So like, one of your mistakes that we make is withdrawing physically or emotionally during an argument. So like, we hang up the phone, or we walk away or whatever, but then later you talk about the skill of asking for a pause, because maybe, like, our brains really activated, and I'm wondering if you could explain kind of the difference between one of those, like, basically, like, one of those things being a mistake, but the other one being like a tool, sure.

    Speaker 1 23:46

    So one of the foundations that we ask you to have in place before you use our conflict recipe. You know, we've talked about multiple realities. We've talked about I statements. The other really important ingredient is having the full brain system online. We have a part of the brain called the amygdala that is constantly scanning for danger now, because we no longer live in the age of saber tooth tigers chasing us. Our brain, our amygdala, is quite bored, right? And when it picks up on any sense of danger, so now it may just be a partner who's unhappy with us, we immediately go into fight or flight. Fight, flight, freeze, Bond, right? This is survival responses. What happens is our frontal lobe tends to power down the blood flow that would have gone to our frontal lobe begins to go to other areas of our body to help us fight, flight or freeze. This is not a good time to have a productive conflict if we don't have access to logical brain. This is when we say things we don't mean, like Fu and your mom and the horse she rode in on. And I wish I would have never right. No, we don't have access to logical thought. We are currently. At an elevated heart rate, we're focusing on defending or shutting down. This is not an appropriate time when we sense this with ourselves or our partner. The best thing we can do is take a break right now. The way we do that incorrectly is saying, Peace out. I'm out of here, and we get into our car and disappear. That can feel like abandonment to our partner. They may interpret that as my partner doesn't care about my pain. They don't care about this issue that's important to me, and they're running away instead, if we can say my brain flipped right. I'm in fight or flight, whatever you want to call it, right? Like I had a couple one time who used to say pickles. I don't know why, but that was the word pickles. Like I'm there. I'm at a place where I don't have access to my logical brain. If we find a way to communicate that to our partners, hey, I'm not in a place I don't have access to my brain, right? I need to step away. I care about this. I'll come back. Right? Let them know when you're going to come back. I'm going to be really honest. I've been teaching this for 11 years. I need 24 hours period. I am not the type of person that can ground myself instantly and be able to keep my brain online and talk about the conflict. I need 12 hours. 24 hours. In really difficult cases, I need 48

    Lindley 26:34

    and it was hard for my husband to get on board with that in the beginning, I would say, I need to step away. I'm not in a place where I can have, you know, productive conflict. I've lost my logical brain. I'm gonna go lay down. Let's talk about this tomorrow. Let's reconvene. I do care about it. And I would go into our room, and he would march right behind me and open the door up and say, No, we're gonna finish this right now. Right? So it's really letting your partner know I care. I've got to pause. We are going to do this later. I find that most people need 24 hours. It is okay to go to bed angry. I don't know what crazy person invented that stupid line of, never go to bed. Angry. Me. I'm like, always, always go to bed angry. Get some sleep. Let the blood flow return to your logical center. Talk about it the next day when you have access to your full brain, or when your partner has access to your full brain, this is not a one night stand. They're not going anywhere. You're married or you're in a committed relationship, right? You've got plenty of time to work this out. And I say, you know, as long as we've come back to the table within 48 hours or so, I think that that's a good timeline.

    KC Davis 27:52

    I like that. Okay, so then explain to us what your process is for witnessing? Yeah,

    Speaker 1 28:02

    we like to tell people WWC, witness, witness, collaborate. Okay, so there is a story in the book about a pair of clients who, just like you said, they were at a dinner party, and the husband cracked a joke about their sex life, like, Hey, we've got little kids, our sex life is is in the toilet, like, it's terrible. And then he made some sort of joke, and everybody at the dinner party starts laughing, and the wife

    KC 28:33

    is humiliated, right? The typical way humiliation shows up is anger and rage, right? We know that, right? The outward expression of humiliation is often anger. So she's pissed, the kind of pissed where you leave your body, you're so angry, right? She's like, dissociated from her body now, but she's using our principles, and she knows now is not a good time to talk about it. I don't have all the brain systems online. I'm gonna go home, we're gonna go to bed, I'm gonna shower, I'll bring it up tomorrow. So at about noon the next day, she has all of her brain systems online, and she starts the process, WWC, witness, witness, collaborate. And she says, Hey baby, I just want to let you know that I felt really humiliated when this comment was said last night.

    Speaker 1 29:20

    Okay, she never said the word you. She started it out beautifully with her I statement. Now, husband knows we're going to start the recipe now, witness, witness, collaborate, and he says, baby, oh my goodness, I am so sorry. I see that you're embarrassed, right? So the first thing we want to do we witness someone is just like, mirror back, mirror back. What you hear? Oh, my goodness, you're embarrassed. Oh my goodness, you're humiliated, right? He is seeing her. He is hearing her. I always tell people ask a question so that they really feel hurt. He asked the question. What part of the elephant are you at? Right? Like, what are you experiencing? Explain it to me, that's, that's what he's doing there. So she is able to say what I'm experiencing is I felt embarrassed because it felt like maybe it was my fault that our sex life is struggling, when, in reality, I think it's the season of life we're at. We've got small babies, and the schedule is hard for both of us. And he says, I hear you. I see you. He repeats back to her, what he heard, is there anything else you want me to know? And she says, No, I feel seen. I feel heard. And he says, Okay, would it be possible for you to witness me now? And she says, Absolutely. And he says, Okay, so this is the part of the elephant I was at, right? I was really worried about our friends. We know they're having a super tough time in their marriage. They feel very isolated. They feel like they're broken. I thought if I could throw ourselves under the bus a little bit, that maybe they would feel more normal, and they would feel like they're not in this struggle, season alone. And so, you know, the wife witnessed him. Oh, baby, that big heart of yours, right? Like I can tell you were trying to use that big heart of yours. What was your biggest hope or what was your biggest goal there, right? And he says, I just want to save their marriage, like I want them to know they're not in this alone. Don't give up. And she's like, Oh, baby, I had no idea. That's why you made the joke, right? So now he feels seen. He feels understood. We have now witnessed each other. We had very different realities. Both realities walked side by side. We didn't need to figure out a singular truth or a right or a wrong. There was no closing argument that need to be had. It was two people who were curious, what are you experiencing? What are you experiencing? And now they said, collaborate, right? WWC, what do we do moving forward, knowing that you really love to help people feel normal, and then I really feel sensitive about this topic of sex. And he said, Well, you know what? Like, how about we throw ourselves under the bus in, like, lots of areas, but maybe not the sex area, right? Like, maybe until we fully work through this one ourselves, we kind of keep this one private. And she said, Baby, I would love that. That would make me feel really respected and supported. Immediately after that, they were like, Hey, let's meet up for lunch, right? Let's go meet up for lunch and let's hang out. They had a wonderful lunch together before they up, leveled their conflict skills. This is what it would have sounded like. She would have come home that night, right? And she would have been furious, rageful, embarrassed, angry You embarrassed me. How dare you make a joke about our sex lives right now, right? This would have triggered his amygdala, his fight or flight, and he would have immediately gone into a defensive state. You're so sensitive. You're always so sensitive. I'm sure everyone else there laughed. Why can't you laugh? Right? And now we would have been off to the races back and forth about who was right, who was wrong, who's sensitive, who

    KC 33:24

    you always do this.

    Speaker 1 33:25

    You always do this right, which would have turned into an explosion. They would have gone to bed, you know, not speaking, and then likely would have not spoken for the next day or two, until finally, one of them cracked a joke and they just moved on. Would have happened is they would have missed the opportunity to fall in love. They would have missed the opportunity to see and hear each other.

    KC 33:50

    I love that that's really helpful. And I really like the way, you know, in the little book, or whatever you lay out, like very specifically what words you can use, and what steps you can take to do this process, which, you know, maybe not everybody wants to use, you know, an exact formula, but I think for a lot of people, that kind of formula is really, really helpful.

    Speaker 1 34:11

    Yes, absolutely. To me, if I have a few sentences that I can grab onto in the beginning until the concept really absorbs. I know that that helps me a lot. So I wanted to give people like, hey, try these few phrases that seem to work really well. Just start here.

    KC 34:32

    That's awesome. So if people want to download this, where can they go to find it? Do you guys have a website?

    Speaker 1 34:39

    I think the easiest way to find the book is to visit our website, Austin couples concierge.com, we also are relaunching our Instagram. Austin couples concierge, it'll be in the bio there, and they can follow the link and download it at home. They can do this. They can practice this from the comfort of their home. Oh. Awesome.

    KC 35:00

    Well, thank you so much for your time, and as always, it's been such a great conversation. Thank

    Lindley 35:05

    you. You.

Christy Haussler
118: OCD in Children: When it’s More than Anxiety with Natasha Daniels

Today’s episode will be helpful for all parents—and for anyone who has ever been a child. We are discussing OCD, specifically in children, with Natasha Daniels. She has been an anxiety and OCD child therapist for over two decades. As the mother of three kids with anxiety and OCD, her passion and perspective is both professional and personal. Join us to learn more!

Show Highlights:

  • OCD differs from general anxiety and requires very specific therapies.

  • Signs of OCD, a diverse, idiosyncratic disorder that shows up differently for each person

  • In children, a common sign of OCD is the tendency to ask theme-based, repetitive questions.

  • Is it anxiety or OCD? 

  • Autism and OCD: Comfort/coping skills or compulsion?

  • When does my child need professional help? How do I know?

  • OCD or nervous tics?

  • A discussion of mental health issues in families, social anxiety, neuroplasticity, and addiction

  • Finding “the sweet spot” as a parent (so as not to coddle but not fuel anxiety)

  • The best approach: parents can refuse to participate in the “overblownness” and drama while not being dismissive

  • The wisdom in coaching our kids

Resources and Links:

Connect with Natasha Daniels: Website (find resources, courses, podcast episodes, and more)

OCD Resources: International OCD Foundation and Treat My OCD

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC Davis 0:00

    Music. Hello, you Cynthia balls of stardust, you little OCD weirdos. I say that with affection, of course, because today we're going to talk about OCD. And specifically we're going to talk about OCD in children. And if you are a parent, this is going to be a good episode. And you know what? If you're not a parent, but you've ever been a child, you're going to want to listen to this one too. We're going to talk about OCD today with Natasha. Daniels, Natasha, thank you for being here.

    Natasha Daniels 0:29

    Oh, thanks for having me. I really appreciate it. Yeah, okay,

    KC Davis 0:32

    so introduce yourself. Tell us why you know about this subject. Well,

    Natasha Daniels 0:36

    clinically, I am an anxiety and OCD child therapist. I have been for two decades, so I feel really old. I think more importantly, I actually have three kids with anxiety and OCD, and so it's something that I live with as a parent. So I wear both hats.

    KC Davis 0:50

    I love that I always feel like that's kind of the perfect that's like the clinician I want. Like I want the personal and I want the clinical, because they both bring something really important, and they both bring something that the other side can't bring by itself. Totally

    Natasha Daniels 1:05

    Yeah. You want someone who gets it and knows how hard it is, yeah?

    KC Davis 1:08

    So when we chatted before the recording, one of the things that you're really passionate about is talking about the distinction between OCD and just kind of general anxiety or anxiety that may be coming from other sources, and tell me why it is you think that is so important that we kind of pull out OCD as something distinct.

    Natasha Daniels 1:32

    It's so important. I'm glad you're starting with this, because I think it's so so important because the therapeutic approach is different, and if you treat OCD as if it's anxiety, and you go to a regular general practitioner and they try, like cognitive behavioral therapy or some other approaches, it's not going to work with someone with OCD. And in fact, with cognitive behavioral therapy can actually make it worse with general CBT. And so you want very specific ERP exposure response prevention, which is a type of CBT, not to throw acronyms at you, like, right from the get go, but that's important. Yeah.

    KC Davis 2:07

    And, you know, a lot of my I think it's hard as when thinking as adults, right? Like, when you're an adult looking back at your life and you're kind of trying to figure out, like, Hey, where's all this stuff coming from for me, it's so difficult as an adult, because by then you have so much life experience, you probably have some traumas thrown in there. And I've just never met, I don't know that I've ever met somebody had, like, one thing going on, right? Like, Sure, maybe they are autistic, but they also have ADHD, and there's some trauma, and, you know, maybe the world around them is burning and like, it's just, there's just so much going on. And, you know, I wouldn't say that it's totally easy with kids, but at least earlier in life, there are fewer factors to consider, and there's so much anxiety that I think just comes from living if you're disabled, if you're neuro divergent, if you have mental health issues, if you are, you know, from a marginalized community, if you are a woman, if you are living in late stage capitalism. I mean, there's just so many reasons, and some of them very valid, to feel anxious. And so it makes sense that when we're looking at our kids and we're going, Okay, well, my kid is really anxious, and they're also ADHD, so maybe it's that, or, well, maybe they're autistic, or maybe it's that, or is this just social anxiety, or is this a normal development, like, sometimes I feel like I go too much the opposite way, like it's normal for a kid to feel some anxiety at certain developmental ages, right? So I guess my question is, you know, what would be, kind of some of the signs that I as a parent would be looking for that should not necessarily be, oh, this is definitely OCD, but should sort of, like, turn that curiosity on. For me,

    Natasha Daniels 3:53

    it's interesting, because I feel like out of all the disorders that you can have, especially in childhood, OCD is the oddball where it's like, it's very clear to see it when you know what to look for, versus, you know, fleshing out the differences between, you know, autistic behavior or ADHD behavior and OCD. Then when you get into the CO occurring struggles, then it gets a little bit trickier. I have kids with multiple co occurring things going on. And my son and I always argue, he'll be like, That's my ADHD. And I'm like, I think that's OCD. We actually had a huge argument last night about that, and I was like, we could just agree to disagree. Yeah, he knows his brain, but I am a therapist, so but the different like the signs that you might see when you're looking at your child's behavior is and it is hard to say, because OCD is such a diverse, idiosyncratic disorder that shows up differently for each person, and so I think that is one of the reasons why it's missed. Most people don't get diagnosed. It can take 17 years to get a diagnosis in the right treatment, because it's so hard if you're not trained and had a cocd, but on a very general term, like if you see a child doing. Uh, repetitive behavior, because compulsions can tend to be repetitive and not purpose filled, right? So if your child's like going through a door, back and forth, back and forth, back and forth, we obviously know the stereotypes of washing their hands or lighting things up, but I want to talk about some non stereotypical ones that are super common but get missed in in the media that involve the parent. This one gets missed a lot. So if your child's asking you questions on a loop, and you're like, oh my gosh, like, it's kind of, I always say, like, the pull your hair out moment where you're like, we've already, I've asked this, I've answered this, like, 300 times, and you're coming back for more. So it might look like, you know, Mom, I touched the clock, swipes, and then I wipe the sink down, and then I rinse my hands, and then I touch my mouth. Is that poisonous? Mom, I touched a plan outside and, you know, like, so it's all these kind of questions that are either reassurance seeking or checking, seeking. I thought that I might have gossiped about my friend the other day. Is that doesn't make me a bad person, and our kids are going to ask these questions. But then it's the intensity, and it's the lack of satiation, you know, like they're not getting anything from the conversation. It's almost like you're talking to a wall. And so I would look for those kind of things. So

    KC Davis 6:06

    let me ask you a couple questions on those kind of pop up for me. So like, what about because I think a lot of kids will do this sort of, like, asking question over and over when it comes to, like, wanting something. So it's like, Hey, I'm hungry. And, you know, maybe it takes you 10 minutes to put something together, but they're asking three times, I'm hungry. Are you getting me food? I'm hungry. But is that? Can that be developmentally like, distinguish whether it's kind of an impulse control? I'm hungry, I'm hungry. Are you making it? I'm hungry. Are you making it? Yes,

    Natasha Daniels 6:33

    that is a great a great distinction, because, yeah, kids can nag you, or they can be impulsive or impatient. They're normally when it's OCD, it's theme based. So you'll start to notice a theme like, wow, they're always asking me questions about if they've done something bad, or they're always asking me questions if something is poisonous, or they're always asking me questions if I wash my hands. Like you'll start to if you really pay attention initially, they seem like worry based questions, yes for the most part, yeah. And the other thing is, they typically want something from you, not the sandwich or whatever you're making, but they want a specific response, like you might say, I love you. And they'll say, No, you have to say, I love you too, you know. And they'll almost re script what you need to say, or how you or if you throw it back with, like, an ambiguous response, like, let's just use the Clorox wipes as an example. If you say, I'm sure it's okay, right? Like, just, you know you're busy, and you're like, I'm sure it's okay, that would not satisfy the OCD, typically. And so they might say, No, Mom, is it okay? And so you kind of get that push back. They're wanting to hear something specific. It can show up in all different ways. I'm just using examples, but it can look different.

    KC Davis 7:48

    What about like if you get asked, let's say you're getting pancakes, and your kid says, Don't put the whipped cream on until the pancakes have cooled down, otherwise it'll melt. You're like, Sure. And then you go, and you get the whipped cream from the thing, and you're walking over just now, remember, don't put the Like, you don't know where it's the same question, but it's almost like, it's like, okay, well, I clearly have remembered that you said it 30 seconds

    Natasha Daniels 8:12

    ago. No, I think that is, like, just anticipatory anxiety. Like, please don't do that. Like, I'm gonna freak out if you do that. Yeah. And for me, like, I think when it's OCD, intuitively, a parent will know the difference, like, you'll feel it, it's like It's nonsensical, versus those things of, like, I'm anxious. Did you do this? Because when you're talking to anxiety, like when your child is anxious, and I have kids with both issues, and so I can tell who I'm talking to, you know, the anxiety or the OCD. And so when it's anxiety, like, I feel like we can move forward. I'll try to give you some examples. Like, Well, I

    KC Davis 8:45

    think what comes to me, sort of intuitively, is that it seems like anxiety can be soothed, like, by by an emotional response, whereas, like, what I know about OCD, and I guess probably good to clarify for people at home, like, the reason it's called obsessive compulsive disorder is that actually the obsessions and the compulsions are two different aspects of it, right? And the obsession is whatever the belief is that isn't reasonable, but it's sort of impervious to logic, right? And then the compulsion refers to the action that one takes as a response to the obsession, either to try and manage it or to quell it, or to satisfy it, or whatever, right Would you say that's mostly accurate? So when we have a kid maybe asking about like, Are you sure it's not poisonous? Are you sure it's not poisonous? I kind of hear you saying that like a kid that just experiences some anxiety can be soothed, even if they need lots of soothing by like an attuned emotional response that not necessarily the words I'm using or that I'm saying the exact right thing, but that I'm just kind of being attuned and that helps, whereas a kid with OCD really needs, almost like they need me to participate in the ritual of specific words or specific reassurance. Businesses that don't seem to ever actually reassure they just seem to, like, put a pin in it for the moment because it's going to

    Natasha Daniels 10:06

    come back. Yeah, yes, that's a really great way to describe it.

    KC Davis 10:10

    And how do we because a lot of this also is sounding like kids on the spectrum, like, how do we distinguish between some of those, like, repetitive and restrictive behaviors that we might see with an autistic kid. How do we know whether that's their autism or whether it's just OCD, or maybe an autistic kid can have OCD, and how do we distinguish that?

    Natasha Daniels 10:33

    Yeah, and unfortunately, a lot of autistic kids have OCD. And so it does get really sticky when you get into the weeds, and then, on a general level, typically, that rigid, repetitive behavior, or stimming behavior that you see in autistic kids is comforting to them. There is like this comfort, like, I want this routine, I want my red cup. I want to go this way, compulsions. And even in autistic kids, that repetitive behavior is not comforting long term, like there's distress in it, there's like, this overwhelm in it. And so you can start to see the nuance and the difference. One is comfort and a coping skill, and the other one is a compulsion. And it's

    KC Davis 11:10

    that's an interesting that's an interesting distinction that I think is really helpful. So when you have a kid that's saying, like, No Mom, say these words, because we know that, like, scripting can happen with autistic kids too, but it sounds like you're saying, like, long term, we should be able to kind of clue in as to whether you know the restrictive behavior is like, what I know about autism is that if an autistic child can have their repetitive behavior, It kind of stabilizes them in a lot of ways. But does a compulsion have a stabilizing effect on a kid with OCD in

    Natasha Daniels 11:49

    the short term? Yes, and this is why it gets very confusing, because let's say you have a child who has just right OCD themes that one gets really confusing because just right and disgust themes are not fear based. They're feeling based. And so the fear is I won't be able to handle the discomfort of it not feeling just right, or I won't be able to handle the feeling of it feeling disgusting for me. And so those get missed a lot, and I think there is overlap. But when someone, let's just say someone has just right OCD themes, and you say something to them, but it didn't feel just right, they'll be like, No, say it again, and then you repeat it, and they're like, no, no, mom, like, you have to say it this way. You repeat it again. And there's escalation in, like, getting it to feel just right. And you'll know, I'm on a loop with them all the time where haven't raised an autistic child. So here's my like, caveat and disclaimer, and it's not my specialty, but certainly there's so many people in my community who are raising autistic kids, and the number keeps going up just because of the overlap. But I don't think you're gonna get that stuckness. Like there are people who can get stuck for hours with their kids on these loops that they can't escape, and the child explodes or implodes because they're not getting that satisfaction, because OCD is like, Nope, it didn't, it didn't feel just right. You have to say it again.

    KC Davis 13:09

    Well. And I wonder, even if, like, if a parent's listening and they're going, Okay, I know my kids on the spectrum, but it sounds like some of this stuff's going on. I wonder if, though, like, what the point you made at the beginning, where you said, like, OCD needs a different kind of intervention. I wonder if, at the end of the day, whether or not it is OCD or autism, if it's looking that similar, I wonder if that's the important thing to know, that perhaps an OCD intervention would be worth looking at to help an autistic child that is experiencing a lot of distress from a repetitive behavior, not necessarily like, oh, we need them to stop and look normal, but if they themselves are experiencing anxiety and distress, perhaps it's true that an autistic child experiencing that kind of distressful repetitive behavior does not need, as you said, a sort of like cognitive behavioral therapy, normal anxiety approach. But perhaps it would be worth looking at. Not so much. Oh, we have to know. We must know in black and white, is it OCD, but more? Hmm, this looks so much like it. Let's get curious about whether these kind of interventions would be helpful also, yeah,

    Natasha Daniels 14:23

    definitely. If it's causing distress and it's impacting their daily functioning, then that rigidity isn't serving them, and that would be something to look at. And how can they handle discomfort? Or how can they handle flexibility, which then it does overlap, because really, that is the ultimate goal with OCD treatment, is sitting with the discomfort and not scratching the itch. Now,

    KC Davis 14:41

    let me ask you another thing. How do we distinguish between OCD and maybe nervous tics? Like one of the things that happened to me when I was young was when my parents were going through a divorce, I developed, like some vocal tics, and I developed some almost. Was like, I guess compulsions around like, Okay, I've turned the light three times. I need to turn it till it feels right, or I need to. There were some other ones, but I had this little vocal tic where was like, and I wasn't doing it. I was doing it kind of subconsciously. It very much had to do with, there's a feeling that it feels like it's going to hit the spot. If I do it and it's not quite doing it, I have to kind of do it till it does. And they didn't persist through childhood. It happened in kind of like that space there. But it did have that similar I guess, when you were talking about the just right one, that kind of almost like, threw me back to like, Okay, I've done it on the left side. Now I have to do it on the right side. And I have to just kind of sit here and I have to just kind of sit here and do this until it feels right. Yeah. And I'm curious if those are related, or if, you know, there's kind of a spot here for, you know how to kind of ticks and those sort of things go into this. They

    Natasha Daniels 15:54

    are related. I mean, ticks can be co occurring, can be a co occurring condition with OCD, but there is something called toretic OCD, which actually is kind of ticks and OCD combining, and it's exactly what you just described. It's having that urge, that impulse to do, to have a tick, which is kind of automatic, but then OCD kind of hijacking that and saying you have to do it until it feels just right, or you have to do, you know, putting the OCD angle into it where there's intention, because tics, in and of themselves, are typically unrelated to thoughts or feelings. They just happen in your body. Sometimes you can suppress them, or you can have therapy to kind of work with them, but they are happening automatically. And a lot of kids with OCD have tics and that come and go and are transient, touretic. OCD is something different. It's exactly what you described

    KC Davis 16:42

    well, and I know probably a lot of neurodivergent kids may perhaps that have some echo Lolly like it might look like ticks just because they're kind of repeating. I'm curious if like, and I can't recall a lot of DSM criteria like, the real difference maker is that like creates clinically significant distress. Is OCD one of those, yes,

    Natasha Daniels 17:06

    like, if you look at the side box and you're looking at the criteria, it is really based on how disruptive it is in your life and your thoughts.

    KC Davis 17:13

    So we could be seeing maybe some of these things in our kids. I'm thinking about my parents looking at me during the divorce. I'm going and, you know, the lights. But I will say that although I relate on some levels to that feeling of just right, just right, just right, it wasn't like I could suppress it and it, I can honestly say it never got to a clinically significant level of distress for me. It wasn't, you know, it was kind of annoying to suppress it, but it wasn't something that was super disruptive. And so I always think that's important to say, because I think, you know, with our kids, like we might notice some things here and there, but it doesn't necessarily mean, oh my gosh, okay, my kid has OCD. It really does, as with many, many, many of the diagnoses, like, have to do with whether that it's creating a significant distress in that child,

    Natasha Daniels 18:04

    yeah. And, you know, some of us have that genetic seed and it just doesn't fully sprout, you know? I mean, I feel like, you know, well, anxiety, OCD, mental health issues are just rampant in my family, and I remember being a little kid and my pinky toe had to, like, I had to move my pinky toe every time I was in between a driveway, or if we were on the highway and there were lights, and I don't know, and I remember, but I had this, like, pull like, I had this kind of, like, rebellious personality in my brain. I must have been like, nine. I was like, I'm so tired of my brain telling me to do this. And so I just was like, I'm not doing it anymore. And that was like, a little seed. And then instead, you know, social anxiety sprouted. It was gonna get me somewhere. But it was like, we'll try OCD first. And it was like, Nope, that didn't work. Let's just go into social anxiety. But I think, yeah, sometimes

    KC Davis 18:47

    I do think, like, what's super interesting is that when we look at genetics, I mean, when we talk about mental health, especially like depression, for a long time, there was kind of this like, Well, is it environmental depression, situational depression, or is it like the chemicals in your brain are, and we know now that, like, that's not what depression is. And I'm not saying it doesn't involve chemicals in your brain, but like, you could have, for example, a like, there are some genes that are, I just know this because I have an autistic child, like, there are certain genes gene mutations that are related to autism and epilepsy. They're Same, same gene. And if you have this genetic mutation, a lot of people with this genetic mutation have autism and epilepsy, but not everyone with the genetic mutation does, and it has to do with how that whether or not that genetic mutation expresses itself, and to what level it expresses itself. So like you know, it could be dialed up to 10, it could be dialed up to one and even so, what causes a gene to express itself, or can be even an. Environmental factor could there could be something that happens that kind of causes that expression, or amps that expression up, and I find sort of that interplay. I mean, as a therapist, I feel like I have enough of that understanding to not speak a ton on it, because I'm not a psychiatrist or a, you know, neurologist, but I do think it's helpful to be aware that, like all of those bio psychosocial things are kind of interplaying together. Because I think as a parent, you can go down that wormhole of, how did this happen? Yeah,

    Natasha Daniels 20:34

    absolutely. And I think I mean the mean, what to me? What gives me hope with mental health issues, especially since it's rampant in my family, is the idea of neuroplasticity and epigenetics, and the beautiful thing of being able to alter my brain based on my behaviors and my thoughts and the interplay between genetics and environment is so powerful, and that's why you do twin studies, and you can have two identical twins And one doesn't have OCD, or one does really well and one doesn't, because there is this interplay, which I think offers hope that just because genetically, it's rampant my family, that doesn't mean that my kids are going to be institutionalized when they're older, because we can do things.

    KC Davis 21:16

    Yeah, and when I was in rehab for drugs, one of the things they explain to us is, like, when you flood your system with basically, like synthetic dopamine and oxytocin and all this, like your transmitters, your transmitter sites in your brain, like, actually begin to shut down, because your brain wants homeostasis. And so if you flood it, it goes, Oh, we have so much of this. We don't need this many. So let's shut some ports down, basically. And the effect of that is that then when you're not and so that's what that tolerance is. So now I'm using, and I'm not really even getting high. I'm just feeling normal, okay, no pain. But the other effect of that is that when I wasn't using, nothing made me happy anymore. Nothing was exciting. I didn't look forward to anything, and that was really depressing, right? And that you want to use more, because nothing feels good. And one of the things that I was told when I was in rehab was that, and this, I'm quoting this from, you know, 20 years ago now, so don't take my word for it, but they basically told us that it takes about 18 months of not using drugs for your brain to start to reopen, those receptors to kind of like reset. And they call, it's called, like, your hedonic threshold, right? Like, how much kind of pleasure you need to get happy. And so they're like, you have to be prepared that, like, things are going to feel like they're in gray scale for the first, you know, year and a half, but it will get better, and we need some tools to get then. Luckily, I was actually just institutionalized for the entire

    Natasha Daniels 22:48

    18 months. That is nice to just be there. One

    KC Davis 22:50

    of the things that happened was they were totally right, is that they did. My brain did begin to reset. My hedonic threshold began to lower, and, in fact, it reset itself so hard that I was a happier person than I had ever been that, like small things. And it was funny because me and my friends would joke, like, we've all become so boring and lame now because, like, we do these things that everyone's like, that looks like such a boring life. And we're like, dude, but you have no idea, like, my brain lights up at a monopoly game with my friends on a Friday night, like the smallest things, and it really reset my brain, reset my personality, and I think, like, reset the trajectory of my life. And that is all just neuroplasticity. Yeah, that's

    Natasha Daniels 23:36

    crazy. It's so good. They told you that, you know, I feel like, if we can just tell people, because then you understood, like, why everything was in black and white, and why it felt that way. And there's a light at the end of the tunnel that was probably so therapeutic for you to understand the science behind what you were experiencing that's interesting

    KC Davis 23:53

    well, and I kind of actually have this theory, just from my personal and professional experience with addiction. I actually believe that addiction is a subset of OCD, and the reason that I believe that is because when, from my personal and professional experience, because a lot of people go to rehab that are using drugs, a good percentage of them don't ever come back and they quit. And a good percentage of people who use too many drugs or drink too much alcohol never even make it to rehab. They just stop. And they were indistinguishable before they stopped, from people that you know ended up having, like substance use disorders and have chronic relapsing. And what we found to be the difference between people who kind of chronically relapsed and those that didn't, was that people who chronically relapsed had a belief that this time it will be different. It's not just it's so bad I don't care. I'm going to use again, because anyone can get to that spot. We're talking about the ones whose life would be going great, and then they would relapse. And every single time, there was this belief this time it will be different. Mm. Yeah, it wasn't really that bad last time. This time, I can control it. And there was no like. It was a belief impervious to logic. You could sit there and have all their friends and family read these letters. You could show them how many times they'd been to jail. You could talk about all and they would agree with you cognitively. And then, you know, they'd tell us in private sessions like, but my brain keeps telling me to do it anyways and that it'll probably be fine. And it was like, that is an obsession. They It was literally a mental obsession that if we could not figure out how to get the mental obsession to go away, it wouldn't matter how much sobriety they had, and I began to think of it that way, like this is a mental obsession about your ability to use drugs like other people, and your ability to moderate with a compulsion that you then go use and for whatever reason, like you are not able to moderate like other people. And that really changed the way that that we in the places that I worked at, like that we approached addiction treatment, yeah, which makes sense, which is kind of funny, that, like, I escaped the vocal tics, and then it was like, Yeah, but I think, like, like, there must have been a little, just a little dabble there.

    Natasha Daniels 26:15

    And I know there has been research on addiction and OCD and the overlap. And I'm not a neuroscientist, but I like to nerd out on it, and this same part of the brain, you know, addiction and OCD. So that's not surprising to me. I feel like, hopefully it

    KC Davis 26:30

    is also not that strange, because, like, only recently did we pull hoarding out as a separate diagnosis from OCD, yep. So like the idea that, you know, an obsession and a compulsion can pair with like those like, a behavior that isn't as kind of my like, as repetitive as like, exactly the same motion every time, and it's similar. Like, you will get somebody with hoarding disorder, and it's like, but I might use this right? And you can sit there and show them, but you've never used anything you have, but look at your house, but wouldn't it be but, and you will logic with them all day long, right? And there's a part of their brain that goes, I recognize this is reasonable, but it just never can get to that, like deep seated belief, place that drives their actions.

    Natasha Daniels 27:13

    Yes, that makes sense. Anyways, I know

    KC Davis 27:17

    that's kind of a tangent, but I just, I've always thought that addiction really should be looked at as a part of obsessive compulsive disorder. You know, we kind of talked a little bit about, you know, how OCD needs different interventions, and you mentioned a couple of those. But I'm also wondering, as a parent, you know, I feel like when it comes to anxiety in general, and we can make kind of, like, two opposite mistakes. And I think our generation grew up with parents that were very like, pull yourself up by the bootstraps and can't swim, throw you in the deep end. And who cares about your feelings. You know, like, this is silly to be scared of. Get on the bus. Like, quit doing that like. And so obviously that kind of, like running roughshod and being dismissive or even just being really punitive, like, didn't work. And so I'm of the generation where we're trying to do something different. But what I watch a lot of my generation do, and what I have found myself doing, is that I feel like sometimes I go too far in the opposite direction where I'm like, I mean, I hesitate to say coddling, because I'm not. It's not like, Oh, I'm too afraid. Like, I want to spoil my kids. It's more like, okay, honey. Like, we'll just wait with you, and we'll wait till you feel like doing it right. While the doctor's like, we have to give her the shot. She's never going to be ready for the shot. You just have to hold her down. I'm like, but like, but bodily autonomy. And here's what I noticed. It's funny, I mentioned the shot because that is what happened. It's really important to me to always tell my kids, yes, we're getting shots. I don't want you anxious about every doctor's appointment, because I spring it on you in the last moment. Exactly, yeah. And the first few times that they were old enough and they were, you know, my daughter would say, like, wait, wait, wait, I'm not ready. I'd be like, Stop, everyone. Stop. We will wait until she is ready, because I wanted her to have that feeling. I've been in medical procedures where they kind of overtake her autonomy. It was not good, but what I noticed was that it seemed to make it worse. I watched the fear grow bigger and bigger and bigger as she sat there, going, Okay, I'm not ready. Okay, right? And now we're almost in full blown panic. And I thought, Okay, I need to rethink this. Because, yes, I want her to, you know, I guess I have these values of bodily autonomy and of you feeling in control and consent, but at the same time, like, at what point is it my job as a parent to go, Okay, I love you. We're gonna get a shot. Now. I know it's scary, and I know you don't want it. I'm gonna hold your body on the count of three so that they can give it to you and that it'll be done. And she's going no, and I'm going one, two, and then her distress is like, four. 30 seconds, and then she's totally fine afterwards. And I guess the point of this big, long story, right? Is I feel like I waffle back and forth, right? I go from just figure it out, like, kind of, you know, which doesn't make it, it makes it worse, right? When I'm pushing really hard and I'm getting frustrated at whatever anxious thing they're in. But I also feel like sometimes I do too much of the like, well, we'll wait till you're ready. Okay, do you want to do it now, honey? Okay, what will make you feel better? And it's like that that also seems to grow the anxiety.

    Natasha Daniels 30:28

    Yeah, I 100% agree. I feel like there is this sweet spot that that we have to practice on a daily basis. You know, sometimes we swing too far to the left then too far to the right. And I know as a parent, I'm always trying to find that that sweet spot where anxious, the fuel to anxiety, is avoidance. And I think once we recognize that, we don't want to contribute to that fuel line, right? I mean, like anxiety is a fire, and it can't grow massively if it's not being fed avoidance on a daily basis, and so we can inadvertently partner with anxiety by facilitating avoidance to an extreme degree. And so it's always finding that sweet spot of, I don't want to push my kids off a cliff, but I want to encourage them to look over the cliff and see, oh, actually, there's a little bit of a ledge, and you can jump down, and then you can jump down again, and you don't have to fall off the cliff. You can actually climb down the cliff, but how do I get them to the edge so they can see that or that they have a parachute, and they can actually parasite whatever that's called. And so I know I messed that word up, but it's like finding that sweet spot. And but the shots is a great example, because everybody can relate to that, because a lot of kids are anxious about that, and I totally resonate with that too, because both my kids have had to have a lot of blood work in general, because one has celiac, one had Hashimotos and so and very phobic. But it's a good example, because it has to be done, just like our kids do have to have some sort of education, they do have to sleep, they do have to eat, right? These are things that anxiety impacts, and if we just give them their own agency to the point where we don't offer opportunities to practice being brave, we're robbing them of that experience. My mom, you know, she just threw me off the cliff. I would be throwing up in the back seat of a station wagon, and she'd be like, okay, here, take a napkin and then get get to first period. There was no talking about it, or like, you have anxiety. Let's talk about there was none of that that's extreme or being punitive, right? And like, my mom would, like, push me and say, like, you have to get up there and go do that. And it was like, I was afraid of her hitting me, and so I would do it. But that wasn't really therapeutic. So with my kids, it is, it's doing what you said, like exploring it. What's the scariest part of and it's interesting, because I had assumed because one has a fear of shots and the other one has a fear of blood work. And so I took them aside privately, and this was at different stages of development as well. Like, What's the scariest part about getting your blood taken? You know, for my son, it's being poked. And he actually had even, like OCD themes around being poked, like, we live in Arizona. He's afraid of the cacti. He was afraid of, like people poking his stomach. So he'd always hold his belly button. It got very compulsive. So I knew, Okay, it's the idea of being poked or stung. He was, like, terrified of anything that can sting him. It was all very related, but with my daughter, she was mainly afraid of getting her blood taken. And when I process What's the scariest part about getting your blood taken? I thought, because I'm afraid of getting my blood taken, I don't like the needle going my vein. That grosses me out. She's said, I don't like when they put that rubber band on my arm, I feel like my arm's gonna fall off. And I'm like, Oh my gosh. I would have never thought that that's the problem. And so, like, we did exposures. I bought a rubber band, you know, and we practiced the tightness. I actually advocated for her when she would get her blood taken, I'd say, please take the band off as soon as you can. That part bothers her, and so she was more in control. Did she get to have a pass and not have her blood taken? No, right? Because that's not an option. Did we get a lab to come to our house? Yes, because she throws up every time. So we accommodate on some level, but walk them through that with my son. This is going to sound really weird. We did exposures on poking, you know. I actually got a paper clip with his buy in. He earned prizes, and I would lightly poke him super light with a paper clip, which sounds bizarre, I know, and we're like, this is poking, you know. And that was like a 10 for him for a while, but I got to the point where he can get a shot, and it was like no big deal, because he kind of exposed himself to what that experience was.

    KC Davis 34:28

    I think this you said two words that I feel like are the answer for my generation and everyone else, is exposure and accommodation. Because I feel like, you know, I always have the saying of like, it's not our job to be the parent that we needed as a child. It's our job to be the parents that our children need. And so it's difficult if your parents never accommodated you and everything was in their mind, exposure. I'm quoting that right, because that's not true. Therapeutic exposure, but this kind of suck it up, no pain, no gain, figure it out. Stuff, your feelings, you know, whatever, whatever, Don't be weak and get over yourself. It's all in your head. We sometimes, I think as parents, react to that, and we feel as though any type of pushing our kids or exposure is going to be, like, really traumatic or really wrong, and so and we don't want to expose, we want to accommodate. And I think what you said is so beautiful, because it is the marriage of both. It is, I mean, you just named so many accommodations that you did, but there was also exposure. And you know what's funny, I wanted also share with you something similar about figuring out around shots, like what you assume, what the problem is, right? So both my kids hate shots, and when we went to get when the COVID vaccine finally came out, and I have one of my children is autistic, and you know, it was really hard for her, and we had to hold her down every time and give her the shot, and it was screaming. And so we go to get our COVID shot. Now, in those early days, right? You were going to, like the hospital, and they were fering you through the line, and they were doing adults and children. So when we get there, it's a seat in an auditorium next to a desk, and I've got one at this one, and I'm with the other one, and I'm about to say to the lady at the desk, and they're there going so fast, right? I'm about to warn her, like my daughter's autistic. She doesn't like shots. This woman turns around, goes right into her thigh, and she looks down at it and looks up at me. Literally did not flinch. She did not care. She did not flinch. And you know what? We realized she doesn't like to be held down. She was not screaming because of the shot. She was screaming because she did not know what was happening, and she did not like it when everyone was putting pressure on her limbs and on her body. And for, of course, for my other daughter, it's the opposite, right? It is the shot itself, like she you kind of have to help her stabilize her body, or she'll move around and hurt herself. And I just thought that was so interesting, what you mentioned. But So talk to me a little bit more about this idea of accommodating and exposing. And I wanted to kind of tie it back to what you said at the beginning, which is, like, how we need to do that differently for OCD than just other types of anxiety, yeah,

    Natasha Daniels 37:10

    and that is also a really great question, because I think that accommodation in the OCD world is like a four letter word. They're like, accommodate. It's the person we remove is accommodation. And I feel like that word is used differently in different communities. And so it has a different meaning. When we talk about OCD accommodations, we're talking about really participating in the compulsion. And I wish that we'd use a different language, because I think it does confuse parents who are navigating multiple worlds, the autistic world and the OCD world, because the accommodations used in a different way. Yeah, accommodations

    KC Davis 37:42

    means supports for independence or for whatever it almost seems more similar to, like to borrow a word from the addiction industry is enabling.

    Natasha Daniels 37:51

    Yeah, although enabling has a bad connotation too it

    KC Davis 37:56

    does. But I mean, when in the OCD world, when they say, don't accommodate the obsession. I wonder if what they mean is closer to the definition of when we say an addiction, like, don't enable the addiction. Yes, because we're not saying don't support them, don't accommodate them. We're also not saying like, you know, like, if I have a friend that's new in sobriety and I know how they feel around alcohol, I'm not gonna have alcohol at a party like that. Is accommodating, yeah, but we distinguish that in the addiction world from, oh, my friend, you know it needs money. And I know that if I give them money, they're probably gonna, you know, go use it to use and, but I'm too scared to say, yeah, so I'm gonna, but I don't want to be mad, and I just maybe, if I give it to them, right? Like, that's the enabling aspect of it. So it sounds like in the OCD world, when y'all say, don't accommodate it. You talk more about enabling it, as you said, like participating in it. Yes, that's

    Natasha Daniels 38:46

    a word I'm going to use then, because I feel like when I use the word accommodation, I upset the autistic world. But then the OCD world's clueless. Most of them are clueless to how those are, and I'm trying to educate people in the OCD world, like, don't use the word accommodate. People are getting upset about that in other areas. But what it means with OCD is you can easily enable, we use the award accommodation, even to the point where, like, you know, there's a therapy modality that talks about removing accommodation. We're not talking about removing support. So if your child has OCD most of the time, it's a family affair, and so OCD might boss the family around, like Don't say that word, or you can't sit there, or you have to wash your hands here, or everyone has to take their clothes off before they enter the house, or can't come into my room because you're contaminated. And we follow these rules that's enabling the OCD, and so that never helps. It doesn't happen overnight. And so to pull those back is takes time, and there's therapy modalities that help you pull those back over time, but the accommodation, and when we're talking about OCD or anxiety, there might be your child really can't function at school because they have to share, you know, joint supplies or whatever, and it's a decision of either they don't go to school at all, or I have to find some accommodations in the. School environment where they're not triggered, so they can get an education while we work on it, or when we're talking about anxiety, like, what is going to make my child comfortable while they're moving towards doing break things? Can my child get their blood test at home? Yes, that's an accommodation. Can they do certain things that will help them feel better and have autonomy while doing still scary, big things, because sometimes it's too big of a step to do something without those supports. Well,

    KC Davis 40:29

    and really what we're talking about in any world, whether it's addiction or OCD or autism, ADHD, is just scaffolding. Yeah, like, we want an appropriate scaffolding, and that's going to be different for each kid, because there are going to be especially when you get into like the and we would consider OCD a type of neuro divergence, but when you get into like the autism, ADHD, kind of duo, some people are going to need accommodations for the rest of their life. And so it's not that the goal is to scaffold every single person into complete independence, never needing accommodation. But we don't want to make the opposite mistake of, okay, we'll just cocoon this person to this serious degree for the rest of their life. A good example that comes up even with autism and ADHD is sensory sensitivities, especially sound. So a lot of kids with autism and ADHD are really sensitive to sound, and so you know, you have, like, your one accommodation for that is, like noise canceling headphones. One of the things from a pure, like audiologist perspective, is that the more you use noise canceling headphones, the more sensitive your hearing can become. So you kind of have to play this dance of, okay, well, for a lot of kids, you can't just not give them headphones because, oh, it'll make it worse. Because worse than what, they're already melting down. They already can't function at school. They're already in so much distress, and they don't have the skills to deal with that. But at the same time, we also don't want the answer to be okay, you know, we'll just wear these 24/7 unless it is to that. Like there might be a kid where there will be no scaffolding away from that, but there will be a lot of kids where we can scaffold in such a way that there are instances where we can use it where we need help, and there are instances where we are targeted in this is what we're working on via exposure and obviously doing that with a team. But I think that idea of scaffolding supports yeah is kind of what you're talking about, yeah.

    Natasha Daniels 42:35

    And I do have a really good example of that as well, just to show like, where we can inadvertently harm our kids or set them back versus encourage them. This is what I was arguing about with my 15 year old son last night. He like one of his predominant I think OCD issues is that he gets songs stuck in his head. And so with OCD, you can get songs stuck in your head. You can get images stuck in your head, not just intrusive thoughts or feelings, and to the point where he would melt down. He would not let us play like the music on the radio. His sister can't sing like nobody can hum like dominating the environment. And then when he got diagnosed with ADHD, he's like, Mom, you were wrong the whole time. It's my ADHD. Like,

    KC Davis 43:16

    I think I was like, most people with ADHD

    Natasha Daniels 43:19

    aren't getting like, they're not getting compulsive with having a song stuck in their head. It might be, you know, that it might happen, it might be distracting, but they're not getting distressed the way you are, like you would have a full on meltdown at the airport because he has a song stuck in his head. And so I said the volume button is probably higher because of your ADHD, and it's probably more distracting, but the idea that you're having it, it's getting stuck. And so what we have done is like you you can if you want to block the sound and you want to wear headphones or you want to put your air pods on, that's fine. You get to control what you want to do with that, but you're not going to control the environment. We're not going to turn the radio off, but we had to do it really slowly, because there'd be mornings that he's melting down and he can't go to school for all sorts of other anxiety OCD issues. I wasn't gonna put the radio on and just like, you know, push him off a cliff. I was like, we're gonna be quiet. He's not okay right now. But, you know, last night, I think he wanted this, like, global rule in our house again, that no one's gonna be allowed to sing. And I was like, that seems very compulsive to me, and we're not. I said, you know you're gonna have roommates, you're gonna have you know at your employment, you're gonna go to college. People are gonna be singing, they're gonna be playing the radio, and I will be doing you a disservice if, if I coddle you, or maybe I didn't use the word coddle, but if I cocoon you and have you live in a bubble where you have no exposure to this, what is that gonna be like when you grow up? We kind of agreed to disagree last night, but is it to be continued? But that's an example.

    KC Davis 44:44

    It's a great example also, because it also shows the what can be hard as a parent, especially if you grew up with a disability, which is that everyone always told you that everything was your fault, and so we can sometimes feel very guilty. But. By telling our child like, Hey, you're being inconsiderate. I know it's coming from your disability. I know that it's but you don't get to kind of hold the, you know, room hostage or whatever. And we feel that inner child wound, you know. And I always like to say, like, everything is emotional context. And telling a child, you know, hey, we can't just always turn the radio off. The saying that in a way that is attuned and kind and empathetic, and in a context where you are looking for appropriate accommodations and you do care about their sensory experiences and their challenges that is not going to be the same emotional context than your as your parent, who did not look for appropriate accommodations, did not take your disability seriously, was very dismissive, and said we're not turning the radio down just because your ears hurt. And I think that's kind of what we have to do our own healing to get to the place where we're willing to recognize like I have to teach my kids, and I do have to recognize which of these aspects of their disability might be lifelong and might be pretty intense, regardless of how much intervention, but also not let go of my responsibility as a parent to teach my kids about you Know, I want them to self advocate for themselves, and I want them to feel validity in their neuro divergence and their differences, and I want them to feel responsible for being a good citizen in society and believing that other people's needs in the environment are just as valid as theirs. And I think that's it, right? It's like your needs aren't less valid than everybody else, but they're not more valid than everybody else. Like, I want to, I want kids that believe that their needs are just as valid as everyone else's, even if their needs are different, you know, so that they can sort of take this process on, like for themselves. Once they're out of my house where they're they know how to think about, okay, how do I get my needs met? And when do I recognize, like, how I can do that in a way that still respects everybody else's needs and is kind of reasonable both ways?

    Natasha Daniels 47:10

    Exactly? Yeah, definitely. Let

    KC Davis 47:12

    me ask one more question as we close. We talked a little bit in our pre interview about kind of our responsibility as parents to right size our kids feelings, you know? And I think this is really true. Like our anxiety will feed our kids anxiety, right? And we kind of recognize this, like you we realize early, like sometimes our kids fall and they look at us, and if we go, oh my god, like they kind of do the same thing, right? And so while I don't want to be dismissive at the same time, I don't want to be kind of overly dramatic. I don't want my anxiety to be contagious. And so I'm curious if you have any sort of, like, ending thoughts on how, as a parent, can we best, like, right size our kids feelings and not participate in kind of the overblownness or the drama of it while not being dismissive.

    Natasha Daniels 48:02

    Yeah. I mean, I often talk about being a lovingly detached anchor, like, That's my ultimate goal, is to be to be supportive of my kids struggles in the moment without having smudges on my lens that are, that's my stuff, which is a lot of what we talked about today. You know, a smudge might be, oh, you're just like my dad. Or a smudge might be, oh my gosh, you're not gonna be able to function in college. So I might be living in the what ifs instead of the what is. Or I might be in my smudge might be, I'm gonna be late for work again, and I can't keep having this or this smudge might be, my parent didn't listen to me in this moment, and so I'm gonna be over identified. Or a smudge might be. I'm so empathetic or an empath, that your pain is my pain, and I'm feeling it. So as a parent, learn how to identify your smudges. We all have them. There's no way we have a clear lens when we're looking at our child in having a struggle, but being able to identify them separate out. What is my stuff versus their stuff? And then the thing I always ask myself as a parent, is, what do they need from me right now? You know? And that really helps put me back in the moment. It kind of grounds me. Sometimes I literally do grounding stuff, like let me feel my feet on the carpet, or let me feel my breath, or let me smell something. So I'm like, out of my head and more into my body. And then I just say, What's my role right now? What do they need for me and I get into my coaching, you know they need me to not be emotional, or they need me to just reflect back to them that this is hard for them right now, but I think that can help us anchor ourselves and be there for them with more intention than reaction.

    KC Davis 49:36

    I love that you use the word coaching, because I think we can learn a lot as parents from watching coaches, because there are good coaches and bad coaches. And bad coaches are not just the ones that are super gruff, super mean, super pushing, super challenging, not listening to having kids run exercises till they faint in the heat, but also you've. Bad coaches that are so concerned with everyone's just gonna have a good time that like they never win a game. And so I think when we when I think of like the good coaches my kids have been with, I have had coaches say to my kids, there's no crying in the pool. But that's also the coach that celebrates so much with them with their wins. It's also the coach that goes home and thinks about, how best can I accommodate, you know, my one kid's fear of water, and maybe let's try this, or let's try this, or let's try this. And yet, they have that balance of, I'm listening, I care, but also I have what you the perfect wording, right? Which is this kind of, like, detachment, where, like, I don't have to own your feelings. I'm separate from your feelings, and I have so much confidence in your ability to handle your feelings that I don't need to participate in your feelings. Yeah,

    Natasha Daniels 50:52

    which is really comforting for kids who are overwhelmed that we're an anchor and that we kind of reflect that, and we might have to do our own inner work to get that, and that's a daily practice, honestly, but it's a gift that we can give our kids.

    KC Davis 51:05

    Well, Natasha Daniels, you have been a delight. Can you give us any resources? Tell us about like, Where can we find your stuff or anything about you? And then, what would you recommend to kids, to parents who are thinking that maybe they're seeing some OCD in their kids?

    Natasha Daniels 51:18

    Well, you can find my work at at parenting survival.com, I have a podcast. I have YouTube videos for kids, teens and young adults, and courses and a community, so all sorts of stuff that you'll find over there. I have a OCD workbook for kids, eight to 12 that just came out, crushing OCD workbook for kids. And you know if you're concerned or you're like, I don't know if my child has OCD or just listening to this conversation. Now I'm not sure if it's anxiety or OCD. You can always get like a an assessment. I always you talk about no CD just because they are virtual and they're all over the world. So treat my ocd.com also a really good resource is the International OCD foundation@iocdf.org

    KC Davis 51:59

    Awesome. Thank you so much. Natasha,

    Natasha Daniels 52:01

    yeah, thanks for having me. You.

Christy Haussler
117: Private Infant Adoption: Altruistic Act or Human Trafficking?

Today’s topic of adoption is a sensitive subject for many people. We are covering adoption from a different perspective as we talk to Stacy, an adult adoptee who belongs to a community of adult adoptees who are vehemently opposed to private infant adoption. Join us to learn more!

Show Highlights:

  • Meet Stacy and learn her story

  • An overview of differing views of adoption through the years (Are new laws needed?)

  • Examples of laws that are drawing negative feedback from adult adoptees

  • The expense of private infant adoption and the ethical dilemma of a more systemic problem

  • The ratio of parents looking to adopt and available infants

  • A closer look at adoption theology and open adoption

  • The US system that contributes to the number of desperate pregnant women and creates the perfect storm for exploitation, pressure, and propaganda

  • What adopted kids need to know

  • The adoption industry needs a different approach.

  • The nuances of adoption out of foster care

  • For many people, adoption into a “nice” family was/is a fantasy. 

  • Stacy’s viewpoint on what to say–and what NOT to say–to adult adoptees

  • Stacy’s message to adult adoptees

Resources and Links:

Connect with Stacy: TikTok

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC Davis 0:00

    Music. Hello, you sentient balls of stardust. It is KC Davis, your host. Welcome to Struggle Care. And we're going to talk today about something that is a bit of a sensitive subject for a lot of people. And we're going to talk about it from a perspective that you may not have heard before. I'm here in the studio with Stacy rebec, and we're going to talk about adoption. So Stacy, you are an adult adoptee, meaning you were adopted by your parents. And before we get started, tell me a little bit about yourself. So what do you do? And you know all that good stuff? Sure. So

    Stacy 0:32

    I'll probably limit it for my job, saying that I work for our state's court system in the IT sector, and I live in Topeka, Kansas. I'm 41 years old. Both my younger sister and I were adopted through domestic infant adoption to my parents. My mom also had relinquished a child at age when she got pregnant at 17 and relinquished a child at 18 before going on to adopt us later on. So we have lots of experience in our family. Yeah.

    KC Davis 0:59

    So you know, when I was growing up adoption, there was this very clear picture of adoption. It was like this very altruistic thing to do, and particularly if it was like an overseas adoption, right? Like, Oh, I'm getting a child from a country where they wouldn't grow up with anything, and I'm bringing them over here and saving them. And then the other sort of picture that I grew up with adoption is that it is this like fulfillment of all hopeful wishes for maybe parents that are experiencing infertility, and then I had some time in the evangelical church before I deconstructed, and they were huge about adoption, and so It was sort of like, partially a story about how much we need to save kids, and then, like, partially a story about, like, how much everyone deserves to have a kid. And so I was really, I don't know what the word is. I wouldn't say blindsided. That's too strong. But like, I had no idea about a year and a half ago when I stumbled upon a whole community of adoptees that are vehemently against private infant adoption. So let's just start there. Stacy, you know, tell me maybe a little bit about what you're kind of where you're at. And can you tell us anything about this community of adoptees?

    Stacy 2:17

    Sure. So there's a really great community, especially like on Tiktok, that I've interacted with, and there are kind of distinct segments within the community. There are adoptees that are from international and trans racial adoption, there are adoptees that came out of foster care, and then there's domestic infant adoption adoptees. And those worlds are similar, but they are very different in sometimes outlook and what methods they want to see changed in the adoption system. And that's great, like we can have productive conversations about that. And I specifically, I'll give an overview of some of the other ones, but I don't want to speak for anybody that is from foster care adoption or transracial or international adoption, because that is absolutely not my lane to speak in. But I'll give kind of an overview of a lot of the discussion is talking about the need for either Abolishment, in some cases, or at least a reckoning and read reorganization of laws to better help adoptees. A lot of the laws in place are really centered on adoptive parents and what is the best for them and what they want, which is understandable. You know, a lot of people that make the laws are adults who perhaps would like to adopt a child, and that's kind of where that has come from. And we really want to make it more child and adoptee focused in those respects. There is some disagreement about abolition versus not sure what the best word to use is, like reorganization

    KC Davis 3:46

    or like restructuring or reconstruction? Yeah, restructuring

    Stacy 3:50

    is probably the best way to think about it. I lean on the side of restructuring, specifically for domestic infant adoption. I think there are some really good arguments for Abolishment In other instances, but again, that's kind of outside of my lane to give my viewpoint on. Especially I do think for domestic infant adoption, restructuring of laws is really necessary. I will say I do live in Kansas, where we have one of the best set of laws for adoptees. You can get your pre adoption birth certificate fairly easily here, but that is a rarity among the states.

    KC Davis 4:24

    So you mentioned that because I was going to ask you know, you said that part of the problem is that a lot of the laws regarding adoption are geared towards what parents want, not what children maybe deserve or have a right to. So can you give us some examples of those laws that adoptees and adoptee advocates are not happy with, sure.

    Stacy 4:46

    So in some states, your records are sealed forever. You can try to petition the court to unseal your records in a certain in your certain case, but that is highly unlikely in some areas. Which means that you cannot easily find your biological family, which means you have a higher chance of not being able to catch like genetic illnesses and things that could be passed on. You don't necessarily have those risk factors that you can rely on. You could, in my instance, even though I had one in Kansas, and I found my family, Ma, I had a younger brother who is five years younger that litter up in the same city than me, and that's putting you at risk at procreating with somebody that you are siblings with, and that is very unfortunate. So having access to those records and your health records is vitally important for most adoptees, and in some states, you cannot access them at all. The best chance you have is doing a DNA test and by luck, connecting with somebody. So

    KC Davis 5:47

    one of the other, like kind of big paradigm shifts that I had when I was listening to adoptees, is also hearing birth mothers. And I apologize, I don't know if that's like the term that people prefer, or if there's a different term, I don't

    Stacy 6:02

    know for sure. I know my mother, who did again, give up a child, calls herself a birth mother, so in reference to her, specifically, we can say that. I don't know. I know biological parents. Some people really prefer to just say parents, but I think it's very individual at this point of what families

    KC Davis 6:19

    prefer. Well, for clarity sake, I'll say birth parent, but I've seen a lot of birth parents talk about how they regret their decision, and how at the time, their decision to put their child, their baby, up for adoption, was a decision in worst case scenarios. It was a decision of duress, where they were really pressured by private adoption agencies. And then kind of, some of the, you know, medium case scenarios, it was a decision made out of desperation, because of circumstances. And then, you know, maybe five years later, they find themselves in different circumstances, and they're going, why did those people convince me that this is what was best? Because, sure, at the time, I, you know, maybe didn't have somewhere to live, or I didn't have a good job, or, you know, I was on the outs with the Father, whatever. But, you know, five years later, and now, a lot of those circumstances have changed, and I don't have any access to this child anymore. And I don't think I had ever really heard, I mean, birth parents are hailed as simultaneously, this beacon of bravery, but also they're kind of like an NPC, like Silent character that you never hear from again.

    Stacy 7:29

    And I know things have slightly changed since my mother's story, but my mom got pregnant, and I will say I have her permission to share this. I specifically asked her beforehand if I could share pieces of her story. So I'm not talking without asking, but she got pregnant at 17 in 1963 while still in high school, and she had her daughter at 18, but she had to pretend that she wasn't pregnant during high school, she graduated, I think, like four or five months pregnant. Nobody knew. And then right after that, her parents drove her to another city, like she didn't really have an A stay in it, other than like, I'm not marrying that guy. Like that was her say. It was like, I'm not getting married. Just picked her up, drove her to stay with a family in another city so that nobody could see that she was pregnant. She had her baby. She didn't get to see the baby, although I guess her mother did, which is nice. She got to see baby before she was placed on for adoption, and then just came home and had to act like nothing happened. And so she we've had discussions about how it was a choice, but it wasn't really a choice. You can talk about people having a choice. And this, by the way, this predates roe by a decade, so that was really not an option at all. The choice was either you marry this guy. The choices she thought was, you marry this guy, or you put the baby up for adoption. And she knew there was absolutely no way she was going to marry this person, so she put the baby up for adoption. And that's not really a choice. When you look at it, right? There's not in that mindset. There isn't a choice. And I think nowadays, it still happens where people get convinced that, you know, you can't raise your baby like, what are you thinking of? You're young, you're poor, you're whatever. Here's this nice family, like they can provide so much more for them. And, you know, it's kind of crazy, because a lot of times families that I have seen, and I know this is not the case around the board, but families who adopt will get so much help from their church or their their community, they will be provided with diapers and clothes and all these kind of resources that maybe a young, poor mother wouldn't have and it makes you wonder if they were provided with those resources like perhaps they may not make that same decision.

    KC Davis 9:53

    That was one of the more eye opening things to me, was when people talked about how expensive it is for. Private infant adoption. And how okay, this family will go fundraise, and they'll get 1000s and 1000s, I'm talking, you know, 13,000 20,000 30,000 $50,000 and like you said, the church will have this huge baby shower and give them all of these things, and someone will give them a crib and, uh huh. And it was like, okay, but now we have this pregnant woman who the only reason she's making the decision to give up this baby is because she doesn't have access to those things, and yet, everybody can give it to this other couple. Like, why can't we just give it to this mother? And I know it's not that simple. Like, you're not no one's gonna require a private citizen to fork over 20 grand to, you know, a stranger that's pregnant, but just from a systemic view, it does sort of make you scratch your head like, you know, it's not always, or it doesn't even seem often someone being like, you know, what? I don't want children. That's not what I want ever, no matter the circumstances. And so I am gonna, you know, give my baby. It's like I do. I would want this baby if circumstances were different, and circumstances get moved for the people that want to take the baby, not for the mom that is actually having the baby?

    Stacy 11:12

    Yeah? And that's equity. There's a huge discrepancy in equity between the two situations, right? And I do think there are some scenarios I know for my adoption, and I have not met my biological parents. They did not choose, they did not want contact, and that's fine, but I know from research that my biological mother was very Catholic, and so when she got pregnant, she absolutely did not want another child at that point in time, but she didn't feel like she had other options either, because abortion was completely off the table for somebody that was very, very Catholic. And so I know that I was not a wanted child, as in, like, I want to keep this child. So that does happen. But again, it's not really like we can talk about choices. When you grow up with a lot of in some cultures, you don't the choice is not quite the same. I guess it's a nicer way of putting it,

    KC Davis 12:06

    which kind of brings me to, like, the next point that I learned that I'm wondering if you can speak to for a minute, because let's say that so it's not the majority that are in that spot right. The majority are making this decision out of desperation, circumstances, things like that. And if you were to only think about how many infants are available to be adopted by mothers who are saying, You know what? This is not desperation. This is not circumstance. I just I don't want to be a parent to this child, to another child. What would you say? Like, what's the percentage or like, the comparison of like parents who want to adopt an infant and available infants?

    Stacy 12:51

    There are more parents that want to adopt by a long shot than available infants. And I think when we talk about that, we kind of have to talk about adoption theology, because the pool of parents that want to adopt is not just parents that are struggling with infertility or anything like that, because adoption theology, especially, I think, since the 80s and 90s, has risen in popularity. You have a lot of parents that want to adopt because they think it is the good thing to do.

    KC Davis 13:25

    Because the picture is, here's this mother who, you know, doesn't want this baby or can't take care of this baby, and so you're the good person stepping in to take on somebody else's baby and make it yours.

    Stacy 13:37

    Yes, and they think it's a good thing to do. And some of these parents do adopt from foster care, and perhaps adopt children whose rights have already been terminated, and some of them don't. Some of them turn to either international adoption or pursue domestic adoption, or sometimes will sign up as foster parents for infants hoping to adopt, which I find problematic, which

    KC Davis 14:02

    is a whole other can of worms. And I do want to get into that. And what's interesting, though, that you can bring that up, is that every time I have listened to adoptees or adoption advocates talk about these things we're talking about, where they say, Hey, a lot of this is out of desperation. Hey, a lot of this, you know, whatever, somebody always brings up foster care, and that's a different conversation, right? Like, that's a different conversation, and there's still issues there, and we can talk about those. One of the other things that I thought of, too, is when I've heard a lot of birth mothers talk about, you know, I was made a lot of promises by these adoptive parents about how I would be involved in this child's life, and they would know me, and that's why I agreed to this. And then we come to find out that, like, that's not in the contract, that's not enforceable, that's just a thing, a nice thing. They said that after the rights are. Are formally handed over to the adoptive parents. We have a lot, and not not all of them, not every one of them, but we have, you know, a lot of people saying, and then they said they changed their mind, and I have not spoken to them since, and I have not heard from them since, and I have no right to be in this child's life. Yeah, open adoption is problematic in the United States, especially because our laws like and that, as far as I know, this is across the board for all states, the concept of open adoption is there, but there are not specific laws to ensure that that happens, right? So you can write it in. So it's open adoption, a legal type of adoption, or is it just an there's one type of adoption. And then there's like, whether you're doing a nice handshake on the side to say, we'll keep in touch.

    Stacy 15:45

    Yeah, it's like that. So it's just really just adoption, and that some contract can be written so that you say you want to give biological parents some input, or what have you. But in most cases, that's really not enforceable. And again, I'm not an attorney, so I can't speak to the intricacies, but I know that that is not enforceable in the majority of cases, especially for domestic infant adoption. And I don't want to say that a lot of parents are going and using that as a manipulation tactic, necessarily. Yeah, I think in a lot of instances, they really think that that's something that they want to do, and then when you have the child in your arms, you realize, like, oh, I don't actually want to share this with anybody. And that is not great, because that means that they didn't really put in the work ahead of time to realize what it meant,

    KC Davis 16:39

    right? Like, it's almost like not informed consent on the I do think some people

    Stacy 16:44

    do use that specifically as a manipulation tactic to try to force their arms. And that happens, and it's gross

    KC Davis 16:51

    so, and it makes sense to me, you know, if we have desperate, well, listen, we can't even get into how our country, here in the US is set up to create desperate pregnant women. We're rolling back reproductive rights. We don't have universal health care or universal paid maternity leave, and so we have this system that kind of uniquely puts women in a situation of desperation. And one of the other things that I think really opened my eyes, and I don't know what I thought before, like that adopt, that there's like an adoption ferry, that there's like an altruistic wing of the government, like, like, oh, you know, oh, it's a nonprofit, so it must be not. But like, adoption agencies are businesses, and they need to make money and turn a profit, and like any business in a capitalistic society, they have a problem of more demand than supply, and I'm not saying that that's I phrased that wrong, but like their response would be, like any business in a capitalistic society facing more demand than supply is we have to figure out how to get more supply. And it just seems like it's the perfect storm for exploitation, for pressuring and for propaganda and for, you know, like they literally have their own financial interests in mind when they're talking to a very vulnerable woman in a very vulnerable state trying to make one of the biggest decisions of their life, which just seems a little icky. Yeah,

    Stacy 18:19

    it is very icky. I've had my own run ins with some of the crisis pregnancy centers in town and people who work for them, and it is just so highly unethical that that they are kind of they work hand in hand with generally religious adoption groups, although I guess not necessarily all the time. I can't say that, but to kind of funnel women in who are perhaps looking to get an abortion or something else into instead supplying them with an infant. And

    KC Davis 18:50

    I mean, I'm gonna say something, and I know, listen, and I know that it is gonna be a triggering phrase for a lot of adoptive parents out there, but like, we're getting pretty close to human trafficking.

    Stacy 18:59

    Yeah, I definitely think in some scenarios that that is probably a good word for it. And I think domestically, that's probably more of a like a Ooh. Do we want to use that word? But in some cases, when you go, when you are going to a place where you think you're going to get health care, and instead, you are funneled by a religious group into changing your decision, or maybe solidifying your decision in a way where you weren't quite sure beforehand, who's telling you, perhaps inaccurate information about how your life will be afterwards. In regards to this child, I don't know of a better word for it, so

    KC Davis 19:38

    that they can take possession of that human being and then literally sell it. Uh huh, yeah. Okay, so now that we've offended and upset a lot of adoptive parents out there and perhaps adoptees that really love their families, let's take a step back and then kind of circle back and touch on some of those feelings that other people might be having, that maybe had a different experiences or adopted. Parents. You know, what is that like for adoptive parents to hear that kind of perspective? What has been your interaction with adoptive parents? Like, give us a little splash of cold water to the face, because it feels like we've got a little intense Yeah. So

    Stacy 20:16

    I have met a few people my age who have adopted children, and they've actually that I thought pretty open that I'm an adoptee and what my story is. And my mom and I talk to people about it, and they're like, Well, I'm adopting a child, and not necessarily even infant adoption, but like, what should I do? I want to make sure my child grows up fairly well adjusted, you know? What can I do? And when I tell them, like, Okay, well, you have to one. They have to know, grow up knowing that they're adopt, not something you can either spring on them or hide from them, which I grew up knowing I was adopted. My mom was very intentional with that, so that it wasn't like a big surprise or shock when we were older, and so that, like, my health records were accurate and things like that. And it is not that suggestion is usually not met well, because they feel it's almost like a sense of ownership of child. And that's not I want to be clear that that is not just adoptive parents who feel that way. I think a lot of parents feel like an ownership rather than like, almost like, like the child is an object rather than a child, in those regards. But so they don't want to tell them, and they don't want them to grow up knowing that. They said, Well, maybe we could tell them when they're older. And I, I'm pretty frank with them. I'm like, you know that is a big betrayal when they find out when they are older, like you will have the best chance of a good relationship with your child if you are open with them about it and their experiences from the time that they are very little like that. You don't have to like go into details with a two year old about why all of this happened, right? But there are age appropriate ways to introduce it very young, and I know because that's how we were raised. So

    KC Davis 21:54

    yeah, well, and I would imagine that most adoptive parents their hesitation in telling their kid is probably not a malevolent reason, like, I definitely would imagine that most, as you know, as most parents like, we're like, I don't want my kid to feel singled out. I don't want them to feel like they weren't wanted. I don't want them to feel like, you know, they're not 100% my kid and loved and all these kind of things. And I would imagine that that's what's driving most parents fears is like them wanting to be a good parent and feeling protective of their child. Yeah, I think, to your point, though, it's, you know, it's a big thing. It's pretty damaging. It sounds like for to have that sprung on you later in life. I would imagine,

    Stacy 22:40

    I think there were a couple. I mean, obviously with trans racial adoptees, you can't really, like, hide that. So there, growing up, there were a couple of kids that I went to school with. They were all also adopted. And our family and the few that had adopted internationally were the only ones that were fairly open with their children, like on the offset of what had happened, and then a few of them got dropped on them in their teens, and let me just say I would not make that choice seeing the reaction of that happening. So, so

    KC Davis 23:09

    we've talked a lot about, you know, what are certainly generalizations. Like, it's not this is not every circumstance of adoption, but they are systemic problems with the adoption industry, at least in this country, would you say that it's unethical to ever do an private infant adoption?

    Stacy 23:28

    I don't. I don't like

    KC Davis 23:30

    saying no. You don't like saying black or white, yes, no, total answer, yeah,

    Stacy 23:35

    yeah. I think it is problematic at best, systemically right now to participate in domestic infant adoption, but I don't also think that it is always unethical. I do know a few adopted biological parents who were in places that they didn't want to be, but they also didn't go through. They went through there's you don't have to go through an agency to adopt. You can find family, friends or whatever to or like friends of friends, and do a private adoption that way. From experience, I tend to think that that is more ethical, but it comes with other problems, because if you do that, that's actually how our adoptions were, like it was through a doctor or friend that my parents knew. But when you do that, then you tend to adopt a child and live in the same area as the biological parents, which has its own issues, right? And most agencies are very careful to not place children in the same area so that there can't be like accidental incest, because nobody wants that. But I think you're less likely to get a coerced decision in situations like that that not that it's perfect, right?

    KC Davis 24:46

    Well, and it does seem like this isn't about demonizing individual people. This is about sort of pointing out some very systemic exploitation and how high the risk is. It. Seems like we need a different approach to this industry in general. And it doesn't mean that there's never a circumstance where someone is, you know, engaging in a private infant adoption that is not, you know, that is wrong, I guess is what I'm saying. Yeah,

    Stacy 25:16

    and I have my personal thoughts on a women should always have a right to choose whatever scenario works best for her. I really have a hard time saying that, yeah, because what if that's what she wants to choose? We should move towards abolition. Yeah, because there are situations and we can talk about the motives behind her making that decision like you know, whether it is she had a very strong religious upbringing, and that really is her only decision in her mind, there her only option in her mind, like that is a different situation than that. Is a different question. Rather than having that off the table entirely, right, their motives behind it could be problematic, but I still think that the pregnant person should have the final say about how this goes, because she maybe have a revulsion to the idea of abortion, which is fair, I guess, but perhaps this baby is product of rape or product of something else, and she never wants that child. I feel like she should have the option to do adoption. I do think in those instances there needs to be something in place so the adoptees have their full health record, and even if they don't make contact with their biological family. Know enough about it, so we don't have surprise incest. Because I know in some situations that has happened, of course, that is not like an adoption specific thing that can happen with like sperm donors and men stepping out on families and all kinds of things. So that is not like just an adoption thing, but we can try to plan for those scenarios, right, so that we don't have those pop up as much as possible.

    KC Davis 26:53

    So you referenced foster care earlier, and you know, one of the things that that I have a little bit of experience only because my husband and I attended some foster care training, because we were considering becoming foster parents. And one of the things when we went into, like, the initial meeting, like the very first thing they said to all of us was, if you have infertility trauma that you have not addressed, I need you to get up and go home and address it before you go through this process. And they really hammered home to us that the goal of foster care is reunification, and that that should be what we're striving for. And that, you know, if it comes to a place where reunification isn't safe or possible, then that's when we need to look at adoption, but you kind of referenced it earlier. We have, we see a lot of parents, I think, go into foster care, hoping that a parent will not get their act together and that a family will not reunify. And I think there's a I mean, and I've had some friends that have adopted children from foster care, and like, there's a really big difference. I want to be clear what I'm saying. Like, you know my friend who fostered a young boy, and then got to the place where, like, there was a point in time where he was hoping that the rights would be terminated, but that was because of the biological parents behavior, because they were not safe and there was no indication they were going to be safe. And that was sort of his love of this child, is this is not the best place for that child that's different than, right? Because that's based on the facts of the situation, of what's best for the kid that's really different than entering the foster system and just generally going, Oh, I really hope we get one. I really hope this parent that I have not met, that I do not know, you know, I hope they don't get their shit together. I hope they fail at reunification so I can have a kid. That's a completely different thing. And unfortunately, I think even kind hearted people don't recognize that's kind of what they're hoping for when they enter into foster care. The other interesting thing that I think comes up in the conversation about adoption is that there obviously are adoptees that have had different experiences, that have different feelings about adoption, you know, biological parents or birth parents that have different experiences. But one of the things that I have noticed is that the demographic that you maybe wouldn't initially expect to have such a vehement sort of push back on some of these talking points are kids that grew up in abusive situations, in neglectful situations, that are sort of reflecting on their own trauma and going, you guys are complaining, I would have given anything for someone to have rescued me out of this situation and put me into a different family. And I just think that that's a very valid perspective and feeling to. Have. And so I just think that's important. Like, not everybody having sort of strong reactions or feelings to this conversation is Oh, so you're for human trafficking. Like, that's not the case. Like it is complicated to grow up and not be taken care of. And I think for a lot of people that grow up this way, adoption is almost this fantasy, uh huh, you know what I mean, this, this almost Daddy Warbucks. What if I could be taken away from here by a nice family that would really take care of me? And I think that sometimes, whether we're conscious of it or not, some of that can play into sort of the way we address the adoption industry at large, in general.

    Stacy 30:38

    I agree, because I've seen some of those people that are very angry and adoptees comment sections. And like their hurt is understandable. And like, I understand that I don't know that they are productive and their outlet for it. I understand where it comes from. Take it to your therapist. Yeah, they're a better way. There are better places to express this, but, yeah, no, that is completely valid. I think the trouble with any government organization, or anything that handles basically any government organization, because generally it's even if they have private contractors, you know, sync and DCS are government programs. And with any government program, it's imperfect, and they're going to do too much and too little at the same time, right? It's almost impossible for them to do it completely correct, right? There, you're going to miss families, and then you are going to come down too hard on families, depending on the factors at play. You're like, right? What judge Are you in front of? Is your guardian ad litem? Like, what biases do they bring into this situation is the foster family really like, oh, like working for reunification and hoping that they that your the child goes back with the family? Or are they really just secretly hoping to get this over quick enough so that they have the child in their home? And so it creates both scenarios where kids get probably ripped out of their homes more than they should, but also we they miss children who are left in abusive homes and who want to be like, taken out of their house and into another situation. And so, you know, I don't know that there's a way to change that enough to ever that they'll

    KC Davis 32:14

    never be a mistake one way or the other. And then, speaking of like being up in comment sections, what are some of the Give me some of like, the best and worst responses that people have when they hear adoptees talking. Like, what would you say? Like, hey, this is not a helpful thing to say. This is not a supportive thing to say. Versus like, what is an appropriate response to someone sharing as an adult adoptee? Because the one that comes to mind, honestly, is the You should be grateful. Yeah.

    Stacy 32:41

    Like, you should be grateful. It's gross and like, and also like, oh, did you want to live with your drug addicted parents? I've seen a lot, and I'm like, that first off, that is not even like, I can't even say that's like, the majority of families. Like, like, you're just like, pulling scenarios out of the air and being like, would you rather live with these No, like, I love my parents. I wouldn't have rather grown up in another family, but also, like, for one that wasn't true. But what if that was true? Like that is like, why would you say that to somebody that doesn't do anybody good? Referencing? Oh, well, you could have ended up dead in your family. I've seen that in comment sections, which is super inappropriate, or people. I also don't think it's awesome. Like, again, I understand that people had terrible scenarios growing up, but trauma dumping What happened to you to make somebody else feel bad, you know, like they didn't experience that is also weird. Like, Oh, well, my father did this to me, so you should be grateful that you got adopted. Like, that's weird. Like, don't

    KC Davis 33:42

    also, like, adoptive parents can do bad shit too. Oh, yeah, absolutely, it's not a guarantee, just because you got adopted. And then Stacy, sort of wrapping up, what would you say to maybe adult adoptees that are listening, that may be thinking of these things for the first time, or experiencing some of the like, did you have conflicting feelings? Was there a part of this that was difficult for you?

    Stacy 34:07

    So as an adult adoptee, I think you really if you are wanting to find your biological family, I think the biggest thing to prepare yourself for is that they may not want to find you right like or they may welcome you with open arms, but they're dysfunctional, or they may have been looking for you for a long time. You may not find them. You may find them and they don't want contact with you. Yeah, they might have died before you got to meet them. You really have to make sure, I would say, talk to a therapist and make sure that you are really prepared for any of those scenarios, because you don't want to go in with a fairy tale scenario in your head, because then that's the other thing we see. Is we see a lot of scenarios where adoptees meet their biological family and it's just roses and awesomeness and things like that. And that can happen like my mom has been in contact with her. Daughter for years, like, we went to her wedding back in 1994 we were, you know, we weren't in her wedding or anything like that, but we went to met her. We're in her wedding. Like, my parents don't want any contact, which is, again, fine like that. I mean, it's not fine because, like, medical history would be nice, but I don't think they also owe it to me at the same time, if that makes sense. And my sister has gotten in contact with both of her parents, and she has a good relationship with one of them, at least. So just, you just need to prepare yourself. And also, the reason why I kind of step back, and I don't really have a whole lot of videos on my Tiktok about this I deleted most of them, is because there is a lot of tension between how people process their adoption, and I decided that, because I have kind of my situation was better, I didn't find it productive to go in and counter other people's arguments, necessarily, because it's not I mean, I didn't want other people to feel like I was negating their experience, even though I Have a perhaps different outlook of what should be done to remedy the whole adoption scenario, right? But I worry about inviting in comment sections and video replies and how productive that is to the larger discussion. So I really would suggest, if you want to engage with these topics, like in a public atmosphere, that go to therapy and you really have a good handle on yourself before you start talking online in those spaces. So, yeah,

    KC Davis 36:30

    that's all really helpful. And I think, you know, as a therapist, I feel like the hardest thing for any person to do is to hold two truths at the same time. And, you know, I think that it can be true that you have feelings about your adoption and about and maybe anger or distress about, you know, the problematic aspects of adoption in general, and you love your parents, and you've had a good life, and you don't want to hurt your parents feelings. You know what I mean? Like, I just think it's important to say that, like everyone has that permission to hold two truths at the same time.

    Stacy 37:10

    I've been very fortunate that my mom my dad has passed. So I'm talking just about my mom currently has been very open, and we can talk about this subject because, you know, from a birth mother perspective and adoptee perspective, and sometimes we hurt each other's feelings, and that's okay. We just talk through and work through it, that having these conversations is really helpful, not only to us, but so that we can work to make the future a better place for other adoptees and how these systems continue on. Yeah,

    KC Davis 37:40

    it really isn't about anyone being the good guy or the bad guy. When it comes to talking about individual adoptive parents and adoptees, it really is about all of us being human. And I think most people are doing the best that they can with the information that they have at the time. And we're all growing, and we all make mistakes, and, you know, not kind of moving out of that adolescent phase of seeing everything in black and white and needing everyone to be sort of, you know, morally perfect. Well. Stacey, this has been a really great conversation, and I appreciate it so much. Do you want to plug anything of yours, your Tiktok handle, or anything like that? Sure. I

    Stacy 38:17

    think I'm drowning Ophelia at on Tiktok. Let me just verify before, before

    KC Davis 38:21

    you send them to somebody else's pain. Yeah, that's

    Stacy 38:23

    terrible. Yeah, no, I'm drowning Ophelia, because that is a name I have picked out for my online handles when I was 16, and I haven't changed it.

    KC Davis 38:31

    I love it. So awesome. Thank you. You.

    Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Christy Haussler
116: Follow Up: California Passes New Family Vlogging Law

Today’s episode is a follow-up to Episode 65, The Dark Underside of Family Vlogging, Part 1, which aired almost a year ago. My guest from that episode, Cam, returns to discuss her reaction to a recent big development in the world of family vlogging. Cam grew up as the child of one of the first well-known “Mommy bloggers,” and is an international advocate for the children of influencers and family vloggers. She shares her perspective on the new California law. Join us!

Show Highlights:

  • Understanding the basics of the Child Content Creator Act in California to protect kids’ rights (similar laws are being passed in Illinois and Minnesota)

  • Legal ramifications for parents who don’t follow “the 30% rule”

  • Children on reality TV shows do NOT fall under the new law.

  • Understanding the Coogan Law

  • Cam’s perspective on the protections of the law for children—and what she wishes the law included

  • “The right to forget”: what it means and why it’s not included in the law

  • Cam’s thoughts about a recent scary cancer diagnosis in light of her past history with vulnerability at the hands of her mom’s vlog

  • Growing up with NO boundaries or privacy

  • Laws in CA, IL, and MN to protect kids from being exploited

Resources and Links:

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC Davis 0:04

    Hello, you sentient balls of stardust. Welcome to struggle. Care. I'm your host, KC Davis, and we are back in the studio with Cam. You'll remember cam from several episodes ago where we talked about family vlogging. Cam's mom was one of sort of the OG family mommy vloggers, and I wanted to sort of do this little catch up, because there's been kind of huge news in the family vlogging world. So cam, thank you for being back with us.

    Cam 0:29

    Thank you so much for having me again. Hello, hello.

    KC Davis 0:32

    Okay, so the big news is that California has passed a bill that relates to family vlogging. So share with us what that is. Yeah,

    Cam 0:45

    so similar to the bill that was passed here in my home state of Illinois that protects child vloggers or child influencers, we were able to talk to legislators over in California, we were able to speak to Governor Newsom and kind of express how necessary this bill is in a state like California, because, as you probably know, it's kind of like a quote, unquote, right of passage for family vloggers to pack up and move to California because of opportunities, or whatever the case might be. So we brought that to their attention after they were kind of seeing the work that we've been doing in several states around the country and with kind of comparing it to the Coogan law and explaining how, you know, these brands will seek out family bloggers so they have kids, but they don't have to pay the children legally. They were kind of horrified that this was able to go on for so long, and so they kind of copy and pasted the bill from Illinois. 30% of the revenue will be protected for the kids when they turn 18, which, you know, 30% is 30% but I still think it should be at least 50, but it passed, and yeah, I don't know. I'm sure we'll see a lot of family vloggers start to move out of California soon.

    KC Davis 2:03

    So when you say protected, you basically mean like, if I was to get a payment from a brand to make a video and my kids are in it, I would be required to put 30% of that payment into a bank account for my kids, and I wasn't allowed to spend it. Is that what that means? Yes, correct. So

    Cam 2:19

    you would be required by law, essentially, to have a Coogan account that's similar to what it's being compared to, and you would have to put 30% aside for your child. You can't touch it, and it's only accessible to your child when they turn 18.

    KC Davis 2:37

    And if a parent doesn't do that, does that give the child legal recourse when they turn 18. If that money's not there, yes,

    Cam 2:44

    it does, because legally, they are supposed to follow what is now being set up like if you are there's basically regulations and guidelines now. So if you're going to choose the route to post your child on social media, to monetize your family, to monetize your children, you have to do it the right way and set these things up now, of course, there's not like, you know, the government isn't gonna get like, a ding, a notification if someone doesn't do that. It's just kind of like, but you'll

    Speaker 1 3:15

    have recourse when you Right exactly. So for when I

    Cam 3:19

    like to compare it to like Alana, like Honey Boo Boo. Her mom was supposed to set up a cougan account for her for a few different things, and she never did. And so all of that money is missing, and legally, Alana is able to take action against her for the certain things where the Coogan account lies, not the reality TV, because those kids also aren't protected. But like the things she did where she as a child, was paid, she's able to legally go after her mother. I

    KC Davis 3:45

    don't think I realized that it doesn't apply to reality TV. Did I hear that? Right? Yeah. So children

    Cam 3:51

    on reality TV shows, they are not protected by the cougar. They actually have no protection so they can film from sunup to sundown. They don't have to. They don't pay the kids legally. It's up to the parent to kind of pay that. It's to just be ethical,

    KC Davis 4:09

    yeah, which doesn't happen. I

    Cam 4:13

    don't know if you remember, but when a lot of the stuff about the Duggars was coming out, I think her name is Jill, she said that her parents had were supposed to set aside money for the kids, and then her dad gave her $1,000 after like, 20 seasons of being on the show as a child. And you know, so none of those kids have that money, because those parents take it. And you know, it's their responsibility to, like you said, Be ethical, but they aren't. It's about even the John and Kate Plus eight kids like those kids you know, didn't have any protections as well.

    KC Davis 4:48

    And so for people who are listening that maybe aren't familiar with what the Cougar law is, maybe they didn't catch our last episodes. It's basically a law that regulates child acting how many hours a day they're. They can work, you know, how when they can get their education, and what happens to the money that they earn? So I am a little shocked to hear that that doesn't apply to reality TV. Yeah,

    Cam 5:12

    it's also something that we've kind of been advocating for, in a sense, just because reality TV is blown up. But yeah,

    KC Davis 5:18

    it's mild. So okay, two follow up questions. One is, are there any other protections in the law besides just the financial protection? And two is, are there any protections that didn't make it into the law that you would have liked to have seen?

    Cam 5:32

    So some of the protections that have made it into the bill, that I do think is important is parents have to keep kind of a log of how many minutes or hours their child is working for them, for like social media or whatever. And so it kind of goes hand in hand with the cougan law. So like these kids can't necessarily be exploited to the point where they are like their life is working for the camera every single day, all day, like there's no separation between reality and what's posted online. So I think that parents keeping track of how many hours they're making their children work. One, I mean, I think that's ethical. I think that that's really important. And two, I think it puts a responsibility on the parent, so they can kind of have perspective and see kind of how long they're making their child work, you know, because at the end of the day, kind of, I think a lot of people just think it's simple to just put your phone in front of your kid and be like, Oh, this is easy, whatever. But when you're looking at it on paper and you're seeing like, oh, I had my kid working for five hours today, you know, I think that kind of might put some into perspective for people.

    KC Davis 6:53

    Well, it strikes me as something that, you know, okay, so that's not probably enforceable, or if it is, it's probably really easy to get around. But I actually still think that it's a really like healthy law to have, because I feel like it's making a statement, which is like making it's like forcing people to recognize, like, No, this is work. You are requiring work from your child. This is not I have a little family camcorder, and we're recording happy family memories like, I think it is. I think making an important first step of saying, like, no, like, this is a thing, and we're gonna, like, officially, state legally that this is work, right, and you are forcing your child to work right? So I think that's a good first step. Is there anything that you would have liked to seen in in the law,

    Cam 7:40

    absolutely, the right to forget part has really been something that I've advocated for, these bills in every single state. However, it unfortunately hasn't made it in a bill yet. And what is that? So the right to forget is when the child turns 18, the child influencer turns 18, they would have the legal right to have any or all of the content removed off of the social media platform that their parent posted. So not only would we be holding parents accountable, but it would also be holding these social media platforms accountable. There are a few platforms who have been fighting against this. However, in recent light, they've actually been advocating with us. Now, Facebook was really against this. They lobbied against us really, really hard in Washington, but they were with us when it came to the Maryland bill. So

    KC Davis 8:35

    it's interesting, because this is people may not know this, but the right to be forgotten is a legal right in the EU so in the European Union, which is basically, like, if you don't want to be online, like you have a right to have things taken down online that are about you. And I obviously there's some nuance to it and things like that. But yeah, it's interesting. It does feel like it's not surprising to me that you would run up against resistance to that here as, like, a uniquely American culture around, like, sort of, maybe tangentially related to free speech, but it's kind of like this, no, I have a right. Like, you have the right to film anyone you want on in public. You have, you don't have a right to privacy in public, and someone can put it online. You can't do anything about that. And like, it does feel like there's kind of a uniquely American culture that would resist this idea that somebody would have the right to be like taken from the internet. But I'll tell you like. I'm sure you could relate like as someone who makes content. It's just like a totally unique experience to like blow up online, especially if you blow up in a negative way or in a way that gets criticized, and I can't imagine the trauma of blowing up completely against your will, like you didn't even put it online to begin with, or that you were a child, yeah,

    Cam 9:52

    and I think that's just again, like I could have biasness towards this, because whenever you Google my legal name, there's Photos. That pop up that I wish didn't pop up. I mean, that's why I don't go by my legal name on the internet. And I totally agree, and I think that's especially where we run into a lot of problems, because a lot of legislators that I've talked to around the country, every time we get to that part, it's kind of just like, oh, we'll see what we can do. We don't really, we don't really know how we can incorporate this? And it's, I don't think they realize that it's something that we can do, because, like you mentioned, this is something that happens in another country. So it's, I feel like we can definitely find a way to word this bill so these kids that have been forced to do things are protected because, I mean, hey, the post about me getting my first period when I was nine years old, that's still on the internet. I can't do anything about that. And it's just like, it sucks. It

    KC Davis 10:51

    does seem like it should at least apply to children. Absolutely, I

    Cam 10:55

    agree. Like, I

    KC Davis 10:56

    understand the argument against, like, oh, you know, if you maybe, if you did something horrible and it got publicity. Maybe you shouldn't, you know, be allowed to run away from that, but like a child, I think should have that, right?

    Cam 11:08

    I agree.

    KC Davis 11:09

    So switching gears just a moment, I wanted to ask you kind of a personal question that I already asked, if it was okay to ask, but so you recently got kind of a scary medical diagnosis,

    Cam 11:19

    yeah. So I've been advocating for myself to kind of get these tests done. It's taken a while, and I was recently diagnosed with stage four cancer. It's treatable, but it's spread, so it's a little bit scarier. I mean, cancer in general is obvious, obviously, just very scary. But, yeah, it's been interesting, kind of navigating the diagnosis along with having a platform of my own. Yeah,

    KC Davis 11:45

    I'm curious, like, how you know one of part of your story is your mom, like, very much publicizing your medical history and the things that happened to you medically, and the times you were in the hospital and and I'm curious, like, as an adult, how that still affects you, especially going through a big medical event like this,

    Cam 12:05

    yeah, so you know, when I first found out, I just panicked, and I had so much anxiety. And of course, it was because finding out I have cancer is scary, but I felt so vulnerable and so exposed. I guess I don't really know how to explain it, because, I mean, I'm in the privacy of my own home, but in my mind, it's like, oh my god, like it didn't feel in my control. And so I was just getting real, like I was isolating myself, like it didn't feel private. Yes, exactly. And it got to a point where I was starting to really isolate myself and not talk to anybody and like, I just was like, Okay, I'm just gonna keep all of this a secret. And like, I'm not gonna whatever. I'm not gonna just, I won't burden people with it, like it's my thing to carry and my partner, my fiance, Alex, they said, you know, after we were leaving the doctor's office, I just was like, Great, now I have to tell everybody. And, like, I have to update everybody. And my partner was like, No, you don't. They were like, you don't have to tell anybody anything until you're ready to tell what you want to tell. And I think, I think kind of getting a big diagnosis like that, I felt obligated to make like, update everybody. Like, get on all my social media platforms, and get on Facebook, which I haven't been on in years, and be like, I have cancer, but kind of having that reassurance for my partner of them, being like, you are not obligated to post anything. You are not obligated to tell anybody until you've processed this yourself and you're mentally ready to tell people. And I think kind of hearing that was just like, it was like, like a weight off my shoulders, kind of Yeah. Well, one

    KC Davis 13:59

    thing that kind of strikes me is like, as an adult who makes content about my life, like, I have a very clear line between, like, my real life and what I talk about online. And there's tons of things that happen in my real life that I don't talk about online, right? And I specifically talk about the things online in a specific way, but like, that's an adult, right? Like a child who just kind of has a camera put in front of their face and their real moments documented and then put online, like they're not gonna develop that same sense of boundary. And so it's interesting and heartbreaking to me that, like, after you got the diagnosis, part of your initial anxiety was already like, how am I gonna talk to the internet about this? Or, like, how am I going to update everyone? Or, like, how am I going to roll this out? It's like, honestly, like, the, you know what I mean, and like, that's such an extra anxiety. Like, how am I going to roll this out? Like, all the PR people are coming in,

    Cam 14:52

    yeah, it's just like, it's like, an instinct, almost, because, and I always say, like, I was literally raised on the internet, like, I, I. Grew up on the internet, in a sense, where not only was my parental Guardian, the person who was supposed to trust and protect me and teach me these things, posting everything. So like, I'm thinking, it's okay. So like, like, I'm a chronic overshare for a reason, because I I grew up without boundaries. And so that's something that, like as an adult, I'm really, really trying to work on in therapy, is knowing that these boundaries are okay. And even, like, I said, like, just that reassurance of being told, like, I don't have to run to the internet and immediately post this, like, I'm allowed to process this separately, and then if I decide to share, like, then I can share. It's just kind of like, oh, like, you're right. I can do that and you're right. It is kind of sad, like, you know, like, my first instinct was literally like, run to Twitter and be like, lol, I have cancer. Like, you know, like,

    KC Davis 15:56

    yeah, okay, so the one in California is the child content creator Rights Act, yes, and I just want to mention that in case anybody wants to, like, look it up and, you know, use it as a template. In Illinois, it's called the child influencer law, I think. But what's interesting is that Minnesota passed a similar bill that's going to be effective next year, that prohibits children under the age of 14 from engaging in the work of content creation, and requires adult content creators to delete content if a minor appearing in the content requests removal. Yeah,

    Cam 16:28

    that one is huge. That one I am very, very excited about. I don't think a lot of people know about it, because it's Minnesota, which, I mean, no shade to Minnesota, but it's just, you know, focused on California, but I'm so thrilled about that one, especially because on social, and this is something I have been saying to every legislator that we've met with on social media, there is a rule that you have to be 13 or 14, depending on what platform to even post on that platform. So seeing Minnesota actually kind of enact like, Hey, if you're under 14, you can't have these kids working for your social media account, I think that that's really huge. Like, I think that it's I think it's going to protect a lot of kids from being exploited, and I think it's going to protect a lot of kids from thinking that oversharing or just constantly posting everything on the internet isn't okay. Like, I think, I mean, 14, obviously you're still a child. You're still so young, don't get me wrong, but I think at 14, you're smarter than you are at six, you know what I'm saying? Like, you have more awareness, is what I'm trying to say. Well,

    KC Davis 17:43

    that sounds like great news. And I hope that you know, if you're listening from other states and this is something that interests you, you'll go and look at those laws and see write a letter to your local government, see if we can get more of these laws passed. Cam, thank you so much for taking the time to come in and update us on that and to share a little bit more of your story. And I really appreciate the time. Thanks for having me. Of course, have a great day. You too. You.

    Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Christy Haussler
115: The Difference Between Bullying and Ordinary Meanness (and why it matters) with Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore

Hello, World!

Today’s episode covers the topics of bullying, meanness, and conflict. My guest is uniquely qualified to share her wisdom and expertise, which she did in a TEDx talk. Bullying or meanness: what’s the difference, and how do we recognize the two? Join us to learn more!

Show Highlights:

● Dr. Eileen’s background as a clinical psychologist and author

● The specific criteria in the definition of bullying

● Empowering our kids to withstand meanness without taking a victim stance: “Conflict is inevitable.”

● Bullying has become “a thought-stopping cliche.”

● Meanness and bullying in the online world

● Vulnerability in being a content creator and dealing with feedback

● A better approach with kids: “Whose opinion matters to you?”

● The truth about self-esteem and a “quiet ego”

● Connecting with something greater than ourselves

● Helping kids learn self-compassion rather than self-esteem (Dr. Eileen teaches a “reflect, but downshift” technique in her book, Kid Confidence.)

● Dr. Eileen’s formula for teaching reflection to kids

● “Whose feelings are most important?”

● Validating and normalizing kids’ feelings (by following their lead) by offering empathy and confidence

● Being your kids “biased biographer”

● Learning to “stay in the water” instead of standing on the edge of the pool ● “Testing the water” to pull back on accommodations

Resources and Links:

Connect with Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore: Website (Find books for parents and kids!) and Kids Ask Dr. Friendtastic podcast,

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website:

www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC Davis 0:00

    Music. Hello, you sentient balls of stardust. Welcome to struggle. Care. I'm your host, KC Davis, and today I have Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore with me, and we're going to talk about the difference between bullying and ordinary meanness, which is the title of the TEDx talk that you did. That's right, although

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 0:21

    Ted central changed the title to conflict resolution on the playground, which is so bland,

    KC Davis 0:29

    but what can I do? Oh, that's funny, yeah. No, I like the first title better, for sure. So tell me a little bit of your background of how you kind of came to be the person on TED stage talking about the difference between bullying and ordinary meanness. Well, I'm

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 0:42

    a clinical psychologist, so I work with adults, children and families, and I've also written a whole bunch of books about children's feelings and friendships for both parents and kids, and one of the things that I often saw in my practice is that the B word gets thrown around too casually. So one of the stories that I tell in the TEDx is I had this middle school boy come in and he told me I was bullied today. And I said, what happened? And he said, this kid, he told me, quit making that annoying noise. It's like, No, that is not bullying, and researchers actually have a very specific definition of bullying. It involves deliberate meanness targeting a specific person, usually repeatedly over time, although sometimes one especially horrible action can count, and the most important part of the definition is that there is a power difference between the kid doing the bullying and the kid being bullied without that power difference. It's not bullying, it's just ordinary meanness or conflict or an unfortunate event or something like that. Now this definition, this distinction, is really, really important for a number of reasons. First of all, if we call every little thing that a kid does that we don't like bullying. We're really trivializing the very serious cases of peer abuse, and I don't like that. The other thing is that we're saying to our kids, you're fragile. You can't handle it if anyone is even slightly mean to you, and I don't think that that's empowering for our children. They are going to face somebody being mean to them. We do it as adults too. You know that somebody will say something like or, you know, we'll be irritated with somebody, and maybe we'll say something that, oh, gosh, I wish I hadn't said that. This is not good, but it's something that we can work through.

    KC Davis 2:41

    Yeah, that's what's hard, right? It's like, okay, on the one hand, I don't want to say we should normalize ordinary meanness as if it's okay or provable, or it's not a big deal, or it's not hurtful, but there is a sense of, like, normalizing it for a child, in the sense of, like, hey, this isn't okay. It's not acceptable. But like, it's going to happen, and you can survive it, and we can walk through it, and we can figure and it's not like the world is not ending Exactly,

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 3:09

    exactly. You are not devastated by that.

    KC Davis 3:13

    This is not going to cause, probably long term damage, like most people are going to have general meanness experiences in their life, right?

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 3:23

    And that, again, I'm so glad that you brought that up. I am not in favor of bullying or meanness or anything like that, but I do think it's something that we all need to figure out how we're going to deal with conflict, because conflict is inevitable. My favorite work activity is I have this little podcast that comes out every week. It's just five minutes, and it's called kids ask Dr friend tastic. And every episode features an audio recording of a question from a kid about friendship, and then I try to say something practical and thought provoking. So I have so many favorite episodes, but in one of them, a kid, a little six year old named Zen, asked, How do I not have conflict with my friend? And I said, Well, there's only one way you can never have conflict with your friend, and that is you and your friend have to think and feel exactly the same at every single second, but wait, then you couldn't be friends, because he would be the same person. So, you know, it is just unavoidable that we're going to disagree, but that conflict is actually useful. Now, most of us go through life assuming that, yeah, pretty much everybody thinks the way I do, but that's just human nature. So conflict is actually what brings us up in those moments to go, Huh? I guess they see it differently. Oh, okay, so

    KC Davis 4:48

    here's something that I think is light bulbing. For me for the first time, is that if we call everything bullying, one of the things that we lose, we position our children to react to. Any feelings of hurt, feelings in this very black and white, they've done something wrong. I am a victim. They are bad. There is nothing else to think about here, when, in reality, like the majority of the conflict we experience, you know, because we're human, there might be, you know, a slightly out of line comment, or maybe a little too sharp of a tone, or maybe outright something kind of mean they said,

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 5:25

    or they didn't realize that that was a sensitive topic for us. Yeah, they

    KC Davis 5:29

    didn't, they didn't realize it, or maybe you did something really hurtful to them, and that's their knee jerk reaction. And we're not saying it's okay that that's their reaction. It almost it's like bullying has become a thought stopping cliche in some places. That's exactly right, and it also seems like it would harm people that are being bullied, because if someone is being bullied, we don't want to talk to them about, Well, what did you do to bring that on? And do you see their point of view and like, it really does come down to like. You need really different interventions and responses depending on what it is, you need to diagnose it Right exactly.

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 6:03

    Because, if there truly is a power difference, if it's the kid doing the meanness or the bullying is bigger, stronger, tougher, more socially powerful, or if it's a group of kids picking on one kid, we cannot expect that one kid to say, you know, we'll just speak up to them. No, they can't. There's the power difference. That's what makes it difficult or impossible for that kid being targeted to deal with it. In that case, they need adult intervention to be those safety guardrails. But if it's just one stupid comment, because they're a kid and you're a kid, and they don't know how to handle conflict, and we adults, let's be honest, we're not so good at conflict either.

    KC Davis 6:45

    This is all applicable to adults, absolutely.

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 6:47

    So we all need to figure out, how can I raise my point without, you know, punching at them verbally, or certainly, otherwise, How can I when do I just need to, like, roll my eyes and say, I love them anyway. And, you know, so it's a balance. It's not like they're just do this one thing and then you're fine. We really need to be thinking about it. We always, always, always need to try to imagine the other person's perspective. Because, as you said, maybe they're responding to something that I did before that. Michael Thompson, the author, has this wonderful line that I wish I'd written, and it says his description of conflict among between kids. And it goes it all started when she kicked me back. Isn't that great?

    KC Davis 7:37

    So good. So Dr Eileen, I want to ask you about, like, if we take this concept of meanness and bullying, and then I want to step for a minute into the world of the internet, which is like, where a large portion of my presence is, is being on Tiktok and Instagram and being a content creator there. And it's been really interesting for me to see the discourse around what bullying looks like online. And certainly, I think we have instances, you know, where, especially with children like you mentioned, like, oh, the website of all these are cyber bullying and things like that. But when I think it gets interesting is when we think about someone who has, like, an online persona, and the difference between meanness and bullying. And this is actually funny, because this on my mind today, because I actually just had someone comment on one of my videos and said, You know, I think that, you know, I've been trying to tell you that I think that you're a bully, because you are sometimes really mean to people. And there is such a stark power differential. You have 1.2 million followers, and you know, you can mobilize a huge group of people. And we see this, there are people, there are creators out there who have, we call, like, call out accounts or, you know, they'll kind of get into an interpersonal spat with someone. And it is true that someone with a really large following has social capital and can, sort of like direct other people to go to this other kind of lone person on the internet. And so their point was that there is a power differential always between me and some like, random commenter on the internet, and now I've never, like, sought someone out to like, say something mean about them what they're referring to.

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 9:29

    Yeah, like, I haven't, I don't know what they're talking about, but I cannot imagine you getting all your followers to say, Take that one down. That doesn't seem like anything I know about you.

    KC Davis 9:39

    No, it's almost always me responding to someone in my comment section that has said something that I thought was inappropriate or hurtful or whatever. But what I have found really interesting is that while I agree with the argument that in that instance, there's a case to be made that I am in that like it's not just. Me being mean to someone, even if I was mean, right? Like, let's say it's not just me. It's bullying because of the power difference. But in my experience, like, there's also a lot of power that comes from being anonymous on the internet. I

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 10:15

    was just gonna say that there is absolutely the power of because I've done a fair bit like between the books and videos and articles what have you. I'm out there. Also, there is a vulnerability, because anybody can say anything about you. So I'm not sure I totally buy that. It's a one way power dynamic. You Yeah.

    KC Davis 10:43

    I mean, certainly there are things you could do to leverage it, like we the example of, Hey, everyone, go get this person. Or if you're making maybe, like, video after video after video about a random private citizen or whatever,

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 10:54

    but you're not going to do that, but you are very vulnerable. And I and you know anybody who makes the effort to share content with the world? Because the world can be vicious, and it

    KC Davis 11:07

    becomes groups of people who anonymously, make more profiles or get other people to come, and it's like, you can't. My thing is always, and I don't want, I'm like, trying to, sorry, this is like, fresh on my mind.

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 11:18

    Because, yes, of course, so do. I

    KC Davis 11:20

    think that not only did I get that one, but I got a ton, but that's on the back of a ton of other like, hate comments I've been getting for days about how ugly I am and how mean I am and how awful I am. So

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 11:30

    Brene Brown talks about that, about people writing, you know, more Botox, less research. It's like, ouch, ouch. So it is a very brave thing to go out there and put stuff out there, put your ideas out there, try to be helpful. And yeah, anybody can say something vicious about you, and you can't really hit back, and you wouldn't want to, but I think that people don't always realize how vulnerable creators are. And exactly as you said, because it's so public, so that person who said whatever mean thing about you, they are actually harnessing your earned audience to punch at you. So I don't think they're powerless. That was intentional. Like I'm not gonna quibble about who's bullying who you know? I think that was certainly unkind,

    KC Davis 12:24

    but I do think it's interesting when we think about online spaces, I think that's where power differential sometimes becomes harder to quantify, like, if it's this is my boss, okay, power differential, right? If it is, maybe even from a social capital more, where it's like a white woman in public, sort of harassing a black woman. It's like, okay, there's an obvious social capital racism power differential there. If it's a like you said, a bigger kid, a stronger kid, a more popular kid. But it's interesting to me, once we move online, that it's a little bit harder to talk about bullying versus meanness, one because power differential, I think, is harder. But also what I find interesting is the repetition part. You mentioned that, like, it can be one thing that's really severe, but usually it's sort of like a cumulative and targeted over and over. And I think that anybody who has

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 13:13

    put their ideas out in public has encountered nasty people like so my first book for parents was called the unwritten rules of friendship, simple strategies to help your child make friends. Like, what is more G rated than that? Like, I am the most G rated person on earth, right? But I saw this one reviewer who called the book nauseating because it doesn't contain bible quotes. Now, okay, like, I don't have to go there, but I don't remember a lot of comments about play dates in the Bible. But you know, so and you know, this person felt very free to just say this. And of course, they had the right to their opinion, but they didn't just not buy my book. You know, they made a point of announcing it to everybody that it's nauseating, and it's like, Do you know how long it took me to write that book? You know, all the research that I read for it, but, and I would consider

    KC Davis 14:08

    that and tell me if you'd agree, like that would be to me, like, ordinary meanness, yeah, because

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 14:13

    I don't care. Like, this is not, you know, something that wounded me, because this is not someone's opinion I respect. Yeah, exactly. But

    KC Davis 14:20

    what's interesting to me is, like, let's say you have a teenager online and whatever, in way, they're like, they're getting a lot of comments, but it's not from the same person. It's not even coordinated. It's not like a group of people who are coordinating, coordinating. It's just that, as they grow up and they're on the internet, and this, this is, I think this happens a lot with teenagers, I think, and I see it a lot with, like, professional people who have any kind of online persona where, okay, no one is bullying them, but psychologically they are being bullied like they are still having the experience. Of this repetitive onslaught, anonymous power differential, like, it's just like an interesting thing that I think happens online, and I'm curious, like, how we address that with kids, how we handle that as adults? And because it is, like, a huge impact.

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 15:15

    So a lot of times, parents will give their teenagers sermons about you shouldn't care what other people think. Well, they can't. You know that that's just not possible. And if they did, they would be sociopaths, because only sociopaths don't care what anybody right. So I think the better message to give them, or the more useful message, is whose opinion matters to you? Your parents, sure your close friends, sure, your teacher, yeah, some anonymous person who you know, you know, grumpy pirate 27 like whatever. You don't even know who that is, and that person is not creating things and trying to put it out there. So I think with teenagers, they're trying to figure out who they are. They're experimenting with different ideas, almost like putting on hats. So one of my main advice pieces to parents of teenagers is, whatever the kid did a month ago, you can't hold that against them, because that was an entirely different person. So you just gotta let it go. But so they're trying on these identities, and sometimes they're going to get nonsense. And like you and I, are old enough to be have more established identities, maybe more established relationships that anchor us. It's harder for a young person, and all we can do, I think, is talk about it. What do you think motivates someone to make a mean comment to a stranger, let the words come out of their lips. How do you think you should respond if a stranger says something that's mean,

    KC Davis 16:49

    I like that. You're saying that, you know, that we shouldn't just say, oh, you know, don't care what people think. Don't listen to what people think. Because I think there's something kind of invalidating about that. And I think in my experience, and I feel like this is how any teenager would feel, like, even if you know that that person's opinion maybe isn't correct, or that's just their projection or whatever, it doesn't take away the pain of this individual wants to hurt me, like, whether their information is accurate or not, it's still wounding to be like, there's a person out there who just, like, decided what they wanted today was for me to be in pain, right?

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 17:28

    So is that person who's someone whose opinion you respect, somebody who has nothing better that to do with their time than be nasty online. So let's not give them the satisfaction and to say your problem, not mine. Now it's different because you said sometimes you'll have a teen who gets multiple comments along the same direction. So you know, if you get feedback, you might want to think about it. It's like, Huh? I've heard several people said that maybe I should tone it down a little bit, or think about how I'm expressing that feedback doesn't feel good, but if you're

    KC Davis 18:05

    getting, yeah, do you think that's part of it too? Like, I feel like people they mistake I don't like what you're saying with your being mean, or like you're this feedback about me that's critical. Is you being mean? And people have a hard time distinguishing? Yeah,

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 18:20

    and I think there's, it's very people are very quick to cancel someone and say you're toxic, meaning you have no value, no worth. And I don't believe that, like you might have made a mistake, you might have done something unkind, you might need to learn something, but you know, to just dismiss people entirely. So I had a client once, she was a college girl, and she had a best friend who was very close to her, and then she fell in love with this guy, and they started dating, and the roommate, the best friend was jealous, and my client tried to say, well, let's have brunch. Let's do this, and let's make sure we have time. But the best friend was still angry, and then, after she'd been dating this guy, I don't know, was it six months a long time, the roommate sent her a letter, five pages handwritten, and the gist of the letter was, you're bad, like that is not how you resolve a conflict. So if I had the other roommate as a client, I would have suggested start first with connection. I miss you. Offer validation for their point of view. I know it's so exciting for you to have this relationship, and I'm so happy for you that it's been going so well for so long, you look really happy with him, and that's great. And then ask for what you want like. So could we make sure that we have some time together? You know, let's talk about what makes sense, and that's going to get a. Positive response, as opposed to the you're bad, which is just a conversation Ender, yeah.

    KC Davis 20:05

    And when you talk about, you know, helping, maybe helping kids or teens deal with the ordinary meanness by sort of saying, okay, like, just because they say that about me doesn't mean that that's true. I feel like that really ties into, sort of like, your other area of expertise, which is like children and self esteem. And I want to talk about that for a minute as well, because I know there's a lot of parents that listen to the podcast, and I've also never heard advice for children that wasn't applicable to adults. To be honest, like so many of my

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 20:36

    Yes, yes. Isn't it fascinating? Yes,

    KC Davis 20:38

    but you know, I think it's I'm really interested in self esteem, because I feel like when I was growing up, there was a big push for the self esteem movement, and now we're sort of looking back and going, did that work? Like, yeah, I want like, I know that science

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 20:54

    says no. So what research finds is that higher self esteem is not associated with better mood. It is not associated with better school performance. It is not associated actually, it might be associated with better mood, but it's not associated with better school performances. It's not associated with having kids avoid sex, drug and other bad things that we don't want them doing. It's not associated with better relationships. In fact, bullies tend to have higher self esteem. I was gonna say, like it, yeah, yeah. So this is not and you see a lot of stuff on like Instagram about how you can't succeed without believing yourself that is the key to success, or you can't have a relationship unless you love yourself, and that's simply not empirically true. So what I like I was I wrote this book because I kept seeing all this nonsense about self esteem, things like affirmations to say good things to yourself, or heap your kids with lots of praise, and scientifically, that does not work. If you've got a kid who's self doubting and tell him to do affirmations, or you heap them with praise, it makes them feel worse, because it highlights the contrast between whatever it is you're saying and how they actually feel. This is science.

    KC Davis 22:17

    I remember being a kid, and I remember that the more praise people would heap onto me, the more shame I felt, because I was, like, if you only knew, Oh, look, I feel even I feel even less disconnected, like I feel even more disconnected now, because the only people that like me are the ones that don't know me.

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 22:38

    Yes, that is perfect articulation of how a kid or an adult with low self esteem tends to think, and also the other recipe that's always pushed is accomplishments. No, we all know adults who are very accomplished but hate themselves, so then we certainly don't want to put our kids on a treadmill of constantly having to prove their worth. And I think the problem is that the whole premise of boosting kids' self esteem is wrong. So I mean, how many people stand in front of a mirror and say, gosh, I love myself and like, would you want to be friends with them if they did? No, no, that is not what we're aiming for. What we're aiming for is more like the way we are with a close friend, so you're not thinking, does he like me, or is she impressed by me? You're not even thinking about yourself, because you're immersed in the conversation or the activity. And there's this beautiful kind of forgetting of the self, which is called a quiet ego. Isn't that beautiful? I just love that term. Yeah,

    KC Davis 23:40

    it reminds me of my favorite quote by CS Lewis, where he says humility is not thinking less of yourself, it's thinking of yourself less. And this has been my experience to a T like I went through rehab when I was 16. I had really low self worth, self esteem problems, and they did the whole Oh, stare in the mirror and tell yourself, I'm good enough today. And none of that worked. No. But what's interesting is that, you know, as I got better, I did get sober, and I did become like a healthy person, but I didn't think about myself any less. Now I was just thinking about, Am I doing the good things? Am I doing the good things? Am I doing the good things? It really wasn't until I just stopped thinking about myself in general as much.

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 24:18

    Yeah, so either thinking I'm amazing or, you know, I'm terrible, both of those are focused inward. And what we want to on judging the self, and that's a dead end. So what we really want to do is turn down the volume on self focus and self judgment, and we do this by connecting with something bigger than ourselves. And that sounds so Hallmark, but it is absolutely true. And we've all had moments of that, when you're moved with compassion for a friend. You're not thinking, do I look good now when you stand under the night sky and just feel that deliciously small that. Sense of, oh, again, you're not thinking, how am I doing? You know, is everybody impressed?

    KC Davis 25:04

    Well, there were periods of my life where I was thinking that even under the night sky, but those were the ones where I was not happy. But Dr Eileen, how do I help my kids do this? Like I have a six year old and when she struggles with perfectionism or self doubt or something, it's hard as a parent to not go right to but you're so special. I love you so much. You're so great. How do I help a young child instead learn self compassion instead of self esteem? Right?

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 25:31

    So it depends on what they're doing. So the book that I talk about this is called Kid confidence. Help your child make friends, build resilience and develop real self esteem, and I talk each chapter is one of those things that the self doubting kids say, like, nobody likes me, or the worst kid in the world, or whatever it is, so we kind of just take it step by step with each one and like, I'm a clinician, so I'm very much a roll up my sleeves. What are we going to do kind of thing, but for a kid who is putting themselves down. Remember, with a little one, some of it is experiment to see how you respond, and what I recommend, yeah, some of it is a twinge of oof, but some of it is also they're feeling their way in the world and in relationships. So what I would recommend is don't get into an argument about whether or not they're worthless, like that's not the topic. You know, they're a human being. They have worth. What I would do instead is focus on the feelings behind the comment. And one technique that I recommend is what I call reflect but downshift, so you describe the kid's feelings, but then for bonus points, you attach in this situation at this moment, so it's not a Forever and always. So you're feeling discouraged with this particular project that you're trying to do tonight, you know? So we're making it smaller and more anchored, but we're acknowledging how they're actually feeling. Don't tell them don't feel that way. Just reflection is such a Dippy intervention, but some of us have made a career out of it, because it works. It feels good to be heard, and especially as a parent, when you acknowledge your kid's feelings, you're ramping them up in words, which makes them feel more understandable and more manageable. And when you as a parent do it, it's like you're holding half the weight of those big feelings. Now I have a couple of recommendations about how to reflect with kids. The basic formula is you're feeling blank because blank or you could also say it's hard for you when, or it bothers you when, or you wish whatever it was. We adults tend to want to skip the feelings and go right to the solution, but kids won't let us, so we really have to meet them where they are. I had a family once. The parents were these lovely, gentle people, and one day, their son came home and said, I hate Stuart's guts, and I'm changing names, of course. So the parents responded by saying something like, throughout history, dehumanization is what has led to atrocities. So I work in Princeton, what I can't What can I say? So, like, this is true, right? It's good. We shouldn't teach our kids, not sure, but they were completely talking past the kid. So the kid responded by saying, I want to kill Stuart and these poor parents were horrified, thinking they're raising a future AX murder. But the principle is, when kids don't feel heard, they get louder. So this is a Dippy intervention, but just reflect, reflect, reflect, until you see the softening in their face and in their body, and then and only then can we move on to problem solving, and it's better to ask rather than tell.

    KC Davis 28:47

    And when do we pivot? Like, because I feel like sometimes reflecting works really well for my kids, but then, like, occasionally I get a that's what I just said, like, you know, like, I'm like, I'm getting and I feel like, as a therapist, I've, it's like they kind of go, okay, therapist like, that's true. Like, we get a little too therapisty on it. And, you know, when where's that middle ground of, like, I want to validate your feelings. I think we follow the kids lead. Yeah, follow the kids lead. Okay. I love that downshift language because I was just talking to a friend this morning about, you know, I really I want to validate my kids emotions, and I want them to, you know, honor their feelings and things like that. But at the same time, you know, I don't want to make such a big deal out of every feeling they have, that they think every time I have a feeling the world needs to stop because something horrible is happening, or something or that I can't do things that are uncomfortable or that there aren't, you know what I mean. And so how do we validate but also normalize? You know, I feel like there's kind of a middle there absolutely is,

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 29:53

    and we follow the kids lead. So if they say, I know that's what I just said, and you can say, Okay, I just wanted to make sure that. I understood, and that's fine, but it is we do have to watch our instinct to leap in. So I had a mom of a high schooler once as my client, and one day her kid came home spitting nails because of something that happened at school. I don't remember what it was, but she's like, I can't believe the teacher did whatever it was. And the mom told me that for once, she remembered to do the reflection. Because normally she would be like saying, well, you should do this. You know, you should go talk to the teacher, but she said, for once, I remembered, and she said, you're really frustrated that the teacher did whatever she did. And the kid goes, Yeah, and it's not fair, because she's always doing things like this. And the mom said, it's hard for you when she keeps doing this thing, even though, you know it's hard on the rest of you, or whatever. And the kid said, Yeah, and it's just not fair that she does that. And she says it really bothers you that she's doing this thing again and again. And the kid said, yeah. So now what did we see? We see the softening in her face and her body. So the mom knew, if she could say, So, what do you think you might do about it? And the kid said, I guess I'll go talk to the teacher. And she stormed off. And the mom was like, Well, it worked so and it worked a lot better than the mom said, why don't you just talk to the teacher, even though the mom was right, that's exactly what she should have done. But we made room for the kid to think about it. But to your point about their feelings are not the end of the world. Like you know, I've devoted my whole professional life to people's feelings, but our feelings in a given moment are not necessarily the most important thing. I had a younger kid once who just hated, hated, hated getting her picture taken. And it was grandma's birthday, and the whole family was gathering from all over, and I said to the kid, I get it, you hate pictures. You know, you just feel uncomfortable. You just really dislike pictures. She goes, yeah. And I said, whose feelings are most important at grandma's birthday? She goes, grandma's. And I was like,

    KC Davis 32:01

    yeah, that is so helpful, Dr Eileen, that has unlocked some things, because it's also not even, like, whose feelings are most important, but like, I was just listening in this moment, just this morning, I was listening to a Tiktok of this lady that was like, you know, if your kid says, you know, I don't want to try this, like, the sandwich tastes like peanut butter. And you know, it doesn't, because there's no peanut butter on there. And, you know you like, maybe just say, okay, that's fine. Don't eat it. And in my head, I was like, my child's diet would be two items if I just literally validated every fear and feeling she has about food. But at the same time, there's this concept that you just mentioned, of like your feelings can be valid, and is your feeling more important in this moment than perhaps what your body might need, the opportunity to have a new food, the like, like that, I think, unlocked something for me where it's not either or it's not shut up and try the sandwich, or quit being so sensitive, or, ugh, you're too much eat the sandwich. But it's also not okay, sweetie. You know, I told I want to validate your fear of the sandwich. And, you know, like, or having to have this long, drawn out kind of, like tiptoe conversation about, like, cajoling them into the sandwich. It's like, hey, you know what? Sometimes I feel afraid when I've tried something new, too. And

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 33:25

    that one yeah and yes

    KC Davis 33:29

    in this moment. You know, trying, you know, the opportunity to try a new food that might give you a lot of nutrition for your body is more important than what you feel.

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 33:38

    I mean, we all it's always a judgment call, but one of the reasons that we adults are the ones with the car keys and the credit card is because we have a bigger perspective. You know, kids are just like in this moment right now. So there's a lot of interesting research by somebody named Ellie Liebowitz, and he's out of Yale, and he treats childhood anxiety, and he never meets the parents, or never meets the kid. He only works with the parents. Isn't that interesting. And what he finds is that when kids have an anxiety disorder, more and more, the parents do things to accommodate that anxiety, you know, like we don't want the kid to explode. So okay, we'll find we'll, you know, do it three times and, you know, check the whatever, and it gets bigger and bigger and bigger. So what he has to do the parents do is dial back the accommodations. Can't control the kid. Can only control what happens around the kid. And he says that there are two key ingredients that parents need to offer empathy, because the kid really is struggling. You know they're not doing this just to make your life harder, and confidence that this is hard for you, and I know you can do this. I know not that you won't feel scared or uncomfortable or whatever, but I know you can get through it. One of my favorite interventions for developing real confidence is. Is for parents to be our kids biased biographers. So tell the collect and tell those stories of where the kids struggled initially and then triumphed. I remember when you were first learning to swim and you were afraid to put your face in the water. And now look at your year of fish. I remember when you were first learning to ride your bike and you fell and you fell and you fell, and now look at you zipping around. I remember the first time you went to soccer and you were so nervous and you didn't know what to do, and now it's your favorite activity. So because we have that broader perspective, we can be their biased biographers and tell these stories of struggle followed by Triumph.

    KC Davis 35:42

    You and this idea of empathy is big, I think, because I just know there are people listening that when they heard the term dial back the accommodations, they bristled and they felt triggered and they felt because I think part of where a lot of this comes from is that we remember being children kind of raised by that, you know, be seen, not her generation, or that generation, that maybe we were undiagnosed ADHD or undiagnosed autistic, or we undiagnosed anxiety, and our parents were going, you know, get over it. Who cares? And so we're trying to do the opposite. But I think sometimes we might go too far, like, we're parenting out of a reaction of our own wounds,

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 36:24

    yes, and you can't make up for what happened before. Like, if that's your game plan, it's

    KC Davis 36:29

    not gonna work. Yeah, yeah. Like, because my parent was too tough and never gave me accommodations. Now I almost parent out of this fear, and I am over accommodating, over tiptoeing, over sort of like, you know, I'm almost like, making my kids anxiety worse, because, you know, I'm doing all these things. And so, you know, I know that you don't mean rip all the accommodations away, but I don't want to just specify that for the audience, because I do think that attuned, connected, empathetic caregiver saying, You know what, Honey, we're actually not going to do that right now. Or, you know what, Honey, we're going to do it anyways. Or we're not going to use this, you know, accommodation of this tool right now, right? And I know it's going to

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 37:16

    be hard for you. Yeah, that's so different. And I believe in you. I believe in you. I know you can do this, and you might even say, I'll be right here with you, or I'll see you at the whatever or so and so's gonna help you, or whatever. So the metaphor that I use with kids all the time, and sometimes with my adults too, is that you can't get used to the water by standing at the edge of the pool, so we really have to stay in the water, and what changes? You know, you jump into the pools like, oh my gosh, it's freezing. If you stay in the water, you're going to get used to it. That's just a physiological fact. Does the water temperature change? No. What changes is our perception of it. Now, if the kid wants to go in toe by toe, that's absolutely fine. I'm certainly a toe by toe person myself, but no amount of standing by the edge of the pool is going to get you used to the water. So the protecting the kid from feeling uncomfortable, it feels good to us, because, you know, we don't have to deal with the big fuss. And you know, we like the idea of being protective, but sometimes, and it's hard

    KC Davis 38:22

    as a parent, if you had parents that did not accommodate you, that were not empathetic towards you, that did not think about your need, it's hard, I think, when you had parents where you felt like your pain didn't even affect them, or didn't affect them the way It should, we never learn what amount of discomfort is okay for our children to feel and what isn't, because it is my job to protect my kid from some kinds of pain or to accommodate for some kind right? But I think sometimes, if you don't have that model, you don't know how much discomfort is appropriate, and you're we're all just kind of trying to figure it out. But I think, to your point, you know, knowing that it's not one extreme or the other exactly,

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 39:06

    and it's got to be both ingredients, the empathy plus the confidence. So one of my principles is that realistic expectations for kids are what they do pretty much most of the time now, or just a bit beyond that, we can get very tangled if we think about, you know, what kids ought to do, or what most kids could do, or what the younger sister could do. I don't care we deal with the kid in front of us. And so when you're thinking about, you know, what kind of accommodations might I start pulling back like I would recommend talking about it with a kid, you know, see, you know. And because I do this all the time in my practice, and I'll tell the kid, I will never push, but I will nudge, because I believe in you, and our job is to put our heads together. And I'll look for like we usually do, a scale of one to 10. Of because I don't know how bad something is for a kid. I cannot know that without asking the kids sometimes can't know either. So I'll say we're looking for something that's uncomfortable but definitely doable, and our job is to keep doing it until you're bored. So it's really about building confidence, rather than ripping away because they shouldn't. You know that that's not helpful well.

    KC Davis 40:24

    And one example is, you know, when you're doing, like, food things, like, if you have a really picky eater, or a kid that really has some stuff around food, I'll never forget, like, listening to a nutritionist that was talking about, like, Okay, your parents old school method of you have to eat everything. We're not doing that. Or you have to eat this before this. We're not doing that however. We're not just gonna go all the way over to eat anything you want, and it doesn't matter, and we're not gonna push you to try new things. But when she talked about the like, the steps you should be taking towards it, the first step was always the child tolerating it on their plate, right like, before we get to you have to take a bite. Even it's you don't have to eat it, but it does have to stay on the plate. Now, obviously, you're, we're listing depends on your kid. Oh, I have a sensory thing, a smell I can't do, right? But I just thought, like, that's a good example, not a rule, but an example of, like, how sometimes we might go to what we think is the first step of, sort of like pushing them past their comfort zone, but it's really like way back in the back there. This has all been so super helpful. Can you, like, just as we land the plane here, where can parents go if they're going, oh my gosh, this is so great. You know, what books have you written? What's your website? Tell us all the stuff where we can find you. So

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 41:37

    my website, for my main website, is Eileen kennedymore.com, e, i, l, e, e n, k, e N, N, E, D, y, M, O, O, R, e.com. So you can see my books there. I've written four books for parents. The most recent one is kid confidence. Help your child make friends, build resilience and develop real self esteem. I've also written four books for kids. Moody moody cars is for four to eight year olds. That's just such a joy. It goes freewheeling, full of feeling, traveling near and far. Honk if you see me. I'm a moody, moody car. So it has beautiful photos of antique cars, and I think they look like they have feelings. And I also have two books growing friendships and growing feelings for six to 12 year olds. And those ones, each one has little cartoon vignettes of common friendship problems, and then the narrator comes in and gives research based tips. And then wandering through the text are this cat and dog character that make goofy suggestions, like, he should sniff their butt, their butts. I'm like, No, he shouldn't. He should not sniff their butts. But it makes the kids laugh. It makes them feel smart because they know not to do that, but it's still getting the information in there. Yeah. And then my joy is the kids ask. Dr friend tastic podcast. You can find it on any podcast app that you like, or drfriendtastic.com Dr friendtastic.com you click on the podcast tab. And for accessibility, I have full easy to read pod transcripts there. There are always discussion questions also. So an interesting thing you can do is just play the episode up to the end of the kid question. Ask your kid, what advice would you give, and see what they say, and then play my advice. And then it always comes with a couple of a handful of discussion questions to deepen your kids understanding to and mostly it was about, have you ever had something like that happened? Or why do you think that it's so much fun? I'm

    KC Davis 43:31

    definitely going to check that out for my six year old. Can

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 43:34

    I tell you one of my favorite episodes there was this little girl named Vera, who is eight, and she asked, do we have to change ourselves to make friends? So my answer was, oh my gosh, my favorite questions and life, not just the podcast, are ones where the question seems simple on the surface, but the more you think about it, the more questions it raises. So what do you mean by change, and what do you mean by self? What do you mean by make friends? So I talked about how we are all different in different situations, different relationships. We also change over time. At the same time, we have a felt sense of authenticity, those moments where we think this is who I am or want to be, but sometimes we'll do something that's not exactly what we want, because it's what a friend wants, but that can be very authentic, because it taps into our deepest value of caring for the front and that's the foundation of friendship. So the answer to the question, do we have to change ourselves to make friends is no we have to show up as our most authentic, caring selves. So it's just, I like that and

    KC Davis 44:49

    like I think the difference making that distinction between authentic change, which is maybe I have a way of acting that I don't even maybe I don't like it either, but I can. How it's impacting people, and maybe I want to change that, and I want to be and like, that's an authentic change, versus a, you know, oh, I need to hide what I like, or, you know, what

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 45:09

    I think and what I feel, and I that's so cool. That's helpful. Is this really a balance so growing feelings, which is the second book for six to 12 year olds, that's about children's feelings about friends, because feelings don't usually come up in the abstract. You know, it's usually because they did that, whatever. So we talk about the feeling cycle, so or stories, feeling stories cycle, and it starts out with an event, and then as soon as that event happens, we start making inferences about what does this mean for me, for you, for our relationship, and those thoughts lead to feelings, and those feelings prompt actions, and those actions trigger reactions from other people, which could be setting the cycle of motion again. So what I find is a lot of the discussion about emotions nowadays is not taking the social piece into consideration, and that's really, really important. Kind of like that college girl who's like, You're bad, like, you know, she's just barfing out her feelings to be crude there, without any sense of what is the response you are hoping for and what kind of communication is most likely to get that that's not about being fake or manipulative. It's about being able to see beyond just, you know, this feeling that's happened in this moment. Can I expand my awareness both to what's going on with them and to what I really want? So I think that can be a really powerful perspective for kids, and each of those areas on the cycle are something that we can intervene with. I'll tell you one more thing. This is probably the best thing I ever invented, because it worked and it's, I call it a soft criticism. So the normal response to criticism for all of us is to defend, wow, it's not my fault. And you do it too, and they do it worse. That is just human nature. So the soft criticism is designed to get around that normal defensiveness. And I find this works with kids. It works with partners, it works with coworkers. So step one is you give an excuse. So you might say something like, I know you didn't mean to. I get that you were trying to do that. I understand that you were having a lot going on, or you were really tired, or whatever it was. The beauty of giving the excuse is, in order to come up with an excuse, you have to stop for a second. Imagine things from their point of view. Raises your empathy, lowers your anger. Great place to start. And just practically, if we give an excuse, they don't have to come up with one. And we can just skip that. And and you've put yourself on the same side with them, rather than against them. You're bad and I'm good, you know, like, that's not useful.

    KC Davis 47:51

    So see that working really well with kids? Well, really with anybody. But I'm going to use that with my kids too.

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 47:56

    But step two is the part we want, which is to describe the problem. And here, the formula we would use is, when you bad behavior, bad outcome. So you might say something, like, I get that you were really frustrated last night when you're trying to do your homework and your brother was making a racket. The same time when you throw your shoe at him, you could really hurt him. So like, we can be very specific here. And then step three is the most important, which is about moving forward. A lot of times, parents think they have to solve it. It usually works better if you get the kid to help you solve it. So ask a good question about, what can we do instead, or what can we do to prevent this? Or, you know, what can you do to help him feel better? You know, if the kid's crying or whatever, and you get the kid back on track with being a good kid, and we solve the problem together, rather than, you know, thinking, Oh, I gotta figure this out. No, let's figure it out together and see what we can do. So

    KC Davis 48:58

    that is really helpful, and I really appreciate the time that you've taken, and especially since I missed our time this morning, this afternoon, and I hope that you have a really great day.

    Dr. Eileen Kennedy-Moore 49:08

    Thank you. This was very fun. You.

    Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Christy Haussler
114: Why Budgeting Doesn’t Work (and what to do instead) with Jill Sirianni

I have an honest confession to make. I am a terrible budgeter, but I’m a world-class financial goldfish. In this episode, I’ll explain my “financial goldfish” status and budgeting for our neurodiverse brains. I’m joined by Jill Sirianni, host of the Frugal Friends Podcast. If you’re like me, and budgeting just doesn’t work for you, you’ll learn a lot from our conversation. Join us!

Show Highlights:

  • Characteristics of a financial goldfish

  • Budgets–the diet of the financial landscape (and they don’t work any more than diets do for most people)

  • Top reasons we fall victim to impulse buying

  • The myth of “Wants vs. Needs”

  • The downfalls of typical antiquated budgeting

  • Creativity in meeting needs without spending

  • Jill’s 90-day transaction inventory

  • Helpful online tools

  • A moral problem vs. a systemic problem

  • KC’s helpful hack to be more thoughtful before spending impulsively (like late-night DoorDash)

  • Jill’s tips for creating a pause before spending: keep a list and buy second-hand

  • Understanding the marketing behind sales

  • Making choices about your behavior today that may not align with spending habits held up as the “standard”

  • Understanding values-based spending

  • In finances, one size does NOT fit all. 

Resources and Links:

Connect with Jill Sirianni and Frugal Friends: Frugal Friends Podcast and Buy What You Love Without Going Broke book by Jen Smith and Jill Sirianni (pre-order now!)

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • Unknown Speaker 0:00

    Music.

    KC Davis 0:05

    Hello, you sentient balls of stardust. Welcome to struggle care, the podcast where we talk about anything, everything, mental health, your well being, and try to talk about, you know, ways to take care of ourselves that actually work and work for our brains. I'm your host, Casey Davis, and I'm here with Jill Sirianni, who is the host of the podcast frugal friends, and we're going to talk about budgeting for our brains. Specifically because I am historically a very bad budgeter. I always used to, my husband's a big budgeter. I used to tell him, like, he's like, What do you mean you have a budget? And I was like, Well, I'm like, a financial goldfish. Like, I just have a general sense of, like, how much I have, and I just, like, try to only spend that, but then, like, if the tank gets bigger, well then like, my sense of what I can spend gets bigger. And anyways, the joke is, is that, like, I don't know if you know this, but a goldfish never stops growing, and it will grow to the tank you give it exactly, and I always become massive. I was like, I am a financial goldfish.

    Jill Sirianni 1:03

    I love that. I think most of us are like that. And really, there's nothing wrong with how you're describing your approach. Yeah,

    KC Davis 1:12

    I always tell him was like, I mean, I've never, like, put us in debt. And he's like, Yeah, but, but we could have so much more money if you just, like, stayed a small goldfish in a big pond. I'm like, Well, I'm sorry,

    Jill Sirianni 1:22

    it's not how goldfish

    KC Davis 1:24

    work. Yeah, that's not how goldfish work. But listen, I feel like this is one of those areas where, which is funny, because it's like cleaning where, like, there's so much advice out there that doesn't work for people who are neurodivergent. Do you have a take on that? Like, why that is?

    Jill Sirianni 1:41

    I think what you're describing here is the issue with managing personal finances, kind of across the board. I think most people would say budgets don't work for me. Budgets are kind of the diet of the financial landscape, and they feel so restrictive to so many of us, and so many of us have been taught it's been ingrained in us, whether overtly or covertly, that spending is bad, and if you're going to do a budget, then it's how can you spend as little as possible? And I think one of the things that we're trying to reframe, both in our podcast and in the book that we just wrote is being able to describe managing money as what works for you, being good stewards of the resources that you have, and not so restrictive with it, but recognizing that spending is a skill. We all spend money. We spend money every single day, and dispelling this myth of there are spenders and they're savers. No, we all spend money, and we can, just like any skill, learn to get better at spending that money, make sure that it is aligned with our values, with the way that we want to be spending and in a way that's going to be beneficial for our whole personhood. I've always

    KC Davis 2:59

    thought it was interesting how, like a lot of the big financial like advice givers, they make it seem like the issue. I mean, God, you nailed it on the head when you said that budgeting is the dieting of the financial world, because it is so similar. A lot of the big financial like advice out there acts as though it's a mainly, like, a character issue and a willpower issue, when really, like, it's a behavior and, like, we have a lot of science on like, what changes behaviors, but like, when I'm sitting like, yeah, if I'm sitting down, like, making a spreadsheet, yeah, sure, my morals and my like will to do differently in my values, like, come into play, but like, those are not the things like making the decision at 10 o'clock at night when I've had a bad day and I'm really hungry and I want to Door Dash food for the like, fifth time that week. You know what I mean? Like, it's those moments that I personally struggle with where it's like, okay, I have these long term goals, but I also have these, like, short term needs, but is it a need? And is it a want? And am I like, over moralizing what needs and wants are and and I just, you know, those are, like, the make or break moments. For me, it's not even like the big organizational things. It's like those moment to moment, like, I want a Starbucks drink. What do I do

    Jill Sirianni 4:19

    with that? Oh, Casey, everything that you're saying, there's so much congruence here. And I think just a lot of your messaging that I've been hearing from you, morally neutral care tasks is something that I hear from you a lot. And we like to describe debts, neutrality, spendings, neutrality that, yes, we are accustomed to, and we hear the voices of people assigning character issues to what we do with our money, and it's completely ignoring the fact that we've got History Society marketing tactics that are tapping into behavioral economics that are getting us to spend impulsively. They're tapping. Into what is known of the human psyche to be able to gain more money and make us feel as though we don't have what we need. And in order to belong, I have to spend money, and there is nothing wrong with us for then buying that thing or making that impulse decision. But that doesn't mean that we have to stay in that place. It doesn't mean we have to set up camp there and remain victim to some of these tactics that are happening unbeknownst to us, and then we're stuck wondering, why did I just buy that at 12am on Amazon? It

    KC Davis 5:38

    strikes me that we're like, bringing a water pistol to a gunfight when it comes to like, behavioral science, like people who want you to buy things are heavily invested, and like the science behind what makes you want things and make impulsive decisions, and, you know, makes you think you're going to be happier if you have this thing and all of that right? And like, on our side, there's not a lot of people giving us, like, helpful tips for the actual moment, besides, like, I guess, grip your, you know, white knuckle it like, just don't,

    Jill Sirianni 6:08

    right, just don't spend. Just stop spending, just budget. Just stick to your budget. Just don't impulse by and if that were realistic, then we will all would have figured it out by now, we like to talk about the top five reasons that we impulse buy. That's a question that a lot of our listeners are coming to us with, and when we're looking at spending as a skill and becoming better spenders, this is something that's really important to understand. It's not an exhaustive list, but it can be helpful to find ourselves. What am I most prone to here? So a lot of times it'll either be habit spending, whether it's time of day or location, it has just become a habit for us, and we are not even necessarily thinking about it or planning intentionally. It's just when I'm at the store, that's when I get a caffeinated beverage for myself. It could also be that we are shopping as an activity. It's just what we grew up doing on the weekend, and it's what we do for fun. It's how we were trained to enjoy ourselves in our leisure time. And so we just go out and shop as an activity, and we spend money we weren't necessarily planning on other times it could be stress, shopping or shopping because of any type of emotion that we're experiencing, whether we're happy or sad or celebratory. There's a lot of things that can play into what propels us to spend and it absolutely can be connected to our emotions. There's also social influence. So this is all of the social media, but it's also the people within our communities who they have XYZ it looks good in their kitchen, their lives look like they're functioning so well. And maybe if I bought that thing, my life would go smoothly too. And so I'm gonna get that or we follow people on Instagram who make things just look so beautiful. And we think if I buy that thing, I'll be cool, I'll belong, I'll have all the things just like they do. And the final one that we see really regularly is the thrill of the hunt. Just I like to dig. I want to find the deal. I like finding those red or yellow tags and getting that clearance, and I feel smart and powerful and engaged when I can get the thing, I can dig for it and find it so again, not an exhaustive list, but these are some of the top five ways that we end up impulse spending, and I think one of the first steps is identifying which one might I fall under until before we can then identify what could be next steps so I can be kinder to myself, kinder to my finances, and really make more beneficial Decisions, decisions I can feel really confident and proud of.

    KC Davis 8:53

    I feel like I can identify with a lot of those in the same target trip, right? Like, you know, you go to, like, there's a target right by my kids school. So, like, often I'll drop her off, and then you pass by this target, and you're like, you know what? Like, it would be fun to just stop and go in there, like, I don't really need anything, but I'm gonna go and then you go in and it's like, okay, there's like, a coffee shop in there. So you're like, Well, I'm gonna get myself a beverage as I walk around. And then maybe you see a few things you like, maybe you realize, like, oh, I need razors and some toilet paper, whatever. But, like, I also am, like, obsessed with the Joanna Gaines, like, set up and do it

    Jill Sirianni 9:32

    so well. They make it all look so beautiful. It's not how my house looks, but looks great there.

    KC Davis 9:38

    And I particularly always get sucked into, like, seasonal decor, which was fine the first day I the first year I lived in this house, because I didn't have very much decor. But what I find that I do is, like, I see it and it's so cute, and I get it, and then when I actually go to, like, get my decor out, I'm like, I already had this. That's embarrassing, or I had something that was so similar to this, like, it was silly of me to buy that, and it's all. Almost like there's this esthetic yearning. And I've even noticed this when I look at tick tock like, I'll see a tick tock of someone like, you know, making a stake over a campfire while they, like, look out their tent into, like, a rainy kind of like, and I'm like, wow, that feel like watching this feels peaceful, and I like that feeling of peace that I feel, and I want to go do that so that I can feel that peace again. But when I actually sit and think about like, what would I actually be feeling if I was sitting in a tent and it was muggy, it was raining, it's muggy, right? I'm cooking a steak, so the smoke is blowing in my face. I don't have, like, the seasonings that I would normally want for this steak. I'm gonna have to figure out, like, where, like, when I actually think about how I would be feeling if I was in that it's not peaceful. And I feel like I do the same thing with, like, shopping, right? You go in, you look around, and it's like, this setup is so esthetic. It's so beautiful. Like, look at this little coffee cup that's like a copper little coffee cup. And wouldn't I be so peaceful? And wouldn't I be so quaint? Wouldn't I be so cutesy, so demure, so mindful, if I was sipping coffee from my little copper coffee cup in the morning, right? And then I get it home, and it's like, worst case, it's like, oh, this bird, this scalds my fingers because it's copper. And then, like, best case, it's like, oh, now, like when it's sitting in between all of my mismatched mugs, like it's actually not bringing me. The thing that I felt when I was in the store,

    Jill Sirianni 11:34

    the one that gets me is the tiny carafe with the cup that can go over top of it. Have you seen these? Oh, I haven't bought one. Are you kidding? I'm like, it looks so adorable. Wouldn't that be so cutesy, so demure, so amazing

    KC Davis 11:49

    that people are gonna experience

    Jill Sirianni 11:54

    next to my bed. It's gonna be luxurious for me. And then I think in the middle of the night, I'm gonna be clanking glass around to drink your cup of water to dump it, right? Yeah, because it also requires that I had filled it up before I went to bed, like waking up my husband like it's just, it's not practical, but I love the idea of it, and I think you're really onto something here, and even you were describing the wants versus needs. And I think there's such a myth there, especially when it comes to this outdated approach to budgeting, it's well, separate your wants from your needs and only spend on what you need. And then it's like, well, how do I even define that? Because I need food, but what degree of food am I then allowed to spend on? Can the food be tasty? Can the food be organic? Can the food be cooked by somebody else, or does it have to be bland, cooked by me? I need to not like it, because it's all about deprivation. And I think one more like

    KC Davis 12:54

    the opposite, where in my head, anything I buy from the grocery store is fair game, because it's a grocery like I can buy, okay, I don't have to look at and, I mean, I'm blessed to not have to look at food prices when I go. I can just, you know, I can buy the brand that I want, but that doesn't, like, no Casey. You can't just, like, stop at the, like, summer decor aisle in heb and feel like that doesn't count because it's going towards the grocery budget. Like, doesn't work that way. One

    Jill Sirianni 13:26

    of the things that has been really helpful to guiding us in making some of these decisions, we love to talk about values based spending, aligning our spending behaviors with the things that we say are most important, but along those lines and kind of dispelling the myth of wants versus needs. Maslow's Hierarchy of Needs has been super helpful. I'm sure you're familiar with it. It's that triangle of our various types of needs. And at the very bottom, you've got your physiological needs. That's your air, water, food, shelter. Then you've got your safety needs, of employment, health resources. Then comes love and belonging. Needs. This is where friendship, family, sense of connection comes in, followed by esteem, our own needs for confidence, respect, achievement, and then very tippy top is the self actualization, where we can find our meaning, our purpose, our creativity, our expression. And one of the downfalls of typical antiquated budgeting is it just wants to look at those bottom tier needs of what's the air, water, food, shelter, maybe resources and employment, and forgetting that we have all of these other needs that we can spend on. As long as eyes wide open, we feel like we're the ones who are making the decision, not being baited, manipulated into making those spending decisions, and so with some of these, and

    KC Davis 14:47

    you know, what's so wild about that is the Maslow's hierarchy of needs, which I now know he like, kind of nicked from a an indigenous cultures like view of talking about those things. But. It was never intended to mean you need these things and more than these things, right? Like it was intended to describe that people cannot focus on this level of need unless the level of need below it is already secure. So it's not like a ranking of which needs are more important, necessarily, in terms of like, human fulfillment, it's that like, people can't focus on their need for creativity if they can't pay their rent. Do you know what I mean like? That's that like, which I feel like, is better explanation for what you're talking about, and

    Jill Sirianni 15:38

    it does help to describe, yeah, how we kind of move through those but in reality, once we do have some of those basic needs met, we will spend on trying to achieve some of the higher levels, maybe before some of those needs have been met in its entirety. It's not as if, oh, we only move on to level three once we've fully achieved level one. That's not entirely true, and we see that kind of across the board, like, oh, we go spend on our cars sometimes before we fully have all of our electricity bills paid. Well, yeah,

    KC Davis 16:13

    it's not supposed to be prescriptive, like, you can't move on or whatever. I think it's more of a systemic observation. Like, yeah, people are not gonna have the bandwidth to, like, look for, you know, all these other things, if like, there are some basic things that systemically are not being provided for them. So how do we tackle that?

    Jill Sirianni 16:33

    I think part of it is permission to recognize that we are whole people with varying degrees of need, and it is okay to spend money to meet those needs, and it's also okay to get creative on meeting those needs without spending money that some of what you were describing, both of us are describing. And what's this draw to esthetic? Why is what is it about this glass carafe water thing, or the seasonal decor that's making me want to spend on it, and it could be helpful to identify Is there a deeper need that I am trying to meet here? Is it a need for creativity? Is it a need for peace and stability? Is it a need for belonging? I'm not going to know that that answer for every person, but I think it is important to start to create those pauses and be curious with ourselves about the spending decisions that we're making. What is it about the seasonal decor that's drawing me in, and how am I going to feel about that purchase afterwards, is it going to create a sense of confidence that is going to solve for the need that I'm identifying, or is there a deeper need here where I could hit that need more accurately without buying this item, and I could meet that need in another way? And so that curiosity piece really is the first step we don't like to jump to, well, we don't really call it budgeting. We call it making a spending plan, but there's so much work that can be done and self understanding and kindness found before we even get to the action steps. I know a lot of times we want to jump there, but recognizing that our actions and our behaviors originate in our thoughts and our emotions and so beginning, there is the best place to start, and we recommend curiosity. Practicing curiosity with ourselves. This will be beneficial for every aspect of life, certainly finances. And one of the things that I like to describe with curiosity is avoiding the why question, not that there's anything wrong with why, but it really can put us on the defense when we're looking introspectively. It's the difference between, why do I always spend so much money on seasonal decor that I end up throwing away at the end of the season, to what is it about seasonal decor that I like so much? What does it give to me? Right? Such a big difference.

    KC Davis 19:02

    Wow, that's huge. Because why do I want this pumpkin? You know, it's like, first of all, I'm probably going to find a reason that means something about me that I probably don't, like, you know what I mean, like, Oh, I'm being impulsive, because I think it's going to be my life better, as opposed to, like, the kind of curiosity you're talking about, it's more likely to uncover something about myself I do, like, which is, like, I love that magic of holidays and my little kids thinking that everything is magical, and that feeling of like, comfort and warmth, like that is actually a good thing about me. And I think that, like you said, that's a better place to start, because then I can just ask myself with a lot of self compassion, like, okay, so is this stuffed pumpkin? Is that really going to get me closer to that, you know? And I, you know, to that point of, like, the first step being awareness. I think that, you know, that's something that's talked about a lot. Oh, first become aware of. First become aware. But I think the part that we don't say enough is that, like, it is totally appropriate to spend, like, an extended time in that space, like, literally before you change anything. Like, if you spent a week not making yourself change anything about your spending, but just asking yourself being become aware, like that moment of, like, you know, becoming aware of why you want the pumpkin doesn't matter if you buy the pumpkin anyways. Like, just, you don't have to pressure yourself to do that, but like to get the full picture without, like, the shame of shutting down or making the mistakes and things like that. Like, it is okay to spend some time just becoming aware. It's just not one journal entry process. This is a, yeah,

    Jill Sirianni 20:42

    it really could take weeks, and there's so much discovery that can happen out of that. When it comes specifically to our finances, one of because I know we do love tangible steps, one of the things that we encourage people to do is a 90 day transaction inventory, so again, not shifting any behaviors, just observing ourselves objectively, like that fifth grade scientific process we all learned. We're not bringing shame, we're not trying to shift anything. We're just curious what's going on here. And so that's gathering all of our credit card statements, bank statements, every transaction that we've made over the last three months, and making almost journal entries next to all of it. This is not going to necessarily be done in one sitting, depending on how many transactions there are, but it can be really helpful.

    KC Davis 21:29

    Are there any of those, like online tools that, like, do that automatically, that you found have been that are like, helpful or beneficial? Because I know that there are some out there that'll kind of like, try to give you a breakdown, give you everything

    Jill Sirianni 21:39

    we do like monarch money as an app for helping you to create a spending plan, but a lot of times, if you're not already using something like that, it can be just as easy to just download a CSV file of all of your transactions, especially if you've got a couple of different bank accounts, and so whether that's printed out or in a spreadsheet, creating another column where we are being curious about our emotions and learning who we are giving ourselves the opportunity to understand ourselves better. It's quite Invitational, and it can be quite kind to then look at okay, what happened here with this transaction, what had and how did I feel about it afterwards, what led me to spend on this thing? How did I feel about spending on it afterwards? And keep going down the list, we won't remember every single item, but it can help to bring our attention to when do I end up spending money that I wasn't intentionally I didn't want to spend intentionally? Are there certain times a day, is there a pattern that I'm seeing popping up here and from there, once we've done all of our curiosity and we're learning more about ourselves, and we're asking ourselves whether or not these things are aligned with the things that we would say are actually valuable, then it can inform some of the decisions that we might make from there, how we might curb some of the ways that we spend that we are now deeming this actually wasn't that beneficial to me. I thought that it was gonna get me time with my friends, but really, we were just at this loud restaurant. I could hardly hear anyone. I felt so overstimulated, and I went home stressed like but I just wanted time with my friends. So is there a different way that I could get time with my friends that might actually meet that relational need and potentially even help me financially as well? I feel

    KC Davis 23:34

    like that's such an important step, because I feel like some people who do that step are going to find, okay, there's a lot of areas where I maybe am spending money that I don't necessarily like, that I don't want to be anymore, or that I could spend in a different way. And then I think, though that, like, just as powerfully and important, there are people that will do this exercise and be like, Oh, I'm not the problem. The problem is, like, systemically, I'm having a hard time finding a job that will pay me a living wage, and the cost of housing has gone like, you might look down at it and go, Oh, shit. Like, this isn't my moral problem. Like sitting down and trying to decide, Okay, should I shop at the Aldi versus the heb because this one has three cents. Like, I feel like that is, it's like equal parts has the potential to cause despair, because you can feel like, you know, okay, I feel powerless. But there's also this part of it that is, like, very freeing when you realize that, like, society wants you to think it's your moral problem, when it is, in fact, a systemic problem, and like, the quicker we stop treating it like a moral problem, like a moral individual problem, and start realizing it's a systemic problem. Like, the faster we can figure out ways to live a meaningful life with those constraints, instead of kind of like spinning our wheels.

    Jill Sirianni 24:56

    Yeah, exactly. Exactly. Like, I think, recognizing that there's so much bigger happening, although we do have to respond to what's within our power and our control to be able to shift in this narrative. And some of that is that awareness piece and choosing differently, but also recognizing we get so many people coming to us saying, Okay, I've got everything what now? And we're saying it's not always about cutting. It's not about deprivation. Sometimes it might be sacrifice, certainly, but we are aiming at easier nos and better yeses when it comes to some of these things, and certainly for some of us, it could mean bigger life changes that need to happen. It's not just the grocery store that we end up shopping at. But how can I make sure that I'm being valued in the place where I work is where I'm living still aligned with my season of life? Or is there an opportunity for me to rethink my living situation here, which is why we say a 90 day transaction inventory and include all of your bills and everything on it, because everything is up for negotiation when it comes to redefining what's going to be beneficial for us in our personal finance management, the top three areas of Our spending for most people is food, transportation and housing. And so transportation and housing decisions we're not impulsively, typically making. We're not making those decisions every single day, food decisions we are and so making sure that then we can kind of align our lives with that recognition in mind. Okay, what can I do to help some of the fluctuating food costs that are happening, but also realize it's not just about how much butter costs that week, but what is my housing situation like? What is my transportation situation like, and what is the money coming in? And are there bigger decisions that I can make here? Is there a decision, a one time decision that I can make that'll make everything else easier or unnecessary in the future, talking about just functionality. And

    KC Davis 27:07

    sometimes those are revolutionary. Like this is, I mean, I know people who are, you know, talking about multifamily households, intergenerational households, buying land and having a couple of houses with different like, sometimes these. And I think that's kind of what I was trying to get at. Is like, get at, is like, if we could, some of us, it's like, if we give ourselves permission to stop spinning our wheels over, like, Man, I feel so guilty that I use DoorDash and instead go. Maybe the system's not working, and what I actually have control over is like, looking at some revolutionary moves that I need to make that will have an impact on some of these, like, bigger financial things. I like that. So let me ask you a couple of, like, little things that I think have helped me, and like some advice I've heard, and tell me your thoughts on them, and then see, and then I want to hear if you have any other ones, right? There's this one on Tiktok that was so helpful to me, that was talking about that, like, esthetic trap, right? Because I get sucked into the Joanna Gaines setup. And her thing was, like, if you find something that you really, really want, one of her tricks was like, to take it to a different aisle, like, take it to the bathroom aisle with the towels and the, you know, whatever, and stick it and look at it. And she's like, sometimes the magic falls away when you're not looking at the whole, you know, like fake living room they've put there, you know what I mean? And I was like, that's such a good tiny tip for those moments where you feel like, Oh, what do I do? And then, like, I recently deleted DoorDash off of my phone, which isn't to say that I don't use it anymore, but now, when I decide to do it, I have to reinstall the app. First make the order, and then I delete the app. And that moment of pause, of like, extra labor has forced me to, like, take a moment, take a beat, because I will still order DoorDash. Like, I think the other day, I was like, we had a really rushed day, and I was like, oh shoot, I gotta feed the kids. I have these things I also need to do. And I was like, I'm just gonna order some DoorDash. Or like, wow. You know, my mom came over to listen to me read my book, my new book, out loud. And halfway through, I was like, You know what? I want to order us some lunch. This is so wonderful, but it's helped me not DoorDash a lot of times where it would have just been kind of that impulse that, like, it's 10pm And I'm cranky and I'm hungry, and instead of getting up and instead of getting up and making myself cheese and crackers, I'm just gonna DoorDash Taco Bell. So it's like that extra step I felt like was really helpful. So I'm curious if you have any other like of those small like behavior hacks, almost that have seemed to help people.

    Jill Sirianni 29:35

    Absolutely. I love that first example you gave. We must be in a similar algorithm, although the Tiktok that I saw was the trashcan method, where you take the item that you see in the beautiful like Magnolia section of target to the trashcan aisle, and that might be closer to how it might look in your own home. Not that our houses are filled with trash cans, but sometimes the quality of these things don't hold ordinary items wouldn't. It's not next to all of the other items within the display, and it can really help to provide a pause and an interruption. And that's really what you're describing, is how to create pauses and opportunities to be more mindful and intentional about the actions that we're taking as a habit. How can we implement this a little bit more? What are some of the ways we can interrupt ourselves and ultimately, eventually, this will have to become more and more intrinsic, but there are certainly some external things that we can be doing. One of the things that I particularly helps me is keeping a list of the things that I want to buy. So whether I'm scrolling Instagram or I happen to be on Amazon, or I'm over at a friend's house, and something, I see something or something breaks in my own home, and I'm like, Okay, gotta replace that. Rather than one click buying it immediately, I keep a running list of the things that I would like to purchase in my notes app on my phone that does a couple of things. It helps me feel as though I'm responding to the need. I'm valuing the fact that I had this urge and desire to want to acquire this thing that's valuable. There's a reason for that. I'm not ignoring it. I'm not stifling it. I'm giving it an outlet and a place to go. And it's not going away. It's gonna live there. It's not gonna live in my cart, and I'm not gonna get reminders of it constantly, bye, bye, bye, that thing, but it's there, and I know that it's there. Then when I'm out, I can be looking for those items and am I still interested? There are plenty of times that a week later, the thing gets removed, because I either found another solution to solve for that problem, or it's not hitting me the same way as it was before. I just don't think that I needed or wanted anymore. One of the other things that's important to me is buying second hand. So reducing, you know, the amount of waste that is being created is part for me of being a good steward of resources. So it also kind of allows me to give myself time and be patient in finding some of the things that I say that I want. Can I fix the thing that's broken? Can I find another solution within my home? Can I find it used pre owned, and then I might come to the point where I'm buying new if needed and necessary, and so that little bit of creation of pause is helpful also, as you're describing, removing ourselves from some of the email lists or the text messages that are reminding us to buy one of the tangible kind of software pieces that we recommend is unroll me. Think it's unroll.me and so,

    KC Davis 32:36

    yes, I've used it. You can, like you basically swipe left and right to unenroll from various things. Which brings me to another point about sales. I love your idea about a list, because one of the things, one of the rules that I have for myself is now, if I need something first, and I put it on a list, and I can wait for that thing to go on sale, but if something is on sale. Like, basically, in general, I've stopped utilizing sales because I found that I spent more money when I was using sale. When I was like, Oh, it's a big sale. It's half off. I need to whatever, whatever. If there is a large item that, man, it would really make an impact if I had a 50% off coupon. Or if this went on sale 20% like you said, like, I'll make a list. Like, you know, my kids are growing really fast, and there's a particular clothing company called primary that I love to buy from, and they're a little bit more expensive than target, but I found that they last them longer, and they're made a little bit better. And so, like, they're kind of a better investment. But if I know that, like, every August, because I'm a weirdo, every August, I inventory, like, coats, jackets, sweaters, long sleeve things, then I want to, like, buy for that season, or whatever, then, like, I know that I'm going to do that and I can wait and watch for their end of summer sale, right? As opposed to getting that pushed to me with a bazillion emails about, like, Wait, 20% off. Okay, let me go find something I wouldn't have otherwise bought. I do sometimes do the 24 hour cart thing, but only on Amazon because they won't send me emails. But that actually does help me, because I'll put it in my cart, but I won't let myself buy it. Then I'll be like, it's there. It'll be there tomorrow. And by the time I go back to that cart, you're right half the time, I'm like, okay, these were two things that I actually have some version of this. I just momentarily convinced myself that these things would be better, and therefore my life would be easier, and therefore I would have less stress, when, in reality, I'm just gonna end up with three of something that's similar and still feel stressed about it.

    Jill Sirianni 34:39

    I think it can be so helpful when we are able to educate ourselves with an understanding of marketing tactics and how much marketing tactics are playing into our psychology, our cognitive biases, our cognitive distortions that are a part of us can serve us well, but in many ways. Marketers are leveraging this, and it doesn't mean that we won't ever take advantage of a sale, or we won't ever impulse buy, but I think understanding it, we can feel more equipped and we can make better spending decisions for ourselves. Sales are not for us. Sales are for a company to make money, and as you're describing, usually there's going to be some sort of upsell. Most of the time. Sales are not really real sales. They've overinflated the cost to cut them just a smidge, but then they're going to sell you more on the back end to try and get you to spend even more. Bundle this, pair this with that customers also buy this. And so a lot of times, with the deals, the urgency, the fear of missing out these items are played into when it comes to selling us items. That doesn't mean that, you know, we can't get a 50% off here and there, but I think asking ourselves, what is behind me making this spending decision? Is it just am I feeling stressed about this right now, or is this something I did intend to buy? This will be helpful. It will make other decisions and actions easier or unnecessary in the future. I feel good about spending this then fine. But if we've been able to pause and say they've just created urgency in me right now, and it'd be okay if I come back to this decision tomorrow, we'd be better off spending the extra $2 the next day than spending the extra, who knows how much by responding to the sense of urgency and impulsively making a decision that we may or may not feel good about the next day. I

    KC Davis 36:36

    was ordering something that I needed the other day, and I got to the cart checkout, and it was like, You're $3 away from free shipping. You could pay $10 for shipping, but if you added $3 to this car to be free, and that's fine. But my new rule is that I have to find, if I cannot find something for $3 then I'm just going to pay for the shipping, right? Like, yeah, if there's a little $3 thing that I want or I need, fine, throw it in there. But like, I'm not gonna go then purchase a $20 item, because now I'm still spending $12 more than I would have if I just, like, that's helped me thinking less about like you said, We're for that the hunt the deal. But look how many items I got. Because in reality, it's usually not like items that are make or break survival. For me, it's just that feeling of, I've got a good deal. I'm getting so many things, but if I'm spending more money than I otherwise would, that is affecting, you know, these spending behaviors, especially when it comes to like, so there's a few things, and I love the advice that I've heard about, like, making choices about your behavior, the behavior you have today, not the behavior you hope you'll wake up with tomorrow. And what I mean by that is that I heard someone say once, like, if you have tried over and over and over to tell yourself, like, No more eating out, no more DoorDash, we're just gonna buy groceries, and you continue to do it like, let's just be honest with ourselves that whatever, that feeling, that guilt, that whatever, like, it's not working, and what's happening is that you're going out and buying a week's worth of groceries for your house and still doordashing. And you're telling yourself, because of moralizing, what I need to do is cut out the DoorDash. What I need to do is cut out the DoorDash. But let's be honest, you aren't and this guy was like, at this point, just stop buying groceries, like, lean into the behavior that you're already doing, because you would be spending less money if you would just do what it's clear you want or need in that season of life than, like, trying to be someone else. And this is my Instacart, okay, like my husband has pointed out a couple of times, like, hey, like, Instacart marks the prices up on each item, and then you pay, like, even if we have, like, the membership, so we don't technically pay for delivery, but like, they mark up every item there, and then there's a service fee, then there's a tip, right? And he was like, look at this list of what you ordered, it would be 20% cheaper if you just bought these items at the grocery store. And I had to tell him, I'm aware of that, Michael, but what you need to understand is that the grocery bill would actually be 50% higher if I walked into that store and saw all of the things that I you know, like, Oh, I'll get this. Oh, that looks good. But like when I sit down at the computer, I literally put my list into Instacart. There are no end caps, there's no little coffee shop, there are no impulse buys, because I have to search each item and then select what I want. And so like we are, in fact, spending less money on groceries when we use Instacart every week, then we would be if I was going into the grocery store and living in that reality of like, that's who I am. And this is not a thing that I have the capacity to sit down and like, really fix at the moment. Nor maybe do I need to, like, it's okay. I don't have to be perfect, like, I can work with who I am, not like this. Perfected version of who I think I need to be,

    Jill Sirianni 40:07

    yeah, our idea, our fantasized self, versus the realistic version of ourselves, and learning to honor that person, the person that we are today, I think this ties so beautifully into one of our principles that that we talk about, which is honoring your season with your money, recognizing where am I at right now in life, whether that has to do with levels of stress, with work, children. How old are the kids? Single, married, living situation, whatever it is, recognizing that our finances needs to be congruent with that we can and it's one of the reasons that these one size fits all financial experts. It's not working for people because we haven't made it individualized enough to recognize the needs of individuals and how that's going to shift the way that they make money decisions. It paying off debt as quickly as possible is not the best decision for everybody. Owning a house is not the best decision for everybody. There are these things that are held up as the standard, but in reality, it needs to look different given your season of life. And I think this is a very helpful, very tangible daily way of recognizing the season that you're in. To say, I do want to eat some food at home, but I need to pay for convenience. And that's worth it for me right now, because also I'm seeing that it is decreasing the level of impulse purchases that I'm making as well. So somebody might look at this and say that's a waste of money, but for me, in this season, raising kids, this is going to be the most helpful decision that I can make. It's efficient. It helps make other jobs easier or unnecessary for me in the future, and this is something I'm willing to pay for as a result of that. And I think when we can really take find that permission, take the guilt and shame out of it, be very fully aware of where our money's going, why it's going there, then have at it. We can even create space in the spending plan for impulse purchases. If we know that we like to go out and we like to be able to get ourselves a little treat. Fine, make room for it. This does not have to be deprivation. It just needs to be eyes wide open so we can be certain we're making beneficial decisions for ourselves that are serving us, not just serving corporations.

    KC Davis 42:35

    I like when you talk about, like, values based spending, and I feel like one of the things that you are really emphasizing is that, like, I don't think that necessarily that sentence like values based spending is like, revolutionary. But what is revolutionary is that you're emphasizing that it actually be your values, because we have such internalized set of like, what the value should be like, we should have no debt, we should not impulse spend. Shopping shouldn't be to, you know, change your feelings. And it's like, I mean, if you're having a bad day and you want to go, like, obviously, I'm not saying like this, like, reckless overconsumption, but like, make sure it's your values. Like, like, you said, like, you can value convenience and that doesn't have that's not like, morally worse than valuing like, you know, homegrown, you know, made from scratch. Food, you know, it's not one of those is not inherently better than the other from like, a character perspective,

    Jill Sirianni 43:29

    right? And it just might be. Then you make decisions on what are your easy nos as a result. Don't say the hard nos. Don't deprive yourself of the thing that is a lifeline for you, but find the things that are easy to say no to for me, I don't have a value for luxury handbags or high end clothing or super expensive skincare products, so that's easy nose for me. But I do love travel. I do love a really nice dinner out with friends, so that's where I'm going to be spending my money to get at some of the things that are just super enjoyable for me and for all of the other things I can get creative on how I can meet my internal needs. Sometimes, even without spending money, it doesn't even always require the super nice dinner. Sometimes it's having a potluck with friends.

    KC Davis 44:23

    I'll tell you, like my closing story on this. But you know, my husband is a corporate attorney, and so he works a lot, and one of the things that, like, we had to kind of get clear on was, like, that we value money that saves us time. Because the reality is, like something that like you. If I say, like my husband and I will Door Dash like a Gatorade and a can of dip. And you might think, like, that's so wasteful, that's so over the top, that's so silly, like, why can't you just go to the whatever, whatever, right? But the truth is, oftentimes, like the difference between you. Like, my husband getting home and time to put the kids to bed, and missing bedtime is like, the 30 minutes it would take, or even the 20 minutes it would take for him to, like, pull off the highway Park, go inside a gas station, get what he needs. And even if someone was like, oh, okay, well, he could go out after that. Well, like, Yeah, but then, like, I want to hang out with him. You know the amount of times that we are, like, ordering dinner, and he's like, let me just go get it. I don't want to pay and I'm like, I want to buy back that 45 minutes with you. I just want to get it delivered. And, like, when we started thinking of things that way, like, you know, we're not someone that has a lot to show for how much money we spend in the year, at the end of the year, but that's because we realize that we value experiences and not even, like big vacations. Like we don't even really do that, but like, we value being able to see our family a lot in the year and go see them, and we also value just like, making our life easier and buying back as much time as possible to spend with each other.

    Jill Sirianni 45:58

    I think it's one of the reasons that to kind of go backwards with it, that some of these financial experts have become so big in their one size fits all, is because it can be easier to just say, Do this, don't do that. Do this, don't do that. But what you're describing, and what I'm describing, is this, getting to know yourself more and finding these foundational principles of efficiency and contentment and honoring our seasons, that takes a little bit more of introspection and kindness towards ourselves to say. How do I understand what this looks like for me, and how does that then inform the decisions that I make with my money, it's a lot more fluid. It's not as cut and dry, but it can lead to so much more freedom and permission in the ways that we choose to spend our money that is going to be completely different from somebody else and still both doing it right or okay when in beneficial ways. So it's a beautiful thing when you can start to grasp but it's not necessarily something that can happen overnight, to be making these intentional decisions feel good about it, even if somebody else might say that's not the best way to be spending your money like well, maybe not for you, but for me. These are the decisions that I've made, eyes wide open with the money that's coming in, this is how I want to steward all of the resources that are given to me, including time. It's the really, the only finite resource that we have. So if I can use some of my money, as you said, to buy back some of that time, fantastic. Well,

    KC Davis 47:40

    Jill, thank you so much for this conversation. And can you sort of tell the audience what, where they can go to get more of you, more of your excellent advice. Tell us about the book. Tell us about the podcast. Tell us everything.

    Jill Sirianni 47:50

    Yeah. Well, thanks so much, Casey, it's been so fun and an honor to be with you and your listeners. We just wrote a book called buy what you love without going broke, and it can be purchased at buy what you love book.com it's on pre order right now, but it will be shipped out to everyone who purchases in January. And then we put out a podcast two days a week, Tuesdays and Fridays, frugal friends. Podcast, wherever you listen to your podcasts.

    KC Davis 48:17

    I love that. Thank you. Jill Have a great day. You.

    Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Christy Haussler
113: Balancing Self-Care and Community Care with Nat Vikitsreth

This episode is about liberation, revolution, and social justice. We are tackling these topics from a practical perspective with my guest, Nat. Join us!

Nat Vikitsreth is a licensed clinical social worker who works with families who want to practice social justice in their daily lives but are torn between acting in their communities and at home. She helps them bridge the gap despite being tired, overwhelmed, and stretched too thin. Holding space for their beautiful intentions and walking with them on this journey are Nat’s passions.

 

Show Highlights:

  • Nat’s background as a transgender woman from Thailand who has become a clinician and a social justice organizer

  • Trying to honor our values about liberation at home and in the community

  • Being your own ally first with agility and awareness of your available bandwidth

  • Learning to hold space for accountability

  • The root causes of our suffering: white supremacy, colonialism, capitalism, and patriarchy

  • Leading with compassion in action instead of punishment

  • What it means to be truly humble

  • Nat’s advice for parents

  • Finding the sweet spot between discomfort and boundaries

  • Being realistic in your family about what causes you can support and take action on with your limited capacity

  • Nat’s words of advice about actions beyond the “sexy actions” to take

Resources and Links:

Connect with Nat Vikitsreth: Website and Come Back to Care Podcast

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC Davis 0:05

    Hello, you. Sentient ball of stardust. This is struggle care, and I'm your host, KC Davis, and we're going to be jumping into a topic today about liberation and revolution and social justice. But you know what? We're gonna get really, really practical with it, because as I say those words, some of you maybe feel inspired and energized, and maybe some of you feel exhausted and overwhelmed. And so I'm here right now with Nat wicked said, and I practiced that last name a few times. Did I do? Okay,

    Nat Vikitsreth 0:41

    it was beautiful. Casey. Okay, thank you. Thank you.

    KC Davis 0:45

    I'm so glad to have you here. Can you just share with the audience you know who you are and what you do and why you're so passionate about the topic today, absolutely,

    Nat Vikitsreth 0:55

    I get to work with families who really want to practice social justice in their day to day life, and they're torn between doing it in their communities and doing it at home with their families. And I get to help them bridge that gap. And a lot of the families that I get to work with, which is such a huge honor. They are tired, they are overwhelmed and stretched so thin. Yet tension is there, yet they have this wound from their childhood that keeps getting in the way when they want to practice those beautiful social justice intentions, so I get to hold all of those pieces together and walk with them on this journey awesome.

    KC Davis 1:49

    And can you share with us a little bit about your identity and your heritage and how some of these issues of liberation are really close to your lived experience and your passions?

    Nat Vikitsreth 1:59

    I was born and raised in Thailand, in a Thai, Chinese family, and as a transgender woman who's also a social justice organizer and a clinician, I get to combine all of the things that I love into my work with families. I started out as a sex worker and doing social justice organizing amongst our trans sex worker community in Thailand. And then I moved into working with little children with autism, and I just fell in love with working with little children and families.

    KC Davis 2:39

    That's amazing. The you know, the two things that I really wanted us to get in today, and they kind of mirror each other, is that I feel like a lot of people struggle with this idea of self care versus community care, so it feels as though they're having to choose between. How do I take care of myself so I don't feel overwhelmed, so I don't feel in despair. But how do I also stay plugged in to maybe the world stage and what's happening to other people that are being oppressed and being marginalized and and it feels like they have to pick between one or the other. And then, very similar to that is, you know, something you spoke to, which is people who are parents, who are going, Okay, I, you know, I would love to be involved in some of these issues, but I don't have the time, you know, to go out and be in a protest, or maybe I don't have the time to organize or be involved. I feel like everything is kind of right here at home. And, yeah, I guess I want to teach my kids about these things, but is that enough? Like, can I really not do anything outside the home, but I do want to do want to do some things outside the home, and it kind of feels like there's not enough time and energy to do both. So I'm hoping that people at home, whether they're parents or whether they're childless, or whatever their family situation, is this idea of trying to honor our values towards liberation in our homes and in our communities and in the broader kind of like, world stage, like, I just want to acknowledge, like, it's super difficult.

    Nat Vikitsreth 4:05

    It is, especially when we play by the script written by white supremacy, capitalism, colonialism and patriarchy that's centering us, our individual will and our individual action, where, if I don't take action, I am failing as a human right. The same thing applies here, that if we center our will and our action instead of our collective action and liberation, then we just fall into that trap that the oppressor want us to fall, which is, oh, it's, it's too big for me, then I'm not going to do anything. So what I often say to people who want to take action but are so tired is that we must be our own ally first before being our. Eyes to other people, and that means, instead of focusing on what's the right strategy that I need to do, what if we focus on agility, where let me check in with my bandwidth? Do I have enough to step in and take action? And we'll get into details about what the options can be based on disability justice movements and things like that. Or do I have just enough bandwidth to step back a little bit Fill my cup, and once it's filled, I can step back into action? That's the agility. How much bandwidth do I have, and what can I do?

    KC Davis 5:44

    And I appreciate that what you're describing is an embodiment of a fluid movement, because I feel like where a lot of us get stuck sometimes is that, you know, you'll hear someone say, I don't know what's going on in Palestine because it's all too overwhelming, and I have anxiety, and then you'll have this kind of flood of people that will really say, like, how dare you. How privileged of you. I'm sure people in Palestine would love to turn the TV off and not think it. And it's not that there's not some truth, because there are people who say that from a perspective of, you know, I don't want to be involved or, or, oh, I want to center my comfort and let like there's some validity to we don't just get to unplug because it's uncomfortable. But at the same time, I feel like sometimes that white supremacy motive of like, if you are not acting, you're a bad person, morally, gets used and weaponized even within social justice communities, where we're policing each other and but then you have the people that aren't doing anything, weaponizing even that, and being like, well, you're not allowed to police me. And it's like, well, and it's so it's like this whole mess of, is it accountability, or is it policing? Is it self care, or is it sticking your head in the sand? And, and, you know, I know, even personally, like I've had friends call me and say, I really don't want to be the person that just puts their head in the sand, but I am really struggling. I feel like, if I'm, you know, if I'm on tick tock, and a video comes up talking about the genocide in Congo, I feel like, if I scroll past it, I'm being a bad person, because I should look, and I should pay attention. And then you'll have people that say, you know, and so there's this interesting tension there to me, where it is, you know, at some point, yeah, if I'm just saying, Oh, I have the privilege to not have to look at anything distressing that doesn't feel right, but at the same time, forcing myself to never be able to opt out of something distressing is now overwhelming my system to the point I can't take any action.

    Nat Vikitsreth 7:51

    Yes, Casey, thank you so much for naming Congo Palestine and the lives of children that are being lost and children that are being starved, right? And this tension is so needed. If any of us is feeling that tension, it indicates to me, humbly that we're in the ring. We're taking action, we're getting into the mess. So why not give ourselves a little bit of grace and and this conversation just came up in my community too, when I work with black indigenous youth organizer of color, that we just want to take action. We just want to take action. We want to jump in because the global injustice is so strong, we must hold ourselves accountable, and we need to take pause on that idea of accountability as punishment and disguise. It's really difficult to hold someone accountable, and the alternative is to hold space for accountability. Let me

    KC Davis 9:09

    sit with that for a minute, because, you know, I've had a lot of interesting experiences with kind of that word accountability in a community sense, where, you know, where I've almost had these thoughts of like, you know, accountability is not something you can force onto someone else. It's only something we can take for ourselves, and then at the end of the day, sometimes, you know, I'll take accountability, but the other person doesn't think that I have or I didn't do it in a way that they wanted to see it, or it wasn't good enough, or there's some, you know, accusations about my motives behind it, and it's hard to be in that space where, okay, I don't want to be too defensive, and I want to look at myself and I, you know, then you almost get in this rabbit hole of, I don't know if I know that I have blind spots, but am I always. An unreliable narrator to my own reality, yes,

    Nat Vikitsreth 10:02

    right, like you can't see what you can't see, and that narrative of okay to be accountable, I need to take action, otherwise I'm going to be punished. And then to your that accountability can only look like a, b and c, otherwise it's not accountable enough or accountable in the wrong way. So we end up policing one another into conformity, where in my trans community, when we organize, we often aim for how do we be different together, different in our interventions, different in our strategies, and even different in our values. So when we hold space for someone to be accountable to say it differently, it means I love you so much. What support do you need to take action?

    KC Davis 11:01

    Gosh, and think about how different that is, to hold space for someone else, to be accountable, to come to them and say, you know, I love you so much. What do you need right now in order to, you know, take a look at what's going on with you and start to take steps towards, you know, what feels more aligned with your values?

    Nat Vikitsreth 11:23

    Yes, yes. I'm

    KC Davis 11:25

    kind of curious as we're talking and I'm gonna Google it real quick. I feel like accountability is one of those words, and I'm kind of curious what that like. Can I get a definition? Of course, it's gonna tell me how to make an email account. Okay, accountability, responsibility, okay, let's see. Let's see. Let's

    Nat Vikitsreth 11:46

    see. I

    KC Davis 11:48

    want someone to give me to make an account,

    Nat Vikitsreth 11:52

    to make an account, to make,

    KC Davis 11:57

    to make an account of one's behavior. Let me see if that says something. I

    Nat Vikitsreth 12:08

    can always cut this off.

    But I thought that we're exploring and learning. Yeah, we're in real time. We need this

    KC Davis 12:20

    because something tells me that to make an account doesn't mean just saying you were wrong or just saying, you know you agree with someone or I don't know. It's interesting

    Nat Vikitsreth 12:37

    to me, yeah, and I'm approaching this idea of accountability Casey through the lens of transformative justice, meaning that we look at the root causes of our suffering, and it's again, White supremacy, colonialism, capitalism and patriarchy, and because we're swimming in this water together, it's really hard for me to fault you for hurting me without understanding the root causes. So when hurt and harm happens, the community comes together and ask, yeah, we're surviving under the same systemic oppression. How do we move through it together without involving the police, without saving one another? Like, what do we need to move together forward?

    KC Davis 13:36

    Hmm, okay, here's some interesting things. So to call someone to account means to hold them accountable, to blame them or to reprimand them. It could also, which is an interesting right, but it says it could also mean to ask for an explanation of something. For example, the people responsible for the accident must be brought to account. It says synonyms of call someone to account, include blame, cast a stone, hold responsible. It's interesting how deeply entwined those things are with this idea of blame and how that's not, that's not like quite it. But I love this idea of like to call someone to explain, or to examine or to you know, and what's interesting, I think, is this idea of like to call someone to account as the idea of asking for an explanation, it's almost like I'm not coming in with this, like I know that you're wrong, but it's like this looks strange. This looks concerning. Let's come to the table and talk about it, because maybe I don't know all the information, or maybe you're needing some help, or maybe there's something that you need from us, and I think that's an interesting way to look at it. I.

    Nat Vikitsreth 15:01

    And that's compassion in action. Instead of leading with punishment, let's explore what your needs are. How can we show up for you? How do we move together through this? And to me, that's accountability, and I'm so struck by the definition of blame and cast a stone which is so deeply embedded in our cultural narrative, the punishment piece right where the military force in Israel also has that texture of punishment, and they're training the police force in the US again, same texture of punishment, and it trickles down into our home when we try to, quote, unquote, hold our children accountable for their behaviors. And is it truly accountability, or is it punishment that

    KC Davis 15:57

    is like the words you hear as you will hear Israel say, we will hold these terrorists to account. We will hold them accountable. And then, you know, we have mass bombing of civilians. And so it does make you think, gosh, do we even have the right words to describe what we want to be talking about now? And I think you know, we're our own first bully when it comes to these things,

    Nat Vikitsreth 16:18

    yes, and it serves the system of oppression so well when we keep blaming ourselves and shutting down and not taking action because of shame, and that keeps us stuck in cynicism and despair, instead of mobilizing Together with our neighbors, with us with each other. And I always say this Casey, because I work with parents who are so stretched so thinly across every direction, especially now back to school season, that across races, places and classes. We all want our kids to have better lives than we had, but we're surviving, trying to get through the day in one piece, paying the bills, putting food on the table together without a lot of support right, like structural child care, paid parental leave and so on. So sometimes we're left with our tiny bandwidth to only teaching our little ones how to survive, and if we pause long enough, we can hear our wisdom that says, But teaching my kids how to survive the system is not the same as giving them a different childhood, like we all know this, right? So I think lots of grace to ourselves trying to do what we can. Yeah, it

    KC Davis 18:00

    reminds me, too, of, I think one of the biggest things that I learned when I got sober was, you know, I had really poor self esteem, and I wanted high self esteem, right? And I focused so much on that, and I realized, and I think it's actually, it might actually be like a CS Lewis quote, where he talks about, you know that, like, Oh, God, I'm going to butcher it, but something about the fact that, like, it's not about thinking higher of yourself. It's thinking of yourself less. It's not trying to fix how you think about yourself. It's trying to adjust the amount you think about yourself.

    Nat Vikitsreth 18:42

    Oh, and how did that unfold for you in action?

    KC Davis 18:46

    I think because, you know, when I thought that I was so awful and worthless, I was thinking about that all the time. I was interpreting all of the events around me as being about that. And then I got sober, and I started being like a productive member of society. But what I noticed was, even though I'm not doing these quote, unquote bad things, like, I'm not stealing, I'm not, you know, cheating, I'm not lying, I'm not being self destructive, I'm doing good pro social things, but I'm still thinking about myself just as much. And does this Okay? That makes me a good person, okay? That makes me Okay, okay. That makes me lovable. And I think the real freedom came when I just stopped thinking about what things meant about me in general. And I feel like that's like one of those first steps you're talking about, which is, is possible to think about what's the right thing to do without first thinking, like, how am I going to feel about the right thing to do? What is the thing to do? What does it mean if I don't do the right thing? What does it mean if I don't like, you don't have to have like, like a self reflection filter about your worthiness. You know what I mean,

    Nat Vikitsreth 19:56

    absolutely. Yeah. Yeah. I'm just so curious if I can ask a follow up question that thinking of yourself less, did that transform at all along your journey as you're practicing liberation or anti racism, at becoming an ally and accomplice? You

    KC Davis 20:19

    know, I think that, I mean, I come from a pretty liberal family that's always been involved in social justice causes, but what I found is that that happened as I deconstructed from evangelicalism. And I didn't deconstruct from faith completely, but I deconstructed from that sort of Puritanism, and that was the big part. And I remember the CS Lewis quote. It was about humility. It said humility is not thinking less of yourself, it's thinking of yourself less

    Nat Vikitsreth 20:51

    that is powerful,

    KC Davis 20:53

    which I think is powerful, especially in regards to social justice, like if we you know, we talk a lot about how important it is to be humble, and, you know, thinking about how awful you are for not taking action is also not being humble. That's like thinking about yourself a lot and kind of making it about yourself. Yeah,

    Nat Vikitsreth 21:16

    because another thread that we talk about a lot in our movement work is, who do we center, and who do we decenter? And the tension that we talked about in the beginning is there where it's such a human thing that we are hardwired for belonging. So of course, we're going to examine, Am I doing the right thing? Am I doing enough? Am I hurting someone? And on the other side of the same coin for us to move towards liberation together, it's not about me, it's not about you, it's about us. So is this action moving us closer to our values? What we the question that the parents in our come back to care community ask is, what's adaptive right now?

    KC Davis 22:14

    And where do parents start with that? Where do they start with, okay, I don't have enough to do. You know? I don't feel like I have enough to do 100% at home or 100% in the community. And so, you know, what do I do from here?

    Nat Vikitsreth 22:30

    Yeah, and it starts with how much bandwidth do I have, realistically, brutally, honestly speaking,

    KC Davis 22:39

    right? And do you encourage people to think of bandwidth, like, as because this is something that I feel like a lot of people struggle with, is that if you ask me, like, Can you do it? This is something I get onto my husband a lot, because he'll be like, Well, he'll be doing something at like, 11 o'clock at night. We were like, in the middle of, you know, doing something together, and he'd be like, well, they asked me if I could do it. And like, technically, I can, and I'm like, but can is more than just, are you physically able to do it? It's also about like, you know, there are other things in your life that you're allowed to prioritize. And like, am I looking for? You know, my bandwidth on a scale of one to burnt out, like, am I responsible for doing everything right to south of the, you know, one point before burnout, that's a hard question. What? Even, just like that first question about bandwidth,

    Nat Vikitsreth 23:34

    that is, that is, oh my gosh, I love this so much. Because how do we know? Especially growing up surviving capitalism, we, all, most of us, are trained to override our discomfort and produce and produce and perform and perform.

    KC Davis 23:54

    And I have this theory that that is why that is not only responsible for us overworking, but I think in places where we selfishly prioritize our own comfort or selfishly take more than we need, I think that comes from that same system, because if you know this system is going to push you until you break, and it's not going to give you your fair Share, the only way for you to not break is to just take what you can. Oh, you know, like it's, I think of it this way, like, if you never believed that, let's say that, like you have parents that every day when you woke up if you were sick, they never believed you and made you go to school anyways. Well, then you would eventually learn that, like, the only way for me to take care of myself is to be overly dramatic when I'm sick, or to, you know, to have to lie and manipulate and take more than what I need. And then I'll say, Well, okay, then if you won't let me rest, then I'll lie and say I'm gonna go work on homework, and instead, I'll go do this. You know what I mean? It's like. That sort of like, I have to be super comfortable all the time. I wonder if there's like, that flip side of the coin

    Nat Vikitsreth 25:07

    again, Casey. It's how the societal thing trickles down into our home, and then it gets reinforced. And when those who raised us weren't holding space and reflecting back, oh, you're sick. What do you need? Your body might need rest, and rest is equally important than productivity. Then how do we know? When are we overriding our limits? Right? And I had to relearn what that feels like in my body, and it's so dependent on you and your background and intersecting identity. But for me, I had to find that sweet spot Casey between discomfort and boundaries. Because yes, if I'm going to take action for justice and liberation, it's going to be past my discomfort, because risk is involved. But how far can I push that? It's not going to go beyond my physical, spiritual boundaries, and for me, if it goes past my boundary that I set, it becomes people pleasing, right? That I'm gonna do this because I want to be perceived as a good ally, as a good human, as a person who knows what she's talking about. I know that my throat will close up, palm sweating, yeah, was

    KC Davis 26:42

    talking about deconstructing from evangelicalism a minute ago. I think another big part of that is like having to deconstruct this idea that punishment is purifying, that like that, like pain is atoning. Because a lot of times, you know, I was talking to a friend recently, and they were talking about that same thing, about, like, scrolling on the end. It's like, okay,

    Nat Vikitsreth 27:06

    it's like, it's

    KC Davis 27:07

    a video of, you know, some really pick your tragedy, whether it's, you know, a black woman being murdered by the police, or, you know, people starving and Congo. And it's like, every I'm making myself watch it, and I'm not gaining any new information. From the video. I'm not being inspired to more action by like there's no there's no new information there for me to gain, to inform my actions in this it's simply that I feel as though being assaulted by the distress and the trauma of it is like making me a good ally, or that it would be selfish to not have to look at it because, you know, oh, now I feel so guilty about how privileged I am, and it's that interesting. Like, what do you think just putting yourself through the pain of witnessing that over and over and over is doing because if it's not giving you more information,

    Nat Vikitsreth 28:09

    right, and it drains you even further from the little bandwidth you have left to go take Action and this idea of self punishment that runs deep. That runs so deep, Casey, and then we mistake that for that's me being an ally for the day, consuming that information, hurting myself, right? And when I see parents that I work with who do this, and they love their kids so much, and as they're scrolling, and then their kids come in, bidding for connection, they snap, yell, the cycle continues. So I think a lot of us know this pattern so well. So what are the alternatives that we can spend our energy on?

    Yeah, I will say one thing that has

    KC Davis 29:08

    really helped me is finding sources of information that I can proactively seek out as a and letting my and not like feeling like I have to consume every piece of information that's pushed to me, pushed to you, yeah? So if that's yeah, so that's like a reputable news site, or maybe one account that I can go and look up and see because they're giving updates on a situation. Or if it's like an organization that has sort of taken on something as their you know what they're talking about in action items like somewhere else that I can go, you know, whether it's once a week or once a day, and go, Okay, hey, what's going on with that situation XYZ and where I'm proactively like, made like, being knowledge. Or like being aware, like I'm proactively being aware, instead of just like reactively dealing with information being pushed to me about whatever that topic is.

    Nat Vikitsreth 30:10

    It takes so much self awareness. I'm not shaming social media. I'm human, and I'm on Instagram search page looking for cute animal videos, mainly squirrels and red pandas. And I love it, yeah for my body and my nervous system, the first five minutes, so blissful. I love it so much watching these fluffy animals. But beyond that, I start to notice my body just my brain turning into mush. I'm feeling kind of numbed out, and that tells me, Okay, I gotta put the phone down. So hard to do, but it's time. So it takes a lot of self awareness to know what your limits are and how much information do you need to go take action.

    KC Davis 31:01

    And if we're to talk about taking action, I feel like the actions that get PRI like, there is definitely a hierarchy of actions to take in, like, various liberation movies, right? And I feel like the top of that hierarchy is like, very like, patriarchy, coded, right? It's like people who can go out and be in protests in black block with their signs, and people who can make several videos a day, you know, updating a situation. And I'm just thinking about, like, all of these women who are, like, nursing babies and making dinner and, you know, like, I can't, like, there was a protest in my area the other day. And, you know, I don't know if you guys are super plugged into protest, but like, you don't often have a lot of time to be aware. Like, they'll tell you, like, tomorrow, six o'clock City Hall. And like, I would love to be a part of that, but like, I almost never can get childcare that quickly, right? You know. And sometimes you know, if you know, hey, it's a school board meeting in six weeks and an important issue is coming up. And like, okay, you can arrange for that. But you know, going to a school board issue isn't at the top of the hierarchy. No,

    Nat Vikitsreth 32:17

    it's not sexy, right? We often aim for sexy actions that are going to get the most coverage, the most visibility, the most Look at me.

    KC Davis 32:31

    I'm doing the and how do you help? We know when you talked about capacity, and I was thinking of capacity in terms of how much can I be involved in. You know, the causes that matter, but how do you talk to families about capacity, just of how many causes they can realistically keep tabs on and be active in at any given time? I mean, I remember, you know, I had a, this is like a little vulnerable to say, but I have, I for maybe eight months now, I've been running a campaign for Palestinian relief, and then, you know, I have a young child that's autistic that has eloped a couple of times, and one of the last times that it happened, the sheriff's department came over to visit with us and said, Hey, there's this program called Project Lifesaver, where We can issue a tracking bracelet to your daughter, and if she were to ever get away from you, like, we could find her within minutes down to the foot of where she is. And, you know, it's a free program, but there's a waiting list, and when they came to give it to her, you know, I asked, like, how many people are on the waiting list now? And he was like, Yeah, it's like, 50 families. You know, we're not, we're run by donations. We don't have any grants. We don't have any funding, like, so and so, like, I really wanted to, I talked to my husband about and I was like, I feel like we could get people together and clear this waiting list. And so I made a fundraiser for it, and I made a video for it, and when I went to, like, put it on the top of my link tree. You know, it was like, okay, that the Palestinian fundraiser raised a ton of money. And I had this moment of like, Am I allowed to do this? Do I have to keep them both on there is someone going to be angry with me, because I understand the genocide is still happening. But now I've switched to talking about this other issue, which is like a local issue, and it there was some conflict there. And so, like, how do you help families? Think about, you know, how many like am I like? Should I be keeping up with everything? And at what point is it me being selfish by only looking at, you know, the ones that affect me or the ones in my local community? Because surely, we need people to do both. But how am I supposed to think about

    Nat Vikitsreth 34:41

    that? Yes, oh, Casey, I'm letting that sink in. Right. When you talk about mobilizing people in your community for that program, there's that creativity and generativity and vitality in organizing. Your local community. Yes, it stems from a real need, but there's that generativity in there, right? That we often don't talk about. We talk about the suffering of, oh, I need to organize and mobilize to address this real issue. It's real. And when we gather people and we address the issues together, it's beautiful, right? And that's hope that I hope it can refuel us to do this work. And to your point about, how do I choose? There are 5000 issues, and the tension is, yeah, we can't be everything for everyone all the time with our limited capacity, but we keep our clear eyes and heart on the political analysis. We know that the issues in Palestine and the issue in our backyard are connected, the issues in black communities and the issues in trans community are connected the environmental issues and the indigenous issues are connected. So Grace and trust in our community that when we address one the ripple effects throughout the whole ecosystem,

    KC Davis 36:22

    you Wow, wow. That's really moving. I really feel I got kind of emotional in hearing that. And it's not like it's not, you know, it shouldn't be mind blowing. And I've heard people talk about, you know that before, but the way that you stated, it was very empowering. Maybe that's it. Maybe I usually hear it in terms of, you have to care about this, because this is related to this. And you know, if you don't care about this, then you you know, you don't understand. And as opposed to this idea of, where is your you know, what is your bandwidth and what is your capacity? And sort of that belief and knowledge of you know there are several different systems, like there's one system that is broken in several parts, right?

    Nat Vikitsreth 37:10

    That's right. And pick one, pick your entry point. The best teachers for me doing this organizing work Casey, are poor, working class, disabled women, mothers, femme identified bodies who have limited capacity, because they have to survive so many systems all at once. Yet they get together, yet they mobilize, yet they do political analysis, yet they take direct action within their capacities, because that's what they can do. And for me, when I work with parents, I ask, what's your gift? What can you bring to the table? And just do that. Let's not just aim for the sexy action or a one time donation, but can we aim for the boring, mundane stuff marim Kaba talks about, you know, she does boring things with protest and organizing, where they would go early to set up the space and leave last to sweep all the trash if you can't go to the protest. Can you do that? If you can't go to the protest, can you set up a spreadsheet that organize ride shares or pick up and drop off for people who want to be on site and protest. Or can you like, Hey, bring your kids if you want to go marching, I'll do childcare. Or I'll bring cookies to the meeting. And we all have our sites of change, school board meeting, Trader Joe's grocery person at checkout, our neighbor, our relative at the bus stop. The possibilities are, I think, endless.

    KC Davis 39:14

    So when we think about these various spheres of you know, influence, it also kind of strikes me that one of the questions is, like, where, if I'm looking at my bandwidth and it's, you know, this big or this big, like, in what ways is my participation most impactful, you know, like, where are my spheres of influence? And you know, you're going back to you talking about, like, okay, there's the sexy things to do, or there's the the main cause happening that you can kind of do and, and I think, you know this idea that what's hard, I think, is going, Okay, this is an important thing. I don't have a large sphere of influence. That overlaps with this thing. I don't have a heavy sphere of influence that will affect this thing. You know, I don't, maybe have a ton of finances that could move the needle or could contribute. But what I what I do have, can I do it? So maybe it is, even if this is the largest cause on everyone's mind, okay, I have a few bucks to give to this, and I can call, I can email a representative and share a Facebook post and like, maybe that's all my sphere of influence can really afford to do with this. But if once I've done it, like, can I then allow myself to go, okay, that's what I could do. And now, you know where the are, there other areas or things that I can do that are going to be you know that I can use my more of my other capacity for or that I could you know what I mean? It's kind of like I've done what I can do. There's no point of me continuing to have anxiety about it. There's no Pass Fail. There's no pass fail. I remember I had another friend call and was talking about, you know, I almost feel guilty having fun with my family when I know that, you know, and then fill in the blank that there's a genocide in Palestine, that there's a a genocide in Congo, that there is famine, that there is, you know, people being, you know, shot in their own homes, like I almost feel guilty going on vacation, or, you know, having a party, or, you know, sitting down and reading and wanting to call a friend of like, and something that I said to her, I didn't realize I really needed to hear it and it, I said, this is going to sound kind of shocking, but like, horrible tragedies have happened since the dawn of time, and people have always baked pies while they were happening. So I'm not saying ignore it or put your head in the sand or don't, but like, it's actually very weird that at this day and age, we can be so connected to every single tragedy that's happening. It's not normal for the scope of humanity, for us to be so in tuned with tragedies that we have so little sphere of influence over like it. Usually, if something was happening, it was because it was, you know, the town next door, or it was, you know, in your country, or somebody knew about it, or, you know, but at the same time, like there's people are still having babies and baking pies and wrestling on, you know, the floor with their kids. And I think sometimes that is hard. Am I allowed to continue to have joy? You know, without it's almost like a survivor's guilt,

    Nat Vikitsreth 42:39

    yes, and what I hear from the parents in my community too is I tuck my kids in at night, knowing that some other families don't get to do that, and getting Real about our capacity and what we can do while holding next to it all the tragedies that are happening to show up in solidarity with others. We gotta be ready. Our cup cannot be dry. We know this right? And the guilt is so real Casey, it's so so real. And to put my therapist hat on is to ask the question of, so how do we mobilize that guilt into action? But the human part in me, I carry that guilt too, like I was treating myself with pizza the other day, so excited to eat the first moment I opened the box, and I have my phone, my Instagram on the other hand, and I see pictures of children starving, or rather made To be starved. And it was a choice point. Am I gonna let the skill take over? Like, I know my body needs nourishment and my bandwidth needs to be replenished, my cup needs to be refilled so that I can go back and take action tomorrow?

    KC Davis 44:18

    Yeah, that sort of filter of like, sphere of influence is, I think, a really helpful for those moments where it's like, Can this feeling, this distress, this guilt, is whatever, like, Can this inform or mobilize me into an action item? Because sometimes the answer is yes, and sometimes the answer is no, no. There's not really any more action items here. You know, there's not

    Nat Vikitsreth 44:41

    That's right, that's right, that sweet spot before guilt turns into shame, we are okay. So what am I gonna do about it? Yes, my heart is breaking. What am I gonna do? Yes, I'm feeling guilty about the joy that I'm cultivating to fill my cup. What am I gonna do? And it could be, what am I gonna do tomorrow? Makeup is a little fuller, but right now, can I give myself grace and permission to cultivate joy? Right? Because, throughout history of organizing Casey, they're artists. They're poets who write as they process, who make art as they process their grief and rage and heartbreak, and who, mothers, femme, identified bodies and humans who bake pies, right? And I think we talked about that briefly, where there's always going to be oppression, people who put us in hierarchy of worthiness. But as long as there's oppression, there's always resistance, and sometimes resistance is taking place in the kitchen where I'm going to knead the pie dough together, mobilizing grief and heartbreak out of my body by moving bilaterally. At midline, there's rhythm, there's humming, there's music, there's connection with the land, with the spirits. They're swaying and rocking up the body. There are ways throughout history that people are unapologetically moving through grief and heartbreak well,

    KC Davis 46:17

    and just you saying that, you know, I think it finally hit me that it's not resistance if you're giving in to the despair, resistance is also resisting the despair, resisting the hopelessness, because those are the weapons of oppressive systems. And if you're not resisting that, it's not resistance.

    Nat Vikitsreth 46:41

    No, it's gaslighting ourselves into what the oppressors want us to do. And it's not moving the needle. It's not helping us stay in the struggle, right? If my trans community, my Asian immigrant communities, we can't afford other like more people burnt out and not take action.

    KC Davis 47:05

    Now this has been such a wonderful conversation. Can you plug yourself and your accounts and where can people find you and see more of what you do?

    Nat Vikitsreth 47:16

    Thank you for asking Casey. I can mobilize families and people to do this liberation work. But when it comes to talking about myself, I have no word. So please be patient with me. All of my information, along with my podcast, which is called come back to care. Is at comeback to care.com, and then work with parents and families, people who love and raise young children and want to heal their inner child wounds and internalized oppression wounds so they can really show up as an ally, as a parent, as a human, and do this liberation work for the long haul. Well,

    KC Davis 48:01

    I can't thank you enough, and we will put those in the show notes that people know where to go. And I hope that you have a wonderful day.

    Nat Vikitsreth 48:09

    You too, KC. Please take care. You.

    Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Christy Haussler
112: When a Loved One Won’t Seek Mental Health Treatment with Dr. Alec Pollard

What do you do when a loved one won’t seek the mental health treatment that they obviously need? We are looking at the very important topic of mental health from the perspective of your concern for a loved one who might be resistant to asking for help, and what you can do about it. I’m joined by Dr. Alec Pollard, a co-author of When A Loved One Won't Seek Mental Health Treatment: How to Promote Recovery and Reclaim Your Family’s Well-Being. With a long career as a clinical psychologist, he is the founding director of the St. Louis Behavioral Medicine Institute. Join us to learn more!

Show Highlights:

  • Dr. Pollard’s background and four decades of experience as a psychologist 

  • Turning his focus to help those who are concerned about their loved one’s mental health

  • Dr. Pollard explains The Family Well-Being Approach/Consultation

  • Two types of accommodations that loved ones make: commission and omission

  • Differentiation between appropriate and inappropriate accommodations for a loved one

  • Recovery avoidance: a pattern of behavior that is inconsistent with the process of recovery

  • Creating opportunities for a loved one to get better through support, incentives, and positive rewards

  • Dr. Pollard’s book and its approach of finding a balance between long-term planning and crisis management

  • Dr. Pollard’s takeaway about his book as his proudest achievement in his career

Resources and Links:

Connect with Dr. Alec Pollard: St. Louis Behavioral Medicine Institute and When A Loved One Won't Seek Mental Health Treatment

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC Davis 0:00

    Music. Hello, you sentient balls of stardust. Welcome to struggle. Care. I'm your host, KC Davis, and I have a guest with me today, Dr Alec Pollard, and we're going to talk about, what do you do when someone that you love doesn't want to seek out mental health treatment that they, in your opinion, probably very much need I talk a lot about mental health on the podcast, but I'm usually talking about mental health from the perspective of you being the person looking for help. But I know that things get really complicated when it's someone that you love that needs help that maybe feels resistant to it, and so for that reason, Alec, thank you for being here. You and some of your colleagues wrote a book, and the name of that book, let me pull it up here, when a loved one won't seek mental health treatment, correct. So tell me a little bit about yourself and how this came to fruition. Well,

    Dr. Alec Pollard 0:55

    I'm a psychologist. I've been practicing, I won't say how many years, but let's just say I was a child prodigy, certainly, of course, but okay, I'll admit it, almost 45 years, I've been practicing at this point, and I started off with my interest in specializing in OCD and anxiety disorders, and that was truly my love for many years, in terms of both research and clinical work and teaching and training, but at some point myself and my colleagues would get these calls, and we're not alone in this, and it would be somebody, it might be the husband of someone, the wife, the parent, the child, the adult child of someone with a mental illness, who would say something along the lines of, he or she has got this serious problem, it's affecting the rest of us, but they won't get help, either because they deny it's a problem, or they agree it's a problem, but they're working on it themselves. They don't need help whatever it is. And so what can you do to help us? And then we would say, well, not much have him call us when he's ready. And that's pretty much what we call in the book, Doctor typical. And we were Doctor typical, because that's what you know to do. You're not a miracle worker. Can't make somebody want to change. And so that's what we said for a number of years. And finally, we were feeling guilty about that, because we had real human beings calling us, it's suffering, and that's kind of what we're supposed to do, is to help people who are suffering, and we were just turning them down. And so we realized that, well, maybe we can help the families, if nothing else, to reduce the impact for the mental illness of their family member on their lives. And so we started sharing ideas and researching the literature. Found that there was very little directly about this topic. There were lots of things to draw upon, which is what we did, and we also learned a lot from our colleagues in the substance use area, who are very used to people not wanting help and denying that they have a problem. So we took some things from them. I'm happy to say that I've never had the original idea in my life. I I just steal from everybody else, and the only original contribution, perhaps, is how we package it, put it together into a comprehensive, holistic approach. And that's nice, but, but really, we were fortunate that there were theories and interventions that we could draw upon to put together this, what we call the Family Well Being approach, or Family Well Being consultation, if it's provided by a therapist. But the book really was designed for some families, at least, to be able to do this on their own and to learn how to deal with a loved one who will not seek treatment, something we call recovery avoidance, and we can talk more about that, if that would be of interest. Well, I,

    KC Davis 4:09

    my own background is in addiction. I was a therapist in various addiction centers, and then ended up at the end of my code of addiction career working with families, and so I'm a little bit familiar with, at least the conundrum of, you know, when families are so desperate for help. And the way this book is laid out, it's, it very much is laid out. In my mind, being a practitioner, it looks like, Oh, this is someone who has had the same conversation with person after person after person after person, and after person, and then finally, kind of realized, wait a second, there's kind of a pattern here. This could kind of be systematized and given out, you know, at mass to people, because I'm really kind of saying the same things. There's kind of the same principles that I'm repeating, yes, and I find that when I used to work with people that wanted to get their person. Into, like, a drug rehab. There was kind of, like two polar opposites. You kind of had the people that were like, I think the word we would use was, like, enabling. Like, there's this idea that, well, if I just make sure that this person doesn't experience any distress, then you know, I'll get them to stop using drugs. And then on the other side of that, we had the families that were like, you know, if I make their life hard enough, if I punish them enough, if I control them enough, you know, if I if I bring enough consequences, and if I make them hit rock bottom. And I'm curious if that's been your experience, sort of generalized out to other mental health issues, because it seems like you address both of those things in the book

    Dr. Alec Pollard 5:42

    we do that's very, very good observation on your part. And so we came from the field. When we first started doing this work, it was largely with families of people suffering from OCD. And then we started to realize, well, in fact, when we first started the book, it was going to be about OCD families, and then we realized, Now, wait a minute, we've been doing this with the families of socially anxious folks, agophobics, depressed. Why are we just focusing on that so? But the reason I mentioned the OCD focus early on was in the OCD literature, there's something called accommodating, and it's very similar to enabling, and it's the concept gets has the ability to sort of be fine tuned and nuanced in our book, so that we have different types of accommodating and things like that, which are not as critical for our conversation, but it basically is the concept of enabling, and which we call accommodating. And then there's two kinds of accommodations that we're concerned about for family members. One is accommodations of commission. Those are the things people usually think about with enabling or the term accommodating, the things we do for someone that we wouldn't normally do for anyone else if they didn't have who was not disabled in some way, and those are accommodations of commission. But we also learned that something that doesn't get talked about as much as accommodations of omission, those are the things we give up in life for those people because we're accommodating, we're committing those accommodations and the social life the you know, sometimes even more extreme, you have to quit your job and realize we didn't address that early on, when we were Developing this approach, and we started to realize this is something that we're omitting that should be in there, and because we really emphasize a lot with the families the importance of cutting back on those accommodations of omission to start to bring back into their life the things that bring them, that they value the bring them meaning joy, pleasure, because, and this is, again, not a unique idea to us, is that if you, if we go, think about the flight attendant who always tells you when the oxygen mask comes down, put it on yourself first before you Try to help your children or others that you're with, and that's such a great metaphor for our whole approach, which is we're not going to even talk about how to get that family member in treatment until you've taken care of yourself, both because you need to be a model for that person, instead of telling them what to do, why don't you do it and take care of your life, your own well being. And secondly, very pragmatically, when you are stressed, when your well being is not taken care of, you are not very good at dealing with the challenge of what we call recovery avoidance and and that's the pattern. It might be helpful at some point for me to kind of define that term a little bit, but,

    KC Davis 9:12

    yeah, I want to get into what recovery avoidance is, but I only want to ask a little more follow up question about this term accommodating, because I'm interested in that term, as opposed to enabling. And I think I like it, but accommodating is also the term that we use when we're talking about, you know, okay, somebody who needs accommodations at school, someone so I'm interested in that being the word. How do you help families understand maybe the difference between, like, an appropriate accommodation for someone's disability or their mental health versus an inappropriate or a kind of accommodation that's not helpful or maybe is sort of like an over functioning on the family's part? Yeah,

    Dr. Alec Pollard 9:55

    that's a great question, and you're right, and we go into some length about. Talking about accommodating as a general term, is a good thing. You know, it's good service at a restaurant. It's, you know, when you accommodate people. And not only do we talk about it in that way, we also use that point to try to destigmatize or unshame people from thinking that somehow there they goofed up because they wanted to accommodate somebody. Their intentions were absolutely positive and good, and in most cases, accommodating is a good thing. The problem is that they don't, and they can't possibly realize this at the time is when you start accommodating a recovery avoider. That's when it's bad. So there is no general strategy that's good or bad in life. Generally, usually okay. I think shooting is bad thing. Don't shoot people, but. But even then, if somebody's attacking your family, you might have to so it's understanding the nuance of when to do something and when not to do it. I use the example of a loaning money to a friend. So it really depends on who that friend is, whether that's a good idea or a really dumb idea. And sometimes you don't know your friend well enough until it's half it's too late, but you that friend who needs that extra money to get through the last last year of college, and they get they graduate, they get a job, they put themselves on a payment plan, they pay you back every month. That ended up being a really good thing. You feel better about yourself. They get through college, it's a win, win. But that friend who maybe isn't so responsible or doesn't have the right attitude about it maybe doesn't pay you back, and then you start calling them, going, Hey, where's the money? And then tension builds, and this is just what happens in families, and then it starts to deteriorate into that conflictual

    KC Davis 12:04

    Well, it's an interesting distinction, you know, accommodating the mental illness versus accommodating the recovery avoidant behavior, yes, which I think is interesting and important, right? Because we're not just talking about, in general, a loved one with mental health. We're specifically talking about a loved one with mental health issues that is not taking the steps towards seeking any treatment, or not taking the opportunities, or not accepting the help, or not really where, where we find ourselves working harder than they are, on a consistent basis on their mental health, right? Exactly. So that's a that's an interesting distinction.

    Dr. Alec Pollard 12:45

    Yeah, no, that's exactly it. And also, you know, it's just in life in general, even without any concepts of accommodating and all the things we all know about, just as you approach life, it's a human challenge to learn and know when to change what you're doing. And you know, well, we all know that. Suppose a quote from Einstein about the definition of insanity is keep doing the same thing, but expecting a different outcome. I'm not sure he said that, but, but he gets credit all the time, but for that. So it's knowing, okay, I don't know anything about accommodating or whatever, but something's not working here. And human beings, God, love us, we sometimes get stuck in things, because, unlike computers, it's not input in analyzed and input, I mean an output. It's we filter things through what we hope and wish for, and so when we get information, we don't always use that information to change our expectations and our tactics. We just keep doing the same thing over and over again we get that's

    KC Davis 13:58

    what we always used to say in in rehab was we would tell families, you know, they'd say, Well, you know, is it right to give them money? Is it wrong to sign them up for therapy without their and we'd always say, it's not about right and wrong or good and bad. It's about what works and what doesn't work. Because if we find ourselves kind of doing these same things, these same accommodations, over and over, and that person is not helping it's not helping them. They're not getting better. They're not, you know, wanting to seek out treatment. So tell me, let's go to that point about what does it mean to be recovery avoidant, and what does that kind of cycle look like?

    Dr. Alec Pollard 14:32

    Well, we think we felt that we needed a term for this to study it, we needed to label it, to give it a term that we could begin to talk about it with, and recovery avoidance was the term that we picked. There's a and recovery avoidance we define as a pattern. First of all, it has to be a pattern. It can't be once or twice something happens, but a real pattern of behavior that is inconsistent with the process. US of recovery from whatever the problem is. And we're very adamant about emphasizing that this does not describe intentionality. No person wants to not recover to wants to be impaired. It is not no decision is made consciously. I'm going to be an impaired individual, and that is part of why the thing you were talking about the people who are maybe more conflictual in their dealings with a person with a mental illness, we call that minimizing. And again, I'll say why we did which is that it trivializes the forces that drive recovery avoidance, that make people act in ways that are inconsistent with their own welfare, and by sort of suggesting that if I lecture you one more time, you'll snap out of this, and in fact, they're not capable of snapping out of it, and certainly not on command. So So So what happens is that that the minimum we talk about two ways that families interact with recovery avoidance. One is the accommodating, and then the other one is the lectures, the nagging, the prodding, the shaming, the shaming, the guilting, the on and on and on, all the uglier sides of being human and and we try to help people not feel so ashamed of that when they look at themselves. We try as much as we can to help people feel that this is all just natural ways of reacting to very challenging situations for which none of us is prepared. Well,

    KC Davis 16:44

    a lot of people I know, at least me, I mean, most of us, I think, vacillate right. We maybe are trying the accommodating, and then it, you know, we kind of blow up and get frustrated and swing to this other side, and then we feel guilty about being so harsh, and then we come back over here, and we just kind of swing back and forth, and neither side is really working, and we're we're not really even reacting to the person we're trying to help. We're just reacting to our own internal frustrations and fears.

    Dr. Alec Pollard 17:13

    Yes, absolutely, and we would not say that you're either Accommodator or a minimizer. Everybody is both. Now some people might do more of one than the other and and that's certainly true, because we see that. But to really understand what we call the family trap, you have to understand both dynamics, the because both minimizing and accommodating. Not only do they not when we say not work, we're talking about more than not working. We're talking about actually making things worse. So we have to understand that these both accommodating and minimizing, are toxic in that they it's not just that they're ineffective. We would say at best, they're ineffective, but most of the time, they actually contribute to this trap that the whole family is in. So the more that the individual avoids recovery, the more the family accommodates, the fewer opportunities the individual has to engage in recovery behavior, and their motivation to do so goes down because they're protected from the consequences of their own disorder, which is what drives us to go to go see the doctor. For the most part, people don't go to a doctor to be a better person. Okay, maybe in some parts of California. But other than that, don't do that. And I can say that because I lived in California for four years at least. So, any rate so, and then the other part of this, and I don't have, you know, we don't have visuals here, my diagram, that's in the book. But so you have that circle of interaction, more recovery avoidance, more accommodating, fewer opportunities and and incentives to actually work on recovery. And that cycle, then you have this other loop where, because you're accommodating, you are burdened by the extra responsibilities that jeopardizes your well being, which means you're going to be cranky, irritable or anxious and afraid. None of those things help you deal effectively with recovery avoidance. So when you start the lecturing and whatever, the recovery avoider now feels number one, more afraid because you don't get it. You don't understand how hard this is. So they're distrustful of the family because they don't feel that they get it. They're more anxious, more defensive, dig their heels in, which reinforces recovery avoidance. So that's the whole thing we call the family trap. And everybody's stuck in it. They don't know how to get out. And so all right, of course, I'm going to say that our book is the way out. I'd like to think at least for some it will be you. But it's easy to see how just normal human beings can get stuck in that cycle.

    KC Davis 20:11

    I like the term opportunity. It's funny, you know, I actually just turned in the final manuscript for my book. It's about relationships and how to make decisions in relationships, and it actually pairs nicely with a lot of things that you're talking about, because it deals with, you know, what do you do when you're in a relationship with someone that maybe has some mental health difficulties, and you feel stuck between the compassion of, well, I understand where they're coming from and the reality of, okay, but this is really hurtful. And you know, what do I do and what are my obligations? And one of the things that I that I talked about is this idea of opportunities where you can't control whether someone gets better or not, whether they're willing to, or whether they're able to, or some mix of it, but we, we can look at whether or not our behavior is robbing that person of the opportunities to get better. Yes, and you know, we, all we can do is create those opportunities, not get in the way of the opportunities that would be there and be healthy enough to be the kind of support system that a person would need when they are able and willing to take those opportunities. Yes,

    Dr. Alec Pollard 21:17

    absolutely. And we would say, probably there is one more thing you can do besides creating the opportunities. You can create incentives for it. You can actually incentivize people to take advantage of those opportunities, but, and big but, well, that didn't sound right, you know what I meant? So you we don't even talk about that, that's the last step in our five step approach, because we you won't do it well if you haven't taken care of yourself first and reduced the conflict in the family. Yeah,

    KC Davis 21:55

    I was going to ask, how do you help somebody distinguish between creating incentive in a healthy, appropriate way, versus the kind of controlling, you know, oh, I'll just bribe them, right? I'll bribe them, or I'll threaten them, or I'll make these ultimatums, you know, because I can see someone engaging in those behaviors thinking, Oh, I'm creating incentive. I'm telling them I won't pay for college if they don't go to therapy. Or I'm telling them I'm going to get a divorce, if they won't, you know, take the medication?

    Dr. Alec Pollard 22:24

    Yes? Well, that the answer to that could take up the rest of our talk so, but I'm going to try to bullet point it here a little bit. Alright, so you won't be upset with me, Casey. So there's a couple of things that that distinguish sort of what we would call productive use of incentives and incentivizing versus what families often tend to do people violate. So in step five, by the way we talk about that very issue, like, well, what's the difference now you're you told us for the first four steps, we should take care of ourselves, and now you're turning us back to trying to influence the recovery avoider. And the answer is, yes, we are, but it's some fundamental differences. First of all, if you've done it right, your household is no longer filled with conflict. Not saying that the recovery avoider is cured or better, even just saying there's less conflict. So for a while you're gonna All right, so he sleeps till noon. So what? Leave him alone. You go play golf, whatever. I know I'm oversimplifying it, but it's basically stop creating unnecessary conflicts. Save your battles for if they're standing in front if they're in their room doing rituals and it bothers you. Well, you got to learn to let go of that. If they're standing in front of the television doing the rituals and you can't see it, that's different. That's what you have to focus on the things that directly interfere with your life, and then you try to let go of the other stuff. And so the whole goal of Step four is to dismantle those arguments, those contentious things, and focus on yourself more and treating both you and the recovery avoider better. So before you even get to trying to influence them directly. You are trying to get rid and you know, we have a quote before each step, you know, like some kind of defining quote. And the defining quote of step four is, if you can't do anything good, first, do no harm. That was Kurt Vonnegut quote. And so we're saying, let's stop doing harm, which means let's stop the arguments and the conflicts that are unnecessary right now and get the environment better between you and the recovery voider. That is a huge difference, because when you're mad at each other, you can't do any healthy and. Incentivizing. It's, you know, and so, so that's one big difference. The other big difference is that we focus on incentives that are immediate. So when people say, Oh, I'll pay for college if you do this, well, that's too far off, because you have to understand that the reason that people behave in ways that are sort of self defeating are not because of long term things. It's because of the immediate influences on their behavior, mostly the avoidance of something bad or the pursuit of something good. We really are not that complicated at that level, right? So I'm either going to get a high if I smoke this and or if I do this compulsion, I won't feel so bad. And so the incentives have to be more up closer in time to really be so if we just use the example of homework, that's not the big issue for everybody, but let's just pretend, instead of saying, Johnny, I'll get you a new car. Like, take the huge incentive, like, I'll get you a Mercedes Benz. Now, most of us couldn't even think about using that as an incentive, but if at the end of the semester you have straight A's, okay, well, first of all, that's pretty high straight A's. It's all or nothing. So that's a bad incentive, and it's way off better to say when you've done your homework tonight, you will earn screen time tonight based on that you got your homework done on whatever contingency, however you set it up. But that's going to be much more powerful than delayed, and because you're battling against immediate incentives that are keeping people impaired. So any rate, there are nuances to it. We go through the definition of good incentives and bad ones and healthy and most importantly, we focus almost exclusively, with some exceptions, on positive rewards, rather than because often what families have gotten themselves into is threats and negative trying to influence things through negative consequences, whether it's just yelling, arguing, threatening to kick them out, which that's an in a lot of times, the concept of tough love. One version of it is, you know, the idea that you're kicking them out of the house and tell you get treatment, you can't live here, and all that kind of stuff. And that all sounds good, and sometimes people can do that successfully. But the problem is most families can't follow through with that, and so what they've done when they kick them out of the house and then they let them back in after the first call from a homeless shelter, they've now done more harm because they've lost their credibility. So we emphasize for families do lesser things, but make sure you're ready to do them and don't do them out of impulse. Plan them all that's in the book talking about how to plan your interventions, do things that you'll follow through with, because it's about building credibility in part over time, so that when that family member hears you say, starting in June, I will no longer, or I will start blah, blah, blah, whatever it is, and they believe it. And so you reduce testing you, yeah, and that you start to get credibility, right? So that's another thing that we emphasize a lot, is don't be so ambitious. Start easy and make sure you can follow through with it, because that's going to build on your ability to be effective with that person down the road.

    KC Davis 28:55

    Well, we're running up out of time here, but I just wanted to say that the book is chocked full of really, really practical things. And I like the balance between long term planning and like crisis management. Like, what do I do right now when this thing's in front of me, speaking of in front of me, I think I have a child about to run in here. That's life. It's okay. And I do, I do, honestly, really like the book. It does seem to mirror a lot of the lessons that I learned, you know, just in working with people in addiction, which I, you know, is my stamp of approval there. And so again, for everybody, it's when a loved one won't seek mental health treatment, how to promote recovery and reclaim your family's well being. And so I really encourage everyone to check that out. Do you have any last kind of things that you want to say about the book? What is the thing you're most proud of in

    Dr. Alec Pollard 29:48

    the book? Well, I will say, I think this is the thing in my career, which is, I've already admitted has been rather long. I think it's the thing I've done a lot of things, and I. I won't go on about it, but just I've done a lot of things I think I'm proud of in my career, but I think this is the one that I'm the most proud and mostly because I think we've started to create thinking about and again, other people have, you know, set the tone for us, and we used their information to go a step further, but I hope that we've opened up the door for a whole group of people that otherwise were ignored and neglected, and not the recovery avoiders, although them too, they will benefit, but these family members that so many of us have been ignoring for years, They're suffering, and I'm hoping that we can do some good there.

    KC Davis 30:43

    Well, it's a great book, and I'm going to be recommending it to people, for sure. I'm actually going to send it to some of my therapist friends that still run rehabs, because I think you're right. It's not that, it's, you know, you know, I know. You're very you're humble and saying, oh, you know, we're really building upon, you know, work that's been out there, but this is such an excellent synthesis of all of that wisdom, and I appreciate the way that you laid it out. I mean, my whole thing is kind of talking about moral neutrality, where, you know, we don't want to shame you for what you've been struggling with, and not put these moral labels on it. And I think that's something that the book does well. It's not good bad, right or wrong, it just is. It's just human, understandable, human reactions, and some of them work, and some of them don't. And let's get you on the right path. And so Alec, I want to thank you again for your time and for the all the effort that you guys put into this book.

    Dr. Alec Pollard 31:34

    Thanks so much. It's been my pleasure. You

    Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Christy Haussler
111: How to be a Content Creator without Wrecking Your Mental Health with Franchesca Ramsey

If you joined us for last week’s episode, you know that we promised Part 2 of my conversation with Franchesca Ramsey. She brings an expert perspective on the various aspects of content creation, like authenticity, compassion, handling negative comments, the value of listening, and more. Franchesca Ramsey is an actor, writer, public speaker, and longtime content creator. She wrote and performed in the web series MTV Decoded, where she tackled race, pop culture, and other uncomfortable topics. Other notable accomplishments include writing for The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore and a nomination for an NAACP award for one of the best books of 2018: Well, That Escalated Quickly: Memoirs and Mistakes of an Accidental Activist. Franchesca shares her expertise and insights about guarding your mental health as a content creator. Join us to learn more!

Show Highlights:

  • The skills we lack in being human, trusting each other, and genuinely calling someone IN

  • The public vs. private sphere of an online presence

  • Listening, forgiving, and doing the right thing

  • Hard-earned perspectives on hot takes and being silent

  • What’s your WHY for content creation?

  • Handling critical and negative comments on social media

  • Being authentic in content creation means sometimes logging off.

  • KC’s thoughts on her WHY as a content creator

Resources and Links:

Connect with Franchesca Ramsey: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and book

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC Davis 0:05

    Hello, you Sentient balls of . Welcome back to struggle. Care. I'm your host. KC Davis, we're going to jump right back in to part two of my amazing conversation with Francesca Ramsey about mental health and being an online content creator out in these public platform streets. If you didn't hear last week's conversation, go listen to that. And if you are just joining us this week, you're going to want to hear that first just as a reminder, Francesca Ramsey is an actor, writer, sought after, public speaker, and the creator, star of the award winning web series MTV decoded. She has been a former writer and correspondent for The Comedy Central show, The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore, and she wrote an amazing book called well that escalated quickly. So without further ado, here is the rest of that conversation. Well, and I think in general, like as a society, as people, like one of the things that we don't we're not taught well as kids, it is how to manage emotional reactivity and that feeling of being in fight or flight, and so, like we, I think, lack those skills in general, but then you push somebody into the place of a content creator, and like all of that is amplified online. And I actually had that same situation last week. I had a mutual mega video, and it was friends only, and she tagged me in it, and she was like, Hey, I just saw this video that you made, and I almost didn't say anything, but like, I think like or form, I think poor form, it kind of hurt my feelings, right? And like, what was so it was genuinely, maybe one of the most touching things that has ever happened to me on Tiktok, because, like, this person and I have followed each other for probably three or four years, and like, they absolutely they could have just scrolled on because, hey, you don't agree all the time, or they could have unfollowed. Literally, it was like this very human moment where I was, like, this person cared enough to tell me, like they actually valued this. You know, it's parasocial, but it was like a mutual parasocial relationship, and they felt comfortable

    Franchesca Ramsey 2:06

    and they trust you. And I remind people I saw that happen, and I remind people all the time that it's really scary to share that you've been hurt or that you're disappointed or that somebody fucked up. I think people assume like, Oh, you're getting off on this. You're gonna, especially if you respect somebody, it's really scary, because you're like, this could potentially, this could potentially hurt our relationship. Like, is this going to be the end whatever? So if someone does that, it's because they believe that you can handle it. They believe you can do better. They believe that you are worthy of their time and energy. How many times that people piss you off and you just go, Fuck it. I'm never gonna talk to them again. I'm just gonna write them off. Versus you say, like, Hey, can we make time to talk? I'd love to go out to lunch or get on the phone or FaceTime, or can I send you an email? Whatever? I'm setting aside time for this relationship, because I value it, and I want us, my best friend's sister, as a therapist, and she says, rupture and repair. We've had a rupture, and now I want us to repair it, and it's because you believe it's worth it. And, yeah, I've made a few of those friends only videos and commented on a few of them, which I think is how we got to this podcast episode. Yeah, I again, it doesn't always work. Don't get me wrong. It does not always work, but I believe it's worth it. And I just think more people could stand to benefit from calling folks in. And just like sometimes you got to call people out, brands, celebrities, stuff like that that I don't have personal connection to. But I think if you really want to move the needle, you got to call people in sometimes.

    KC Davis 3:48

    And I do think like when it comes to calling someone in, like when it's someone who has, like, an established relationship with me, there's so much more there than someone ran. Because I do think sometimes someone will make a video, and it'll be a very passionate, quote, unquote call in, and they'll say, like, Well, I'm not calling them out, I'm calling them in. And it's like, I mean, okay, I guess technically, but like, and at the same time, I think there's a difference between, you know, if you've been directly hurt by someone or something, like not saying that everyone needs to, like, tone police themselves. But at the same time, I do think that if we are the person doing the calling in, we have to ask ourselves, like, What is my purpose? Do I want this person to hear me? And am I thinking about the way that I'm talking and the way that I'm addressing them in the hopes that they can hear me, or am I using language or tone that I know is going to make it more difficult for that person to hear me, but I'm gonna enjoy how it feels like I'm the one that's right.

    Franchesca Ramsey 4:54

    Yeah. I mean, I think assuming that your audience has heard these terms before, but just for. Reference, you know, calling out is when we do something in a public scale, and we're taking a celebrity or a brand to task or person you know in our personal lives, because we've been harmed, versus a call in requires a lot more care. Even though you have been harmed, you are not making this public, you are making it a private or a more delicate conversation, because your hope is to repair the situation so the person can learn from it. And so I think you bring up a really good point about asking yourself, what is the intended goal? Because I do think there's a way to call people in that happens to be public, but I think it's very tricky. And I think a lot of people to your point, use the words I'm calling you in, but they're not really and for me, I think calling in requires like offering a little bit more grace. It doesn't mean that you're saying what you did is okay, and I'm excusing it. You're just allowing a little breathing room to say maybe you didn't mean to do it like and intentions are those things that, like we often try to stay away from when we're trying to take real accountability, but when we're calling someone in, I think you give that little breathing room so that the person hopefully can meet you in the middle, and then you can move forward together.

    KC Davis 6:28

    And I think the less of a relationship you have with them, the more you need to have some of that graciousness, because I don't know you, and you don't know me, and so like, if I do, it's like, if I do know you, you can actually be a little more pointed and direct with me, because I know you're not here to harm me. I know that the it's like the grace is unstated, and if I don't know someone or have a relationship with them, I actually have to put a little more of that graciousness in there. The best call out I ever yeah, there's more to calling in than being right and being on the same side. I think people think that as long as I align politically with you and I'm right, then anything I say to you being wrong is a call in, and that's more than that. But the best call in I ever got from someone that did not know me was a follower that made a video, and they said, Hey, I see that you feel a little spun out. And I want to tell you, like, with all the respect and the care in the world, just stop. Stop. You feel like you're being attacked. I know that it feels that way. Oh my god. I know it feels that way, but you're just digging yourself deeper. I implore you to just take a beat and step back and remove yourself in this conversation. But it was that like, I mean, it genuinely, like, auto regulated my nervous system. And they were like, you know, you've really kind of stepped in it, but I see you in this space of feeling frantic, and I one time went viral, and I know what that feels like. And it was like, there was this compassion for that without saying that. Like, yeah, yeah, you stepped in. It still, but like, I care you enough. Yes, yeah.

    Franchesca Ramsey 8:05

    They centered your humanity. They were like, and again, it's that thing that I keep saying is, like, two things can be true, you fucked up, but you're also a human. And my good friend Dylan Marin said this. He has a fantastic podcast called conversations with people who hate me, and he wrote a book about and did TED talk, and one of the things he said is that empathy is not an endorsement, and I think about that all of the time, but we can empathize with someone and not say that what they did was okay. Still hurt people, you still need to face consequences, you still need to repair the harm, and also you are a person and hurt people, hurt people, and people make mistakes, and I've made mistakes too, and I needed to learn from that mistake, and I've gone viral, and I've been called out. I've done those things, and I can see the humanity in you, and that's why I'm taking the step to call you in. And I think most people aren't prepared for how much work calling someone in is. It's like emotionally draining, and you don't get the public cookies for it, and that's where I think people default to doing things publicly. And they say it's a call in, but it's like, No, you. I mean, you just want people to hear it, which is fine, that's okay. But if it was done offline, it would be a lot more work, and you really don't get anything out of it. You get nothing out of it.

    KC Davis 9:36

    Yeah, this whole like private versus public fear is interesting to me online, because I feel like a lot of the conversations that we have, a lot of the discourse around community, does not take into account the very unique dynamics of online platforms. So like, when we talk about, let's just take like, the very comment, you know, like, listen to, and then fill in the blank, right, listen to. Black women listen to people with disabilities. And it's this idea that you know you don't necessarily get to be like the arbiter of whether you caused harm, like the people who you know. You need to listen to people that say, Hey, that harmed me, and it's intent versus impact. And all the stuff, like all of that stuff, is really, really true, and there aren't a lot of people there to help you walk through what that actually means in the context of 1.6 million people watching your videos, right? And like, because, okay, like, you know, you've said something or you've done something, and like, no one is a monolith. And so there's a portion of people that are like, hey, that's fine, and a portion of people that are really angry about it, and maybe you need to address this. And how do you address it online? Do you address it offline? If someone came to you offline and you address it, you know, not every mistake needs a big public apology video. So you have to make these decisions about, you know, what does need me to address publicly, and what you know, I addressed privately, and I kind of did my thing, but now there's still people publicly that are upset because they didn't see whatever that work was. And you start to, you know, when you when we hear this, sort of like, you need to listen to people, and it's like, well, is that the same thing as every single person that has an opinion in your comment section, sort of like being owed or needing to get an explanation or you're wrong, as long as anyone can say you're wrong, and that there's like, a tricky way to translate some of those lessons on how do you listen to people while recognizing that you know not everything kind of going back to our First point, not everything has to be performed publicly and but maybe some things do,

    Franchesca Ramsey 11:46

    yeah, I mean, I think, unfortunately, there's not really an easy answer for that. I think it's something that I struggle with myself, and we kind of touched on this before, is being okay with the fact that you're not always going to get it right. Everyone's not going to like you that even when you really make your best effort to do it right, it's not going to be enough for some people. And the same way that when you have conflict with someone and they say, I'm really sorry, and you decide you're not going to forgive them, sometimes you're on the other end, and you say you're really sorry and the harm was just too big, and the person says, like, I can't forgive you, and you just have to be okay with it. You have to say, like, my actions will hopefully show you that I've made the changes and I'm bettering myself, and I'm trying to do what's right. And if it's not enough for you. It's okay. It's not gonna you see this a lot of times where someone says, like, oh, I said, I'm sorry. Like, what more do you want? Like, it's like, oh, so then you weren't really sorry. What you wanted was to be forgiven. You didn't actually want to repair the harm. You didn't want to change your behavior and do better. You wanted a clean stamp, and then to move on, if you're really trying to move forward and be better and learn, you have to accept, oh, it's not going to work for some people, but I'm still going to do what's right. I'm going to do what's right not because it's profitable, not because I'm going to get rewarded for it, not because my name is going to be in lights, because it's the right thing to do, because most of the time the right thing to do. Don't get you anything, nothing. You know, we're not all getting a Nobel Prize. Sometimes you lose you lose jobs, you lose friends, you lose opportunities, because you're trying to stick to your morals, but you stick to your morals because that's the right thing to do. And it's I get messages from people about this all the time, and I'm like, I wish I had an easier answer for you.

    KC Davis 13:48

    One of the boundaries that also has really helped me, particularly when I make like white woman mistakes, is, do I want to do the right thing or like? Is my goal to do the right thing, or is my goal to be seen as doing the right thing?

    Franchesca Ramsey 14:06

    If no one was around, would you do the right thing?

    KC Davis 14:09

    And sometimes like, I will take steps to like be accountable and rectify situation, and for whatever reason that is not somebody doesn't like that, either it was a publicly and it wasn't good enough, or sometimes it was just something that actually went private, and that work went on privately, and I didn't make a video about, Oh, and here's all the things I learned. And so early on, what would happen is someone would say, like, you're not doing this, and I would want to respond with, actually, I am doing this. Here are all the things that I'm doing. And then really quickly it was like, Oh, so you get in this place where, okay, if I don't publicize all of this thing that I did, that I thought all these ways. I thought that I was meeting my integrity. There's this group of people that will think that I. Didn't. But if I do make that move to publicize it, to make these people think this, then it will do something that tastes bad. It will be this. Here's this self aggrandizing. Let me give you I've now centered myself, to give you a long list of how I'm really okay, and you're not allowed to think that about me. And I've learned that like, truly, most of the time, the more appropriate response is, like, just to allow people to misunderstand, or I can let someone know you know something, but like, if it ever comes down to the only way this person is going to think that I have not done the wrong thing is to make a big, long video about how I've done all the right things. It will not feel good. It will not taste good in anyone's mouth. It will not center the right things, it will it will blow up. It will not feel good, and it will not have, it will have just been about me, really caring that user number 904455, is wrong about me, and they see that they're wrong about me, and that's when I kind of go back to that, like, Okay, did I pursue the right thing? Yes, I did. So that's what I developed,

    Franchesca Ramsey 16:10

    like, a number of just like responses that I share all the time, that I go back to when I feel myself wanting to defend myself and go back and forth. I often tell people it's okay for us to see this differently. It's just okay, like, I again, especially on the internet where it's like, I don't know you, I don't know you, you don't know me. You have a life. I have a life, and I realize I'm in a privileged position in that like this don't pay my bills. So like, if this was fucking on my check, it would be very different, but it's not, and it's okay if you have to unfollow me, it's okay if you have to block me, it's okay if you report this video, it's okay if my Tiktok gets taken down. I mean, I'm gonna be disappointed, but I'll be fine. I'll move on. And I also often say I'm not gonna repeat myself. I was clear the first time. At this point, you were just asking me to give you more of my time when I said it very clearly, and that's it. And I like doing that because it is a trick that makes me go. Now I really can't respond, because I'm gonna look fucking stupid. Yeah, if I just said I'm not gonna repeat myself, and then I repeat myself. Yeah,

    KC Davis 17:16

    I sometimes will say, like, if someone's really pushing and pushing and pushing, I'll say, I understand that you don't agree with my choices,

    Franchesca Ramsey 17:23

    and I'm okay with it. Like, yes.

    KC Davis 17:26

    Like, just to put it back, like, put it back into this perspective of, like, number one, this is just a disagreement on opinion. This isn't a lot of people like to turn it of like, hey, because I've, you know, I'm trying to hold you accountable, and if you don't do what I think you should do, you're a bad person who doesn't want to be accountable who did it? And it's like, actually, this is just two people having a differing opinion on what we and like, I've done what I think, you know, meets my standards of integrity the best I can. You don't think that I did. That's okay. Neither one of us is bad or wrong. I understand, and then I'm also, like, making them realize, like you're just repeating yourself, like your goal now is to get me to do something to control my behavior, and I'm letting you know, like I'm not going like, I understand you disagree with my decision, clear, nothing to argue about.

    Franchesca Ramsey 18:16

    Yeah? Well, yeah, I do something really similar. And I think what's really smart about that is, at the crux of it, people just want to be heard a lot of times, and I've learned through my time on the internet, dealing with my audience and people that I actually know and people that don't like me and people that have you know, dedicated hours of their content to talking about how they dislike me is that a lot of people don't feel heard in their real life, and so the Internet is a place where they feel like they could be heard. And so sometimes, when I'm going back and forth with someone, sometimes I just say, I hear you. It doesn't mean that I agree with you. It doesn't mean that you're right. I just I hear you, I hear where you're coming from. And I've again doesn't always work, but I've oftentimes found people that are just like, you know, thank you so much for hearing me. I really respect that we had this conversation, even though I still think you're wrong about blah, blah, blah, it's like, wow, how unfortunate that you've been in too many situations where people just didn't listen to you. And I know how frustrating that is when you're being misrepresented, and it's just like, but this is what I feel, this is what's important to me, or like, this is what I believe is right, or, and the person's just got their fingers in their ears, and you're just saying, I just, I just want to know that this is penetrated, and then I can move on. And so sometimes you just have to give that to people. I understand is a great one. I use. I've heard you, and sometimes I've said to people, especially when I can really see that they're upset and it's not going anywhere, is I say, like, how would you like this to be resolved? Like, what do you want? Because if you. What you want is for me to say I'm wrong. You're right. That's not gonna happen. But if you want, because I don't think I'm wrong, but if there's something that you want me to do, and it's within reason, I might be able to do it. Sometimes I had somebody say, you know, I'm getting dog piled because of your comments and blah, blah, blah, I said, What would you like me to do? Can you delete the comment? Okay, I'll delete it. Hey, I remember one time I was, I had gone through a bad breakup, for Jessica was not being smart. She was sub tweeting. And I was sub tweeting about this girl and all this drama and whatever, she showed up in the comments, and she was like, You blah, blah, blah, blah, blah, and and she said, You're you're posting this for validation, and you need to take this down. And I said, You know what you are, right? I was posting this for validation. I didn't name you, but obviously you're upset, because you know what's about you, so I'll delete this. And then, sure enough, we exchanged some very friendly emails, and we're not friends, but like, we decided to squash it, and it was a great example of, like, I fucked up. Somebody was unhappy, and so I said, and again, what I said, No, sub tweets was not wrong. That's probably why she was upset, but how I went about it was not right, and she was upset, and I could acknowledge that I had done the wrong thing. And so if deleting this, because it was one of those things where, like, I fired off a subtweet and then it went viral, and because people were agreeing with it, or they had been the same situation, and it must have come across her feed, and she was not happy about it, even though she wasn't named. And so I said, No problem. I can just delete it. It's over. And I think more people would be served to just say, what is going to help us move forward? It doesn't mean that anyone's the winner or the loser. We're just agreeing to disagree and move on.

    KC Davis 21:48

    Yeah. So the last thing I wanted to ask you about is, what are some lessons that you've learned, or advice that you maybe have to give, or maybe just experience, some perspectives on how to engage with like, bigger issues as they come, as they're happening, whether they're political issues or social issues or things like that. Because I feel like there's kind of like two sides to the polarity. Of like, there's that frustration of like, I need to have a hot take on everything. But then there's also this, like, I feel like it would be weird for me to not say anything. Then sometimes there's a lot of pressure from an audience for you to address something, and then you know, so what are some like, kind of maybe hard earned perspectives you have on that?

    Franchesca Ramsey 22:31

    Yeah, something that my therapist says to me a lot that has been really helpful for me is like knowing what your WHY IS, and when I know what my why is, it helps me make decisions about what I speak on, what I share, what I create. And for me, my Why is telling untold stories and making people feel seen. And sometimes that means, like, posting a silly video, sometimes that means sharing content from someone else. And I think my why also kind of like what we're talking about, the calling in versus calling out. Like, am I sharing this because I want to look knowledgeable and informed and I want to be a good look like a good person? Or am I sharing this because something is really important that needs to be amplified and I'm the best person to speak on it, or I have a perspective that people haven't heard. I use that a lot when I decide if I'm making content. And I think that's one of the things I really don't like about Tiktok, is that it rewards everybody speaking on something. And a lot of people there the videos are like, I don't really have anything, I don't really know anything about this, or I don't you know. People are asking me to talk about no one is asking you to talk about this, but okay, but everyone's talking about it, so they need to. And for me, I'm of the mind of, like, am I adding anything to this conversation? And if not, I'm just not going to participate. Doesn't mean the conversation is not important. Just means that, like, I Francesca, don't have anything to share, so I'll just share what somebody else has said. You know, someone who's more informed, a journalist, you know, and you know, an economic specialist, somebody who has some letters at the end of their name. And I can say, You know what? That makes some sense. Now, why am I going to just try to, like, regurgitate what I hate, those videos that are like, I saw somebody that said it's like, just share the video with the person that said it like, I don't need your cliff notes version of it, because you're just trying to get views. So I think, like asking yourself, like, What's your why? And everyone's going to be different. And then the thing that I've tried to do to varying degrees of success is to be candid about my wins, but also be candid about my failures. I have found that that has given me goodwill with my audience, because it happens so rarely, that when you do fuck up, if you're like, Yeah, you know, I fucked up. And instead of trying to sleep it under the rug, like, here's what happened and whatever, you're not going to win everybody over. But for me. Me, more times than not, people are like, Yeah, you know, I rock with you. You've always you've done that the entire time. I've been a fan of yours. You know, sometimes you get it wrong. You're human. It happens. And then when it comes to, like, speaking on certain things, I always similarly to how I feel when I've been wronged or I have, like, strong feelings about something. When something happens, I try to give myself a moment to make sure I have all the facts. And that has come from mistakes. The story I talk about my book was there was a guy who posted on Facebook that he was throwing out resumes of anybody whose name sounded too black and they like went viral, and everybody was trying to find where he worked. And I was on the case, and I found where he worked, and I posted it on Tumblr. And then we were calling the office, and we were yelling, and blah, blah, blah, and the guy did not work there. We were calling some like, random business, and we were flooding their phone lines, and they had like, an automated, like, off site phone service, and they had just been instructed, if you said, Hey, does Casey Davis work there, they were just supposed to say, Oh yes, we will send her a message, even if you didn't work there. They were just instructed to do that. And so that's what they were doing. And I remember when the company put out a statement, and they were like, that person does not work here. We do not know who that person is. I felt so stupid, and I was like, I was not the sole person responsible, but I had this moment of, if I had just taken, like, two seconds to just one, one, what is my why I want this person fired or like, or do I want to have a conversation about, you know, racism in the workplace and how certain names get like? That's a conversation worth having. But I've decided that this, like, one random guy needs to lose his job, and I need everybody to know about it. And so I jumped in, and I didn't have all the facts, and then you can unring the bell. And so similarly, something will happen in the news, or a celebrity will do something, or whatever. And like, everyone is so fast to be like, I have to respond to this. And it's like, Did it really happen like that? Like, do we know all the information, it doesn't mean that it's not worth talking about. But like, I am not the Associated Press. Like, why do I have to talk about it the minute it happens? The minute it happens? How many times Kate Middleton, perfect example, homegirl, was missing, quote, unquote, she just had cancer. And so many people were like, holy shit. I've made like 30 videos saying that she was kidnapped and she's dead, and conspiracy theories, and we're making all these jokes, and then she comes out, and she's like, Hey everyone, I have cancer. And I was like, now if y'all had just satchel asses down and waited again, like it was weird, the Royal Family handled it poorly. Like, don't get me wrong, but like, everyone was just so quick to have a response. And it's like, sometimes it's okay to just say, I don't have enough information to comment on this.

    KC Davis 28:19

    There's been a couple of times where I have made a video where I've said, like, hey, this thing happened, and a lot of people are talking about it, and I do not have a hot take. I am also processing this thing, this like Zeitgeist event that happened. But I just, you know, it occurs to me that it might feel strange to you that I'm not saying anything, you know, that just to see my content go on and and, you know, I just want you to know like I'm right there with you, like I am also sort of reeling from this whatever, whatever I think I might have posted something similar to that, like when January 6 happened, where it was like, I don't have a comment. I may never have a comment, but I know that some of you sometimes are, like, wondering, like, why do you not seem disturbed by this? And I think sometimes, particularly being a white woman, a lot of people have that, like, fear of like, when, like, are you not saying anything? Because you just don't care if you're not affected. And it's not this, like, demand. It's more like a safety check. It's like, I'm constantly wondering if you are indeed continue to be a safe person. And so sometimes that's like, the best I've come up with, yeah. And

    Franchesca Ramsey 29:34

    I'm also just something that I say all the time is, like, speak up, not over and sometimes, like, you just don't need to hear from me. And like, I would rather reshare, repost someone else's content, you know, or recommend, like, a book or an article or, you know, I oftentimes will read something and I'll just, like, post it on my story. And I'm not saying like, this is the right perspective, or, like, here's why you should read this. It's just like I read. And I thought this was interesting, and I'm sharing it with you. And so people are like, what do you think about blah, blah? Sometimes I'm like, I really have been living my offline life, and I don't know about that thing. And I think, on the one hand, it's flattering when people care what I think, but I often have to remind people like, I'm a comedy writer. Like, yeah, even when I was doing decoded, which was, you know, is a show about race and pop culture, and one that I'm really proud of and opened a lot of doors for me. Like I was reading a teleprompter on that show. I know I'd do a great job at it, but people are like, You are so smart I need to know what you think about a, b and c. And I'm like, I had, like, a team of writers and fact checkers working on that show, and so, like, you were getting a really funny, concise, five minute explainer, but it took like two weeks to write, and it went through all these different channels to make sure that it was correct before it was put out. It was not a hot take. And so, like, now something is happening, and you know, it's like, Will you speak on this thing? And I'm like, do you want me to speak on it because you don't know how you feel about it? Or you want me to filter through how you should feel about it? Or do you actually care how I feel? Because real talk, like, I'm not qualified to speak on a lot of things, like, a lot of times I'm just sharing my opinion. And again, I've gotten to a place where I'm okay, not commenting on every single thing. And I have really been making a conscientious effort in recent years to, like, move away from being, like, the social justice educator. It's tiring. I just I want to, like, be funny and like, Sure, say stuff that's smart too, but like, I don't want to be tasked with, like, oh, this tragedy happened. Like, Francesca has to explain it in like, a minute video that's shareable. Like, I just, like, drew something in my journal that I thought was cool. Look at this. I painted another wall. Like, I'm just, like, I want to do that. And I think people need to give themselves permission to do that again. It's so important to talk about all these issues. But, like, it's weird to me when I'm like, You are a cupcake influencer. Like, why are you explaining to me? Like, geopolitical news with fucking icing? Like, why are you You don't I mean, it's like, when the freaking Johnny Depp trial happened, like, suddenly everyone was like, a body language expert, and I was like, just make your fucking crochet videos and go like, I don't need to hear from you about this. I don't think you're qualified, and I don't think you actually care. You just want the views, like, listen

    KC Davis 32:35

    the nuttiest one that I ever got. This was like six degrees too. Was I had a guest on my podcast to talk about friendship. She left like she did, like an advice column about friendship, and we want to talk about, like, different kinds of friendship. And so I had her on my podcast. She has a tick tock, but, I mean, she had probably, like, 20 or 30,000 followers. There's, like, a very small account, but I just happened on some of fruities. But then I got an email from someone, from a listener that was like, I'm just so disappointed that you had this person on your podcast because, like, they have not used their platform to talk about and like, I don't remember what it was. I don't know if it was like they have not spoken about Palestine, or like they haven't talked about this, like, event that happened, and I remember being like, wait, wait, wait, you're disappointed in me for having a content creator that talks about friendship on because on a completely unrelated social media account where she talks about friendship, she did not make a commentary on some sort of, like geopolitical happening. I was like, This is strange. Yeah,

    Franchesca Ramsey 33:35

    it's also just, it's so interesting to me, like, personally, if I'm going to do someone's podcast, or if I'm working with someone, you know, I do my due diligence, but sometimes it's like, I'm on a panel with someone. I'm like, I don't freaking know this person. I don't know every single thing that they've done or said, and it's like, do you denounce this thing they said in like, this year? And I'm like, yeah, that's pretty fucked up. If I talked to them, I would say that was fucked up, but on the panel, it had no relevance, and I didn't know about it. And I can't go back in time and tell them that I disagree with the thing that they did that I didn't know about until now. Like, I

    KC Davis 34:14

    just not everything needs a press release. Ah,

    Franchesca Ramsey 34:17

    no, it's such a weird way to engage. And I just have to remind myself that people that have the time and energy to devote to that, like, it has really nothing to do with me. It has it's other stuff that has nothing to do with me. And like, I just have to wish them well and hope they figure it out. But it's taken my other time to get there. The

    KC Davis 34:38

    other mind trick that I do sometimes it really works is that I what I noticed is that when people would say really hateful things to me or really critical things to me, I was automatically picturing like a reasonable person that I wanted to like me or agree with me. And so then I felt this like I need to convince them, no, I need to show them if I just explained. And then I was watching Tiktok one time, and it came across those like, street this is, I'll admit, this is a little mean, but it was like street interviews from people at Trump rallies. But like, in particular, the ones that are like, very into conspiracy theories, where they would be like, he's the new Christ. He's the new Christ. I

    Franchesca Ramsey 35:17

    saw him pulling all the strings. But also he's not like, how? And they're like, Well, why

    KC Davis 35:22

    do you think that like? Because I saw his face in my pancake, right? And so what I started doing was realizing, like, Casey, why are you assuming that every person that like is a scholar, like, start thinking of him as this person? And so I did. I'd be like, I would picture it coming out of the mouth of like, the person who thought they saw Trump in their pancake syrup, and then being like, Is this someone that I need to respond to? Like? Is the substance of this necessary like? Do I even care what this person thinks of me? And all of a sudden I was like, so free of a lot of like, because sometimes there was like, a genuine, substantive like, I'm concerned about XYZ, and sometimes it was something where it's like, You're so wrong, and it would be so easy to prove myself right, but also like, I don't care enough because you think Trump's in your pancake. Yeah. I

    Franchesca Ramsey 36:12

    mean, I think that's definitely a way to go about it. And I think, you know, having that offline community that gives you that gut check, because sometimes, like, I've had times like that too, where someone says something that, like, I really don't agree with but there's like, a kernel in there that I'm like, Oh, is that true? I don't know. And so then I sometimes I just have to say to, like, again, my very offline friends who don't know any of the drama or any of the viral whatever, I'm just like, Can I get your read on this? Just tell me, like, what do you think about this? And if they say something like, I don't know. Think that they're right about blah, blah, blah, I'm like, Oh, fuck. Well, you're like, super offline, and I trust you, and I know you, and I know you're gonna give me, like, an unbiased opinion. Then you know again, but it's goes back to that. Why do you want to win internet arguments, or for me, I want to tell untold stories. I want to make people feel seen. Sometimes that means engaging with people who think differently for me so that I can better inform my content. Sometimes that means logging off so I can do a better job at making my content sometimes that means taking time away from the internet so that I can make sure that I'm better informed before I decide to come back and make something. And

    KC Davis 37:25

    sometimes I'll take that, like, kernel of truth and still not engage with someone, because, like, okay, there was a kernel of truth, and I can take that, and I can grow from that. But it's also clear to me that you are a person that is not for me, that like, your intent was to wound me, and so I don't have to come back to you and be vulnerable about that, like, I can take this like, little kernel of gift you gave to me and, like, leave you on red.

    Franchesca Ramsey 37:46

    I mean, we are not meant to engage with 100,000 people's opinions every single day. We're just not I'm not supposed to know what everybody's doing at all times. I'm not supposed to know about like, every like, exciting event in every person's life. I'm not supposed to know about those things at all times. And so sometimes, yeah, sometimes I have, like, a subset of my audience that thinks that we have, like, that parasocial relationship. And again, it's very flattering. But sometimes they'll just like, dump in my inbox and tell me, like, all kinds of crazy things. And I'm like, I know you're going through something, but like, I really don't have the space to take this on. And, like, I just have to say, like, Hey, thank you for sharing this with me. I hope that you are able to, like, find healing and peace. I'm sorry I'm not the person to like, help you with this, you know. Or sometimes I just, like, send them a heart emoji. And I'm like, that's all I can do right now. Like, I'm literally doing 8 million things, and I just saw your long wall of text, and I'm like, I can't, I really can't do this right now, and I also don't know you, and like, I don't want to say the wrong thing. I'm not a therapist, I'm not a marriage counselor, or whatever it might be, and it's just okay to be like, I can't. This isn't for me. I can't do this. I

    KC Davis 39:02

    am one of the like, lessons that I learned when I was running Drug Rehabs that oddly helps me with social media. Because there was a long time where I was getting lots of emails and DMS about, like, people's personal and they're heart wrenching. And I especially, you know, setting myself as a book creator who's like, trying to give helpful tips to people struggling. It's like I wanted to answer every single one, and I wanted to help every single one. And I took it really hard if someone was like, hey, that tip didn't work for me. And I realized that, like, My why is, like, I'm here to build a really good net, not to go fishing with a fishing pole. So, like, I'm not worried about, like, every fish on the line. I'm not here to save everyone or to fix everyone's problems, yeah. Like, I'm here to make a really good net, knowing that some people will not get caught up, like, some people will pass through, some people won't be helped by it, but in general, like, I have a structure of creating content and education that lots of people can kind of get caught up in, in a good way, and that was always kind of a helpful way, because it's hard to like. Catch and release. You know what I mean, when you kind of feel like, oh, gosh, this person really kind of dumped this shout

    Franchesca Ramsey 40:04

    out to you for keeping that fish analogy going, catch and release. Thank you. Yeah, catch

    KC Davis 40:10

    and release. There you go. Francesca, this has been such a great conversation, and I'm glad that I waited till I had like the perfect person to have it, because you are just such a grounding person to talk to, and I appreciate your perspectives a lot, and especially on this.

    Franchesca Ramsey 40:25

    Thank you so much. That means a lot. And like I said before, I am such a fan of your work and what you bring to this space. I think you do a really good job of navigating challenging conversations with a huge audience. And I'm just very honored that I am in community with you, and that I've been able to learn from you and, yeah, and that we've been able to have, like, a fun but heartfelt conversation. I really appreciate it. Thank

    KC Davis 40:49

    you. If people want to follow you, where can they find you?

    Franchesca Ramsey 40:51

    I'm on Instagram at Chesca Lee, C, H, E, S c, a, l, e, i, G, H, my website is francesca.net Francesca F, R, a, n, C, H, E, S, C, a.net, and then I'm on tick tock as Francesca Lee. Somebody else got my got my username. I'm usually, I'm usually tuscali everybody everywhere. But if you just search Chesca Lee or Francesca Ramsey on tick tock, you

    KC Davis 41:14

    can find me Awesome. Well, have a great day.

    Franchesca Ramsey 41:17

    Thank you. You too. You

Christy Haussler
110: How to be a Content Creator without Wrecking Your Mental Health with Franchesca Ramsey

Today’s episode is a conversation I’ve been wanting to have for awhile, and I’ve found the perfect person for this topic. Franchesca Ramsey is an actor, writer, public speaker, and longtime content creator. She wrote and performed in the web series MTV Decoded, where she tackled race, pop culture, and other uncomfortable topics. Other notable accomplishments include writing for The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore and a nomination for an NAACP award for one of the best books of 2018: Well, That Escalated Quickly: Memoirs and Mistakes of an Accidental Activist. Franchesca shares her expertise and insights on longevity and mental health as a content creator. Join us to learn more!

Show Highlights:

  • Burnout is real in the content creation world.

  • Lessons learned about life and authenticity as a content creator, influencer, and vlogger

  • Are you putting your time and energy in the wrong place?

  • You have to censor yourself EVERY day!

  • Impulsive reactions on social media can have severe consequences. Give yourself space to step back.

  • Prioritizing joy in your content and not reacting with anger

  • The nature of social media

  • Strengthening internal boundaries by getting comfortable with being misunderstood

  • Thoughts on cancel culture and negative backlash

  • Our conversation is so good that we don’t want it to end. We will continue with Part 2 with Franchesca in next week’s episode!

Resources and Links:

Connect with Franchesca Ramsey: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and book

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC Davis 0:05

    Hello the, sentient balls of stardust. Welcome to struggle. Care. I'm your host, KC Davis, where we talk about all things individual and systemic that affect your mental health, your wellness, and occasionally just things that interest me. And so I am really excited about today's episode. This is a conversation I've been wanting to have for a while. I haven't found the right person to have it with, and so I have Francesca Ramsey with me in the studio. Francesca, thank you for being here. Oh,

    Franchesca Ramsey 0:29

    thank you for having me. Casey, I'm such a big fan. I've been a longtime fan of yours, so it's long overdue for us to chat. Well, thank

    KC Davis 0:36

    you. I was so starstruck when you, like, tweeted at me on Twitter. I was like, wait, wait, wait, what?

    Speaker 1 0:44

    Yeah, I've been following you on Tiktok for a minute at that point. And then, you know, I made, I did this thing where I pulled a video from Tiktok to Twitter, which I'm sure we'll talk about that at some point, when I was like, oh, man, I feel like I should let her know that it was me. If people are starting to get weird so,

    KC Davis 1:02

    and they did, they always do. If those of you at home don't know who Francesca Ramsey is, let me give you a little breakdown, and then I'll let you also introduce yourself, right? But Francesca's an actor, writer, public speaker, longtime content creator, and you've done lots of stuff. You did the web series MTV decoded. You've been a writer for The Nightly Show with Larry Wilmore, and you also have an NAACP award for one of the best Amazon books in 2018

    Franchesca Ramsey 1:29

    Well, I got a nomination. I lost the award to Michelle Obama, which I'm totally okay with, right? I mean, we knew she was gonna win. I knew.

    KC Davis 1:39

    And you wrote a book called, well, that escalated quickly, and I believe it's memoirs and mistakes of an accidental activist. Okay, so you're the perfect person to have this conversation with, because I want to talk about longevity and mental health and being a content creator. And you've been doing this a long time, and I've been doing this a short time. And in my short time of doing this, I think I started in 2020, and it was totally accidental. I have had to learn a lot of really hard lessons, and I have wanted to quit a few times, and I have watched other content creators quit?

    Franchesca Ramsey 2:21

    Yeah, burnout is real, and I think especially because this career field is so new, and most of us, you know, you can go online and you can see a lot of people working as content creators, but in your real offline life, do you know a lot of people that are long term content creators, probably not, and so creating community for me has been really important. But I've I've felt myself get burnt out. I've watched other people get burnt out. I started making videos in 2006 so my senior year of college right after YouTube had been founded, there really was no blueprint. And I think for me, the thing that's given me longevity, as I approach almost 20 years, which is bonkers to say, is taking time off. And I think a lot of influencers and creators, they're like, I'm gonna go all in, which is not a bad thing. But when you're self employed, you can essentially work all the time. And when your content, when your life is the content, the lines get blurred between, like, living life and living life for the purpose of creating content. And somehow I just had the foresight to not do that to myself. Yeah, that's actually

    KC Davis 3:41

    one of the things I wanted to ask you about. Is because I just wanna delve into your brain about, like, the lessons that you've learned. And that is one of them. Because not only do I see people burn out, so I see people like, flame out, burn out. I also see people quit because they're like, it's too much and I can't do it anymore. I also you see people, quote, unquote, get canceled, and then they quit, or they, you know, they just can't recover. And one of the things that I wanted to ask about is this idea of, when it comes to, like, the content creation, influencer, vlogger world, there's this idea of authenticity, where, you know, it's not just the product you're putting out there. It is also you. It's your life, your personality. And there's all this emphasis on authenticity. And I'm curious, like, how you lessons you've learned about boundaries, because I feel like that's where a lot of us get into trouble. It's like there's a difference between authenticity and transparency. And you had a Tiktok recently where you talked about, there was someone talking about their frustrations, learning that white content creators were often paid more than black content creators, and there was this frustration, and you made this Tiktok response where you had said, like, hey, that is like a real issue, and we need to talk about it. And it is valid to be upset about. And one of the things that you see a lot of newer content creators do is we don't have a buffer between experiencing something and then jumping online to talk about it

    Franchesca Ramsey 5:14

    and turning it into and turning it into content. And it's it is, it's hard. When I made that video, there were a lot of people that were like, there was differing responses to it, where people were like, you know, don't tone police, don't respectability politics, all these things. And I was like, Look, I know these words, and I think you're using them in the wrong way, because I am not saying that you should not be angry if you're not paid fairly. What I'm saying is when something happens. I mean, it could be the smallest grievance ever. I mean, you see influencers do this all the time, where they're like, I ordered something at this restaurant and it didn't come on time, and then they make a video about it, and you're like, Okay, I understand that you're pissed off, but like this becoming content, what is the purpose? And similarly, if you want to talk about pay disparity, which I think we absolutely should, if your goal is to be paid fairly, making a video the minute you find out about it is not the way to do it. And I saw a number of influencers, one in particular that was saying, you know, my manager reps these white creators, and they're making more than me. And I was like, so you should be talking to your manager, not to us, because if your manager is telling you my white clients are getting paid more than you, then Mom, why you my manager earn that 10% but now you come on social media and you tell us about it, and you you look really tone deaf to Your audience, like your audience is like you're complaining about 1000s of dollars for Instagram posts, other brands are thinking, Oh, if the deal's not right, she or he or they are, they gonna go on the internet and argue and talk about it versus talking to us behind the scenes to get it right? They might be too risky. And so I say that from a place of I have made that I have made that mistake I will never forget. I was working on my first TV job was the Nightly Show, and I was really struggling. And one night after that, we, after we taped Larry, my boss sat us in the office to go through. How do we feel about the episode? And he asked me how I was doing, and I was really, I don't remember what I was upset about, but I was really stressing out. And he said, Well, maybe if you weren't on Twitter so much, you wouldn't be stressed. And I had a moment of, oh my God, my boss is seeing me talk shit on Twitter when I'm supposed to be in my office writing jokes for the episode, and now here I am stressed about if I did a good job or not, because I was putting my time and energy into Twitter. And it was a huge perspective shift for me, because even when I was right with who I was arguing with on Twitter, I was putting my time and energy in the wrong place. And I think that's something a lot of creators, they struggle with, that balance your grievances can be absolutely legitimate, but I have to ask myself, what's the result that I'm looking for? What's the purpose of sharing this on the internet? Am I looking for the instant gratification of Yeah, girl, you're right, blah, blah, blah, or do I want a solution to the problem? And you know, I think that can happen. Sometimes you can get both, but I'm of the mind. It's never going to hurt you to just take a moment to calm down before you decide how you want to move forward. It

    KC Davis 8:36

    seems like it's a hard lesson to learn, and there's not really anybody to tell us when this point comes, but Tiktok is such a different animal than all other social media that we've really been familiar with in the past. Like it used to be that we had our personal Facebooks and our personal Twitters, and then if you uploaded on something on YouTube, there was this understanding that it's like this is cultivated for an audience. And then you used your like, personal, you know, Instagram or Facebook, for your kind of unfiltered reactions to your day, and it was just the people that you knew listening to that, and they knew your intentions and your backgrounds and whatever, whatever. And when Tiktok really started blowing up, I feel like a lot of us started Tiktok just like our facebook, and it was just our friends we were following, and then, like, but as they blew up and as they got big, there has to be this, like, turning point of, like, Oh, this isn't my personal social media in the sense of, like, Facebook anymore. Like, I can't just this isn't just my unfiltered thoughts, or at least if it is going to be be aware that's going to get me in trouble, and I probably can't use this as a career.

    Franchesca Ramsey 9:40

    Yeah. I think with the thing that a lot of people struggle with, like, when you mention authenticity, I've seen this with a lot of younger creators. And just for context, I turned 40 last year, and not to be like, That's old, but maybe you've had this experience too, where I'm starting to see my 30s and 20s with, like, this different lens, where I'm. Like, Oh my God. I just didn't know there was just so much life I hadn't experienced. And one thing I see a lot of young people saying when it comes to authenticity is, I'm not going to censor myself like I'm just I am who I am. And I think you have to censor yourself every day, like you, you know, if your boss smells like a butthole. You don't say, like, Hey, you smell like a butthole. You just go like, Oh, my boss smells a little funky today. And you go about you. You just don't say everything that comes into your head. It's the same thing with building a brand online. You can be authentic without sharing everything. And some people think, oh, that's being fake. Or, you know, you're playing the game. It's like, well, I mean, maybe a little bit of both, but the same way that when you you know, when Beyonce is doing a meet and greet, you're not getting the Beyonce that's at home without her bra on, you know, like, that's a different Beyonce. I don't know that Beyonce behind closed doors, she's somebody else, but when she's at work, she's this version. And similarly So, when I'm on social media, you're seeing Francesca, but you're not seeing all of Francesca. There's stuff that I save for my friends and my partner and my family and whoever else you know. And so learning how to delineate what is for the audience's consumption? What opinions you maybe should keep to yourself? What drama should maybe be on the internet? If you have drama with someone you actually want to squash, maybe you got to talk to them offline. You have slide in their DMS to your point about the tick tock of it all, that algorithm will pick you up and show you to millions of people, and I've started, or for a while, I've thought about who is the person I don't want to see this content. If I have that person in mind, I shouldn't post it on then or because it could potentially get to them. Yeah,

    KC Davis 11:59

    and I want to talk about that the drama of it all for a minute, because two of the big things I wanted to hit was like, how you like lessons you've learned in dealing with like online hate, and also like lessons in online drama, like, I feel like when my account was smaller, you know, I would stitch a creator and say, like, I disagree with this person, or like, I find this person fundamentally flawed, or I this value set is ridiculous, right? And I hit a critical mass of followers to where, no matter how right I was or how tactful I was trying to be, it created this huge ripple effect of people like going to that person's page. And then it became about how I was sending my followers. And then it was like, okay, yeah,

    Franchesca Ramsey 12:45

    and I've even seen you, and I commend you, because I've seen a number of times where you're like, I am not telling anybody to go after this person, but they still do it anyway. And it is that thing of like, you can't unring the bell, and I've learned that lesson many a time. I told a story in my book about someone I don't even remember what exactly I think we were talking about, like victim blaming or something on Twitter, and a girl was in my mentions, and she said something along the lines of, like, Yeah, well, if you get assaulted, then it was probably your fault or something like that. And I ran, like, just reamed her out. I was like, and then, like, a few hours later, when I reread our conversation, I realized she was talking about herself. She was saying that she had been assaulted and that something that she had done had led to it, and by the time I realized it, my followers were just laying into her, and I was I felt so terrible. I DMed her, I deleted the tweet immediately, and I DMed her, and I was like, I misread your comment, and I'm so sorry. You did nothing wrong. And I and she never replied, and I just felt so heartbroken by it, and it reminded it was an eye opening moment for me that the impulsive reaction on my part to be right ended up having severe consequences, and also, because it was a public conversation, despite the fact that I was only replying to her, I didn't quote tweet her. It was still on the internet, and everyone could chime in. And the performance of social media encourages folks to not be thoughtful, not have nuance. It's like, WWE wrestling. It's like, I'm gonna wind up and I'm gonna drop on you, not because that's the right move, but because everyone's gonna see it, and so yeah,

    KC Davis 14:41

    and I had a few times, more than a few times, where I've made a response video that was snarky or sarcastic or clap back, and would have been a stellar, totally reasonable response, except I misunderstood what the person was saying. In my head, I always hear like, friendly fire, friendly fire, like I ended. Up really just blowing up some poor, vulnerable person, or, like, you know, I end up seeing them as, you know, a full human afterwards who maybe just made a mistake, versus someone who was really trying to be cruel. And those are always the times when I'm like, I need to step back for a minute because I'm now in a state that's so reactive. And typically, that reactivity is because I've gone through an onslaught of hate, of people who are clearly just trying to be cruel, people who are pursuing my suffering, and

    Franchesca Ramsey 15:32

    then it gets really hard to distinguish. I've had that issue too, where you have so many people asking questions that are not in good faith or misrepresenting what you're saying. So then you get a random comment. And something that I've done is I'm answering so many comments at once that, like I respond to somebody that I meant to respond to somebody else, or I think again, I just like, read too fast or something. And so again, like giving yourself space to step back and say like the internet is not making me feel good right now, I'm getting either a lot of negative feedback or I'm consuming a lot of negative content that's making me feel bad, and I need a break, and I think more influencers, again, need to give themselves space for that, and that's one reason that I always encourage folks to have multiple streams of income. Because, you know, here we are, Tiktok might not be here next year, and that is going to have devastating effects for a number of reasons, but for some people that Tiktok is their bread and butter, it could potentially be really devastating, but even for your own mental health, when you're like, have to make videos. I have to respond to comments. I have to no no, no, no, no. If I'm starting to feel tense, I'm like, I have to take a break. I have to put the phone down to go outside. I have to hang out with my offline friends who don't know anything about social media and live my life, because this is not productive. And, you know, there's been this whole conversation about like content creator versus influencer, which I think is kind of like semantics. But personally, I don't feel like my brain is suited for creating anything when I'm angry or upset, I mean, sometimes, but I'm really trying to prioritize like, joy in my content, and I can't do that if I'm thinking about like, how someone's gonna misinterpret it, or what the haters are gonna say. Like, that's not a good place to create from.

    KC Davis 17:38

    Yeah, and I find myself sometimes feel like I'm backed into this corner where not responding makes me feel powerless, like makes me feel like a doormat, like I should just sit here and take it, and I have some of my own trauma and my background to where, like when I feel like I'm getting the messaging, just be the bigger person. Just allow yourself just take it. Just take it. Just absorb it. Just absorb it. Yeah, I get to a place where it like clicks off something in me, and I feel really angry about my perception of the expectation that I just sit there and take it, and I lash out, and I clap back, and I feel like I have I'm constantly thinking about the way that I respond to those things, because there's been ways that I've responded where I feel empowered, and then there's ways that I've responded where it feels good for my ego in the moment, and then I end up regretting it. And then there's ways that I respond that I think, okay, all right, that's not some big, huge mistake, but like, what do I want to do differently? And I'm still trying to find that middle ground because it doesn't feel good to become the person that I hate. You know what I mean? Like to just utilize my power to squish you because you've hurt me. But it also doesn't feel good to just like completely ignore all of it, and I'm still trying to find that inner you know, that middle ground of can I Is there a place where I get to stand up for myself, or defend myself or not, have to feel that way that doesn't crush people, and I don't know,

    Franchesca Ramsey 19:08

    yeah, I mean, I don't have an answer. It's something that I grapple with too. But I will say the first time I encountered your content was when you were making those cards where you were talking about, like, bad faith arguments and like, you know, rhetorical devices and stuff. And I really loved that because, to your point about standing up for yourself, it felt like that's what you were doing in that content. You weren't directing it at one specific person. You were saying, here is something that I've encountered, and I'm going to explain to you why it's bad faith, why it doesn't work, how you can spot it, and you were taking your power back in that way. And that's something that I've been trying to do more than my content, like, if I see a trend in my comments, or I've encountered a certain type of person that is just, you know. Sticking in my craw, instead of giving them the spotlight, how can I take that feeling and turn it into content that makes me feel like I am giving it, like letting go of it, having power over me, but also like doing something that helps my audience? Because if I'm encountering this thing that I know they are and I can, or even sometimes, if I comment on drama, you know, for example, this influencer this conversation about pay disparities, I'm like, I can talk about this without saying the influencers name. I can talk about this without being like, here's why they're wrong and like, what you need to learn. And I can make it about what I've learned, my experience, things that I've encountered, ways that I would do things differently. And I can use that grain of situation as a jumping off point without making it about that. So that if you don't even know about the drama, you're just like, oh, this was really great advice. They don't, they don't, they don't have to know who I'm talking about. And I feel like, to your point about, like, the algorithm and drama and whatever, I also feel like it then you don't get caught up in, like, the discourse wave, where then like, everybody's commenting it. I feel like it attracts like a more authentic audience. Like, I'm like, Oh, this video is not going to go viral because I didn't say this influencers name and this data. But guess what, the comments are a lot better because there's people who actually care and want the information, and they don't want to just like, fight. And when

    KC Davis 21:35

    you get to actually talk about the subject, like, one of the things that I have noticed happens is that, you know, I'll start out with a commentary or even a criticism or whatever, and that's what I want to talk about. And I have good points and I'm not maybe I didn't say every single word perfectly, or maybe some, you know, in a real conversation, I might say something and you go, Oh, what about this? Will be like, yeah, actually, let me amend that one sentence. But of course, in Tiktok, it's a one snapshot in time, right? So, but what happens when it's a stitch, or when you say the person's name, or when whatever, not that that's always wrong, but really quickly, what becomes the center of the conversation is whether I did it right. And so now I have to defend whether I did it right, whether I said it right, whether I'm being a big old meanie or whether it was okay to say and then the other person, and then everyone feels like they have to take sides, like, well, I'm with this person. Why unfold that person? Why? And I'm really it's like now the conversation and the content and the replies and the videos are about me and whether I did an okay thing and not the actual subject that I wanted to talk about. Yeah,

    Franchesca Ramsey 22:39

    and I think that that's also just, unfortunately, the nature of social media, like it just doesn't lend itself to giving folks grace. And it is all about the hot take. It's very black and white. It's who's right and wrong, rather than like. And to be fair, there are some instances where like someone is wrong, right? Like someone has harmed someone, someone has broken the law, right? Like someone has, you know, abused someone. Like, those are situations where, like, yes, there is a right and there's a wrong, and then there's a bunch of situations where, like, there's Shades of Gray, where you're like, oh, I don't agree with that, but I can see how you got there. Or Or I've done something similar, and here's how I got to a different place, right? It's just way more nuanced than like, right and wrong. And I'm of the mind that some conversations are just not meant to be had in a one minute video. They're better for a podcast, they're better for an email. Sometimes they're just not suited for a public consumption. I've had a number of offline conversations with influencers and even some celebrities where I just, like, sit in their DMS and I was like, Yo, you getting eaten up right now? I can let you know why, if you want to talk about it, I can let you know I put the ball on the court, I say, like, I know you're getting inundated right now. And I think this is what's helped me, is I say I know people are coming at you left and right. If you want to hear another perspective, I'm here, and we could do it offline. And it doesn't have to be it's not a public conversation. It's totally off the record. Take it or leave it. And I will tell you I've had so many times where people have taken me up on it. Sometimes it worked out, sometimes it didn't, but even when it didn't, it ended in from a place of like, hey, you know, thanks for reaching out. Nobody has done this. Everybody has done it publicly, and you're the first person who seemed to, like, actually care. And for me, I'm like, Yeah, I do. That's why I don't. I don't need it to go viral. I really don't, which is why I've had a number of times where people are like, this is disingenuous, because you're blah, blah, blah, and I'm like, I mean, that's how you feel. But I could tell you for sure, I have people on my inbox that you've seen on TV that are asking me for advice. And guess what? I can offer it to them because I I believe that they want to learn, and I want them to learn. I don't care about going viral. I don't that's not how I pay my bills. That's like a fun bonus. I'm genuinely, like, just very interested in communication and how we learn and mistakes, like all that stuff is just very fascinating to me. The most

    KC Davis 25:19

    helpful, like internal boundary that I had to strengthen, I think, with having a big platform was being comfortable with being misunderstood.

    Franchesca Ramsey 25:31

    Say that again,

    KC Davis 25:32

    I had to get really comfortable with walking away knowing that this person doesn't has misunderstood me, has misunderstood my character has misunderstood my point, because I will fall into the trap of arguing back and forth about, you know, being right, and I just the other boundary that came from that was and it happened recently, because what was it? Oh, I was drinking. I made a joke video, and I had one of those Starbucks drinks that you to the gas station, and very quickly got lit up by people angry that I was drinking Starbucks, because a lot of people are participating in a Starbucks boycott right now. And I had responded in comments like, hey, like, I actually have, like, read a ton about this boycott, and I participated from a union perspective for about six months. And kind of it seemed like it was a little aimless, for my taste, in terms of knowing what to do next. And so I went more for the BDS list of boycotts. And, you know, prefer to do XYZ towards, like, things about I care about with unions. Whatever the point is is, I was like, listen, I wasn't that was not in my thoughts when my husband bought me, like a $2 drink from the gas station. But, of course, like the Tiktok, doesn't do a lot of nuance and but one of the response to that was, as I was telling someone that was, they were like, Yeah, right. Just say that you care more about your creature comforts than you do. You know people's human rights and go or

    Franchesca Ramsey 26:54

    whatever. They've already decided. They've already

    KC Davis 26:57

    decided, yeah. And so I just what I said and what I've started to say at that point, instead of arguing, is I say I don't argue about my character and intentions with people like that period in a paragraph, like, I will give you a good faith response if you have an issue. Like, I will explain what I thought, or I don't want people to think the wrong thing, you know, if someone says I haven't seen you post anything about, you know, the Palestinian genocide, and I'll say, Hey, I've done lots of retweets. I actually have an active fundraiser. Like, I'll I'll inform someone, or I'll say, Hey, let me give you some more information. But once we get into well, you're only doing that because of this. Well, you just did that because of the PR. Well, you and it's like, at this point, I'm the only one that knows the truth. You have no way of knowing what my motives or character is, and like, you get to make your decision, but like, this is a hard boundary for me, because you're not going to be convinced. Like, I don't argue about my character. Yeah,

    Franchesca Ramsey 27:48

    they've already made up their mind. I mean, again, not to be a broken record. But this, I think, is what you explained so brilliantly in your series with those cards. It's like, these are bad faith arguments. The person, when someone says to you, oh, so you doing X, Y and Z, that's not a good faith they have. They are telling you what you did. They're not asking you what you did. They're telling you what you or what they believe that you did. And so at that point, it is a losing game, and I will admit I am someone who loves to have the last word, so it is some and I have learned that the sad in me hates being misunderstood, and especially because I really make an effort to choose my words so carefully. I am a writer. I get paid for my words, for my thoughts, and so it's very frustrating when people one of my biggest pet peeves is when people put quotation marks around something I haven't said, and I often just say, you can't put quotation marks around something that I have not said. That's not how quotes work. That's not how quotes work unless you're using it for sarcasm, like you know, or you know, or you're quoting a specific word. But you can't put a whole sentence together and put slam two quotes on the end of it and say it came from me, because I know it did it. One thing about Francesca, I'm a banker. I love receipts. Show me where I said it. Point on the doll where Francesca said X, Y and Z. You can't so to your point, it's just a waste of your time and energy, and that's just again, a time when you have to step away from the internet. I have to remind myself that we are very loud about the things that we don't like. We're not as loud about the things that we do like, and so it can often feel like everyone is screaming at you, and maybe that's true, but there's also a lot of people who really enjoy your content, who are just passively enjoying it, and they're just not saying anything about it. And then you step away from the internet. And my best girlfriend, I call her my work wife. She and I are exact opposites. She is the most offline person ever, and anytime I will tell her about some drama going on online, she's like, What are you talking. About, like, no one knows who what. And I'm like, Oh, right. Like people in the real world do not know about this. And even, like, a million people saw this video, okay, a million people feels like a lot of people. It's not a lot of people. Like, when you walk out of your front door and you ask someone on the street, Hey, did you see this thing, blah, blah, blah. They're like, No, what are you talking about? But a million people saw it yet. But like, no one on this block saw it, no one at your job probably saw it's like a bubble, you know,

    KC Davis 30:38

    I have so many of those little tricks it because I feel like it comes down to two things, like not taking the bait, but then when you do accidentally take the bait, it's also, like managing the fight or flight of like I'm being misunderstood. I'm gonna get canceled. People didn't understand what I said. Now they think that I said this horrible thing, blah, blah. And like, one of the funny mind tricks that I do is, like, if I make a video and I say something, and maybe I it was wrong, or maybe it was just off color, or was tone deaf, or whatever was it ever I decided to take it down. And then, you know, to manage that feeling of like, I need to make another video. I need to explain and re explain it over explain it. I'll sometimes, like, look at the video and it's like, okay, 12,000 people saw this video, and I'm getting hundreds and hundreds of comments of how awful I am. Sometimes what I'll do is, I'll look at it and I'll be like, okay, 12,000 people, and then I'll be like, every single person that saw this video unfollowed me for it. How many followers would I still have? And I'm always like, honestly, like, 12,000 compared to 1.6 million. Like, is not that big of a deal if 12,000 people saw a mistake and decided they were done with me for it. And I don't see that to be like, egotistical, or to say that, like, you know that I don't care about the people who follow me, but like, my brain goes to this place where it's like, oh my god, if I don't over explain this mistake I made, my career is over. And just reminding myself like, No, it's not. It really isn't.

    Franchesca Ramsey 31:56

    No, it's not. I mean, I say this all the time, but cancel culture is not real. And that's not to say that sometimes we don't experience consequences for our words and actions, and sometimes those are rightful consequences, and sometimes they are unjust consequences. That is the world that we live in. But ultimately, negative backlash. It doesn't, unfortunately, more oftentimes than not, it propels people's career, and I see it all the time on Tiktok. Now, people have gotten very wise to the fact that if you put the right words together, and you can get people upset, you can make a nice little check, and you can maybe get a podcast and and start doing public speaking. So again, I care more about maintaining my morals throughout my work, and sometimes that means when you stray, your audience is going to have a negative reaction. And what I can only hope for, and I think that you've done a good job with, is cultivating an audience that feels that they respect you enough to let you know when you fucked up, and cultivating an offline community, which is what I talk about a lot. I think a lot of influencers lack is some people who will really let you know. They will slide in your DMS. They will pull you to the side. You know, I've had times where I was like sub tweeting and just going off, and I'll have a friend text me and say, girl, you Okay? I see you on Twitter. Uh, everything, okay? And I'm like, Oh, I'm going through some online. I'll never forget my friend Angelica Ross, who is an actress, and she has become a good friend of mine, but we met via social media. She did that to me a few times. She said, Girl, come over, turn Twitter off. Let's lay by the pool, just chill. And I was like, wow, I needed that so badly. And when I see people spiraling online, I often think, God, I just they must not have somebody, or maybe they're just not listening to them. But I definitely think some of them are in real time sharing every single thing, because they don't have that group chat that they could say, oh, this thing pissed me off, and they can all tell you, you're right. Don't post that online, though. All right,

    KC Davis 34:15

    y'all, this conversation is so great, I don't want to end it early, so I'm gonna go ahead and split me and Francesca's conversation into two parts. So stay tuned for next Monday, where I will release the second half of this phenomenal interview. You.

Christy Haussler
109: Should We Bully Immoral People? with Ellie Rushton

Join us for today’s interesting conversation about ethics, boundaries, suffering, bullying, and being online/offline. There are many facets to these topics as they intertwine with morality, and we are diving into a discussion with Ellie Rushton, 

Show Highlights:

  • Ellie’s background, work, and TikTok content about “cultivating bold spaces”

  • Ellie’s definition of bullying: “doing something harmful several times on purpose for the sake of someone’s suffering”

  • Thoughts on bullying and why people do it

  • Holding someone accountable vs. bullying—what’s the difference?

  • Ellie’s perspective on online comments to others’ content

  • Thoughts on the roots of inequality, oppression, and suffering—and the problem with categorizing “good” and “bad” people

  • People are afraid of embodying compassion.

  • What is effective in online spaces

  • Thoughts about boundaries, revenge, and retribution

  • Standing up for what you believe while holding yourself accountable

Resources and Links:

Connect with Ellie: TikTok

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC Davis 0:00

    Music.

    Hello, you sentient balls of stardust. I sound a little sick because I am a little sick, but I am here with you and also with Ellie Rushton here in the studio, and we're gonna have an interesting conversation today about ethics and boundaries and suffering and bullying and being online and being offline. And I don't really know what to call the whole episode, but I am glad that you're with us. You sentient balls of Stardust and Ellie. Thank you for being here on the show. Thank you so much for having me. It's great to be here. So I stumbled upon one of your tiktoks that really, really put into words something that I'd kind of been throwing around in my own head. But before we dive into that, tell me a little bit about you and what you do, and you know your Tiktok channel talks about cultivating bold spaces, and kind of just tell me a little bit about all that. Yes, so my name is Ellie. My pronouns are sheher, and my life's mission has become in recent years, this idea of cultivating bold spaces. Basically what I mean by a bold space is a space in which people are safe and empowered to discover, explore and expand their authentic selves. It's an idea that I sort of spiraled out from the concept of safe spaces and brave spaces. Came up with this idea in the context of performing art spaces, and then I realized it kind of works everywhere. So I thought, You know what? Let's take this to Tiktok. Let's see what we can do. So in my everyday life, I work for an organization that supports the arts and culture industry with things related to equality, diversity and inclusion and change making work. But when it comes to my Tiktok, what I'm interested in is discussing topics and areas that I think throw up roadblocks and barriers to authenticity and connection, and that's kind of really what it's all about. So I go in a lot of different directions, and it's a lot of fun. Well, I am excited about this conversation. Can I already tell you might be somebody that might be coming back for more conversations? Well, that's exciting. Yes, because, I mean, one of the things that I've been thinking about a lot lately is just kind of the way that we behave as a species online, which is a mirror of what we see in public spaces. But I think that it brings out behavior in some of us that while deeply human and definitely something we see in offline spaces, it's like it's much quicker to be brought out. And those of us that maybe wouldn't behave that way in an offline space, and I wanted to start with this Tiktok that you made where you talked about, basically, like bullying immoral people. And I don't know if somebody brought up a question or if it was just kind of on your mind, but you talked about, you know, is it right, or is it practical, or is it ethical, or is it functional to bully immoral people? So tell me kind of your thoughts on that.

    Ellie Rushton 3:02

    Yeah. So this originally came about because I made a Tiktok before that, where I was basically just exploring, why do we bully What is it inside us that makes us feel like it's okay to bully people sometimes? And I wasn't really talking about immoral people at that point. I was really just talking about bullying in general. And I came to this conclusion that, you know, we do feel either because we've learned, or maybe it's just a part of being human that we have the right to correct behavior which we think disrupts the social norm. And I was thinking about, you know, children and teenagers at that point, it's like if, uh, someone in your class behaves in a way which you've interpreted as abnormal, you feel like you have the right to correct that behavior. And sometimes people feel like bullying is the method by which they can do that.

    KC Davis 3:52

    And this is such an interesting starting point, though, especially with when we when we hear people talk about community, like, oh, we need to build a community. We need to build a community. And we talk about how community involves holding people accountable and calling people in or calling people out, right? But really talking about what that looks like, and in what ways is that practical and or ethical? In what ways is that maybe impractical or not ethical? Let's start with kind of like a what definition are you using for bullying? Because that it's that's a word that comes up a lot with, like, Hey, you're bullying me. So what would be your definition?

    Ellie Rushton 4:29

    Yeah, bullying is quite complicated. I actually used to teach primary school children about bullying, and the little phrase we used to use with them was several times on purpose, so it wasn't things that were just a one off. So sometimes you can be very mean to someone, but it's a one off. And it wasn't things that were by accident, but it was repeated and it was on purpose. And I think that is a fairly good model to base this on. But of course, bullying is quite a nuanced and complex thing, because sometimes you can do something as a one off, but you can. Contributing. You know, especially in online spaces, your one off might be contributing to a bigger thing that is very much several times

    KC Davis 5:07

    it might be a ripple effect. I think, particularly if you have a like a large platform, right? You say one thing, and then the ripple effect is several dozen or 100 people going to either say the same thing or do the same thing exactly,

    Ellie Rushton 5:22

    exactly. And so what I think is important to remember it is a repeated attack on that person, and it is for the sake of their suffering. It's not necessarily with a constructive purpose. People might convince themselves that it is, but the goal is to make them suffer.

    KC Davis 5:38

    I'm curious what your thoughts are when it comes to like, intention versus impact. Because one of the things that I have found interesting about existing in an online space is that we haven't really caught up to what happens on an online space when it comes to like, our definition of bullying, and what that looks like and feels like, because, you know, it used to be, let's think the plague yard right where we typically think about bullying. Typically, as you said, it's like repeatedly on purpose to cause suffering. And usually when we say repeated, we're talking about specifically repeated from the same person or from the same group of people that are kind of in on it. And one of the things, and we know how damaging to mental health bullying can be, but one of the things that's really interesting about being online is that you can experience the exact same recipient experience of bullying, even though the little attacks or the jabs or the comment whatever are coming from different people, so as a user, I might be saying a one off in a comment section. Oh, that's such an ugly dress or whatever, right? But if I'm one of 10,000 people saying the same thing, the experience of that person who made that video is no different than if one person had said it 10,000 times

    Ellie Rushton 7:09

    Exactly. And I do think it's useful to draw a comparison to children in the playground, because, you know, as you're speaking, just then, I was thinking about, well, what if there was scenario? What if there was a scenario where, you know, a child throws a pebble at another child, we wouldn't call that bullying, but if a child sees a group of children all throwing one pebble each at a child, and they decide to pick up a pebble and join in, then I think we would consider that bullying, right? Because they are aware that they are contributing to an act of bullying. There is something that is happening several times on purpose here. And so I think that when we're on online spaces, most of the time, when people adding to an onslaught of comments, they're doing so feeling buoyed up behind that onslaught of comments that's already there, and feeling like, Yes, I'm part of this big wave of people saying this thing, and they feel somewhat of a protection within that, and I think that it's something that we have to be extremely mindful of, especially because unlike on a playground where you know you've got 30 children who all know each other and have these relationships in online spaces, you just don't have those relationships with the people that You're interacting with, and it's so easy to go on one video, comment on it, and then forget that you've even done it, because you've now scrolled on to the next thing. And so, yeah, there's a heightened level of responsibility and awareness that I think we need to be thinking about.

    KC Davis 8:38

    And it's interesting that, you know, you could almost see a scenario in which a person is being bullied, and yet one person making one comment would not say, Oh, I'm bullying that person. I did one thing and I moved on. It wasn't repeated. It wasn't this. It wasn't that. One of the things that I have had to contend with as my platform gets bigger and bigger and bigger is like, what is my responsibility in terms of how people react to the way that I react to people? Because I've been known to make a snarky video or a clap back, or, you know, a reply video to someone that is being rude or mean or awful to me, and there's this interesting tension of like, I feel strongly that I am not morally obligated to, like, take it on the nose every single time, because it does rise sometimes to the effect of feeling bullied, especially when you know someone is intentionally being cruel to you. And so I've sort of constructed some of my own boundaries around this. And I'm curious your thoughts and genuinely curious. Like, if you're like, Casey, that's ridiculous, you can't do that anymore. But like, one of the things that I sort of see align with is, like, if I make a video talking about something or someone, or someone specifically, and. And people will make comments in my comment section, but when people then go to that person's page and start making comments in their comment section, for some reason, to me, that crosses a line, and I think it's because I feel as though, okay, if that person decides that they don't want to see what I've said, they can block me. And if they've decided that they don't want to get notifications about what we're all saying about their behavior in this comment section, they can delete their comment. They won't get those like they have an option to opt out of us reacting to their behavior. But if you go into their space on their other videos like you push them into this space where their only way to opt out is to completely shut down their own like online account, which, to me, gets a lot closer to bullying or a lot closer to suffering or like that's a pretty big ask for someone in A world where your online, you know, account is a real part of your life, and I don't know if, if that's like a good enough place to land, or, you know what I mean, or if that's a justification for why, like, I don't want to stop telling people that they're being assholes. I'm just curious your thoughts on that. And then I want to get into this sort of difference between, you know, what is holding someone accountable, versus bullying? Or what do we consider, you know, is a creator saying something and then going, but by the way, guys don't bother this person. Is that sufficient, you know? And at what point am, are you truly, really not responsible for every crazy on the internet? I say that with love. I'm a person who can be crazy sometimes.

    Ellie Rushton 11:39

    Yeah, and it's a big question. And, you know, just to give a bit of context for the listeners, I'm very new at Tiktok, you know, I'm currently sitting just under that threshold of 10,000 followers, whether I might be able to start making a couple of quid a month, you know. So I, you know, I'm very much still figuring this out, and I think that it's challenging, because we can ultimately really only take responsibility for ourselves, but when we are in online spaces, we do also have to consider what the ripple effect might be, right? You know, certainly it's funny, since I started making videos, I basically never comment on other videos. Now I only ever do so to say something positive, because I'm really uninterested in getting dragged into other creators drama. I'm dragging myself by putting a comment. You know, that would be my own doing. And similarly, if people sometimes tag me in other people's videos and they want me to make a comment or make a response, I tend to ignore that. And for me personally, and I'm not saying that this is the correct solution, but for me personally, I think I have shied away from stitches or from doing discourse on top of discourse on top of discourse within tick tock, because, within tick tock, because it can get a little bit insular, right and and so I kind of try and challenge myself where, if I've seen a tiktoker Make a Tiktok about something that I disagree with, well, can I make my own Tiktok about those ideas without actually involving that person at all? Is that more valuable for me to do rather than being like, look at this person. Aren't they terrible? But of course, all of this is contextual, because it sort of depends exactly what we're talking about. You know, are we talking about someone who has got online and said something that I disagree with, or are we talking about someone who's got online and advocated for war crimes? You know, there's

    KC Davis 13:42

    like an ascend ascending level of, you know, okay, is there a need to sort of directly talk about this person is doing something dangerous, so this person is doing something dishonest, or this specific person needs to be addressed directly? But, of course, the interesting thing there is that not everyone is going to agree with where you draw those lines, so then you end up in those arguments. Yeah, yeah. Because as my platform has gotten bigger, you know, I've gone from stitching people to oftentimes, what I'll do now, especially if I don't think it's someone that like is necessarily doing anything dangerous, I just have some like, social commentary or whatever. Is that I started just showing a clip of the video, and then I ended up showing a clip of the video and blacking out the username. And then I showed the clip of the video black out the username and the fate like, because every single time it would just like, spin into this huge thing, and the actual commentary of what you're trying to say gets lost. And so, you know, I have a friend that literally will put it in the background and stand in front of so that you can't say anything about that person except for what they're saying, so she could address what they're saying. But I'm curious, in an online space when it comes to, like, quote, unquote accountability, and you know, you talk about the definition of bullying specifically being to cause suffering. Where you sort of draw that line between, you know, calling out behavior versus causing suffering,

    Ellie Rushton 15:08

    yes. So the place where I sort of came to a few different tiktoks, I mean, a few different tiktoks on this topic, and the place that I kind of came to, that I landed on, was that I am not entitled to pursue the suffering of others, but I am entitled to other things which may cause suffering to others. So I am entitled to pursue my own safety, which means, you know, I may act in self defense in a way that causes suffering, and I am entitled to stand up for what I believe in, which very much does involve calling out people's ideas and calling people in. And, you know, I see no problem with saying something like this person's values disgust me, or I'm disgusted by this person's values. I don't see a problem with that, because that is me standing up for what I believe in, and sharing my perspective. But I'm not pursuing their suffering for the sake of their suffering. I'm trying actually to pursue something that I think is morally good and right, and I think it's in the pursuit of what we believe is a moral ought that sometimes suffering is an inevitability, but I think that, you know, I am entitled to pursue those things, and I'm not entitled to just pursue someone's suffering for the sake of suffering. Where this gets complicated is that, you know, a lot of people do believe that, in quotes, bad people deserve to suffer, and therefore believe that it is a moral ought. But what I spoke about in my Tiktok is that the guiding principle of bad people deserve to suffer, and I am entitled to pursue their suffering is at the root of most systems of inequality and most systems of oppression. Whereas I think my guiding principle of I am not entitled to pursue the suffering of others is at the root of what I would like the world to be like, which is that, you know, people do pursue what they believe is morally right, but they don't pursue suffering for the sake of suffering, and they don't believe that because they have categorized someone as beneath them, for whatever reason. You know, perhaps it is because of sexism and racism, or perhaps it's because of, you know, they see them as a bad person in quotes. But you know, I don't think that we can ever hold the belief that we can pursue the suffering of people we see is beneath us, and that not leads to an extremely destructive place.

    KC Davis 17:44

    Yeah, it seems to me like it's not necessarily a fault of the ideal, as much as it's a reality of human beings, like, if we were to say immoral people deserve to be, you know, for bad things to happen to them, I don't know. And we truly were like to give examples, right, like of the worst people we could think nobody would disagree, like, you know, but the issue is, is that I don't want to construct a society where I could be cast as someone's immoral, beyond, beneath, you know, deserving of whatever, just because of their judgment. I mean, that's really the issue, right, like, and I think I sometimes think this way of like the death penalty. The reason that I am so anti death penalty isn't necessarily that I don't think there are people that deserve to die, or that there are people who have done things so horrendous and are such a danger to society. Society wouldn't be better if they were not alive. It's that the pursuit and the execution of that ideal in the hands of people, it's like impossible to carry that out in a just, consistent way, and we will end up causing more injustice than we could have solved if we try.

    Ellie Rushton 19:14

    Yeah, exactly. It's so complicated, isn't it, because you're exactly right that if you name you know, the worst people that we can imagine, I have exactly the same emotional response of, you know, fear and disgust and rage. And you know, I'm not, I wouldn't shed a tear if they were to suffer, right? But I'm just a person, and I can also be aware that, you know, my feelings about what is good and bad are from the perspective of just being this, like you say, this little ball of sentient Stardust, right? And I can't, for that reason. I can't really get on board with the idea of objective morality, the idea that there. Are objectively good people and bad people. I can't really sort people into categories like that in my mind. And again, it's not because I don't have that emotional response, but it's because that if you decide that someone is a bad person, then that raises the question of, well, how is badness measured? And who decides what the measurement is, you know, what is the percentage of bad things they need to have done in order to qualify as a bad person? You know? It raises all these difficult questions, and

    KC Davis 20:33

    I can't give myself the right to do that without giving strangers the right to do that to me too. You know what I mean? I can't say, Well, I'm the only one that gets to utilize that judgment without saying that everybody else also gets to utilize that judgment. I want to go back to those two statements that you made, where you said, you know, I don't have the right to pursue the suffering of someone else, but I also don't have the obligation to always avoid the suffering of someone else. I think you said it slightly differently, but it was those two principles, and that's the first Tiktok that I stumbled upon, that I really latched onto, because I'm in the middle of finishing up my second book, which is on relationships, and a large portion of the book is about what do you do when someone's best is hurting you? So they are doing their best and it is hurting you. It is damaging you. And a good part of the book is about relationships, and it's about dealing with this idea of, okay, there are people out there who are bad actors, and it's important to how do you deal with someone's a bad actor? And then there are people out there that are not bad actors, but because of their own psychology and decisions and trauma and disabilities and hurts and harms like are causing hurt in and harm in your life. And what are your responsibilities to that person depending on the relationship and and at what point do you say, you know, the harm is too harmful. And it struck me in a conversation about boundaries, that those two sort of guiding boundaries are really powerful in the way they intersect and the way that we treat the people around us, that we are not entitled to cause the suffering of other people, and we are not obligated to always avoid the suffering of other people. And it really beautifully melded what I think is kind of those two polar things that we as humans struggle with, which is like the people pleasing in us, of, Oh, I feel bad if I make them feel bad, right? And then also, like the vengefulness of us, which is like, if you hurt me, everything's game, or if you do something I think is wrong, everything's game. You know, my fear and anger justify cruelty. You know, bad behavior justifies cruelty, because those are kind of the two polar opposites. And you know, when we're talking to one side or the other, it sounds like we're just telling them to go to the other side. And it's like, well, no, you don't have to just right? And so I wanted to kind of just talk about those two principles as they relate to interpersonal and maybe give us some examples of each and how that would come up. Yeah,

    Ellie Rushton 23:23

    well, this is a really great topic to talk about it through. And you know, as I'm sure is the case for many people who you talk to, you know, there is a personal element of that for me, you know, I have been in a relationship where I needed to get out and, you know. So the specific words, and I am a bit of a nerd for specificity of language, and the specific words that I landed on was I am not entitled to pursue the suffering of others. And I landed on pursue rather than cause. In the end, because it was really about that intention, you know. And that's the thing, you know, you asked about intention versus impact earlier. And you know, a lot of the discourse when we're thinking about equality, diversity and inclusion is, you know, we really need to focus more on impact rather than intent, because we're over focusing on intent. But of course, really, it is a balancing act, ultimately, and I really do believe that I am not entitled to pursue the suffering of someone else for my own satisfaction, because I think that way,

    KC Davis 24:24

    yeah, pursue is very active, right? Like pursue is ongoing, also it's not I did a one time thing, and oops, I just realized it caused suffering. Pursue is that if I did a one time, it's like, it not only has an active component, but the active component is the intention of suffering like I am doing this so that this person will suffer, yeah,

    Ellie Rushton 24:45

    and so I landed on that phrase, but at the same time, I am entitled to pursue my own safety. I'm entitled to pursue the safety of other people as part of, you know, being a human being in community, and I'm entitled to. Stand up for what I believe in. And we have to be able to do that in relationships. You know, we have to be able to pursue our own safety and stand up for ourselves and stand up for the fact that, no, it's, it's not acceptable for you to treat me this way. And you know, maybe okay now I have to take myself out of this relationship, and that is going to cause you suffering, because, despite the way you treat me, you do love me, and you are attached to me, and I know that me leaving is going to have a devastating impact on you. You know, I knew that when I was leaving a relationship was that it was going to have a devastating impact. And you know, I cared about him deeply, but I had to pursue my I'm not going to say safety in this particular context, because I don't feel I was unsafe, exactly. But I had to pursue my emotional liberation, and I had to pursue my happiness, and I had to pursue my health, and by having this guiding principle of I'm not entitled to pursue the suffering of others that kept me in check, that stopped me from, you know, seeking any kind of revenge or trying to make becoming attached to the idea of making his life difficult in the way that he'd made life my life difficult. You know, that guiding principle kept me in check and kept me away from that, and I'm incredibly grateful for that.

    KC Davis 26:21

    Yeah, I think the way that I put it in my book was I talked about how, like, love can never be unconditional, because the condition is always my own well being my own survival. And actually, I think the way I specifically put it was that my love can be unconditional, but my relationships are not like I can love you even if I'm not in a relationship with you, and I can love you at a distance, and I can love you, and I can want good things for you, and I can forgive you or feel compassion for you. So my love can be unconditional, but a relationship with me, even with the people that I love unconditionally, will never be unconditional, because the condition is my own survival and my own well being, and because I used to work in addiction, this is a fascinating thing to me, because I talked one time about doing addiction work with families, where you have families who are you're trying to get them to talk to their loved one about the impact of their behavior. And once again, you kind of have a couple of extremes that you would often find family members fall on sides of you. Have the ones that want to say, you know, you have been the worst child in the world, and you have ruined our lives, and you are so selfish and lazy and you stole from us and right, like that kind of where I would constitute that as speaking in cruelty. And then you have the opposite, which is the family members that would be like, listen, I know that you stole my grandmother's ring because you were hurting. And I get it, honey, I get it like, I know that that is not I know that you are not your addiction, and that you really couldn't help it. And I that type of communication I call delicate. So you have people that communicate cruelly, and you have people that communicate delicately, and the goal was always to teach people how to speak the truth with kindness. And so I think that's why your Tiktok resonated so much with me. Because when you have people that speak cruelly, yes, they're having emotions, yes, they might be speaking honestly, but they are purposefully pursuing the pain and suffering of the person that hears it. And typically, sometimes it's from an anger I just want you to hurt. But more often than that, it's from a if I can just get through to you, right, if I can say something so powerful and so hurtful that it will get through to you and you will feel it. That will make you want to change, that will make you wake up and see how you're hurting everyone around you. Doesn't work ever. It just causes that person to fold up into shame and to run right back to substances. And then you have the person who's always speaking delicately, and they're always thinking about and really it's both of these people are more concerned with how this person is going to feel than just speaking the truth, right? And so the delicate people are always thinking, well, if I hurt their feelings, if I make them sad, if they have negative emotions, then they're just gonna run off and go use again. You know, I have to make sure that they never experience anything that upsets them and anything that makes them sad and like, I just love them unconditionally, and that also never works. That's how people get walked all over. That's how people get manipulated. That's how people end up. It's like, when you're almost, like, helping them continue to self destruct, that's when you get into people we talk about, like, enabling both of them are in the same situation. It's, I really think that if I can control your emotions, I can control your behavior, and so we talk about like, what would it look like for you to say you stole my grandmother's ring and it destroyed me. I don't know if I can ever trust you again, because that's how deeply this wounded me. And I don't know who you are. I feel. Like the person I used to love, I don't know where they went, and speaking about your own emotional truth, and you are going to say some things that that person will feel hurt by, that will cause them pain. But there's a difference, as you said, between pursuing that pain and saying, I don't have to avoid you feeling any pain. That's why I really resonated with you making those distinctions, because that's kind of who I always dealt with on the polar opposite ends, right? Yeah, you

    Ellie Rushton 30:27

    know what's interesting is, I think that so many people are afraid of compassion, afraid of embodying compassion, because they their compassion has spiraled towards that delicacy for them in the past, and they exactly. They think of compassion as permissiveness. You know what? On one video I made someone, I spoke about compassion, and they interpreted it as pleasantness, which is a very different, very different thing. And I think that people are very afraid of embodying compassion. And you know, for me, I see compassion as, quite simply, the refusal to deny someone's humanity and always holding that person's humanity no matter what they've done, no matter what the situation is between you two, still always honoring the fact that this is a human being who I do have some moral obligation towards, right? And that doesn't mean being nice, that doesn't mean being permissive, and it doesn't mean being delicate, but so many people are afraid of being taken advantage if they embody compassion. I see compassion as a position of great strength and integrity. And, you know, relating it back to the relationship situation we were talking about, you know, I consider the moment I left that relationship to be the moment that I fully accepted him as a human being, and accepted that I cannot force him to change. And therefore, if I accept that this is who he is, then I accept that the only action I can take is to leave. That is actually the compassionate thing that I can do in this moment. And I think that you know, when it comes to online spaces and bullying immoral people. You know, you had that excellent point there about, you know, I believe I can change their behavior by changing their emotions. And of course, I can totally understand why people would believe that. Because, of course, yes, our emotions drive our behavior. We all know this. And so, you know, why wouldn't we think, Oh yeah, that's a good tactic. But in my experience with online spaces, it's not effective anyway, because there's always going to be other, lots of other voices in the room, and frankly, this person doesn't actually know you. You know and you're not willing to be vulnerable with them. You're not willing to say, this is how I am impacted by what you've said. Instead, you're going you're attacking them. And I do think that if we were able to cultivate, and I have no idea if this is possible, but who knows, maybe in the future of the Internet, we can cultivate a culture where what it looks like for a mass of people to take to, you know, call on someone to take accountability is for them to actually be able to be vulnerable in the way that you just described, and say, you know, this is how your words impact me, And I want you to know that and be willing to let that be enough. And I have this whole life philosophy that everything is facilitation, right? And so when you're facilitating a situation, you're putting out your offer, but you are aware that you cannot control the outcome, and you have to be unattached to the outcome. And so, you know, could we ever cultivate a culture where we show up to the internet with that level of integrity, that level of compassion and actually just being willing to put out what we need, to put out how we've been impacted, or, you know what our view and perspective of that thing is, and allow whatever journey happens to happen, rather than trying to do it through that. Oh, I can control how this person feels, and I can make them change their behavior, yeah,

    KC Davis 34:29

    because that's really what boundaries is. And one of my biggest Eves when it comes to commenters that want to quote, unquote, call things out, is that, you know, like when I show up to give someone information, this is kind of like one of my personal boundaries, is that, like, if I'm gonna, quote, unquote, call somebody out, call somebody in, give somebody information about how I find their behavior either affects me negatively or sidesteps what I believe their own bound, what their own values to be. You know, if I have a relationship. With them, or what I think value should be if I don't have a close relationship with that person, right? So we're just talking to kind of people on the internet, mutuals, things like that. I get to say it once, like, that's it. I say, I don't like this. I think this is wrong. I think you're off here. I think this. That's it. My job is done. I have given the information on the platter. What is not my job and what goes beyond boundaries is okay. They didn't react to that the way I thought they should. So I'm gonna go to another video and say it again, and another video and say it again, and I'm gonna make multiple videos over and over and over about how they're not listening. See they're not listening. And let's whip up the frenzy of how we should all now punish them for not listening. And I don't mean that you know anyone who's making commentary on a public you know creator is wrong, but it really grinds my gears when I get a commenter that'll say, hey, you know, here's my opinion on something you did. Great. I see it, and then they come back to another video. Are we going to talk about this? Are we going to talk about this? You've done this, you've done this. And it's, first of all, it's this. Like, okay, please understand that you're not my friend. You're like, one in a million. There are a million opinions on something I have done or said. And I actually had a situation recently where I made a video and somebody commented and said, Hey, like, this is bad, this is wrong. This is a stupid take. And separately, I had a mutual make, a video, a friends only video, and say, Hey, Casey, I think this was a wrong take, and I was kind of hurt by it. And I, you know, responded to her and was like, hey, fair, I trust your insight on this. I'm gonna take it down. That's whatever. But what was funny is that other commenter continued to come into my comment section of my other videos and go, are we not going to talk about it? Are you not going to take accountability? Are you not going to it? Was like, dude, you've said it. I get it. Like you've done your part, continuing to move on to, I have to force you to have this conversation with me personally is like, beyond breaking boundaries, particularly with the awareness of like, you're a commenter in a comment section, not somebody who kind of knows you, but even people that I know, a mutuals, or somebody that I call out, like that's to me, that's a very clear boundary where I say it, I'm not responsible for whether you change.

    Ellie Rushton 37:21

    Yeah, and you know, something that I think is important to consider in all of that is that people are very, very invested in the idea that there are good people and bad people in the world, and the idea of that binary, to the extent that which, if I say that I don't buy into that binary, people will only hear that I won't label people as bad. They think that I think everyone's good, when actually, no, I'm rejecting the binary entirely, right? And it's so funny, though, because then they will list out examples of who they think I should label as a bad person. They will never list out examples of people who I should label as a good person, right? And what that tells me is that people are measuring their goodness by through how they respond to what they perceive as bad, right? And so this person in your comment section. You know, she's perceived something that she feels is bad, and she feels that her job as a in quotes, good person, is to keep responding to it in that way and to pursue, pursue, pursue, pursue retribution, pursue revenge, even. And it's funny, I was talking to my husband about this before we got on the call, and my husband is one of my greatest inspirations in life, and he was a he said something really interesting. He said retribution and revenge is narratively satisfying, that's why we pursue it. But we're pursuing it for satisfaction and to satisfy our egos and to satisfy the idea that we're a good person, and we get so caught up in that that we're not actually doing the steady work of what we might consider to be goodness, right, which isn't about how we respond to things that are bad necessarily. It's actually about creating the energy of the things that we perceive as good. And I think that in online spaces, there's very little of that going on in comparison to the, you know, the process of, you know, discovering wrongs that can be righted. That's what people are very interested in online

    KC Davis 39:39

    I'm thinking back to, you know, the way that I respond when people are purposely cruel. And I will say, I think I probably, I mean, I let, like, probably 85% of it go, right? You go, oh, that, wow, right. And then you just kind of like, or like, I personally kind of hit my limit before I'm like, hi, you know. Need to go f off. And I do have an internal sense of boundaries when I do that. I don't I've never, like, explicitly said them out loud online or any of that. But like, I think people will find like, I specifically do think about holding that person's dignity. Like, I don't talk about what they look like or what they you know, their identities, or any of that, right? I've been known to be snarky and sarcastic and probably insulting at times. And when somebody, one time asked me, like, I thought that you were such a compassionate person, like, why do you sometimes respond this way to people? And I said to them, you know, I do feel like I'm like, try my best to be compassionate and at the same time, like I would, like, insulting me to be an uncomfortable experience for you. Like, I'm not necessarily interested in, like, you know, pursuing your suffering, but like, I'm really comfortable with, like, my reaction to your purposeful attempt to wound me, to be uncomfortable for you. Like, to not be a fun time for you. And it is something that I have to, like, keep a constant check on, and sometimes make the decision to just like, you know, I probably just need to, like, step back for a few days or a week from even just interacting on the internet to like, to feel as though I can operate in a space where I'm not, like I'm not, never defending myself, and I'm not, you know, grasping at just trying to stroke my ego, as in response to feeling really hurt, because, like that Dance is really difficult, but that is also really helped me in person, like, if someone is really awful to me, it's easy for me to be like, Okay, let me just smooth it over. Let me just like, as opposed to, in my I had an old therapist that used to call it return awkward to sender. Where, like, if someone makes an inappropriate comment and you it, you feel awkward, so you're trying to, like, kind of cover it up or or not draw attention to it. And she was the one that taught me, like you're not the one that made an inappropriate comment. So it is not your labor to make it not awkward. That's their labor to deal with the awkwardness, right? And so you should respond honestly and authentically, without fear of, oh, they might have to deal with the awkwardness of their inappropriate comment, right? Or, you know, and it could be as simple as, you know, someone saying something to you that is insulting, but they're trying to, like, kind of laugh it off, like, oh, it's, it's funny to say things like that. And, you know, instead of going, Why would you say that? Or like, wow, that was rude. And so it's not like we're saying, you know, tell them to, you know, fall off the face of the earth or something. But we have this fear sometimes of like, forcing or creating, like, I'm not going to take on the labor of the moment you just created. Yeah,

    Ellie Rushton 43:01

    yeah, a phrase I really like is, I don't know why you think I'm a person you can say that to. Or I don't know why you think I'm a safe space for that kind of comment. You know, if someone's making a derogatory comment about someone else, for example, or just, you know, I don't know why you think it was okay to say that to me. You know, I think that, like, again, like it's pursuing, it's that pursuit of standing up for what I believe in. And yeah, of course, people are going to feel uncomfortable, but you know, if I wanted to make them feel uncomfortable, there's a lot of different ways I could do that, right? But if I am just willing, if I'm willing to hold space for their discomfort. Essentially, if I'm willing to create an uncomfortable environment in the process of pursuing, you know, what I know to be right, then that's, that's a very different, a different thing. And I think it's just, it's what keeps us accountable. You know, I've said in another video, actually, that the way that I hold other people accountable is by holding myself accountable. And I really try, and I'm not perfect, but I try and use that I language, you know, you know, starting the sentence with I and offering them a window into what I am perceiving and what I am experiencing, and then letting that be the information on which they then make their next decision, right? And it's up to them what they take from that. You know, I try and do that because I see that as a process of holding myself accountable. If someone says something that I, you know, feel insulted by, then I do have an accountability there. There's a process of holding myself accountable in that moment and modeling to them that behavior, rather than trying to make them behave that way. If I'm trying to teach someone the lesson or impart the lesson that it is not okay to treat people like that, then obviously I can't mirror their behavior, because that would be ridiculous. And so sometimes people in my comments who are like, Oh, well, an eye for an eye. Me, it's kind of like, you know, I really do believe that I should be modeling the behavior that I want to see in others as much as possible. And again, that doesn't have to mean that I'm treating everyone's feelings really preciously and making sure that no one ever feels uncomfortable. It just means, you know, holding myself to a high standard and showing the people this is the standard I hold myself to, and therefore that's the standard I'm going to hold you to as well. Yeah, the

    KC Davis 45:26

    phrase, you know, an eye for an eye leaves the whole world blind is what comes

    Ellie Rushton 45:30

    to mind. Exactly, exactly. Yeah, exactly. Well,

    KC Davis 45:35

    Ellie, this has been an excellent conversation, and super helpful and beneficial, and I really appreciate it. Where can people find you online if they want to follow you,

    Ellie Rushton 45:43

    so you can find me on Tiktok, and my handle is cultivating old spaces. Thank

    KC Davis 45:48

    you again. Ellie,

    Ellie Rushton 45:50

    thank you.

Christy Haussler
108: BEST OF: The Sex Ed You Should Have Gotten with Rachel Coler Mulholland

🌟 Taking a Break! 🌟

Hey everyone! I am taking a short break for August to recharge and prepare exciting new content for you. I’ll be back in September with fresh episodes and engaging conversations. Thanks for your support and patience. Stay tuned for what’s coming next!

Today, we are covering an important topic today, but maybe not in the way you expect. I’m joined by Rachel Mulholland (aka Shug CM), a therapist whom I met on TikTok because of her incredible content around sex education for children. Today’s focus is on how our lives as adults are impacted if we don’t get comprehensive sex education as children. Join us for the conversation!

Show Highlights:

  • How KC’s story from her teenage years illustrates the gaps that most people have in their education about sex and the fact that sex ed is NOT a one-time conversation

  • How “purity culture” is impacting teenagers in certain places in the US in damaging ways

  • How even most comprehensive sex ed doesn’t address the pleasurable side of sex–and (for females) that the pleasure doesn’t have to come from another person

  • How sexual predators take advantage of the lack of information in sex ed from SAFE places

  • Why parents have real fear about talking to their kids about sex ed

  • The effects of NOT educating kids that sex and pleasure don’t always go together

  • Rachel’s Four Pillars of Safe Sex: confirmation, communication, lubrication, and enthusiastic participation

  • Why parents should be aware when their kids are ready to hear and learn–and begin at the most basic level appropriate for their age

  • How to answer those first little-kid questions around, “Where do babies come from?”

  • Why curiosity is a foundational part of body talk for kids–not just around sexuality

  • How parents can work through their own feelings around sex ed with their children

  • Why Rachel’s next project is a book about body talk

Resources:

Connect with Rachel: TikTok, Instagram, Facebook, YouTube, and Website (coming soon!)

Recommended by Rachel: How Do You Make A Baby by Anna Fiske

Connect with KC: TikTok, Instagram, and Website 

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

  • KC Davis 0:05

    Hello. Sentient ball of stardust Welcome to Struggle care the podcast about mental health by me KC Davis, eventually I'll have a tagline that sticks also, by the way, I somebody told me, like way early on, that I don't pronounce sentient correctly. And I looked it up and they were correct. So apparently the American pronunciation is sentient. I guess the British still say sentient. But I just want, dear listener, you to know that I am totally 100% aware that I don't pronounce it at the correct us pronunciation, and I will not be. I think it sounds weird, and I will not I want to stick with sentient. My guest today is Rachel, who is a therapist. I met her on Tiktok because she makes really incredible content about sex education for children. And before you swipe away if you're not a parent, we're only going to talk about parenting stuff at the very end, because I want to talk more about what the effect is as adults when we don't get comprehensive sex education. So Rachel, say hello, introduce yourself.

    Rachel 1:04

    Hi everybody. I'm Rachel. You might also know me as Shug from Tiktok. So Rachel,

    KC Davis 1:09

    I want to start by telling you a story. Alright, let's hear it. So by the way, Mom and Dad, you may not want to hear the story, but whatever my I don't remember sex education in school at all. No recollection of it. I do remember my mother, which I thought she did a good job. She sat down when I was in early grade school and explained to me how babies were made, and she drew the ovaries and the uterus and, you know, the vaginal canal, and she talked about the sperm going up through the vet the vaginal canal and meeting the egg and it coming down, like she get, she drew it out the whole picture, and that's what I remember. And at the time, and for a long time, I thought, like, wow, like, my mom really, like, did so much more than school did. And then fast forward, I was 16 years old, and I lost my virginity in the backseat of a minivan at like, 3am it was very romantic. And the next day. So I'm talking like 29 hours later, I was with my friend, who, incidentally, was that person's younger sister, and I went to the bathroom, and I sat down on the toilet, and this gush of blood came out, and it was not period blood, right? Like it was watery. It was a gush, and I panicked, and I called a friend, obviously not their friend, whose house I was at, because I just slept with her brother. And I said to her, this is embarrassing to this day, I said I had sex and I think I got pregnant and just had a miscarriage, because at 16 years old, that was I didn't know anything else except for those mechanics of like the sperm meets the egg, and that's what happens. It's so funny to me to this day of poor little 16 year old thinking that 24 hours later I had gotten pregnant and then had a bloody miscarriage, because I had no idea what happened. I know today that I must have had a hymen that broke like hours later, and a little bit of blood came out. But I just wanted to share that with you and maybe use that as a jumping off point for how what we think is really comprehensive is not that comprehensive, well. And you touched

    Rachel 3:11

    on a really important theme. We've touched on several, actually, and the biggest one is that this is not a one time conversation, right? So many of us can point back to that one time we had the talk, right? I will never forget mine was sitting on the front step with my dad, because for some reason I was much more comfortable talking about that kind of stuff with my dad, and he was, you know, going to have the talk with me. And was like, Well, you know, when this, and I pretty sure, blacked out, because I don't remember a single thing he said. And then after that, it was like it was never talked about again, and there was never any discussion about the interpersonal part of it, which is another thing you're talking about, right? Like the fact that you felt like you had to hide the fact that you've had sex from this one friend. Like, we never discuss the consent piece, the interpersonal piece, the timeline. We put so much pressure, right? You made an off the cuff remark about how, you know, oh, how romantic. In the backseat of event, like, there's so much pressure on the first time, right? There's so many themes that you've touched on. But the biggest one here that we should probably discuss is this idea that, like, you have the talk about the mechanics, then you never discuss it again, and you'll just figure it out. And from an adult perspective, right? You're wanting to talk about how this impacts as adults, that's the piece, right? Because we spend so much of our early adulthood fumbling around and trying to find this information through trial and error and through misinformation of our friends, trial and errors, and that's one of the biggest negative impacts you can have about not getting comprehensive sex ed. And

    KC Davis 4:37

    I even think about fast forwarding to being in my late 20s, I was married, and we were trying to have a baby. We were trying to conceive, and we were having fertility issues, and so that drove me and my little ADHD brain into this, like hyper focus of learning about how conception really happens, and learning that you're only fertile, like four or five days. Days out of the month, and that it happens at this time, and it takes this many days for and I remember being like I was never taught any of this. I had to learn what fertility meant. And my husband and I kind of joked about how our whole, like teenage and early 20s years was spent really thinking that, like getting pregnant was so easy that, like we had to constantly be terrified about it, only to find that, like it's actually kind of hard for some people, and feeling very like no one prepared us for this, I can't believe we didn't know this. And it also makes me think about how, you know, I am someone who considers themselves sort of what we call an ex evangelical. So I still am in sort of a progressive Protestant Christian faith, but I talk a lot with friends about what the effect of purity culture has on us like so if listeners aren't familiar, like in the US church, particularly in the south, there's this real emphasis on sexual purity. It's particularly only for women, really. And there's a lot of conversations about how damaging that is, and that's sort of a conversation for another day. But what I think is so interesting is that even those of us who would not consider ourselves as growing up in purity culture, there's still this like, well, this is not something I can talk to my parents about. And the conversations that my mom had with me about sex were about mechanics. And I was sort of given this impression that it's okay to ask about mechanics, it's okay to learn about mechanics, but when it came to pleasure, that's not okay to know, like to learn about, that you just have to that's

    Rachel 6:48

    not even the thing we talk about, yeah, like ever even once you're sexually active, like it is a recent development that even adult people talk to each other about, not just Like, whether it was good or bad, but like, this was an enjoyable thing. I'm doing this because it's an enjoyable thing. I don't want to have children, you know, they're like, that's a recent development in the way that we talk about sex,

    KC Davis 7:12

    and I think it really does create even if you're not growing up in sort of a religious context that shame culture around your body and your pleasure and the way that your body works. And it's wild to me that we can know so much and learn so much about our bodies, and that somehow everything below the waist and above the knees, it has to be like mysterious.

    Rachel 7:35

    What's really interesting, too, when you talk about the concept of pleasure, and the way that we introduce that idea is like, even if you have the comprehensive discussion like this is between two people who are really into each other, and it does feel good. We also leave out the idea that, like, the pleasure doesn't come from the other person. The pleasure is innate in you, and the pleasure is something that you can do for yourself, and we especially fail to do that for little for people who are born with uteruses and vulvas and vaginas, like we don't talk about that. It's like, ingrained in the culture to acknowledge that people with penises are just going to explore themselves. But we never, like, we don't touch on that subject for people who are born with vaginas ever and so like, even again, even if you have the conversation about pleasure, even if you were lucky enough to have a parent who was comprehensive enough to say, Well, yeah, you know, you can have sex without having babies, because it feels good. We don't like that gives the that gives children, and then again, young adults that the idea that the pleasure comes from the other person, it has to be initiated by the other person. It has to be created and serviced and maintained by the other person. It

    KC Davis 8:41

    totally reminds me of another funny thing, which is that I remember being young, and I'm talking like I must have been like a toddler, like I was sleeping with a stuffed animal, and I had just discovered masturbation, and I was in bed with my mother. I mean, that's how young I was right. And my mom was like, What do you wear on vacation or something? She's like, What are you doing? Why? Like, what are you moving around? And I was like, I'm touching myself here. And she just kind of rolled over and looked at me and went, Okay, well, that's something that you do in private. And then, like, rolled over and went to sleep. And so, like, my mom really did have, especially, think, for the when I was growing up, like a pretty open matter of fact, non shaming conversation or like attitude about it. And yet, fast forward, like around that time or a year later, I remember listening to that Christmas song where it's like, you better watch out. You better not cry. You better not pow. I'm telling you why. Listen, this is how young I was. I didn't know what the word pout meant, and for some reason, I decided in my head, I think that means what I'm doing when I touch myself. I think that must be what pouting is, and Santa doesn't want me to do that. And I remember getting really frightened. Yeah, so it's just so funny to me to like, have what I've always considered like a parent with kind of progressive, open ideas about that, and yet, culturally, still having these, like, formative memories about being like, wait, I shouldn't do that. And I think here's my question, really, is that I think when we talk about, Hey, kids need comprehensive sex ed, and we talk about like, they need to understand how sex works mechanically. I think a lot of people are totally down with that, like, yes, they need to understand. But even the most progressive people that I know, when you start talking about, talking about children, about pleasure, all of the sudden we are so uncomfortable, is that something that you've experienced,

    Rachel 10:45

    Oh, absolutely. One of the very first videos that I had kind of blow up really big was when I proposed that we should not only encourage our young people to explore their own bodies, but that we should encourage them to explore their own bodies as a way to keep them safe, because if you understand how your body works and what your body likes and what your body needs, and you know that that's okay, and you can focus on yourself, and you can say, I'm not really down to explore your body yet, because I'm really still learning about my own that's a safeguard for them. That's a way for them to say, you know, I know that I'm not really all the way sure about how my own body works, so like, let's not go there yet, right? A lot of the ways that predators leverage their power against children is by giving them information that they haven't gotten from somewhere safe. So they start with answering questions for them that the kids have been told they can't answer, you know, they can't ask, or they don't feel comfortable asking their caregivers. And, you know, it's pretty nonchalant. It's pretty non threatening. And then it escalates. And then it goes from answering questions to offering information, and that information is where we start to, you know, get into the dangerous stuff. And when they offer that information. Like, hey, if you do this, it feels good. And you know, I won't tell even you know it's okay to feel that. Like, can you hear like, how that becomes a way for this person to not only gain their trust and their confidence, but to then prepare them to move into things that is absolutely not okay. Whereas, if we take a kid and we say, You know what, you're absolutely allowed to explore your body, and you're going to find spots that feel really good to touch, and you can go in your bedroom, or you can go in the bathroom, and you can do those things with clean hands by yourself, that's totally okay. You're allowed to explore your body, and you should explore your body and find out the things that you like, and when you're older and when you're ready and you're done, exploring your body, and you understand it and you know it, then when you're bigger, you can start to explore it with other people who are safe,

    KC Davis 12:50

    yeah, because it really it deals in the the sort of like it is dealing in the trait of pleasure. Because we're told pleasure is sort of a taboo subject to talk about. And so when there's this person who's going to talk to you about pleasure, and it's the only person that will, and I mean, that's certainly how there's a reason why trust and credibility is so easily offered to teachers, because people that teach you things right, like, that's honestly even I have never thought of it that way. Because even though I agree, I still feel those feelings of, like, really, talk to my four year old about how it feels good, really, like, talk to my 678, year old. And I'm trying even to identify, like, what is my fear, right? And so that's kind of what I want to talk about next. And but I want to pause just for a second, and then we'll come right back. Okay? We're back with Rachel, who's a therapist that talks about, basically, BodyTalk sex ed. What is the effect that not getting sex ed has on us as adults? How should we talk to kids about sex? And so I wanted to come back to this point about how you said that not only talking about the mechanics, but about pleasure, and how that's actually a safeguard, because I think that something in me, My gut feeling feels the opposite. I feel like it's like, scary or dangerous, or like I might accidentally open something up that's like, not going to be good for my kids. Like, where does that come from? Well,

    Rachel 14:13

    I think that's, you know, touching back into the idea of purity culture, right? We're steeped in the US, in this idea that sex and pleasure are intricately interwoven. There we go, inextricably tied, right? They're stuck together. There is no separation. How

    KC Davis 14:28

    is that easier for you to say,

    Rachel 14:32

    Listen, my ADHD brain works one way. I can't explain it. It's just how it's gonna go.

    KC Davis 14:37

    That's amazing. Okay, so it's tied in an untieable way,

    Rachel 14:40

    exactly. You can't take them apart from each other, which is, of course, not true, like I said before, to what I miss the to what sex and pleasure? Yes, okay, they have to come together, right? There's that idea that sex is the only way to be pleasurable, and because sex is an adult thing, that means pleasure is an adult thing. It's. Not for young children. It's not for people growing up, even though it's literally your biology.

    KC Davis 15:05

    And I'm having like such an epiphany moment right now, because when I think about my first sexual experiences, they were not pleasurable, and I thought that was normal. I thought that was fine, like the effect of no one talking to me about sex and pleasure being inextricably linked meant that my first sexual experience as a, I guess, a preschooler, where the little boy wanted me to go under the table and say, I'll show me yours if you show me mine. And nothing about that was enjoyable. In fact, I was uncomfortable, but I just kind of let him do it, and it was a peer, right? And then moving forward, right? Like when the first time that I gave oral sex, and it was sort of this, like, I'll do you if you do me, and it was not pleasurable at all for me. But yet, when I thought about like experimenting, no part of me expected that it was supposed to be pleasurable. And yet, when I think about every male on the other side, they actually were experiencing pleasure. Right. Fast forward to losing my virginity was not pleasurable

    Rachel 16:05

    because had they been given the opportunity to explore their own bodies, to figure out what their bodies liked? It's again, it's a cultural norm that we just expect that.

    KC Davis 16:14

    So we're literally setting our girls up for not believing that their sexual encounters should be pleasurable, and that's like a big reason why so many of us and so many of our daughters would grow up to be like to partake in this culture where, like, my pleasure doesn't matter, and it really just matters about the man. And I'm just doing it so that he like, oh my god, this is such a light bulb moment.

    Rachel 16:43

    Yeah, we never label it. We don't name that. We don't talk about the idea that we're not talking about pleasure because we don't want to talk about sex like we have never that doesn't come up. And then so, like, you know, you feel uncomfortable talking to little kids about it. You don't want to say, This feels good, it's and then the next step of that is it feels good when you do it to yourself and it should feel good when you get to a partner. And that's where, like the next video, one of the next ones that I had blow up was my four pillars discussion, the four pillars of safe sex, because safe sex isn't just about protection. So what are the four pillars? So the four pillars are confirmation, making sure that both partners are really excited to be doing this. You need to confirm explicitly that both of you are jazzed about this happening. Then you have to have communication checking in beforehand. What do you want to try? What are you excited about checking out, like checking in during? Hey, is this good? Are you liking this? Do we want to try something different and then checking in after? How do you feel? Do you want to cuddle? Do you need a glass of water? Do you want to go for a walk? How was it? And then the third pillar is lubrication. Nobody talks about that. It's a whole, I mean, that's a whole nother podcast. But like making sure that you are able to do this in a way that doesn't hurt, right? There's a very low percentage of people that can have sex without additional lubrication and actually enjoy it. Weirdly enough, I keep smacking there.

    KC Davis 18:05

    I recently saw a Tiktok that was like nobody had ever put it this way. And he showed a picture, a D model of a clitoris, and where it showed that, like it's not just that little nub, like it's this big kind of organ that goes, you know, all sorts of ways. And he specifically talked about the part of it that comes around the outside of the vaginal canal. And he was like, here's the thing, there are no nerves like on the inside, like in much of your vaginal canal. And so what makes penetration pleasurable is when you get aroused, blood flows into this part of the clitoris, and that changes what's and it pushes in on the walls and creates sensation. And so he was like, when we talk about lubrication, we're not just talking about so that it goes in easy. We're talking about so that it's actually pleasurable for you, not just the absence of pain and irritation and friction, but that foreplay, getting those areas ready, right? It's as integral to a woman as like getting an erection is for a man, like it won't work. There will be no pleasure otherwise. Yep,

    Rachel 19:16

    you're absolutely right. Like that is, it is essentially, when you think about it, a female erection, getting that part of the clitoris warmed up is vital. You said it beautifully.

    KC Davis 19:27

    And he also, by the way, for any men listening, he said that is typically best done by not touching the clitoris. He was like, you can't just like, go in. It's like, this is the mood setting, right? So that's fascinating. So it's confirmation, communication, lubrication, what's the fourth one? And

    Rachel 19:42

    now my brain just turned off. So this is I'm all like, God, I

    KC Davis 19:45

    love that so much.

    Rachel 19:47

    My favorite part about being ADHD, I talk about this literally all the time. This

    KC Davis 19:52

    is such a safe space to do that. Just blank. It's fine. We'll come back to it. Yeah,

    Rachel 19:56

    yeah. It's just gone. It's not there. I made them up. Made a Tiktok. Can't think of it.

    KC Davis 20:03

    So I think that what I find myself as a parent being afraid of is like, what if I teach my kid things about her body that her brain is not ready to contextualize or make decisions about?

    Rachel 20:20

    So that's where my the kind of foundations of BodyTalk come from. That's where you have that requirement. I call it consent for knowledge, touching base and making sure that your kids are driving this bus, that they're letting you know when they're ready to hear this information. Touch is saying, you know, hey, this answer to this question or this topic that I'm going to bring up might make you feel some things. Might make you feel a little weird, or make you have some more questions. Are you ready to hear this? Do you want to know the answer? Because sometimes they're going to say, No. They'll be like, actually, I don't really want to know that. And then you say, Okay, I'll table this, and we can talk about it later. And what that does is it allows you to know like, Okay, this is something that they've been thinking about, or they've been hearing from someone, or they heard a joke in a movie, or whatever. And I need to come back to this, because it's clearly something that is brewing, right? But it also gives them the ability to say, I'm not ready for this yet, right? If I'm going to feel some things, I need to be in a different place.

    KC Davis 21:23

    So what would you say to a parent that says I don't want to talk to my young child? They're asking me where babies come from. They're asking me how babies get into the tummy. But I'm really afraid that if I tell my kid about penises going into vaginas, they're going to go to school and ask some kid to put their penis into the vagina because they don't have they don't understand cognitively that, like they need to not do that well,

    Rachel 21:48

    and that's where. So if your kid is asking the question, you start with the minimum answer possible, right? You always start with the most base level. So where do babies come from? Oh, babies come from uteruses. Oh, okay, okay,

    KC Davis 22:02

    so let's, let me ask you this in real life, because this has happened to me. The first time that my kid asked, Where do babies come from? I said, mommy's tummy. Yeah. I said, Okay, all right. The next time she asked, and I had actually already been watching your tech talk, so I was, like, trying really hard to and then the next time she said, this was like, you know, I can't remember if it was like, months or a year later or a year later or something? And she kind of stopped doing, how did the babies get into the mommy's tummy? And so I said, well, the daddy's put them there. This may not have been the right answer, but I was, I was trying to go with, like, I'm gonna be honest, but, and then she was like, oh, okay, like, whatever. Then the next question, and when I say they were, like, months, if not years, in between these questions, right? She goes, how did the daddies put a baby into mommy's tummy? And that's when I realized I'm not ready to have this conversation. And I was like, I'll tell you later. So like, and I mean, she was four when she asked that. So how do you first of all, how should I have done that differently? And then how would I answer that question of, how does the daddy put the like? So you

    Rachel 23:05

    didn't, I mean, to make you feel better. You didn't handle it poorly, right? You didn't shut her down and say, You can't know that you're that's too much of a grown up question. Like, you didn't shut her down. You said, Oh, I'll answer that a little bit later, right? We're all. We all have moments where we're busy or where we need to gather our like our thoughts, it is better to say in the moment, can we talk about this? Can we table this? Can we put a pin in it and I'll come back to it and then do that? Right? Obviously, you've got to make good than to freak out and be like, you can't talk about that, right? We don't want to add shame to the conversation. We just want to say, we'll talk about that in a minute, right? We'll give that a second. But that's the perfect time for you to throw in that consent for knowledge piece. So I'm going to tell you how the baby gets in there, but it might make you feel some big things and make you have a lot of questions. Are you sure you want to know? Because it's very possible that she's like, Yeah. And then what you do is you start again, minimal information. So you know that babies grow in my tummy, but there's a special organ called a uterus. That's where they grow. It's like a room that's only made for babies to grow. And what happens is there's these things called ovaries, and the egg comes out of the ovaries, and then the sperm meets the egg in the fallopian tube, and that's where the cells combine, and the DNA zips together and starts the process of making a baby. And the cells divide and divide and divide, and like, when you get to that again, that very mechanical explanation, the sperm and the egg, that's enough information, if you really don't want to talk about the penis and the vagina and that whole thing yet, start with the biology of where the baby actually forms, because that's so much, wait a minute, there's two. They have to Whoa. And it's entirely possible that's enough for her to chew on that, how the sperm gets in there? Not even there, not even thinking about it

    KC Davis 24:44

    yet, sure. Okay, well, is there like, a minimum age, or is it like different for all kids? Like, when you start,

    Rachel 24:51

    it's different for all kids. So, like, my oldest was probably seven. He probably took the longest to be like, how does. Get in there, which, incidentally, was really comfortable, because it was right after we told him that he was having a baby sister. He was like, Wait, how did she get in there? And I was like, Cool. All right, well, I guess I'll tell you. And then my middle was probably three and a half, because she was getting a baby sister. And she was like, how did she get in there? I was like, Do you want to know? And she's like, Yeah. And again, to them, it's like, putting Legos together, right? It's not some sort of big, scary, puritanical, you know, oh, I'm gonna go try this. Right? It's like, oh, that's a cool thing that you could do. Interesting. And then what you were saying, like, I'm scared that my kid's gonna go to school and be like, let's try this. You at the end of this conversation, or even peppered throughout you, throw in this is a thing that grown ups do when they're feeling like they want to have a baby, because when they're little, like that pleasure is not about you're not talking about two people having pleasure, yet you can, you can say that it feels good, I guess, but like, I've never bothered because I don't want them thinking about like, it's pleasure and it's baby. Because for them, they're just thinking about the baby. They're like, Where do babies come from? Where is human life springing forth from? And then the pleasure part is a separate conversation, just for themselves, in my experience, anyway. So

    KC Davis 26:13

    when would it behoove a parent to have this conversation with a kid that maybe is not bringing it up? So

    Rachel 26:20

    I that's another one where another foundation is encouraging curiosity. So curiosity is a foundational part of BodyTalk, and not just curiosity about sex, but curiosity about your body in general. So if you want to pepper scientific facts through their whole lives about their body, did you know that scabs, they fall off? Guaranteed within two weeks, because your skin, your whole outside of your skin, replaces itself every 28 days. Did you know that isn't that cool? Did you know that your body has a mail carrier like the mailman outside your body has that they're called hormones, and peppering those kind of facts throughout your day to make curiosity and information sharing a standard so that if you notice that your child hasn't asked the question, you can say, Isn't it interesting that babies are the result of two cells from two different people coming together to make a human? Did you know that? Isn't that cool? And you can spark that curiosity just by sharing non scary facts that are interesting about the human because we're miraculous, right? The way the human body works is fascinating, and there are things about us that we still don't understand. We've been wandering this earth for 1000s of years, and there are processes we don't get, but we're like, we're still figuring it out, and so making the knowledge of the human body commonplace but still fascinating, is a huge part of making BodyTalk non threatening.

    KC Davis 27:48

    Okay, so when we come back, I have two questions for you. Okay, so here are my two questions. I want to talk about how hard these conversations can be for us as parents when we maybe didn't get those types of conversations as kids, like, how do we address and I love earlier when you said, like, it's okay to punt the question. But what was interesting to me is that punting the question was about me not being ready, not about them not being ready. I mean, how do you help someone get over maybe some of those fears. Oh yeah, what if they're corrupted, or, what if they, you know, go say this to some other kid. What if they, you know, start experimenting, and it's, you know, how do we work through our own feelings of those sort of things? So

    Rachel 28:34

    that's the kind of, the reason why I started my platform, right? Is this idea that working through your own feelings, just like when you're doing gentle parenting, just like when you're trying to get into a healthy adult relationship. So much of this comes from doing your own internal work, and the easiest way is to start or to think about them ahead of time, right? Don't wait to think about this until your kid is asked the question, right? Start thinking about, how am I going to talk about this? What do I want to say? What are some scripts that I can use, right? And then, like you were saying, Where does this come from in me? Why am I uncomfortable about this? What about this conversation gives me the ick and thinking about, Okay, is there a time when I was little that I asked a question and got shut down. Was there a moment where I realized that if I had known this, I would have been a safer person and thinking about those things like that's so much of this is forethought. It requires thinking ahead. And kids don't often let us do that. They love to blindside us with things that we never thought about.

    KC Davis 29:40

    That was such a powerful thing you said, when you said, If I had known this, I would have been safer. And I think that even if you don't have kids, there's something really powerful about the permission to grieve. I mean, the title of this episode is the sex ed you should have had. And I. There should have been someone that could talk to you about this, and maybe it was no one's fault. A lot of people are, you know, we're all products of our time and our culture and the way we were raised, and I think most people are doing the best we can, but it's okay to grieve that like that might have hit some people like a ton of bricks, like you had you had this information, had you had an adult that could have taught you the way you deserve to be taught you might have been safer. You might

    Rachel 30:26

    have been able to avoid you know, I look back on my own youth and again, very much like you. I had parents who were way more open than any of my peers. Parents, right? Like I very distinctly remember, like my book opens with me flipping through the vellum pages of the World Book, encyclopedia, anatomy section, and looking at the systems, and being hyper focused on the reproductive systems, and being like, this is fascinating. And my parents were just like, yeah, if you've got questions, you can ask them. But my parents were married for 31 years. They met my mom's freshman year of college, my dad had been engaged before, when he was in Vietnam, and my mom had dated a couple of people, but, like, there was no there was never a discussion about what healthy dating looks like and what it looks like to, you know, try people on for size, etc, etc. It was just kind of this expectation that when you get old enough, you'll meet somebody that you want to partner up with, and then, you know, that'll be the thing. And so I think about my early 20s, where I dated some really great guys, and I went on some really dangerous dates, like where I had I had my own self interest in mind, even in the slightest, I would never would have gone. And I'm really lucky that being who I am, I was able to get out of those dates without being hurt. But, you know, I think about if those conversations had been more commonplace, how I might have been able to avoid that? And you're absolutely right, grieving and recognizing, like it's okay to be sad that I had to experience those things, and then remembering the reason I'm having these conversations is to help my kids avoid the really dangerous stuff. You're not going to help them avoid heartache. Everybody has heartache. Everybody has those moments where they're like, shoot. That did not go to plan, but hopefully avoiding those situations where they come home and they're like, I'm I'm hurt

    KC Davis 32:17

    well. And the thing that I think's ironic about my sort of gut reaction, fears of like, what if they go do this? What if they go do this? Are all things that like kids are doing when they don't have the right information. Like, those things are happening anyways.

    Rachel 32:33

    I will never forget Samantha s at the base of the curly slide on the elementary playground being like, I saw some sperm. You could see him swimming around in the hand. And I was like, Whoa, no, you can't they're microscopic. Like, that's not a thing. She's literally talking about tadpoles or minnows or something, and just calling them sperm. But like, it is in just seared into my brain, and that is another one of those driving forces, like, I will be sharing the information with my child that you can't see them, and if a grownup is showing you sperm, you need to tell mom. Well, listen,

    KC Davis 33:03

    that was my first thought was, like, if you had the kind of relationship with your parents where you that kind of thing was an open topic, and you were sort of taught about happening between adults. And some one did say to you on the playground, I had sperm in my hand, then that would be something that I immediately would be like, I'm gonna say that. I'm gonna tell my mom about that, because that kind of sounds weird, right?

    Rachel 33:27

    Exactly like I think back on that, and I'm like, because I didn't tell my parents. It like I knew how babies were made. But the concept, like, why would you it never went there for me that like, why are you as a fourth grader talking about, this, is this a flex? And what's really ironic is, my dad was a social worker, so if I had told him, it would have been an immediate like, oh, boy, we gotta check in on this. And it never even occurred to me, because the like, I knew that it was a grown up thing, but I never like and we're not supposed to know and we're not supposed

    KC Davis 33:59

    so do you have any, like, favorite books that parents could use or that you like?

    Rachel 34:07

    So I don't, I know there's

    KC Davis 34:11

    one I should have asked that. I didn't even ask that ahead of time. It's okay. There is

    Rachel 34:15

    one, I think there's one that's called How to make a baby, that's very cut and dry, right? It's very explicit. It's very there's diagrams. It's very clinical with how it comes together, and it's pretty straightforward. And it's a picture book. It's meant for small children that you can and you can show them the pages you want to show them, and you can show them, you know, the pages you don't want to show them. But as far as like, handbooks and guides, I'm working on one,

    KC Davis 34:38

    oh, cool. Is the one you mentioned how to make a baby, is that the one that's really inclusive? Yeah, about, like, the different ways that it doesn't just talk about penetrative sex between a man and a woman.

    Rachel 34:50

    Yes, yep. And that's part of the reason I like it. So I like that it discusses IVF. I like that it discusses, you know, the fact that sex doesn't just happen to be about a baby. Baby, but it, you know, we're focusing on babies again, because this is the question you're asking me. But yeah, that's that it is very inclusive, if I recall,

    KC Davis 35:07

    because I think I might get that one. Because, you know, when we were talking about, like, how do you bring that up to a kid that maybe is getting to the age where you should know, but they haven't asked, like, maybe that's a good way of being like, we're just gonna read

    Rachel 35:19

    this book. You totally good with the idea of, like, if you get uncomfy, this book has lots of really good information, but if you get uncomfy, please tell me and we'll stop.

    KC Davis 35:27

    Okay, well, I can't wait for your book. What do you have a title yet? It's

    Rachel 35:32

    only got my working title, which is BodyTalk, but it's a collection of stories that are then attached to, kind of the foundational pieces of the sex ed that we should have had, right? Like the how this could look different for people if we give them the information

    KC Davis 35:46

    well, so tell us where people can find you now if they want to follow you. So I'm

    Rachel 35:51

    primarily on Tiktok. My handle is lack of impulse control, which is a callback to my ADHD self. I'm also on Instagram, same handle, lack of impulse control. I'll be launching a YouTube channel here and a Facebook page in the next two weeks,

    KC Davis 36:04

    which by the time this episode comes out, that will be out. Yes, okay, cool.

    Rachel 36:08

    And then I'm actually working with a developer to get my website launched with the URL of which will be safe kidsno stuff.com.

    KC Davis 36:14

    Safe Kids, no stuff. No stuff. Oh, no. Like, K N, O, W, K N, O, W, yep, because Safe Kids know stuff. Okay, we'll link all that in the show notes. This has been really great, and I want to thank you so much. I feel like this is such a gap in parenting content when it comes to helping us know how to raise our kids, and especially because when we want to do something different than what was done to us, and that's no judgment, it's just you decide, you know, but it's like when you don't have a model for the way that you want to do it, or even the way you don't want to do it, because it's not like, well, I don't want to do what my parents did. I mean, they did fine, but I don't know how to do anything different without a model. And that's why I think that what you talk about is so vital, and the way that you do your videos is vital. So I want to thank you.

    Rachel 37:09

    Thank you. I remember the fourth pillar, by the way. What is it? It's enthusiastic participation. Nice if your partner or yourself is not in it enthusiastically, you should probably touch base. There's that communication piece again and stop enthusiastic participation. Sorry. ADHD, woo. The

    KC Davis 37:28

    amount of times I've been on a podcast and people have been like, what are your seven pillars? And I've like, said them. By the way, there's not seven, they're six. They already did it. And I'll, like, forget them say the wrong number of times there are. It's amazing. I have just really learned to embrace that about myself like that's fine. All right, cool. Well, thank you dear listeners for joining us. I hope that you guys have a really soft and compassionate day. You.

    Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Christy Haussler
107: BEST OF: The Color of Care Tasks with Danita Platt

🌟 Taking a Break! 🌟

Hey everyone! I am taking a short break for August to recharge and prepare exciting new content for you. I’ll be back in September with fresh episodes and engaging conversations. Thanks for your support and patience. Stay tuned for what’s coming next!

I’m excited to have Danita Platt on the show today. I didn’t know anyone of color in the field of care tasks until I met her. Her content resonates with me and my views around care tasks, so I hope you’ll enjoy hearing more from Danita!

Show Highlights:

  • Who Danita is and how she became an expert on gentle care tasks

  • How our society over the last two generations has moralized care tasks and tied them to the worth of a woman

  • Why we need to rethink our views about care tasks and “being a good woman” that go back to the founding of the US, historically speaking

  • How the concept of “invisible labor” has carried over from colonial days even to today

  • How many white people were able to live the lives they did because of the cheap, exploitable labor of Black women

  • How the Great Migration happened to move many Black families to northern cities from the South

  • How the shift happened to push Black (and white) women to work industrial jobs while men were away during the war

  • How the push is recurring for 1950s homemaking to be viewed as the superior role for women

  • What we DON’T talk about in the fulfilling life of a homemaker

  • How Danita chooses to honor the Black women who had to wash clothes, clean house, and cook meals under duress–with no freedom or choice of their own

  • What Danita would say to women who want to live more joyfully in their homes and experience more freedom and quality of life

Links & Resources:

Connect with Danita: TikTok and Instagram

Mentioned in this episode: Sisters in Hate: American Women on the Front Lines of White Nationalism

Connect with KC: TikTok, Instagram, and Website 

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

  • KC 0:00

    Dan Hello, you sentient ball of stardust. Welcome to struggle care, the podcast about self care by a host that frankly hates the term self care. We have an excellent guest today. I am really excited. I've been trying to get Danita on this podcast for a minute, because I just love her content and her point of view. And so Danita Platt, would you just say hello to everybody?

    Danita Platt 0:26

    Hi everybody. Thanks for hanging out with us today. I'm excited to be here. Casey, I really am very excited.

    KC 0:31

    So the way that I met you was that I had been posting content about home care, self care from my morally neutral perspective. And someone asked me, Hey, do you know anybody that does care tasks like you? And I was like, Yeah, I can make some account recommendations. And I made some account recommendations from people that did, like, auto care, dietitian like that had a similar sort of, like gentle and compassionate view. I didn't want to recommend anyone that had, like, a commercialized self help, you know, like view to them. And I made these recommendations, and immediately it was pointed out to me that every person I had recommended was a white person. And I was like, Oh, you are right. And I was thinking, I don't know any black women or black men or black people of color, or people of color in general, that were talking about gentle care tasks. And when I said that, immediately you were someone that people began to tag in my comment section. And I'm really grateful for that, because I went over and I looked at your content, and I was like, this, is it? This person? I get them. They get me. And so will you talk a little bit about kind of who you are, what your background is, and I love in your bio online, it literally says gentle care strategies. And so tell me who you are and how you came to be doing gentle care strategies. Yeah.

    Danita Platt 2:05

    So yeah, I remember getting those tags, and I was like, Oh, wow, but I had already been following you. And I was like, Casey is going to handle this with grace that she always does what you did, yeah? So I Gosh, what got me started talking about gentle care was the fact that I had been absolutely overwhelmed trying to take care of my family as a single mom. Some years ago, I went through a divorce, and I was just trying to get the kids up and at 'em, and it was like they were wearing uniforms to school, and I distinctly remember not having clean uniform shirts to send them to school, and just being like, and I was raking myself over the coals about that. And eventually I was just like, This has to stop. So I started, you know, I like to think I started doing what other people do, which is kind of consuming content on care tasks and like how to be able to take care of your family and get things done and work in a full time job and etc. And I started to just feel still really overwhelmed with the sensation of it all, like I still just felt like I wasn't good enough. That's just the best way for me to describe it. And then eventually I was just saying to myself, You know what? And obviously this was undiagnosed ADHD, which immediately kicked me out of the box of all of the boundaries around how to get it done. And I was just like, what works for me? So I started doing little things that worked for me and realizing, how about you just be nice to yourself about this, and that's so mean. And I started feeling better letting go of those standards that I felt like I needed to live up to. And so I have degree in home economics. All of my friends in college, they took to calling me the white Martha Stewart, the black Martha Stewart, rather. And I always felt weird about that. I always went HBCU, you know, but I always felt weird about that statement, because it wasn't even that I was the black Martha Stewart. It was that I didn't want to be Martha Stewart like No, thank you. Not that she's not, you know, for all the folks who love her wonderful it just wasn't something I wanted to be because I wanted something else that let me do what I needed to do. So I kind of wandered over into the idea of gentle care for my own struggles around not feeling good enough to be able to take care of my family as a woman in America and a black woman in America. And so

    KC 4:20

    I relate to your story a lot about, you know, the first place we go is the internet or books or podcasts or whatever, to reach for, I guess, what could, you know, self help is like the genre, right? And you're looking at the organizing books and the cleaning accounts and and all of these things, and it felt like what was presented was very much an emphasis on being esthetically pleasing on right so that Instagram esthetic and also just like a really romanticized version. And I remember trying things like, I tried to, like home, edit my pantry. I tried to. And I actually love Marie Kondo. Yeah, me too. I tried to follow her book, like, to the t right? I'm trying to think of other things. And sometimes they were just like, general, like, I'm gonna be someone who wakes up at 5am and does this and this and this. Like, this one influencer I saw, and I had that same like, it didn't fit. I didn't stick with it, I tended to do it for a little bit, and I almost felt like I was like cosplaying an adult that had their life together. And then when I stopped doing it, I felt as though it must be because I failed. I didn't try hard enough, and I found myself in the same position you were in before I knew I had ADHD, also of sort of just realizing, okay, maybe I need to figure out, sort of like rhythms and rituals and ways to be about my house that serve me, instead of worrying about, like, making myself into the type of person that just like floats around their house, Martha Stewart style. So I really relate to that. So I love a couple of the tiktoks that you have made. And you know you mentioned, like, as a woman in America, and I have have been having conversations for a while about like, when I say care tasks are morally neutral, people will say, like, why is it? Why do we have such a moralized view of care tasks. And just from my own experience, I've talked a lot about, you know, well, as a woman, I'm not even two generations removed from the generation that if you were not good at domestic care tasks, you probably weren't going to get married. And if you're not married, you're on the street, and how our families had sort of passed down this messaging about how important it is as a woman. But what I have learned is that that's not the end of the story about why care tasks are so moralized. And there was this viral video on Tiktok recently, where this mom had cleaned her house, and it looked beautiful, and she had this audio to it, and it literally said, if you're not cleaning your house, literally all day, every day, then you're not a good mom. You're not a good wife. Your husband should be able to come home and to a clean house. And it was not parody, like she meant it, and you had this incredible stitch where you talked about where some of that comes from in our culture, and how it's related to the history of care tasks in America. And I just would love for you to enlighten us about that. Sure.

    Danita Platt 7:39

    Yeah, so, gosh, all of the stuff that comes it's so so so packed and heavy, and you don't even realize that you're laboring under years and years and years and generations of stuff that people have decided is the way to do something. And when we look at it historically, it really starts with the founding of the country. It starts with the arrival of Europeans here in America. And you know, that happened in waves. So the first wave was that the settlement in Jamestown and the people who arrived were really about finding resources. You know, they're looking for gold. They're looking, how do I capitalism? How do I gather resources at this place? And as we know, they did not think about farming or crops or feeding themselves, and we know how that ended up. That didn't work out. And then we have another group that lands Just a year later, but they land at Plymouth. And what is that Massachusetts? But these folks have a completely different perspective. They really feel God ordained, like this sense of a god assignment. They are hook, line and sinker in that messaging. And they show up thinking, we are here to bring morality, Christianity, not, you know, the first group was like, I'm gonna separate from the church. You know, this group is like, no, no, we're going to redeem the church, you know, here. And they set out with that level of morality. And so you have these two ideas that are now floating around the East Coast, where it's the idea of capitalism and making a way for yourself and sort of bootstrapping to change your circumstances, and you have this idea of my God ordained. The morality part is really super heavy with these people. And obviously in 1619 there's ship that shows up that has 20 some odd Africans on it. They are then this is where we end up with chattel slavery. It starts with indentured but we know it moves quickly to chattel slavery, and specifically the harvesting of tobacco, which is being sent back to England, and it becomes the crop. The cash crop is tobacco. And so now we need more Africans in order to be able to do this. But what's happening? Societally is that we're still and by we, I mean European sellers, Americans now are still living the way that they were living previously, which is housing. And we see all this play out in the architecture. It's housing that's very small. It's not these. When you think like plantations, you think sprawling and mansions and pillars, right? But it wasn't that initially. It was like one or two rums, and everyone is working side by side. So the white woman who is the enslaver, the white man who's enslaver, the Africans who are there. They're all in the field together, harvesting tobacco together. They're all cooking in the same common room in the hearth that's in the common room in the house. So what we end up with is this side by side labor. Well, then we end up with this third wave of folk who show up from Europe, but they are here now. They are aristocrats, they're Gentry. They're of a different class than the original first two groups who showed up, and they arrive with the idea, why are we living with, working beside? Why are we societally structured so that everyone is all in here together, right? If we're going to do racism, we have to learn how to do it, because we weren't doing it before that, not in this way. So we have to learn what that looks like. And so it looks like separating whites from Africans. It looks like changing our architecture so that we don't have to live in the same spaces and places. So all of a sudden now this idea of the work and the care and all of the care tasks that fall in line with what it is to be white in America, black in America, all of that falls to the enslaved population. But there's this idea also attached in there where the work is being done by the enslaved people, but the credit and the essence of it is really to the enslave the enslavers, the people who are enslaving people in this population. So in America, we end up with this incredible moral weight that comes with the way that we organize ourselves. And we've carried it forward in that if I'm going to be a good white woman who takes care of her white family. That is actually being paid forward from the aristocracy idea during the start of the country.

    KC 12:29

    And it seems like it's part of a carryover from England and Europe, where the class divide over there was very much like if you were, you know, aristocracy, if you were lords and ladies whatever, like, they didn't really work. I mean, they maybe had, like, their investments and things, but they weren't the women baking bread, right? They weren't the men who were, like, tilling soil and, you know, farriers and things like that. They didn't work. So when those people came over, and not only did they not work, but you mentioned like that God ordained. It wasn't like, we're Lords because we earned it. It was like, no, like, our families are better. We were not meant by God to work. We were meant by God to be the land owners. And like, I'm sure there were people who were awful people, but there was also morality in that of like, it's my job to take care of these poor. You know, they don't know better. They live on my land. They pay rent, but I'm the Lord that takes care. And so obviously we move that those people come over and they're not working, but all of their care, right? Their care tasks back in England will be done by servants. Now they're being done by the enslaved population. And I thought it was so fascinating when you talked about how that becomes your status symbol, like, if you have enough servants and enslaved peoples to clean your big house, to cook your big meals, then that is a status symbol for how wealthy you are. And because of that class system brought over from England, the wealthier you are, the more right and moral you must have been in God's eyes for you to have gained that position Exactly.

    Danita Platt 14:12

    And to that point, the invisible labor is where we find ourselves now, right? Because you would have had invisible labor during that time because we were working together. But now, nope, everyone, you go off into this slave quarters down here, where no one's going to see you. You cook here, not in this kitchen. The kitchen is going to be off the house. All of the labor is done invisibly, and the white woman gets all the credit for all this invisible labor. And today it's unsaid, but it's the cap, the feather in the cap of the white woman who can have her house clean always have these incredibly high standards in her meals and meal preparation, the larger the house, the better. And. She does that effortlessly. It's the invisible. We never see her working like I say all the time, the visual of a sweaty white woman cleaning her house, we don't see that. That's not a thing, right? Because that isn't the messaging, and that is the standard that we find is because whiteness is the standard for everything else. That idea of whiteness is a standard for everything else. It becomes the standard for all women, even though it is really the standard for white women. Does that make like that?

    KC 15:30

    Yeah, and I heard somewhere that, like, we talk about this idea of, like running a household, running your household, and a lot of, like the Bible Belt will refer to a certain passage in the Bible, talking about like a woman who runs her household and but like running your household used to mean running your team of domestic laborers, right? It was organizing the maids and the cooks, and you know anyone who was working inside of your house, and fast forward, it's like we've retained the same like standards of cleanliness and home cooked meals. And you know, kids with the clean faces like that effortless always put together, but now running your house means you doing it all by yourself,

    Danita Platt 16:20

    absolutely, and that's new, right? That's like, I mean, that's what, maybe two generations, the whole do it all by yourself. And we see the result of people are exhausted because they're trying to live up to, like you said, the absence of this assistance, this unpaid labor that you have from the days of enslavement to the exploitation of domestic help, you know, up until now, and it just simply doesn't work, because the standard is not reachable. It's not really an attainable standard by any stretch. And I

    KC 16:50

    remember listening to people talk about how, you know, white families had domestic help, and I think that in my generation right now, when you think about having a nanny or a housekeeper, that sort of seems like something only attainable to like the 1% and I mean partially because, like, what you actually have to pay a nanny today who, like, knows her worth and has, like, labor laws protecting her or him is like, not something that is affordable to even. I think most middle class, upper middle class, right? You really have to be in the six figures to pay someone $50,000 a year to care for your kids, you know, on top of whatever you might be paying for private school and all this. And what was so interesting to me is when I heard someone talk about that, the amount of white people that immediately jumped to well, my family never had help. We were poor. My family never had help. We were poor. And I thought that was really interesting. And so I do not come from like a super wealthy family by any stretch of the imagination. My dad's family was well off, and my mother's family was extremely poor. So I just got curious, and I went to my dad, and I said, Dad, so my grandmother's name was tatten. Did tatten have help when you were growing up? Did y'all have, you know, people that came and helped? And he said, Well, yeah, I had a nanny. So my dad had a black nanny, and we grew up in Dallas, Texas, and she came and helped my grandmother, and, you know, watched him after school, and did all these things. And it was interesting. And my dad's, you know, second thing was, I loved her. So she was, you know, like family to us, and like you have to understand, my family is very liberal. And so it was sort of eye opening to me how close in our family history that was, and not that I don't have like, a moral judgment on it. It's just I would never have considered myself someone who was in that sort of group. And when we talk about, like, white privilege, like part of my life is the way it is because of the type of life my father was allowed to lead, and the life that he was allowed to lead was in part because the life his mother was allowed to lead, and the life she was able to lead was in part because of cheap labor from black women, absolutely. And I asked my mother the same question, by the way, the one that got very, very poor, and because I thought, Well, okay, my dad was a little more well off. And my mom said, so we didn't have anyone permanently, but my mother did have a young Hispanic woman that came after the birth of the children and helped her with the children, and she was with us until my sister, one time over dinner, said a word in Spanish, like past the whatever, and she was fired the next day. And I'm talking poor, very poor. And I was really sort of, it was eye opening to go, even very poor white families mostly could afford. At least some help, yes. So you talk about how the civil rights movement, as we you know, the impact that that had on basically cheap, exploitable labor. Can you talk a little bit about that?

    Danita Platt 20:11

    Yeah, it's actually yo. Civil Rights Movement absolutely impacted. But even before that, okay, the war effort of World War Two, because so prior to that, we have basically black families are either sharecropping or they are working in the domestic sense. So we see the great migration. Obviously, after the Civil War, we see black families leave en masse. And the great migration actually happens twice, but the first en masse movement out of the south, people end up going either straight up the coast, and so they end up stopping in DC, Philadelphia, New York, right? Or the kind of this diagonal sort of end up in either Chicago or like Kansas. Kansas City becomes a huge place that the black families migrated to and so when you're there, we're also talking about industrialization, tenant house, tenant housing. What are we doing to house all these people? Because we need workers, so people show up. And specifically, I'll speak to DC, because I'm here. This is part of why DC is called Chocolate City, because of the great migration where all of these hotels needed porters and cooks and bus hops and bellboys, etc. All of these families needed nannies and cooks and live in etc. And so there is this, um support network of African Americans who are fulfilling these domestic roles. What ends up happening is, when we're talking about World War Two, the war effort requires workers because the men are gone, so we're going to employ women. Well, prior to that, black women and had to work. It was many laws passed saying the black women absolutely they could not just be home with their children. They were either sharecropping, which is what my family did, or working as domestic help. And this is mainly because white women are complaining, saying, I need help here in the house. My grandmother had slaves. Now they're not, obviously saying it like that, but the point is, she had help. My mother had help, and what I believe is my right is to have help with these I'm not supposed to be overwhelmed with these kids, right?

    KC 22:28

    And that same messaging is still there for the of I have to have this perfect clean house. So I want to hear more about this, but I'm going to have us pause to hear a word from our sponsors. Okay, we're back with Danita Platt, who is talking with us about sort of the history of care tasks in America, and how that has influenced us today, sort of living under this heavily moralized view of care tasks, and how we're all sort of drowning and we all feel ashamed. And so you were talking about how the women began to sort of demand that they have the help their grandparents had, exactly.

    Danita Platt 23:05

    And so black women are then, well, now you can't be home. You have to go to work. If you're not working as a sharecropper, then we need to make sure that you're working here domestically in our houses. So but then with the war effort, the men go off to fight, and workers are needed to continue with the war effort. And so that dismantled the working pot of black women who could be in houses providing this domestic care. And so we look up and what black women are now being employed, not just domestically. Now, they can work on in manufacturing. They can work here in this industrial role. And that then completely dismantles the domestic pot that white women were able to reach for. And then we have the white women's feminist movement and all of that. We start looking at things like birth control. White women saying, I need birth control. And I say all the time, I get it. You don't want to have 10 of your husband's children. We understand, right? Because of what all that's going to mean. We

    don't want you to either.

    We don't want you to hurt so it all lays out into us, not letting go of this concept of our value and our what we are owed as Americans, air quotes, you know that all of that conceptual nonsense, and we haven't let that go, and we're just paying it forward constantly. So

    KC 24:36

    one of the things that is interesting to me when I sort of look at on the landscape of care tasks, is that particularly kind of the platform that we're on, on tick tock, so there seems to be this resurgent on, at least, you know, the platform we're on, tick tock, where they're calling themselves Trad wives, which stands for traditional wife, and it's typically a. White women, they're often Christian, and they're making content about home, domestic life. It's not like a how to right? It's not like what you and I do. It's just a sort of like picturesque it's almost like trying to bring back the 1950s housewife, and they talk about things like slow living and homemaking as a fulfilling role, and they even go one step further to suggest that homemaking is the superior role that a woman should be in. But like you said, it's never like the white mom with like a ratty t shirt and a vomit stain sweating with the greasy hair being like, yeah, man, taking care of the home is really like the superior place for women to be. No, it's always like some perfectly manicured, thin white woman who's, you know, not wearing a lot of makeup, but is still very like with the Eurocentric beauty standards, like holding a basket of apples right as her like, toddler jumps and puddles. And sometimes they're even, like, living off grid, and she's canning and baking. There's like, beautiful esthetic shots of her baking bread from scratch. And you had, I think, the most, just like the best commentary, where you said, you know, the picture that you're trying to, quote, unquote, bring back of this sort of 1950s housewife where, you know, she's like, so fulfilled, and every moment is sweet, and it's this kind of romanticized idea you said that didn't exist. And you said, specifically, effortless care, task management is a fantasy. And so I'm wondering if you could talk some about that. Yeah, that

    Danita Platt 26:48

    imagery that you just laid out, like it may be, like, I'm hot, like, I'm sitting here now, like, hot at the thought of it. Yeah, it's frustrating, because it is an absolute fantasy. It never happened because that work was done by black women. It was done by black women during enslavement. When you talk about care tasks in America, okay, so to define a care task, and I'm sure you have a beautiful definition, I'm going to throw mine out there. My definition of a care task is something that doesn't stop it's not a project. It's a care task. Doesn't stop. That's feeding people, clothing people, cleaning, managing dirt, etc. These things are just they're just ongoing. All of those things were done in America by enslaved black women and men, invisible labor. All of that's done there, then it fast forwards into after reconstruction and all that, we still have this work being done by a black workforce. And so in the 50s, there was no version of this white woman, hair perfectly honed, like you said, European beauty standards. She didn't exist. She wasn't a thing. And when you look at their like Pinterest boards and their vision boards for this, it's all 1950s marketing propaganda created by white men working at marketing agencies trying to sell laundry soap like the woman that you're trying to be was not even real. So it never happened when you're attempting to create this Trad life esthetic, what you are saying is, I want to go back to the days of enslavement. I want to go back to the days where, because there's no such thing as doing all of that and not sweating and hair not out of place, like there's no such thing, it doesn't exist. So what we're pining for are days where you had slaves like I don't know how to say it. That is what you're pining for. And interestingly enough, I'm reading this book right now called Sisters in hate, about the white woman's contribution to white nationalism and that Trad life esthetic was started and is the main one of the main pillars of the white nationalist message, which is, and it's white women who are promoting it, white nationalist women who are saying that the way that we're going to save whiteness in America and maintain White supremacy is about white women having white children and promoting triad life. It's interesting

    KC 29:25

    to me when I think about the amount of white women and men again in those comment sections online that wanted to jump so quickly to my grandmother didn't have anything. We were poor. My grandmother and I think first of all that in a big majority of the case, that's actually not true. But even if, for those percentage of people where that was true, one of the things I'm learning from you is that just because your poor Polish grandmother didn't have servants or enslaved people, she was still. Being expected to live up to Yes, the pressures and the picture of what a woman is and what she does, and that picture was created by white aristocracy, women who had enslaved people

    Danita Platt 30:18

    exactly yes, and she'll never be able to live up to that. She will always be behind the eight ball. She will always be behind the eight ball, and in the African American community, because, again, whiteness as a concept, as a construct, defines itself as the standard that everyone else is measured against. Then Black women, women of color in America also must rise to the standard of this idea that is held by whiteness, and so no one can live up to the standard. Nobody can be good enough to be able to fulfill that. And that is nonsense. And

    KC 30:55

    I want to even like take it a step further, because, I mean, I get comments a lot online that say, you know, you're lazy, you're this, you're that. Because I had five kids and kept it clean, my mother had nine kids and kept it clean. And I think that one of the things that is important to remember is that even if a woman managed to pull off doing that like most of us can't do it, but even if a woman manages to pull off doing it, we don't talk about what she had to sacrifice to do that. We don't talk about the fact that she never sat down, that she never had a life outside of the house, that she didn't have an identity outside of her motherhood, that she was disrespected by her husband and her grown children. We don't talk about how and I and I it's they're not happy, and I know they're not happy because they're up in my comment section acting like assholes to me, and happy people that lived a life that was such a romanticized homemaking, fulfilling life, don't go around shaming strangers on the internet. And it's like you can tell that where that anger comes from, and that projection of judging other women is because they succeeded, and the prize they got was a shitty life. There it is. And now they're angry, and they want everybody else to do it too, yes,

    Danita Platt 32:20

    and that lie tells you that if you can accomplish this, you're going to get whatever wealth, or whatever it is. You feel like you're owed. You're gonna get that. And then when you realize that's never gonna happen, the consolation prize is self righteousness. It is looking down your nose at everyone who can't do it. And it's interesting, because when I'm speaking to a group about gentle care and having this conversation, I know when I have somebody in the audience who has been successful, because I get the stank eye when I start talking like, oh, well, I did it. Yeah, but you're not you're not doing too well, are you? And those weren't great times. Were they? You know, and it's also why I talk about as black women in America. Part of I feel like honoring the fact that when I think about a black woman who was enslaved, she was born, she lived, and she died in enslavement, and she never swept a floor for her own benefit. Her floor was dirt. She never washed a dish for her own benefit. She never experienced anything around a care task that was to the benefit of her or her children or her family or her loved ones she born, lived in doing that. I say as a black woman, I'm gonna not sweep today for all the times that black women swept because they had to, like that's my moment of I'm gonna honor that woman who never washed clothes, because she just that was what was on the list for her to do today, you know, to take care of what needed to be taking it. No She only did it under duress and under constant terrorism. And so that reaching for rest or whatever I do as a care task, being able to do it of my own impetus, I feel like is a moment in celebration of Black women who never had that opportunity.

    KC 34:28

    That's really powerful. I want to pause there, because I have a question for you when we come back. Okay, so we're back with Danita Platt, and so here's my question, sort of coming to the end of this conversation, so the people that are listening when we're thinking about trying to address our own relationship to care tasks and get to this place where we both have a functional space, but that we're not living to serve our space. And you talked a bit about. You know how you are connecting to your ancestors and using that to empower yourself to sort of break free from this sort of oppressive culture of care, task perfection. And so I'm just curious what you would say, maybe more about that, about if we want to live more joyfully in our homes and experience more quality of life and freedom. It sounds like you can't avoid confronting this cultural history.

    Danita Platt 35:39

    Yeah, absolutely. I don't think that you can stand in the midst of all of the expectations and all of the stuff that's dumped on you and not address it. I think you have to stop and turn your attention to it, and it's interesting, because the stuff of life demands so much attention. And I always ask myself, like that's so interesting, because it's almost like a constant distraction, so I won't turn my attention to the nonsense behind why. Like, who benefits from me being overwhelmed by inanimate objects? I've talked to a friend of the time, she says, I've asked myself, who benefits from that? And I'm like, Yeah, because how many women went to the grave with whatever was inside of them, and it's just laying out there in a casket. The world never experienced it because she was overwhelmed with inanimate objects. And I feel like that is an important question to ask one. I think the most important question to ask yourself in life is, who am I and then live up to that? And are you a duster? Like is that the answer to that question? Because, if so, then fine dust, all the stuff, right? Because that's who you are. But if the answer to that question is more than I'm a wiper or a duster or a washer, all of the actions that come with care tasks, the answer to that is different. Let's figure out how to manage this stuff so you can get around to that thing, because I want to see it. I'm interested in that. You know what? I mean? I want to celebrate and cheer you on, and I don't want you to take it to the grave. So, yeah, stopping in the midst of it all to answer that question, to ask and answer that question, is incredibly important

    KC 37:22

    well, and it's the stuff, it's the the stuff that has to be done in order to live. And I think it all comes back to, you know, do I exist to serve my space, or does my space exist to serve me? And, you know, just echoing what you said about like, it's really almost impossible for one person to do every single care task that needs to be done for really just one person, but much just a whole family, while they're now expected to also work 4050, hours a week, right? And at some point we have to make the decision to break away from that narrative that has been given to us,

    Danita Platt 38:01

    yes, absolutely, and liberate ourselves and free our social net, and ask those tough questions to say, in what way am I not liberated? And then how do I access liberation in that area? Well, this has

    KC 38:15

    been an incredible conversation, and why don't you take a moment to tell everybody where they can find you if they're interested in following, you sure, so

    Danita Platt 38:22

    you can find me in Casey Davis's comment section. So I'm on Tiktok. Danita Platt, I am on Instagram. Danita LaShawn Platt, but you can get to Instagram through Tiktok, so come hang out with me over there and I always say, you know, ultimately, my point is, let's take care of each other, so that is the purpose of my of my online presence.

    KC 38:48

    And your content is great. You have so many practical tips, and you are so approachable. And I just, I love the content that you put out into the world, and I'm so grateful that you made time for me today. Oh, thank

    Danita Platt 39:02

    you. I appreciate the invitation. And you know I love you know I just hang out over on your page because it's absolute gold. So thank you for what you do. You.

    Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Christy Haussler
106: BEST OF: Is Rejection Sensitivity Dysphoria Real? with Dr Lesley

🌟 Taking a Break! 🌟

Hey everyone! I am taking a short break for August to recharge and prepare exciting new content for you. I’ll be back in September with fresh episodes and engaging conversations. Thanks for your support and patience. Stay tuned for what’s coming next!

I’m back with one of my favorite guests who is always up for the challenge of a podcast–no matter what the topic is! I want to explore the term rejection sensitivity dysphoria and get Dr. Lesley Cook’s take on it because I have so many questions. Let’s learn more together!

 Dr. Lesley Cook is a psychologist who works with those with ADHD and other kinds of neurodivergence. Born and raised in Hawaii, she now lives in Virginia and works with children, adolescents, adults, couples, and families.

Show Highlights:

●      What RSD (rejection sensitivity dysphoria) is and how it is manifested

●      KC’s personal experience with RSD and feelings of worthlessness

●      How RSD is different from sensory sensitivity and autism

●      Thoughts about the strong word dysphoria in RSD

●      KC’s personal experience with RSD and being told she is “too sensitive”

●      How we can grow, change, and find regulatory strategies for RSD

●      Why it is difficult to communicate the facets and nuances of RSD and other interpersonal difficulties

Resources and Links:

Connect with Dr. Lesley Cook: TikTok

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC 0:05

    Hello you sentient ball of stardust. Welcome to Struggle Care. I'm your host, Kc Davis And I have one of my favorite guests back in the studio. Virtually, of course, Dr. Lesley Cook. Lesley, thank you for being here.

    Dr. Lesley Cook 0:17

    It is always a pleasure. I'm excited. Every time I'm here,

    KC 0:20

    I've recently started doing this thing where I actually meet with people before a podcast recording for 15 minutes and come up with like an outline of things we can talk about. And I'm like, This is so great. And not only did I not do that with you, I haven't even told you what the topic is today. I said, Do you want to do another podcast? And you were like, Yeah,

    Dr. Lesley Cook 0:38

    this is my wheelhouse.

    KC 0:39

    I love that. I love that I just what I learned was not everybody likes that or can do that. And so I went through a couple of interviews. I was like, oh, I need to start planning things so that I can help like guide the Leslie, I want to talk about rejection sensitivity just for Yeah, don't we all. And here's my like, whatever that word is that you say the disclaimer, I want 100%. And like totally down for any term that someone identifies with, that describes their experience that makes sense of their experience for them, and helps them navigate in a world where they can ask for what they need, and create accommodations in their life, and learn and grow and have self compassion for themselves. And like, I'm so down for that. Like, I'm never one of those people that like wants to take terms away from people are like, that's not the right time. Like, who cares? You like it? You got it? It's fine. I'm disclaiming that only because I have so many questions about this term. And sometimes, in order for me to understand something, I go to this like devil's advocate place of like, these are like the objections that come up in me. And I'm not voicing them, because I think they're necessarily right. But because I have to get these answered for me to fully feel like I understand something.

    Dr. Lesley Cook 1:59

    Yeah, absolutely. I was just talking to another mental health clinician about how like in the evolution of social media, mental health professionals, I did start as the person that was like, that's not the right term. Don't use it that way. And there's some merit to that in some cases. But one of the things I've learned, and I needed to learn by so much exposure to the consumers of our services and our content, is that disclaimer is that number one, people only create and communities only create words when there's a vacuum. So there's nothing here that describes what I'm trying to say. And so everyone is just dismissing it. And I think that term, the biggest thing it did, is it encapsulated quickly, something that we could all go, oh, yeah, yeah, I've had that. Like, that's a real experience. Yeah, it's a real thing. And you share it. It's something that brings people together into more understanding of each other. And I think it's less pathologizing than just don't be so sensitive. So I share that disclaimer, but you know, semicolon, I also have concerns with some of the terms that were adopted. And I think it's because of the fact that things grow and change. And so the original intent of that word, I wonder if we have strayed away from that.

    KC 3:14

    Interestingly, you brought that up. So people ask me, sometimes if I struggle with rejection sensitivity, dysphoria, and for anyone that's listening, it's like, what the hell is that it's a painful experience that you have when you are rejected, or you perceive you're being rejected. So it often comes up with criticism, even like healthy kind of criticism. And it's the idea that like, I basically like, cannot tolerate anything that feels as though I've done something wrong, or I'm being rejected. And I'm extremely sensitive to basically interpreting all criticism, critique, pushback mistake as being rejected, and that my nervous system sort of has this really overblown response to that, where I feel panicky, I feel like I'm in pain, I feel like I'm drowning. I feel all these things. So that's the colloquial like, layman's understanding of that. So people ask, and it's talked about a lot as a something that happens in people with ADHD. It's not officially a part of the diagnosis. It's not a formal clinical term. It's not in the DSM. And to my knowledge, I have not seen any research on it, have you?

    Dr. Lesley Cook 4:30

    Not necessary I think, again, social media is moving so much faster than our science can catch up. It takes years to like select a group and then do some testing. And so I haven't seen specific, you know, outcome research of what is this but I have seen articles and periodicals and shared experience publications that talk about the fact that this does seem to be something that is relatively unique as an experience, specifically for ADHD found in every person to some extent, but over represented for the ADHD crowd. But I think it's unclear where it comes from or how we would encapsulate it.

    KC 5:08

    So I actually looked up like an article on it. And this is from like, the attitude magazine, which is like the ADHD publication that comes out. And it says, What is rejection sensitivity dysphoria. And it goes on to say like, it's not a formal diagnosis. It's just like a common under researched symptom of ADHD. We don't actually know if it is or not, but it is experientially very common. Noticeably, the first thing they say is RSD is not thought to be caused by trauma. And this is one of the hardest things is like, if you asked me, Do you have rejection sensitivity, dysphoria? And then you say, it's what I just described? Like, sometimes you'd be like, Yeah, it's like men really being impacted by the feeling of rejection. And those are, there's a part of me that's like, is that not just having your feelings hurt? Like, isn't that everybody, like, nobody likes to be rejected. But I will say that most of my childhood, I do feel like I had an extra sensitivity to feeling worthless, like I struggled with feeling worthless a lot. And so getting rejected, felt more painful to me than it seemed like it felt to others. And the only reason that I know that is because through being institutionalized, and having to go through a lot of like confrontational therapy that like forced me to grow some ego strength, and then also doing some, like having some own, like growth around some spirituality stuff, there was literally this weird day. And I won't go into it, because it's a very weird woowoo story. But let's just say that I had a run in with this woman at my work that bullied me, and like, It tore me up on the inside, like I would literally reacted that day in the middle of an all staff meeting by screaming at her because she like made a face at me that was kind of like a meant to make me feel stupid, and like ran out of the room and then cried and then went to my car and was trying to drive home and then a pull over. And anyways, I at that time was like, looking into some of my own like spiritual texts, right. And I like read this thing. And it was really meant something to me. And I felt this like physical shift in my chest. And then all of a sudden, it got lighter. And it was such a weird sensation that I described my friends as it feel it felt like something Let go of me and left me. And I had this shift, where from then on and I mean, I also was getting so much therapy. So I feel like it was almost this combination of like a lot of therapy work, a lot of spiritual work a lot of sort of like meaningful things for me, where when I would get rejected or get criticized, it still hurt. It still didn't feel good. But what was gone was this like darkness that would like slither up the back of my throat and whisper in my ear. See, I told you, you were a piece of shit. I told you no one was gonna love you. Like that previous to that, like de that was my experience of rejection. It was intolerable. It was painful. It was more painful than just this hurts right now, I had never heard the term rejection sensitivity. dysphoria, right. And I think the differentiating factor that when you hear people talk about it, as they say, one, it is not thought to be trauma, I would have told you that reaction in me was trauma. And I know what it's trauma from it's trauma from some family of origin shit. So I wouldn't have ever said that, because the specifically they say RSD is a nervous system difference that is not related to trauma. Now, I think I had a nervous system difference related to trauma. And then I got a bunch of therapy and also had like this bizarre spiritual experience. And now I don't feel that anymore. So personally, it's hard for me to contextualize that, because when you describe it, yes, I remember feeling that way. But then when you needle down on, it's not trauma, it's a nervous system difference. It's, I'm like, Oh, well, how would we even know? Like, In what world does somebody with ADHD not have traumatic experience by the time they're an adult?

    Dr. Lesley Cook 9:04

    I think that is the core of where I think we're still kind of trying to develop a way to conceptualize this thing that we're calling RSD. And we're not quite there. And I think to piggyback on that, I agree and disagree and love how they described it and absolutely hate it at the same time. So we know that ADHD comes with this list of dis regulations. And it's not just as we all know, as we all in the club now. It's not just our attention and focus, it's also our ability to control up regulating our emotions, sometimes getting excited or motivated, sometimes down regulating. It's hard to inhibit our impulses. And so one of the most famous pieces of research that gets quoted a lot is kids with ADHD, hear their name called in a negative way, by I think it's AJ teen, like 20,000 times the it's a huge number more than other kids. And so we could look at it through one lens and say, well, that's not necessarily trauma. That's just the interaction of a nervous system that has trouble with this and the environment. However, that's also another way to look at trauma is that the interaction? So I think it's almost a non sequitur, like, is it due to trauma? Is it not? That almost doesn't matter? I think I think what really matters is to look at all of these kids, especially these undiagnosed kids who are growing up hearing that down, stop it go away, you're too much, you're not enough. If you could just focus that builds this sense that of impending doom, that every side glance, every miss text is about rejection is on the horizon. And I don't love the description, but I love the description of it climbing up your throat, I immediately identify with that experience. I even had one experience as a teenager where a friend that I had had since kindergarten, I guess I was probably being too much and too loud, getting on the bus. And she turned around and said, Don't you get it? We don't really like when you hang out with us. And that was my throat, realizing like, oh, it's me, they don't want me. And that was a formative experience to know. Would that have happened? Had I been dysregulated? Bless, maybe not. But those things, I think, you know, are part of the same phenomena.

    KC 11:21

    Yeah, there is this interesting, like hyper vigilance to rejection that you develop because of that. And that's the thing that I was trying to express at the beginning. Like, I'm not saying that the experience that we're all describing, when someone says rejection sensitivity, dysphoria is like not real, like I believe it is. I'm more interested in like, when you get down to this question of, is it an environmental, like, is it an experience that is just describing something we already knew about ADHD, the different factors of, you know, we knew these symptoms. So this symptom intertwining with this environment, creating this kind of, you know, traumatic experience, causes this experience, versus people who will talk about it as a symptom like no out of the womb, something with your nervous system and your brain wiring. Like, even if you've never had a negative experience, like, is overly sensitive to rejection. Because that was my other thing was like, when I read I was like, is that not just emotional dysregulation? I think

    Dr. Lesley Cook 12:19

    you could phrase it that way, you could look at it as functionally speaking, this is an emotional dysregulation that happens faster and more intensely. For those of us with this neuro type with this neurological difference. I think you could also say, maybe for most ADHD people, it's so common of an experience, that it might as well be a symptom. I think the danger in that for me, and this is like a bee in my bonnet as a clinician for years is that when we start believing that this thing, I'm holding up a little AirPods case, that this thing, RSD is like inside of me, like it's part of me, then it's always going to be here. And there's a tendency to think then when it happens, oh, it's RSC. Yeah, that happens. Versus if it's something that that I'm holding that I can look at, that I can examine, there might be a way for me to figure out how to maybe put it down a little more, how to learn how to get that cognitive thinking part of our brain online to say, is this really rejection? And you know this, because we've talked, you know, off of the online space, but I have friends where I try to actively practice, here's what I'm feeling. Am I literally making this up? And I have some amazing friends that will say, Yes, you are making that up. That is your brain has created that story. That's not what's happening. And that has decreased. That feeling of fear of rejection by probably 80%.

    KC 13:48

    Yeah, I think when I hear people talk about it as an innate thing, and to your metaphor, I think it's when we tried to put it in the same category as like, sensory sensitivity and autism, like that's in your brain, you came out the womb with that, like, not every autistic person has the same sensory or even any sensory sensitivities. But it's like, that is a sensory sensitivity that has to do with the wiring of your brain. There's no like cognitive restructuring that you could do to make yourself not be erect or in pain over that sensory thing. Like it is not a social construct. It is not an interaction between some other autistic symptom and your environment, like it is just straight up a neurological response to something that would happen in a vacuum. And I see a lot of people talk about RSD moving in that direction, as is like, No, this is an innate symptom separate from other symptoms that would happen even in a vacuum. And that's the one where I'm always like, Hmm, I'm not sure. And I'm not sure if it is, maybe it is, but if it's not, and we put it there will we be doing ourselves a disservice. And that's, I think what you were saying is like, well, here it is, you know, deal with it. It just sucks forever,

    Dr. Lesley Cook 14:56

    right? Like that's just what we have and I do think there are Some other pitfalls with that, as well, because it could be weaponized and and that could I see this a lot with kids. So if you have a child who like let's say, a teenager who is actually experiencing rejection, and they have ADHD, I have seen it, you know, well, that's your RSD. You know, it's possible that that can be weaponized against kids and adults alike, I

    KC 15:23

    don't have to take your hurt feelings seriously. Because your feelings are just an indicator that you can't control yourself, they're not an indicator, they're not couldn't possibly reflection that I hurt you, or that that thing really hurt you. It's just this, you know, and I have some friends that have borderline personality disorder. And they talk about that exact scenario with them. They're like, you know, I'm, and they're really healthy people, like really mature and healthy around their borderline. And they'll say like, the thing that sucks the most is like, really, actually having someone do something shitty to you, and like, try to talk to your loved ones about it. And they either say or imply like, well, like, Could this be the border line, and you're like, No, like, it actually was a really hurtful thing they did. And like, it's valid for you to be hurt.

    Dr. Lesley Cook 16:07

    And I think sometimes that's what happens when terms start out meaning something and then they get so blurry is that they circle all the way back around to the thing they were supposed to replace. So understanding BPD was supposed to be helpful, and therapeutic so that we don't stigmatize folks that are struggling with that understanding RSD was supposed to help us get away from, you're just too sensitive. But unfortunately, when we use it in this way, it becomes like, that's just your RSC it becomes you're just too sensitive. And I think the other piece is distinguishing between, I think the use of the word dysphoria, and it is really hard for me. And that is the one as a clinician that I'm probably too much of a stickler for I probably need to get over it. But I struggled because there's something it's like when people talk about pathological demand avoidance, and I refer to it just as demand avoidance. Because when we add pathological and when we add dysphoria, those words mean something, dysphoria means I'm feeling not right, based on something that is not necessarily acknowledged by everyone, right? That's a really imperfect definition of dysphoria. But really, it's just being highly, highly sensitive to and reactive to real or perceived rejection. But that's not a super fun descriptive term, like twice as many words, I

    KC 17:25

    think this article talked about the word dysphoria, it says dysphoria is the Greek word meaning unbearable, its use emphasizes the severe physical and emotional pain suffered by people with RSD, when they encounter real or perceived rejection, criticism or teasing, the emotional intensity of RSD is described by my patients as a wound, the response is well beyond all proportion to the nature of the event that triggered it.

    Dr. Lesley Cook 17:47

    And so that's where I struggle, right, because who gets to judge whether it's out of proportion. And that's what that kind of what I was trying to capture. And that's much more elegant way of saying it is that my reaction is out of proportion for what's happening. When we start going down that road for some of the symptoms, I think and traits, we get into messy territory, not only who gets to determine whether it's out of proportion, but also, if you heard your name called 20,000 more times, by the time you're 18. Why would your fear of an anticipation of rejection be out of proportion? To me, that's a perfectly proportionate response. But you are highly sensitive.

    KC 18:26

    Yeah, like in proportion to what in proportion to the thing that just happened, or in proportion to your experience, your lifetime of experience, about what that means about you and what that message is about you. You know, what's interesting about all of this, is that, you know, at the beginning, I asked like, is there any research on this yet? And sometimes, like you said, well, all times like, the world of psychology moves faster than the science of psychology. And so, like, you can't say like, Well, if there's no research, then it's not valid, because again, it moves faster. But one of the things that I think people don't always appreciate about research, it's not just this like, well, we need a bunch of white men scientist to say it's real for it to be real. It's like when we do research, like No person is just their diagnosis, right? And so if we were to say, well, let's get a bunch of people with ADHD together, and like, see how prevalent this description of this thing called RSD is, well, that seems simple. But like, when's the last time you met somebody that had ADHD and no trauma, or no other diagnosis? So even if, you know, wow, 30% or 60% say they have this. Okay. But how do we know the RSD that they all have is stemming from the ADHD because, again, a lot of this sounds like stuff that comes up in bipolar. A lot of the stuff sounds like stuff that comes up and trauma. So you have to do so much research and so many different control groups and, you know, people that only have this one diagnosis and then of them like, what's their educational background? What's their emotional background? What's their race? What's their Right, like, you have to do so much of that, to make sure that the symptom you're looking at truly is only coming from this one disorder. And think about how impossible that is with how high the rates of comorbidity is between ADHD and other things.

    Dr. Lesley Cook 20:16

    Yeah, it's incredibly difficult. And I think if we look through an intersectional lens to, it probably is going to look and feel and be conceptualized in very radically different ways behaviorally, for a black American teenager, and a white 44 year old psychologist, lady, right. So my experience of that is going to be very different, because I also haven't had to hide and shift and mask other parts of myself that other people had. So this is also where to get a little nerdy for you for a second, where I think I really see people not grabbing or going to the qualitative research. And if you're if you don't haven't heard that term before, quantitative research is more when we're doing what we're talking about now. So we have control groups, we're trying to isolate variables we're trying to look at does this thing cause this thing? Qualitative research looks at storytelling and common factors and common experiences. It's a wonderful way to learn. It's it's highly scientific, it's highly rigorous, and we don't we just don't talk about it, I think enough in in regular media. So I wonder, and this is me wondering, because I haven't thought about it. I wonder if there is some, some data and more the qualitative area, I'm going to write that down.

    KC 21:34

    I did do like a cursory Google search to see if I could find any, you know, research data, the PubMed data and things like that. But maybe there's stuff out there that I just haven't found. So I'll leave that obviously, as an option. When you were talking about like, what could be the downside of over pathologizing? The rejection response is that, like, I know, for me, there were so many clinical interventions that went into both clinical interventions. And just like personal work that went into getting to a place where I don't feel like my world is ending when I feel rejected. And my own experience, I think, was too far in the other direction, where I was kind of made to feel as though like that is a personal failing and me like you're too sensitive, and you're not tough enough. And you need to get a grip, like get a grip. Now luckily, I mean, that wasn't the solution. Like that's how they pose the problem is like, you need to get a grip. But luckily, I had access to resources where I could work on like, Okay, this is trauma. Where's it coming from? How can I heal that trauma? How can I learn distress tolerance? How can I widen my window of tolerance? How can I hang on to myself in those moments? How can I work on some cognitive restructuring where I can talk to a friend and be like, Okay, this is what I'm telling myself. And they can either go like, yeah, that just happened or like, no, that sounds like you but and, like, I'm so grateful that I was able to work on that experience, so that I don't have to live that way every day. And I think back to your point is like, if that just gets classified as like, well, you know, that's just a thing, and it will never go away. It's like, I don't want people to feel like shame about having it or that it's some sort of like character failing. But at the same time, like, you don't want people to feel like they just have to live with this incredible pain.

    Dr. Lesley Cook 23:19

    And I do think that's where I have concerns about some of these. And there's other terms too, but that we use for these diagnoses, because they don't necessarily allow for the opportunity for growth. And we need that another thing we know about ADHD brains, in addition to the things that are kind of always going to be there is that our brains do continued while everyone's brains continued to grow and change. But some of the development of that frontal lobe lobe system is just delayed. So some of our treatment is ADHD, or is life is continuing, like literally growing up, yes, keep going. It's going to take us longer to find these regulatory strategies. And so if you tell someone who's eight, this is something you have in terms of RST, not ADHD, and that's it, there's nothing we can do. I wonder if there are opportunities to learn that we can survive some of these challenges, and that you can reach out and have support people that you can check with your friends, and they'll be honest with you, I wonder if we deprive them of that I didn't have access to any of that. I had to learn that as an adult.

    KC 24:22

    Well, and I think most people that I've heard use the term RSD are using it in I would literally say like 95% use it to describe oh my god, I'm not broken. This is a part of my experience. This is why it's so painful. I'm not weak or stupid or any of these things like I just have a pretty unique neurology, whether that is always innate, or whether that was environmentally shaped like whatever it is like this is the thing, this is why this is happening to me. Or maybe like this is why this is harder for me 5% of the time. I hear it used to say because the It is harder for me, for reasons that are not my control, I don't have to work that hard to address the impact it has on others. And that is just a human thing. Like we all don't, you know, it's hard to look at yourself, it's hard to take accountability. And I think that, like, you know, it takes a scalpel to really kind of draw that line between, like, I always, like, My example is always like, I am sometimes late to things because of my ADHD. And what I learned was, like, the proper place for it's okay, it's just my ADHD, that's something I tell myself, that's never something I told the person being impacted by me being late. Like, that's for me to not hate myself, to not feel shame. It's not for me, like that's to address my feelings of being upset at me, it's not to address your feelings of being upset at me.

    Dr. Lesley Cook 25:54

    Definitely forgot what I was going to tell you. And I love that this is like a real world example of like, some of the things that can happen when you have space to be authentic. But I was gonna say is that also does it mean that we're not allowed to reach out for support or ask for accommodations or let people know that we struggle with something, but I 100% agree with you that there is a balance point of what I tell myself. It's kind of like when we talk to kids about inside thoughts and outside thoughts and learning which are, which can make profound differences, I think for ourselves, but also our relationships, so that others feel comfortable to say when we have impacted them.

    KC 26:29

    And like feeling bad about something is also nuanced. Like, I don't feel like so for example, I was 30 minutes late to a really important podcast recording because when I read it, I read that season at 930 cet, not 930 at so I had the time, but whatever showed up 30 minutes late everyone's calling me. So I don't hate myself for that. I don't think that I'm a bad person. I know that has nothing to do with me being irresponsible, I still feel bad, that it impacted the people who were waiting for me and their day, like their day also matters. And so like, I think that that's the other like, fine point in there is like, I know, that's due to my disability. And I sometimes will communicate that to people, not because I want them to change their feelings of aggravation, but because I want them to know that I did not intend for them. I don't think I better than you I know your day is important. And sometimes that's part of the wound of someone being inconsiderate. And your mind is like they think that I don't matter. And I want you to know, like, I do think you matter. I do think your time is as important in mind. That's why I want you to know that this was a disability related, you know, flub not just me being entitled. And I think that it takes a lot of nuance to communicate that in a way that says, I want you to know that I do care. And I'm sorry. And not, you don't get to have feelings about this. And I don't have to address this.

    Dr. Lesley Cook 27:53

    I think even this particular part of our discussion really eliminates why talking about RSD is so hard because all of these different facets of the nuance and understanding. And I think what, what always kind of brings it home for me is that it for this particular experience. I don't know that we've quite gotten it yet. I don't know that we've quite nailed it. What is this thing? How is it? You know, happening conceptually, because it's so hard to talk about, there's all of these facets?

    KC 28:23

    Do you find that that's particularly hard when it comes to any symptom that primarily expresses itself? interpersonally? Yeah,

    Unknown Speaker 28:32

    that's a great point. I

    KC 28:32

    mean, like being late is kind of interpersonally. But I mean, like, you know, there's this RST, but then with borderline personality disorder, there's this, you know, maybe push and pull or being mean, or feeling, you know, what people would say it's being dramatic, somebody that maybe has PTSD, and that is showing up as anger, like you don't even like things that emotionally come into play. interpersonally. Like, I wonder if that's why it's so hard.

    Dr. Lesley Cook 28:56

    I agree. 100% I think that's how we arrive at the difficulty when we talk about things like weaponized incompetence. And why that's so hard to talk about, is because there's just this overlay. Anytime you have an exchange of communication in some way. It gets really hard. And I guess that's where a part of me always gets hesitant to label something boom, that oh, that's RSD. Because I think I know from my work and also my personal life, just because I'm so different than a lot of the people that I'm in relation to that it's just not that simple. As soon as we add the dynamics of someone else, everything gets murky, and we have to consider all of it.

    KC 29:34

    I think that's also what makes the large scale communication about these topics so difficult, just like personally as a content creator as an author. Because if I'm interacting with someone specifically, like I can ask enough questions to understand the nuances and then give a piece of insight or a statement or whatever. But what usually happens when I'm making content about something like let's say I make it about RST at And, you know, you'll have this person, or this huge group of people that will be like, you know, I'm a good person, and I try so hard to love the people well, and I feel so deeply ashamed that I can't live up to the neurotypical standards. And the people around me are always telling me that, you know, I'm not good enough, because I can't do this. And thinking that my inability to regulate emotionally like everybody else is due to me being bratty or not caring. And it's like, that's so painful. And so you want to talk to that about like, this is not a moral failing. This is this is a disability to death. But for every group of people in that bucket, you have a group of people in a bucket going, yeah, like, my husband, or my partner, or my friend, or my parent, was a horrible fucking person, and either abused me or mistreated me or constantly hurt me in some way, and refused to take accountability, because they had fill in the blank of whatever disability it is. And it makes it difficult to talk in general terms about the two competing truths of like, disability is not a moral failing. And it's not an excuse to mistreat people. Yeah, I think it's one of, and that's an easy thing to say out loud. But if you go any further than that, you know, there's no other sentence, you could say, except for that one, before you feel like the people who were married to an abuser that had a disability or being discounted, or the people that were always demonized for having this disability feel discounted, and it makes it a really weird, hard line to walk.

    Dr. Lesley Cook 31:32

    It does. And I think the most common response that I get when I also make content like that, or have discussions like that is well then how do I know the difference? And the fact that there is no answer for that? How do I know if I have RSD? How do I know if I have sensory dysfunction due to this? Because we're all actual, like human blobs, and we have all of this stuff going on? It's incredibly hard to give that answer, especially in these kind of short sound, by the ways. And I think when you're someone say you're in my position, it's so easy to talk about the nuance when you're someone who is consuming that content because they are in daily pain. It is very hard to hear, I think, I don't know, I don't know, you would have to look at the entirety of your relationship, you would have to compare it to this. So I understand the frustration. And I wish it was simpler than it is.

    KC 32:23

    Yeah. Well, Leslie, we are at time. And I can't tell you how great of a conversation this is. It's always a great conversation. With all of the pre planning that I've been doing. It tickles me pink to have somebody that I can schedule a podcast episode with and not even tell them what the topic is going to be. I myself thought of the topic about 15 minutes before I logged on, because I was like, Wait, have we not talked about a topic? But this has been great. You want to tell people where they can find you if they want to hear some of your sound bits, wisdom of sound bits, sound bits of wisdom. Yeah.

    Dr. Lesley Cook 32:51

    I don't know about the wisdom. But I've got lots of sound bits right now. I'm just on the tick tock at Leslie society. So it's le SLEYPSY Be

    KC 33:00

    nice. Thank you so much. Thank you

Christy Haussler
105: BEST OF: Self-Esteem Sucks. You need Self-Compassion with Dr. Kristin Neff

🌟 Taking a Break! 🌟

Hey everyone! I am taking a short break for August to recharge and prepare exciting new content for you. I’ll be back in September with fresh episodes and engaging conversations. Thanks for your support and patience. Stay tuned for what’s coming next!

I’m excited about today’s guest because she has had a huge influence on me. I can confidently say that finding her research on self-compassion was a turning point in my healing journey. Do you need more self-compassion? Join us to learn more!

Dr. Kristin Neff is a renowned psychologist, self-care researcher, and author. Her work has had a profound impact on the field of psychology and has helped countless people cultivate self-acceptance and resilience. 

Show Highlights:

  • How self-compassion became Dr. Kristin’s main area of research

  • Understanding self-esteem vs. self-compassion

  • The three components of self-compassion: mindfulness, common humanity, and self-kindness

  • How self-esteem creates comparison and social disconnection by being conditional and unstable

  • How self-compassion gives the gift of authenticity

  • The difference between fierce self-compassion and tender self-compassion

  • How self-compassion helps us get past our shame

  • Why self-compassion doesn’t mean indulgence

  • Pathways and blocks to self-compassion

  • The connection between self-compassion and psychological functioning

  • How self-compassion helps when we fail and make mistakes

  • Why the goal of practicing self-compassion is to be simply a compassionate mess who is completely human

  • Why the practice of self-compassion has to start small with baby steps of warmth and support (What would you say to a friend?)

  • A look at Dr. Kristin’s latest book, Fierce Self-Compassion

  • How anger fits into self-compassion

Resources and Links:

Connect with Dr. Kristin and find many helpful resources: Website

Connect with KC: TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes

  • KC Davis 0:05

    Hello, you sentient balls of stardust, this is Struggle Care, the self care podcast by a host that hates the term self care. And today I have a guest that I'm really excited about Dr. Kristin Neff, thank you so much for being here today.

    Dr. Kristin Neff 0:17

    Oh, thank you, KC, happy to be here.

    KC Davis 0:18

    I have to admit that I have been a little under the weather for like three days. And I was like, no matter what, I will not miss this recording. Okay, so the reason why I wanted to ask you to come on the podcast is because you have been such a huge influence on me, when you talk about self compassion, and the research behind it, that was a real turning point for me in really starting to heal and grow and get better in a way that sort of leaned me out of the self improvement kind of genre of getting better and more into the actual healing of feeling better. And so I wanted to ask you, how did self compassion become your main area of focus in your research?

    Dr. Kristin Neff 1:06

    Well, for me, it also started as a personal practice, I needed self compassion, I was a mess. I you know, I didn't invent the idea. I learned about self compassion when I first learned about mindfulness meditation. And it just made such a powerful difference to me, I was going through a very stressful time, and I started being more kind of supportive to myself. And I saw that the immediate difference it made, and this was when I was actually my last year of graduate school. And then I did two years of postdoctoral study with one of the country's leading self esteem researchers and I studied self concept development. And I started to see how we can come back to this how self compassion didn't have some of the problems associated with the need for high self esteem, that kind of endless treadmill of self improvement. So when I got to UT Austin, where I still am, I kind of thought, well, no one's really researched this before. But heck, they can study self esteem, they can study self compassion. So I started researching it, you know, really shortly after I got there about around 2000. And I'm just so blown away by not only how beneficial it is, but the applications just so many areas of life life, I mean, basically any area of life in which there's suffering or struggle with, there's a lot, it's irrelevant. So very quickly, it just became my life's work, I became devoted not only to research unit for the last 10 years, figuring out how to teach other people to practice being more self compassionate, because it's not just an idea. It's not just like a trait that some people have. And some people don't, it really is a practice, anyone can learn.

    KC Davis 2:37

    So how would you define self compassion, and then I also am curious how you would define self esteem because I feel like most of us, I mean, I grew up, I was one of the 80s, kind of a 90s kid. And I feel like a lot of the self help world when I was sort of growing up, and even today was this heavy focus on self esteem. I remember going through rehab at 16. And doing all these treatment assignments about self esteem, I remember having to look in the mirror and say, I am okay today. And people like me, and I write like giving myself these positive affirmations. And I remember thinking, this is not working. I do not believe these things. So can you tell us what the difference is?

    Yeah. So let me start by defining what self compassion is, and then I'll come back to self esteem. So self compassion is really just like compassion for others. You know, the Lenten compassion being with suffering, how are we with the tough stuff, whether that suffering comes from, you know, your hurricane, or COVID, or something difficult happens externally, or you're suffering because you feel you aren't good enough, or you've made a mistake, or you feel like a failure of those types of sources. And really, just like we work with a friend, we naturally be warm and supportive. When our friends hopefully for good friend, they say they're having a hard time we're present for them, we listen, we pay attention to them. And also the difference between compassion and pity is, hey, I've been there. It's inherently connected stance. It's not like I feel sorry for myself, or I feel sorry for you. It's just recognizing that everyone struggles, everyone's imperfect. That's what human life means, really. And so those are the three components mindfulness, being aware of difficulty, common humanity, recognizing this, this is shared and kindness, warmth, support. So the thing about self compassion is it's really unconditional in the sense that it's there for us. You know, we can be kind of supportive towards yourself when things are going well. But we're also especially kind of supportive towards yourself when things aren't going well. The difference between self esteem and self compassion, as you might say, self compassion is a stable unconditional friend. Self esteem is pretty much a fairweather friend. Right. So what do I mean by self esteem? It's important to define our terms. I'm referring to a positive judgment or evaluation of self like, I'm good are people like me? I'm great. These are positive judgments and values, you know, good as opposed to bad. So the thing about self esteem is that, and nothing wrong with having self esteem, it's actually psychologically better to delight yourself than to hate yourself. The problem is that it's contingent, it depends. Again, it's unstable. So typically, it depends on first of all feeling special and above average, it's not okay to be average, if I said, KC, yeah, your podcast is pretty average. Admit it, you feel hurt, right, I would feel hurt. You said Kristin, your work is pretty average. It's not okay to be average in our society, which means that technically, if we asked to be above average, it's technically, impossible for us to all have high self esteem at the same time. So we're setting ourselves up also in the sort of comparison, like is that person better than me, you're smarter than me or more attractive to be whatever it is. And that can create social disconnection, for instance, and we know one of the reasons kids start to bully others is to raise their self esteem. I'm the cool kid, you're the nerdy kid, I'm picking on you, I've got more power compared to you, that raises my self esteem. So that's a problem. Really big problem is that it's contingent on success, whatever we value, and so usually, what we value for our self esteem is social approval. Like you said, other people like me, well, that's great when they like you, but what happens when they don't like you? And how are you going to be authentic? If your self esteem is totally dependent on whether or not they like you, right? Or how we look? Actually for men and woman perceived attractiveness is huge. What happens when you start getting older or you know, you don't look the way the supermodels? Look, you don't have the filter on your camera when you post it on Instagram, right? Your self esteem takes a hit. And then also performance, right? So we have high self esteem when we succeed for what happens when we fail or make a mistake. We feel badly about ourselves. So the difference with self compassion is when we make a mistake, or other people don't like us, or you know, we're feeling inadequate in some way. That's precisely when we give ourselves compassion. Oh, well, it's only human to make mistakes. What can I learn from this? Right? Okay, so I'm imperfect. That's part of being human. That's okay. Whoever said I was supposed to be perfect. Other people don't like me sometimes. Ouch that hurt. Well, can I like myself, at least, you know, do I really want to twist myself to contort to meet other people's expectations if it's not true to me. So those are the types of difference. So just to show you one study I did on comparing self esteem and self compassion, we found that the stability of self worth the both forms of self worth, but self compassion is unconditional, because I'm a flawed human being, self esteem is usually conditional, because I'm the way I want to be or because other people like me, or because I'm better than others. So the self worth linked to self compassion was my first stable over time that the self is worth that comes from self esteem.

    That makes me think, also, when you talk about self esteem, being sort of contingent on how you are in comparison to others, or how others think of you, that's not always lined up with your actual values, like people can like you for the wrong reasons and hate you for the right reasons. And and so it that makes it even more turbulent?

    Dr. Kristin Neff 7:54

    And that absolutely, yeah, so one of the biggest findings of the research is self compassion is linked to authenticity, right? You know what some of the feedback powers your self compassion practice helped me personally? Well, I'm still very flawed, I still got a lot of problems, but I'm authentically flag, who I am. Because my self worth is contingent on other people liking me. And that's one of the gifts that gives you you can be your true self. And also, by the way, it doesn't mean some people think it means you're complacent, you aren't going to try to change or improve. That's not the case at all. It's why do you want to improve, I want to improve not to be acceptable as am I'm already acceptable. I want to improve because I care about myself, and I don't want to keep suffering and causing problems with myself and others. And what that does is when it's safe to fail and make mistakes, that means I can actually learn from them. If I'm just full of shame, Oh, I'm such a failure. Everyone hates me. It's not exactly conducive mindset to like, figure out what happened or try to learn from the situation or try again. So it's actually a better motivator is more effective motivator than the motivator of shame or self criticism.

    KC Davis 8:59

    I'm so glad you said that. Because when I talk online, and so you know, my focus is mainly on how people care for their homes and their self in periods of struggle. And one of the major push backs I get is, well, if I'm being compassionate towards myself, when my house is a mess, and everything is dirty, and I'm not really caring for myself, like, won't that just enable me just give me permission to stay stuck? And it's interesting, because in my own experience, it's the opposite. There's nothing more motivating than real self compassion.

    Dr. Kristin Neff 9:31

    Yeah, we know that empirically. So here's the difference. So I like to turn these fierce and tender self compassion, tender self compassion is about unconditional self acceptance. It's also about accepting the fact that life's imperfect, we have difficult emotions. It's kind of the acceptance of the imperfection of life. Fear self compassion is about taking action, right? What can we do in terms of our behaviors and our situations not to suffer? So even while unconditionally accepting yourself and the fact that your house is a mess doesn't mean that you're less worthy person because it that your house was mess, you don't have to identify with it. But if your house being a mess is causing you suffering, if it's making you harder for you to, you know, relax or to get things done, or it's actually causing stress in your life, then it's actually not helping you. So compassion is about the alleviation of suffering, right. So if you're doing things that are causing suffering, like the way you live, or something's causing you suffering, it's not compassionate to let it slide. But it's aimed at our behaviors and our situations, we need to try to change our behaviors and our situations, to maximize well being at the same time that we as people are worth is like, given the fact that we are at imperfect human being is all we need. That's the only bar we need to check to be worthy of compassion, which remember is kindness and support. It doesn't mean you know, maybe you aren't doing things, right. It's not fake, because you don't say, oh, Kristin, you're great. Actually, Kristin, and this has happened. That was a really unkind thing. You said, that really hurt that person's feelings, that self compassion now saying, and you're terrible, horrible person, I hate you. That's not self compassion. But saying, Kristin, you said, what you just said was really unkind. Pay, I understand your stress is only human, it happens sometimes. But this person is hurting, what can we do to try to repair the situation. So for instance, we find that self compassionate people are more able to take responsibility for their mistakes or things they do, because it's safe to do so. And they're more willing to try to repair them again, because you have the emotional resource to do so.

    KC Davis 11:34

    So I want to take a short break here. And then when we come back, I want to talk about that word tender.

    Okay, we're back with Dr. Kristin Neff. I love that word tender. Because what I was trained to be a therapist, we talked a lot about this term, unconditional positive regard that we're supposed to have for our clients. And when I heard you use that word tender, something kind of switched for me when I realized that when I am compassionate towards myself, it's not necessarily an unconditional positive regard, because sometimes I haven't done something positive, but it's an unconditionally tender regard. Because if that connected

    Dr. Kristin Neff 12:14

    conditionally positive evaluation, but to the extent that warmth and kindness is a positive emotion, which it is, it is positive, right, really good analogy, I think an intuitive one is an ideally compassionate parent, you know, most of us are not ideally, compassion raised by them. But if you imagine an ideally compassionate parent, that parent loves their child unconditionally, when their child fails, does something wrong, just mean hurtful. The bottom line is I love you, I'm here for you, right? But a compassionate parent doesn't stop there. A compassionate parent wouldn't say, oh, that's fine, get all this, skip school, use drugs, whenever you know, don't worry about it. That's not because that's causing their child's suffering. A compassionate parent is I care about you? How can I help sometimes it may be kind of tough drawing boundaries, listen is really important that you follow these rules. Because if you don't follow these rules, you aren't gonna learn the skills you need to get by in life. You know, that is true love. And the same thing with ourselves. Complacency is not caring for ourselves, it's actually undermining ourselves. But shame and self hatred is also undermining ourselves. So we can combine unconditional warm support, being there for ourselves with some real hard honestly, this really needs to change. It's not working for me, you know, if I want to be happy, if I don't want to suffer, I gotta either me, I have to change or my situation. So fear, self compassion is also I think, for instance, the Black Lives Matter movement, or the me to movement. These are pure Self Compassion movements, when people rise up and say, Hey, this, you can't treat me this way. I'm valuable, you know, this, this situation is wrong, or maybe your work situation, you're being treated unfairly. Or maybe you're in a relationship where you're not being treated well, part of self compassion is taking action against either behaviors, yours or others, or situations to try to engender wellbeing and alleviate suffering,

    KC Davis 14:03

    When I find that when self esteem is sort of the measure, and there's a lot of shame involved, people can't be accountable, because when that truth is being brought to them about something that's either not going right or something they've done, that's harmful, they can't get unless you can get to a place I don't even know how to it's like, We're such social creatures, that when I'm feeling the social rejection, that is the only thing I can feel. It's the only thing I'm preoccupied with. And it's the only literally my fight or flight kicks in and goes I have to find out how to be acceptable again. And when that's happening, I'm inherently centering me. And I'm not even able to look or be accountable to the thing that I might have done.

    Dr. Kristin Neff 14:46

    Exactly. Shame is incredibly self focused. I mean, it's human. It's natural. It's we evolved to feel shame, but it's so self focused and it shuts down our ability to learn. When we're flooded with shame. We actually can't learn from our mistakes all we can

    Do is like hide in a corner and say I'm so terrible, please don't hate me. And again, shame still rises for me because it is actually evolutionary emotion. So shame arises and like, okay, human beings feel shame, that's okay, this hurts. How can I help myself in the moment, you know, and often helping yourself in the moment means, well, maybe I need to apologize, maybe I need to do something different. But here's the thing, some sources of shame are from social injustice, prejudice. So for instance, we've done a lot of research with teens who are, you know, LGBT plus community, who are shamed all the time. So in that case, it's like, screw you shame, I'm not going to buy into this message perfectly wonderful, just as I am. So but you know, if the shame, like my case, did say something mean to someone, then the shame was playing a function and saying, Hey, Kristen, who, you know, that was not good. And then I can move on from there. If we get stuck in it, that's when it really holds us back.

    KC Davis 15:55

    Yeah, I remember having these feelings when I first entered rehab, and people would try to help myself low self worth, by saying things like, oh, but you're so pretty, and you're so smart. And you're so these things. And there's this real sense of, you know, no matter how many good attributes you try to ascribe to me, I have this sense of if you only knew, and I think that's where that authenticity comes into place, because it really felt like it will not penetrate my heart and make any difference, unless I'm being fully known by that person. And it wasn't until I was able to get authentic and honest, and let everybody see kind of all of the ugly insides, then receive that sort of compassion from others that I was in a place to actually hear. And here are some issues that we may want to look at KC?

    Dr. Kristin Neff 16:45

    Absolutely. You know, and the slight problem with that, although it's natural is that we don't want our compassion to be contingent, either. Everyone, you know, people in prison are people who've made horrible mistakes of their life, they're worthy of compassion as well. All human beings are worthy of compassion, right? Something that's an intrinsic human right, compassion. Again, that doesn't mean indulgence. That doesn't mean letting you get you know, what you do for people to try to help society or help them is a different issue. But our worth isn't dependent on our attributes, you know, and also, these are attributes are constantly changing, right? We all get older, I'm getting older. Now I'm seeing that one, you know, we go up and down, none of this is really stable. The only thing stable is that, at least in the course of our lifetime, is that we are aware human beings who are experiencing life, and that's actually the source of compassion. And you know, you could get spiritual on this, if you want it, I have no problem going there. And it's not like generated by our small cells, it's part of being a part of this larger interconnected universe. You know, we're one in many ways, we're all part of this larger, interdependent whole. So our worth comes from being part of this larger, independent whole, it's supposed to be ego based, like, because I went to grad school. And because I did this right look a certain way. That's where my worth comes from egocentric way of looking at it, do you think that in order to have self compassion, you have to be able to humanize others first, like if you're sort of seeing others, as if you're being really harshly judgmental to others, if you're having to kind of push others down to push yourself up, if you've got whether it's internal bias, or all these things, like I imagined it would be hard to extend yourself the grace and compassion that you're not extending to others or that you believe others don't? Because if they don't deserve it, then how could I deserve it? Yeah, so there's a lot of pathways to compassion and a lot of different blocks to compassion, I, from what my understanding, also with my research, it's not like some people say, you have to have compassion for yourself before you can have compassion for others. That doesn't seem to be true. A lot of people are very compassionate to others. And that oneself, I wouldn't necessarily say that you have to be compassionate for others before yourself, either, because there are probably some people who, whatever reason connect with their own experience and not those of others. So I wouldn't say there's a halfway but some of the principles are the same, the principles of understanding the nature of humanity, and the fact that, you know, we aren't totally in control of our actions, we do our best, but there's so many causes and conditions, you know, culture, history, genetics, environment, so many things that are out of our control, even our thoughts. I mean, how good are you at controlling your thoughts, you know? Exactly. Right. So so many things that are out of our control, understanding principles like that definitely help foster compassion. For some people that's the doorway in is because they can see it with others, they might be able to then make a U turn and do it for themselves. Yeah, I wouldn't be comfortable saying it has to be the case. But what we do knows when you learn to be more self compassionate, it does increase compassion for others, because again, we're understanding the bigger picture of our shared humanity, but it also does big time is actually gives us the

    resources to care for others. Not everyone, but most people are pretty compassionate and caring to others and not to themselves. But what happens is they burn out, they give and they give, and they give. And you know, they always say yes to other people, and they're always trying to help others. And they're, they deny themselves, they don't meet their own needs. And eventually, their cup runs dry. So um, self compassion is very good for decreasing caregiver burnout.

    KC Davis 20:22

    So somebody asked you that you published a lot of research on the connection between self compassion and psychological functioning. I think a lot of people see things like self compassion, I think that's nice. And people should feel nice about themselves. But they don't necessarily understand that it's not just a nice thing to teach people that it actually helps them raise their psychological level of functioning, that it actually can be a way of them getting better and feeling better, and sort of that, you know, the high tide that raises all ships. Can you talk some about that connection?

    Dr. Kristin Neff 20:57

    Yeah. So again, if you think of the word compassion with suffering, how are we with suffering, right, and it's usually the suffering the painful emotions of painful thoughts that derails us psychologically might lead to things like addiction, or suicidal ideation, or eating disorders, or depression or anxiety, because when difficult feelings or thoughts or situations arise, we get overwhelmed by them, we aren't able to cope effectively with and we get overwhelmed. And we're still just trying to cope by whatever means necessary. We're just trying to survive. And so by having a resource, which is warmth, care, support, kindness, what can I do to help kind of unconditional self acceptance, but also that realizing that maybe, how can I change that in a way that's helpful and supportive? That resource is, first of all, you might call it a type of emotion regulation, because it helps us being so overwhelmed by the difficulty. It also is a form of resilience, we might call it a form of resilience and coping. It's huge, right? It's not just good feelings, it's a way of approaching difficulty. In fact, sometimes it doesn't feel good at all, you know, it's really allowed opening to the incredible pain and grief and distress and all the difficult stuff, we open to it, we don't sugarcoat it. But we do open to it's love. And it's the love the warmth, that's actually the strength that helps us get through it. In fact, I think if you don't do it, if you just kind of grin and bear it or just shut down, you can function but it's going to come back to get your body's going to start holding all the trauma you experienced in your processing it. One of the things the ability to open to pain with warmth allows us to process difficult emotions, so they aren't stuck in our body so that we can work through them. So we can kind of integrate them in our understanding of ourselves in the world. If we don't, that all that stuff just gets stuck gets shoved in Eskalene. Things like heart attacks or you know, physical problems are coming back and like dramatic we're experiencing from my point of view, self compassion is really essential to leading a healthy life. And we're also showing that it's like basically, marker of good therapy, doesn't matter what type of therapy you use. If it's good therapy, it's gonna raise yourself compassion. It's kind of like what it is, is how do I can I relate to difficulty suffering stress difficult does in a way that that helps whether the harms is kind of like self evident, from my point of view at both course, we want to do that. Why don't we? Okay, so when we come back from the short break, I'm going to ask you a series of sort of negative messages and talk about the difference about what would that look like from a self esteem standpoint versus a self compassion standpoint?

    KC Davis 23:37

    Okay, so the idea being that, let's say that I'm going about my day, and I make a mistake at work. And the first thing that comes to my mind is me going, Oh, I'm so stupid. I think when we come from like a self esteem perspective, we're often told that the way to combat that is to go no, you're smart. When it's like, well, but in that moment, like I wasn't, that was actually me not being able to think through something or that was actually a mistake that I made. And so I think that's why for so many people that often feels really hollow as a response, like, What do you mean, replace the negative messages with positive ones? I don't believe that I'm smart. I made a stupid mistake. But what would self compassion sound like in that moment?

    Dr. Kristin Neff 24:21

    Yeah, so certainly is not positive thinking anyway, that falls flat. You don't say I am smart. There's a couple things you can do. First of all, one of the things about self compassion is remember, it's kind of separating ourselves from our behaviors or the situations. So yeah, it was a stupid mistake. It doesn't mean that you're stupid. It also doesn't mean you're not stupid. In a way the kind of what you are is irrelevant. Right? Because you are a human being who did the best you could in the moment, but there might be a way you could do better next time, right? So it'd be like okay, that behavior was not good. It didn't work out right. Maybe it was a stupid mistake, but me

    First thing you do is give yourself tender compassion for the pain of that, oh, oh, man, that hurts. I feel ashamed. I regret it. Ouch. So you kind of where you're with your pain of that you kind of hold it, give yourself some space, some comfort, you know, everyone makes mistakes. It's okay. But that's like step one. And then okay, well, that didn't work out. So could I do differently next time that might be more effective. This is how we learn mistakes. And again, even if we do it more effectively next time, it's not because that'll make us a good person. We're already flawed human being is okay, who we are. But we want not to make mistakes, because it helps us to be happy and healthy. And whatever our goals are, it helps them to achieve them right or do well at work, whatever our goal is. So it's really, really separating our worth is people from our behaviors and the situations we find ourselves in another thing, self compassion, because compassion, I'm just complexity, you know, understanding of the causes or conditions. It's also we have lots of parts of ourselves, the part of myself that made that decision maybe wasn't working that well. But maybe there was another voice or another part of myself that wasn't engaged. So instead of saying, I am bad, or I am good, it's like, well, first of all, I have a lot of different parts, and they're neither bad nor good. There's just some of them are effective or skillful or aren't effective, or skillfulness. Focus on what our behaviors are, what gets manifested. Our intrinsic worth is unquestioned. That's the bottom line of self compassion. All human beings, no matter what they do any awareness, you know, and if you think of the thoughts in your head are different than the thoughts in my head, but as your awareness different than my awareness, that's an open question.

    KC Davis 26:36

    Well, I think it's important to say that we don't have to believe that we're worthy to treat ourselves with compassion, like it's actually not a prerequisite, like, there's a lot of people that don't believe they're worthy, but you actually like, you can still treat yourself as if you are like, there's no like worthiness police, can I bust down the door be like, no, no, no.

    Dr. Kristin Neff 26:54

    Well, and the thing is, you have to ask yourself, when a baby is born, do they have to, like, get their high school degree? Or what's a GED enough to be worthy? I mean, right. So it's like, there's something intrinsic to being a human being who's aware is where the worthiness comes from. Now, for people who were treated by their parents is that they weren't worthy of kindness or compassion. It can be scary to have self compassion and can be difficult. But there's even a term we have for it called Backdraft. It's like when I give myself unconditional love, I immediately remember all the conditions under which I was unloved. And that could come up. And so that's something else we have to have compassion for, you know, it's natural doesn't mean you're doing it wrong, and actually means you're opening to the pain so that it can be healed, right? It has to be dealt with. It's totally natural. But yeah, it's really the thing about compassion is it's not self focused. It's really not about me as an individual. It's about life, the human experience, which is again, which is intrinsically worthy of compassion. As long as you're a flawed human being. That's the only checkbox you have to check to be worthy of compassion can take a while, because we aren't taught that. But again, as you act that way, eventually, there's a part of you who will start to be able to see that oh, yeah, that's right. I'm a flawed human being doing the best I can.

    KC Davis 28:14

    I talked to my book about my sort of journey with self affirmations and how they always felt like someone was just asking me to believe in Santa Claus, and you can't really make yourself believe something,

    Dr. Kristin Neff 28:23

    by the way, you aren't getting stronger every day. I'm not I'm fifth year, that's the truth. The only one that ever really worked was when I finally started saying to myself, I'm allowed to be human. Yes, exactly. That's the truth. One of the sayings we have in the self compassion world is the goal of practice is simply to be a compassionate mess, right? So you will still be a mess. I've been practicing for 30 years now I'm still making mistakes, but I have a compassionate mess. So your goal is chess, just from getting it right to be getting it opening your heart that starts to become your goal. And then when your hearts open, even when things are painful, your heart open, feels good, you feel connected to all of life feels good, that actually becomes your primary goal. This mean you don't even give up on all the other stuff as well. But it's not as important. The point is not to perfect ourselves, but to perfect our love, you know, and that when once you you shift your aim in that way, then things are much more workable, much more doable. You are human. Yeah. Whenever people ask me, you know, I've been trying self compassion, and I'm just not very good at it. What do I always say? Well, I mean, then you can just have self compassion about how hard self compassion is. Absolutely. You start where you are. That's actually often when I say to people, what's your current source of struggle? I feel so frustrated because I can't seem to practice self compassion. Well, what if a good friend came to you and said that would you say us cuz you're stupid idiot. Just give up? No, you probably say, Well, of course, it's hard. You know, you're given your history and it's challenging and you know, you just take it day by day and

    KC Davis 30:00

    So that type of warmth and support you can give toward anything, including how hard it is sometimes to practice self compassion, but you can also start small, you're just a baby step, you're just like, ah, you know, just kind of like a little bit, just a little more arms and get your foot in the door. And then you build on that little bit of warmth, that little bit of understanding, having a tiny bit of patience for some people path is, you know, you walk a little slowly, but you might go farther, right? So it's just about taking it moment by moment, trying to approach each moment with warmth, that sense of support, how can I help myself in this moment?

    One of the things that that I'm thinking about is, because we talk a lot about, you know, what would a friend say? What would a friend say? And it's made me when I say to a friend, yeah, what would I say to a friend, it's really made me realize how much even that is something we sometimes have to learn. Because for so much of my life, I would say to a friend, no, you're smart, and beautiful. And there's nothing wrong with you. And you. And I had to learn how to just hold space for a friend and say, yeah, yeah, maybe it was a fail, I fail two people fail, it doesn't change that I love you. It doesn't change. Failure, you fail doesn't mean you are a failure. Like you have to sum up the whole your entire worth is a failure. But I think it's powerful that it whether we're applying it to ourselves, or trying to have compassion to others, sometimes we really haven't raised with the belief that it's about fixing it. It's about convincing, it's something entirely different.

    Dr. Kristin Neff 31:27

    Yeah, you know, it's both right. So that's why you have to talk about the fierce of the tender. My new book is called fierce self compassion, because people get a little confused. We don't need to fix ourselves, we are fully worthy as we are. But some of our behaviors and our situations can use a little work, and that we need to honor that. Because if we don't, that's not helping either. So it's really disentangling our worth is people from some of our behaviors or situations which, and you know, again, we just do the best we can, they aren't going to be perfect. And that's okay. But we still try. And of course, as Carl Rogers said, the curious paradox is the more I accept myself, the more I can change, right, because it gives us the emotional resources to try to make effective I love the idea of fierce self compassion, and what that means about anger and women. Because I feel like as women, we've been told that anger is not okay to have. And that anger is a result of sort of maybe being unhealthy or not being at peace. When self fear self compassion really reframes what that anger is about, like, you shouldn't be angry, if you're being abused, you should be angry if other people are being abused. Yeah. So it's simple to say is that so simple to do, but simple to understand is, when anger is aimed at alleviating suffering, it's helpful. And when anger causes suffering, it's not helpful, right. And so if someone attacks my child, you better believe I'm gonna get angry. And that anger is involved emotion, that's going to give me a lot of things, it's going to focus me, it's going to energize me, it's gonna allow me to be brave, it's going to reduce the fear response, so that I can protect my child, you know that anger is really useful in the moment, but it's aimed at alleviating suffering. Now, if the person who you know, maybe, so maybe I stand up to that person, but once it starts getting personal, and I start, like getting angry at people, and kind of dehumanizing them, or harming them in some way that it's no longer helpful, but it has a role, it can be harnessed, we need to harness it for the alleviation of suffering. But if we just cut it out, if we suppress it, if we say we don't have it, well, that disempowers us because anger is, is an important source of power, when it's harnessed and channeled correctly. And actually easier said than done, I still struggle. But it is something we don't want to reject. We want to embrace,

    KC Davis 33:45

    I can imagine that if you're caught up in a self esteem sort of rat race where you have to be above others, anger becomes your weapon to push others down to push others away, to tear them down, because that's the only way that you can feel good. But if you've been practicing self compassion, I imagine it's a lot easier to let anger be your advocate, instead of you know, harming people.

    Dr. Kristin Neff 34:06

    Yeah, well, also, when you accept this part of yourself, you know, there's nothing wrong with this part of yourself. In fact, it's very useful. Again, this is the button it is a big butt because what happens we're angry is we just forget I mean, carried away. So it is challenging, right to work with, I'm not going to pretend it's not I struggle, but it definitely has a role, especially when it comes to standing up to injustice. Because what happens as we can see the tender and the fierce need to be imbalanced for two fears of a really angry, we have no tender acceptance of ourselves or others, then that's not good. But if we're too accepting, and we, you know, is no fierceness, then that's not good for ourselves for others, right. So it's really the balance. It's much, you know, will fall off balance. We try to reintegrate and it's a process. It's not like an end point we get to finally, that's really great.

    KC Davis 34:55

    Well, I really appreciate the time that you've taken. It's this is a topic that is something that we could talk about for hours. But if people wanted to know more about self compassion, where could they go to read your books and learn more from you?

    Dr. Kristin Neff 35:08

    Well, easiest place to start is if you Google self compassion, you'll find my website self compassion.org. You can take a self compassion test, you can read research hundreds of articles on there by a lots of different researchers. There's a guided practice, I've got videos, things you can read. And then you can also links to order by books. I've got four at this point. So and some of them are practice based, some of them are more just kind of talking about my own journey with self compassion.

    KC Davis 35:34

    Awesome. Well, thank you so much, and I appreciate every bit of it.

    Dr. Kristin Neff 35:39

    Thank You will KC It was fun talking to you

Christy Haussler
104: The Controversy of ABA: A Discussion with Researcher Dr. Robin Roscigno

Our deep dive into ABA and autism continues in this episode. Today’s guest recently finished her Ph.D. in Education, focusing on disability studies and related research in the world of DEI. Dr. Robin Roscigno helps educate parents about neurodiversity to create a more inclusive world for neurodiverse individuals. She posts frequently on social media platforms about autism and autism therapies. Her studies and life experiences give her both a professional and personal relationship to this topic because of her brother’s childhood diagnosis of autism. Robin was also diagnosed with autism along with her young daughter and began navigating the therapy world as a parent who struggled to find therapies that are affirming. After leaving teaching to pursue her Ph.D., she now focuses on autism intervention and challenging the dominant paradigms. 

Show Highlights:

  • Understanding what ABA therapy is and why there is such controversy around this topic

  • The dilemma for parents in the “explosive landscape” of ABA

  • Understanding behaviorism as a therapeutic approach

  • The old-school ABA therapy and its focus on eye contact

  • How current autism therapies are designed to make people appear “less autistic” and “fit in more” in the world

  • The need for wisdom and a harm-reduction approach in therapies

  • Choosing a school program for your child based on goals and techniques and not a binary (ABA:good or ABA: bad) approach

  • The foundation of neurotypical norms (like eye contact) in connection, relationships, and social referencing—-which we ALL need

  • Teaching social referencing in affirming ways that help develop skills

  • Looking for red/green flags in assessing specific goals and techniques from an advocacy perspective

  • Unrealistic expectations of autistic kids and their parents

 

Resources and Links:

Connect with Dr. Robin Roscigno: Website, TikTok, LinkedIn, Instagram, and TEDx Talk: “Your Autistic Child Can Have a Great Life. Here’s How”
Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC 0:00

    Hi Robin, thank you for being here. I've got Robin Rossignol here in the studio with me, and why don't you just introduce yourself and tell us what your area of study is?

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 0:15

    Sure. Hi, everyone. My name is Robin Ristic. No, I do a number of things. I just finished my PhD in education theory, organization and policy, do disability studies related research around disability equity and inclusion. And I am on various social media platforms, educating parents about neurodiversity, and helping to kind of create a more inclusive world for neurodivergent people.

    KC 0:41

    So you're very close to us being able to call you doctor.

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 0:44

    You can actually call me Doctor I just defended. Oh my gosh, okay.

    KC 0:48

    record scratch. Hello, I have Dr. Robin Rossignol in the studio today. Incredible. Well, Robin, congratulations. That's really cool. You and I connected over tick tock because you were posting a lot about autism. And I really wanted to talk to you today about autism and autism therapies, and just some questions that I have as a mom, and that I know other people have as well. So first of all, can you that's kind of your professional relationship to this topic. Do you mind sharing your personal relationship to this topic? Sure.

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 1:25

    Yeah. So I mean, I started as a special education teacher years ago, my brother was diagnosed with autism when I was a child. And I went into that kind of with that as my frame of reference. And my mom was a big floor time person, dir floor time, which is a kind of play based therapy for autism and was very critical of other therapies at the time. So I had this kind of frame of reference, became a special education teacher. And then I saw some things that were shocking to me, honestly, because I just didn't grow up around that type of treatment or therapy. I'm very rigid kind of rope, strict therapy kind of approach. So I kind of worked in special education. For a while then I myself was diagnosed with autism, right around the same time as my daughter, they did a twofer first. And which happens a lot actually, because you know, sitting in all these doctor's appointments like I do that, I do that too. She was diagnosed. And then I started kind of navigating the therapy world as a parent, and was really struggling to find therapy that I felt was affirming to my child's kind of individual ways of being. And so that prompted me to leave teaching actually to pursue my PhD and I focused specifically on autism intervention, the history of autism intervention, and kind of challenging some of the dominant paradigms that we use to think about intervention. And that's kind of where I am now just finishing up with that.

    KC 2:48

    So I have a daughter that's autistic as well. And my experience was immediately upon diagnosis. The first therapy that was recommended to me was ABA, which is applied behavioral analysis. And interestingly enough, because I had been on Tik Tok and listening to autistic advocates, I had heard people be really critical of ABA as a therapy. And yet it was the first thing recommended to me and spoken really highly of by the pediatrician by the developmental psychologist. So I remember being kind of confused, because that was like, being presented as definitely what you know, we all need to be doing. But then I was also hearing criticism. Turns out there's actually some controversy around ABA. And I'm wondering if for the people listening that maybe don't know anything about this. If we could first talk a little bit about what ABA therapy is, and then maybe you can help give a synopsis of like, what the current controversy is around ABA.

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 3:46

    Sure, yeah. So actually, my dissertation is about the autism wars and kind of parents position in that. So really the controversy so ABA therapy, broadly speaking, for autism is the application of behaviorism to treatment of autism. So it's using contingent Rhian rewards and punishments, right consequences to manipulate behavior. And in the context of therapy for autism, we're doing that to kind of reduce visible kind of signs of autism. Right? The problem is right is on the experience side of it, the people experiencing the therapy is that those things don't really go away. We're just learning kind of, and being incentivized right, to suppress them to do them less to do it less visibly to do it differently to act this way, as opposed to this way. And so what's happened is that many, many people who have experienced this form of therapy or this approach to therapy had very negative experiences on the kind of internal sense and one of the limitations of behaviorism is it studies observable behavior, it doesn't study internal experiences. So there isn't really a lot of data about what it's like for the person experiencing this therapy and it's deemed if Effective, right? Because we see, you know, Johnny's flapped his hands 30 times yesterday and he did 20. Today. Effective, right. But we're not actually studying what that's doing right to Johnny on the inside. And so that's kind of the controversy now, it's become very kind of heated. And there's a bit a lot of misconceptions really on both sides. I think that, you know, on the kind of artistic side, there's a lot of kind of rhetoric around that ABA was created specifically to normalize autistic people. That's not exactly true. They were really interested in normalizing kind of everybody in the beginning, LGBTQ conversion therapy kind of treatment for addiction at risk youth, there's a lot of kind of areas, it just turned out that over time, autism came really the most lucrative, so they kind of moved into that arena on the parents side, right is the parents are really in the middle, as you said, right? Being told on one side, right by doctors, that it's the most evidence based treatment for autism, if you don't do it, your child won't have a future, right. And then on the other side, if they even consider it, their child abusers. And so it puts parents in a really tough spot because they want to do right by their kids. And they're getting such conflicting information, and yet have to navigate a system that's heavily rooted in behaviorism. Right? So how do we do that, and that's really where my work comes in, is trying to help parents navigate this very complicated, and really explosive landscape, right, which is, can be very, very hard, especially for parents that are new to this right, that are walking into like a 15 year public visible, dragged out, smack down fight, and are just like, I just want my kid to get some help. Why are you yelling at me? So that's kind of where I come in, I guess.

    KC 6:39

    So for someone listening that maybe has never heard about some of these terms? How would you describe behaviorism as a therapeutic approach?

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 6:48

    Okay, so behaviorism starts with kind of observing somebody, right, and then saying, I want to change x behavior. There's a lot of kind of technical jargon around it, right. But really, the idea is that all behaviors have a purpose, right? And their estimation, that's really boils down to like four of them, escape attention, tangible, and then automatic or sensory, it feels good to do it, right. And then they use kind of rewards and consequences to manipulate that behavior. So let's say someone is, you know, calling out to get the teachers attention, right, a behaviorist may say, we want to reduce the number of times that so and so calls out in class. And so what the teacher is going to do is ignore the calling out, and then only pay attention to that child when they elicit the desired response of raising their hand, right. And so it's kind of uses that science right of operant conditioning to increase the amount of times that so and so does this desired behavior. So it's really using kind of those techniques to reduce or increase particular behaviors, but basically, using rewards and consequences to do it, as opposed to other approaches that may work kind of more developmentally, are kind of involve more internal processes.

    KC 8:06

    So it makes me think of like star charts, because I'm trying to think of like examples that don't have anything to do with autism that might help people understand, like, if I have a child that, you know, you mentioned, like maybe they're calling out in class without raising their hand, and they're supposed to be raising their hand. And one way that you're describing is like, the teacher might just not respond to that child so that they kind of get the message like, Oh, this is not the behavior that is like acceptable in this context. And so if I want to get what I'm looking for, I have to change my behavior. And then there's like this aspect of the star chart, right, which is like every time Johnny raises his hand, maybe he gets like a star on his chart. Yep, exactly.

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 8:49

    Right. So we're going to reward the desire behavior, ignore the ones that we don't want to say the problem is, right, is that it sounds good in theory, right. But we don't know why this particular child is raising their hand is calling out so much, right? They may have an impulse control issue, right? They may have, you know, not be getting a lot of attention at home, they might have kind of attachment issues, they may have trauma, right? They may be struggling with the academic work, right, and trying to get help and not knowing like the right way to go about it. And so when we kind of just focus on Well, they did it this many times, and now they did it less, we miss opportunities for really deep skill development. And it becomes a bit of a band aid, I guess. Yeah.

    KC 9:31

    So I was gonna say you're saying that the risk of behaviorism is that we fix the behavior without addressing like the underlying problem or issue or need. I'm curious, would you say that there are any instances where behaviorism is okay, or helpful or not harmful?

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 9:50

    So it's tricky, right? Because if you criticize anything about behaviorism, right, that kind of response as well. We all do. Behaviorism all the time. Right? Right, that's how our world works is, you know what you go to work without a paycheck. And there is an element of that that's true, right is that we do have kind of naturally occurring rewards and consequences in our daily lives. Right. So we can't actually avoid behaviorism entirely. I think the issue with ABA therapy is it's a very concentrated, constant, specific, intentional application to a very niche group of people only long periods of time, right. So we have kids that are getting 40 hours a week of intensive behavioral therapy, where are these kinds of rewards and consequences are intentionally manipulated all the time? Right. So as opposed to a kind of naturally occurring consequence, right? So we can't say that we can never ever do behaviorism right? I do. You know, I do a behaviorism. All the time. I say, if you get in the car, we'll put your favorite song on. Alright, that's behaviorism.

    KC 10:57

    Yeah. And I'm thinking about my, like, my kids have had speech therapy before. And especially when they were really young, they often had this sense of like, okay, here's the Mr. Potatohead toy. And like, for every word that you repeat to me, you get like another little, like, hand, or here's the whatever. And it really like would motivate my girls to want because like, there would be three and like, no three year old wants to like repeat words to learn pronunciation with speech therapy, but they'd get really excited to like, it's almost like they enjoyed the game of it. Like I say the word, I get the potato head piece, I say the word I get the potato head piece. And so in that context, like it happened once a week, it was you don't know, I'm trying to like, kind of, like, put that into perspective of like, where, like, is it? Anytime I see behaviorism? I should be like, Oh, my God, we're peppering over behavior? Or is it specific to like what you said? Like, there's not like an underlying need for like, why my child, you know, has a hard time pronouncing her B's. So we're not necessarily like papering over something. Yes.

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 12:03

    So I think one, I always tell parents, you will know if it is bad, it's not subtle. When therapy is going bad, it's bad. It's they're crying, they don't want to go. Right, they shut down, it will not be a surprise to you. I think there's this kind of narrative, especially among, you know, like, kind of autistic people on the internet is that, you know, parents can be abusing their kids and not know, and I think in some cases, maybe, but in most cases, if therapy is truly distressing, your child, you'll have some sense of it right? In that case, right? When I would say it would be bad would be, let's say that she can't say it. She doesn't say it, right? And she says, Oh, well, I'll just wait. No Potatohead for you, right child gets more and more frustrated, and angry. And she says, Well, next time you can turn behind a potato head, and then just holds the piece of the potato head in front of her face, right? While she cries and screams. And I've seen this in therapy hundreds of times, right? If we're using something as an incentive, what happens when they don't earn it? And so we have to kind of, if we're following a kind of strict behavior analytic protocol, we're really not supposed to give it to her unless she does the desired response. Right. So what happens? And so that's kind of what we're talking about. It's not all behaviorism, you it's really impossible to do any kind of teaching or therapy that has no behaviorism. In it, I really don't know what that would even look like because anyone could look at any teaching and say that's some behaviorism when you praise someone, right, that's social reinforcement. But I think what we're talking about is the more kind of crueler applications of it, and not kind of just like bringing in other things like relationship like self advocacy, understanding, trauma informed types of approaches, right? When we only do behaviorism, if you do this, you get this, right, then we kind of miss how we could be supporting kids in the kind of broader, deeper ways. Whenever

    KC 14:01

    I hear people talk about ABA, you know, I've never experienced ABA, but whenever I hear people describe behaviorism, and some of the risks with behaviorism, I'm always taken aback to my experience going through teen rehab, because they had this approach called therapeutic community. And it was like heavily in fact, the entire thing was just, you know, you came in, you're a level one. And you had to do certain behaviors and complete certain assignments to get to a different level to get these three privileges. And then if you did a behavior they didn't want you could be knocked down a level. And you know, it was literally everything from you know, how you cleaned your room, to how you shared in group to how you dress like if you there were a lot of rules. And if you broke the rules, you got privileges taken away or you got consequences. And then if you follow the rules, they would slowly add in more and more incentives more and more rewards more and more praise you And, you know, the idea was like, let's take these young girls who are having mental health issues having addictions and like, Let's form them into different people that don't have those issues. And what happened was this really bizarre experience where, like, I can't say that nothing good came from it, like I did learn a lot. There was some other therapy there. But there was also a very bizarre trauma that I feel like I experienced, because like you said, there were a lot of behaviors that got extinguished. But the like, the reason those behaviors were happening, wasn't ever addressed.

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 15:42

    Right? It's kind of like an addiction treatment, right is you can, you know, kind of get someone to stop drinking, if you'd hide all the alcohol, right? And put them in a program where there's no alcohol. But did we kind of address the trauma that makes them want to drink all the time? Right? Did we get to the kind of root cause of these things? Did we give them tools that they can use to, you know, navigate the world? Maybe not? Right? And so what happens is when we take away that oftentimes, a lot of those behaviors come back. Because when we're kind of taking away the carrot and the stick, what did we actually learn? Right? And we didn't fix the kind of root cause of them. I have, you know, an example I use a lot, is it a student in my class, and it's my student was living in a shelter, right? Was Was housing insecure, and had very little things, right. And so another student touched his hat, and he punched him square in the face. And, you know, a behavior analytic approach would say, what was the antecedent someone took his hat? What was the behavior? He punched? Someone? What should be the consequence? Right? He should apologize. He should, you know, not be able to play at recess, whatever it was, right. The reason he punched him, because he took the hat is because he lives in a shelter, right? And he only has a few things, and people steal his stuff all the time. It's coming from a deep seated, very significant trauma, right? And so we can get him to stop punching people. Sure, right, I could, you know, give him a consequence and say, you can't you have no recess for the week. And maybe you wouldn't punch someone again in my class, but we're not dealing with the kind of emotional reasons for it, those are not being addressed. And so it's going to come out in a different way. Same way, when people stop drinking, and they don't actually deal with the root, the kind of emotional pain, they become addicted to exercise, addicted to social media, right? It's we're not actually getting at the root, we're just kind of, you know, stopping one particular behavior, and then it kind of morphs, right, and then we have different problems. So it's really, I think, a missed opportunity. When we only focus on what's observable, we miss so much of what's true for people's experiences for children's experiences. Um, that's really my critique. Yeah.

    KC 17:45

    So if somebody's listening, and they don't know anybody autistic, they've never seen ABA therapy, like, what kinds of things do you see in ABA therapy? And like, what is the goal of ABA therapy?

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 17:55

    So I mean, there's kind of like old school ABA therapy, and there's some people still practicing like that, where it's very, they call it a discrete trial, right? Where I sit across from the child, and I say, I give them a direction, they either do it or they don't do it. And then if they don't do it, I kind of guide them. By me either picking up their hands and having them select the right answer, or, you know, reducing options until they get the right answer, then they get the right answer. I give them some reinforcement, I say, Great job, here's the sticker. Great job. Here's a gummy bear. And we just keep doing it like that, right? I'm gonna have to like train it. So that's one way. And

    KC 18:28

    what kind of things would you be trying to get them to say or do you

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 18:32

    know, sometimes it's around kind of social skills. Sometimes it's like, you know, eye contact using particular phrases. Sometimes it is learning actual skills, colors, shapes, numbers, those kinds of things. Sometimes it is selecting a, you know, particular social skill or using a social skill. It's all different kinds of things, that it could be a lot of ABA, things focus on reducing things that look autistic. So things like stimming, hand flapping, vocal stimming dheireadh IPI, which is what they call a kind of, you know, that's what they call stimming, echolalia, repeating certain words. So I've seen behavior plans that are for every 10 seconds, that so and so doesn't script echolalia, and then they'll get a reward for that. So sometimes it's about reducing those things. I can't say it's all the time that is that. So that's what I tell parents a lot to look out for is what is the goal? And what is the technique we're using to get there? I think the biggest problem is when we have bad techniques and bad goals. The more subtle, right is when we have good techniques and bad goals, or we have bad techniques and good goals. And really we want to be in that kind of good techniques and good goals, area, goals that are affirming and supportive to the child and techniques that are gentle and, you know, inclusive and fun and flexible. And I think you know if you can find something that's ABA that does that, I don't see. It's not always a problem. So

    KC 19:59

    let's talk about it. Eye contact in particular, because that's what I hear a lot about when people talk about ABA therapy, I guess old school ABA therapy used to focus on eye contact, requiring eye contact, encouraging eye contact, and getting children to basically respond more by making eye contact. And that same like, you know, when you make eye contact, you're gonna get a Skittle or you're gonna get one thing that I saw a lot is that if a child has like a favorite toy, whether it's their iPad, or like a lovey, like taking that away from them, and then being like, you get it back, when you make eye contact,

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 20:35

    one of the things they do right is they'll have a parents do what's called a reinforcement inventory, which they'll have them. I don't know if you had to do one, but we used to have parents do it all the time. And I see them a lot. It's a kind of checklist of what is your child? Like? What's motivating to them? They like game, so they like songs? Do they like Peppa Pig? Do they like whatever, and then you use that as the reward. But oftentimes, they don't want them having access to that other times because it reduces its power. Right? So if I can have my iPad, when I leave therapy, that I'm not going to work that hard for the iPad in therapy, right? So the logic is that if you take it away, or reduce access to it to only specific times, then it raises the importance of that item, which is particularly cruel, right? Because then we have kids who are very attached to certain things that now have to perform these desired behaviors to gain access to them. And oftentimes those behaviors are antithetical to what their disability, you know, allows them to do. Imagine, like, Hey, see, you can only have chocolate if you do brain surgery. Sorry. Right. Like, and you would be like I say, Well, I guess you just don't want to do that. Maybe try harder. Right? And I only allowed you to have that right? All right, only allowed like and people do they do it with affection, even right? We're only hugging them when they do what we want, right? Imagine if like your partner could only hug you if you were a good wife that day. Right? It's terrible. Not to say that all people that do ABA are doing this, but there are some that are. And that's one of the things I kind of have parents look out for is are we using a child's you know, sacred items as behavioral incentives. And I think that veers into a kind of cruelty that I can't support.

    KC 22:24

    One of the things that I have sort of observed as I've looked at this landscape, because I don't know when ABA started becoming really controversial, or like when people began kind of speaking out in mass against ABA. But I think people forget that the first person to ever be diagnosed with autism is still alive. Right. And so like the first generation of people that had to, quote unquote, address, autism, were parents that suddenly we have this diagnosis, and we were identifying these children, and they're autistic. And so you know, it was parents having to and I think at the beginning, the diagnosis of autism was really only being afforded to people that were clearly and visibly and obviously, autistic by a certain sort of set of criteria. And so that often included nonverbal children that weren't saying, Oh, it's so distressing when you take my thing away. And I'm not really alert, right? Like, I mean, children don't say that in general, right. And so you have these parents who love their child, and want their child to have a good life, for the most part, I think. And there's this therapy that seems to be making them less autistic, right? Like, oh, she's making more eye contact. She's not flapping her hands as much. And I think also, and we'll get into this, but like, autism is not all hand flapping. Like some people stem by banging their head against the wall, right? Like some people stem by biting. We have these meltdowns where we can't do anything for hours. And so parents are seeing these things that are distressing to their kids and going ABA therapy is making these distressing behaviors, less obvious, right? And then all those children grew up. And for the first time, we're hearing the generation that went through this kind of old school ABA. And I remember hearing autistic adults who had gone through ABA, talk about their experience and say things I remember one girl in particular, saying, like, I've been seeing my therapist, because I'm really trying to, like implement some different like habits for my mental health, and I can't seem to sustain anything. And I really want to journal but I can't journal and she said, I saw my therapist today. And we had a breakthrough. And I realized that because so many of my formative years were spent with 40 hours a week in ABA therapy. When I did what they wanted. I got something I wanted, that I now don't have the ability to have like intrinsic motivation for something like I only feel I can't create my own structure. And people talking about, you know, the reason that I don't make eye contact is because it's painful to make eye contact, and I can't focus when I'm making eye contact. And if I'm looking at you in the face, I'm taking in every detail of your face, and I can't hear what you're saying. And so you're forcing me to look you in the eyes, it's painful for me. And then I'm being reprimanded because I'm not responding correctly, because I can't understand the question. And so it was like, we didn't recognize that there was a reason why autistic children were doing the things they were doing.

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 25:43

    Yeah, I mean, I think autism is always filtered through the lens of deficit and pathology, right, is everything that autistic people do is wrong. And so a lot of those therapies right are the focus is on kind of identifying the things that are different about autistic people and making them not big. And, you know, a lot of the rationale right is that we're helping these children fit in to the world. In some ways, that's true. But I think, you know, we can dream of a better world, right? And we can create a better world for our kids, by empowering our kids to advocate for themselves, and to not be so controlled right in those very specific ways, and to kind of be more kind of CO creators with us. Now, I, to your point, there are kids who have really significant severe behaviors, right? We can't say that we never have to intervene. I got dragged all over the internet, because I said kids have to brush their teeth, that's not negotiable. And people said, Well, what if it's sensor really uncomfortable for me? And I said, well, is dental surgery less so really overwhelming for you, because when you don't brush your kid's teeth, you know what happens? They put them under anesthesia, and they have to get done to work, which is much worse. And so there are times when we do have to intervene in behaviors. And some of the tools available that are kind of rooted in behavior are effective in a short term capacity, right? But it's not all the time. It's not everything. It's not 40 hours a week, it's a kind of supplement to deep relationship building and kind of skill building work that happens on a kind of relational basis. Does that make sense?

    KC 27:17

    Yeah, it almost seems like there's also it's also just like an issue of triage. Like, I think sometimes when I hear people speak out against ABA, I often hear autistic adults with like, low support needs. And like, you know, they're talking about like, hey, you know, being forced to make eye contact or being told I can't flat my hands like stems and behaviors that really aren't hurting anyone. And I think we would mostly agree like, yeah, like, if it's not hurting anyone, there's no need to have this heavy hand of like, we need to extinguish this behavior. But then you hear parents of children who are autistic that are severely disabled. And I don't say severely autistic, like, there's no such thing as severely or mildly autistic, like it's all autism. But you could certainly be more or less disabled in the way that it hinders your daily functioning in the way you interact with the world. And so then there's these parents going, okay, but my child isn't just like not making eye contact and flapping their hands, they're getting up in the middle the night and running out the front door into the street, they are banging their wrists on the table until they have bruises and bleeding, they are picking out their cuticles, they are you know, if I try to make them brush their teeth, we have a three hour meltdown. And, you know, it does seem like there's a triage component to this where we have to keep people safe.

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 28:42

    Yes. And so I help parents a lot navigate the system, right? Because right now, the only therapy that's covered for insurance by insurance for autism is ABA. And they can get a lot of hours, they can get up to 40 hours a week. And a lot of people are using that as like a kind of off label one to one assistant. And they need the extra pair of hands, because that's the only way their family is functioning, no judgement, right? What I do is say, Okay, let's look at your behavior plan. What are the goals? How are we getting there? How is your child being supported in other ways? How can we supplement that with other kind of approaches? I'm never going to scream at a parent for trying to get their kid help. Right? And a lot of people you're right, right, that are saying, you know, never, ever, ever, you know, just let your kids run free. Okay, well, like sometimes people have to go to work. That's a very kind of, you know, privilege take because not everyone can homeschool their kid. You know, people have to go to work. People have to go in the community. So I've seen kids who have stems that are popping their eyeballs out of their eye sockets, gnawing absolute gashes into their arms that then become like infected and they become septic right? So there are times right where we have to use the resources that are available to us. And if that is ABA therapy, you're not a bad parent for going that route. My own child has been you No ABA therapy, I had a heavy, heavy, heavy hand and what the behavior plan was, there are certain techniques that I said no to I won't have or do extinction plans, for example. But there are that is what is available to a lot to most parents. And so I've always had a kind of harm reduction approach to that, as opposed to never ever ever do ABA. Because what does it mean to do ABA, there's ABA in every other therapy too. So it's not like oh, only do speech therapy, some of these speech therapists are just as bad so and some of these behaviorist and newer ones are really trying to change it. So it's got to be, you need to know who your kid is working with. Do you trust that therapist, not the industry of ABA? Not every ABA ever, not the ABA that someone on the internet went through? What's happening in your home? Do you feel okay with it? Do you have enough knowledge to actually look at a behavior plan and say, yes, no, yes, no. And that's, I think, where we can make some real change as opposed to kind of just screaming at parents on the internet, like not to put their kids in ABA, when many parents don't have a choice, particularly when we're talking about, you know, black and brown parents who are getting typhus called on them for educational neglect for not doing ABA. Right, or their kids are in really, you know, serious physical danger if they do some of those behaviors around a police officer, right. So we really have to have a kind of nuanced intersectional way of thinking about this, as opposed to these kind of, you know, binaries of good parents don't do ABA and bad parents do ABA, it's a little bit more complicated than that.

    KC 31:32

    One of the things that I ran into was that when I started looking at schools, I found that the schools that were just like nice little private preschools and things like that, like they are so afraid of the word autism, that I was being told left and right, like, oh, not a good fit, not a good fit. I had someone call and say we can't take her because she has autism, and they've never even met my child. And I'm looking and I'm looking, and I'm looking, and even the places that were like, oh, yeah, you know, we would definitely accept her. And then I go in, and it's like, it's a class of 27, three year olds, with two teachers, nobody, the atmosphere itself was not going to be able to meet my child's needs, they weren't going to be able to give her individual attention, they weren't going to be able to give her physical affection, they weren't going to be able to, you know, like, some autistic kids are hypersensitive, emotionally, and some of them are shut down and get real quiet. And some of them, you know, might get overwhelmed and freak out and fall on the floor. And it was like, Okay, I'm looking at these like environments. And the ones that I think might be a good fit won't take her. The ones that will take her are not a good invite, like they would be traumatizing in and of themselves. And as I go down the list of like trying to find her a place. The only places that were willing and set up to offer accommodations were the places that were like quote unquote, disability schools or special needs programs, and most of them if not all of them were ABA based. And I remember thinking like, I remember just like coming home and crying because like I was so dead set on like, we will never use ABA because I have heard autistic person after autistic person talk about traumatizing it was and I don't want to traumatize my child. And I myself went through a very conflicting experience with behaviorism, where it's like, okay, on the one hand, like I was using cocaine at 15 years old, like I could have died multiple times, like, there were some triage that needed to happen, there were some behaviors that needed to be extinguished, that we could not wait around for some five year relationship therapeutically to develop, right, like I needed to be contained things needed to be extinguished. But the behaviorism went so far, that it ended up also causing damage. And so I'm sitting here going, Okay, well, how do I navigate a system that is like deeply ablest? And the people who are saying, like, we are getting trained in disability, we understand autism, some of them have such an old school view of autism. And it really is difficult as a parent to go in and go, Okay. And then what I realized was because I had heard so many people say, Never ABA, never ABA, ABA is abuse. I realized that I didn't even understand what ABA was behind like, it makes them conform. And so I would go into places and they would say, Oh, we're not ABA, and then they'd be doing things that basically were ABA. And then there were other, you know, daycares or centers that would say like, Oh, we're an ABA center, and you'd go in, but they weren't really doing what I understood to be a VA and so you can't like go off of the term anymore. You That's what I

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 35:00

    tell parents to do. And I know like, there's people that will tell you, Oh, if it's called ABA, it's bad. If it's not called ABA, it's good. But without really identifying what those practices are and what the problem is. And so what happens is, is that they, you know, aren't in ABA or not ABA, but they go to a school and the whole school is ABA. They just don't realize it, right? It's rooted in behavior, analytic principles. There are other school that's not ABA, but it's not called that. So it's okay. I really think we need to kind of get out of the mindset of like, the labels are accurate, because they're not always accurate. My daughter went to an ABA preschool too, because her public school wouldn't take her she was, you know, half a point shy of the threshold for preschool. But I gotten kicked out of her general education, preschool for like kicking kids in the circle. So I didn't know what to do. I was working, I was like, What am I going to do, and I was working for this agency that did some ABA and some floor time, I was doing floor time for them, and, you know, lovely Orthodox Jewish family. And they were like, listen, we have this little preschool here, it's all Orthodox kids. But you know, she can come here in their ABA center. And I was like, I mean, I know their program. I know, their center, I know, the therapist, I work with them. And I trusted them. And I was in the building, and they were collaborative and amazing. And she had nothing, you know, I'm me, I'm the most vocal critic of some of this stuff. And I was completely 100% comfortable the entire time with every single thing that they did. And they had cameras, I could watch it any time. I mean, it was lovely. And people probably, you know, would be very angry at me if I said that my kids who may be a preschool or call me a hypocrite, but it's not, we need to look at the practices. The only practice that matters about ABA is the one that your kid is experiencing. If you're a parent, that's really what you need to look at. Are you okay with this person with this behavior plan, with this therapist with this practice, there are structural things that need to happen. But for the average everyday parent, they're not trying to do ABA reform, they're trying to just get them their kids have health. And so if you look at just what they're doing, right, I can give you some tools to kind of look at that and say, Yes, to this, and no to this, or how to speak to a therapist to say I'm really not comfortable with this aspect. Can we try something else. And that's a lot of what I do is kind of give parents the tools to make things workable, even if they're not, you know, on paper, you know, called the right thing, it doesn't matter at the end of the day, as long as the techniques that they're using, and the goals that they have are affirming. I don't care if you call it ABA, that's

    KC 37:30

    really what I'm hearing you say is that, like, what matters is that you have the right goals, and the right techniques. And, you know, whatever they're calling, whatever therapy they're using, whatever they're calling that center, that that's what you're looking for. And I do want to get into, like what you would consider like some red flags for goals and techniques. But one thing that came to mind for me is that I remember hearing the thing about like withholding, someone said like, you know, that's not right to withhold a toy from a child until they do what you want. And that's, that's really like a two dimensional statement. Because I had two completely opposite experiences that really made me understand this. Okay, so I saw a video of someone doing ABA, and they were sitting at the table, the child was on one end, the practitioner was on the other. And they had like some blocks, and the child wanted a block and the child was saying block. And before the child's hand got to the block, she pulled it up out of range. And when I want the block, I want the block, and she went block block. And she held it even higher. And when I say I want the block, say I want the block, and then the child goes out, but she was good and like handed the child the blog, and I even showed it to my husband and he was like, I don't something about that, like rubs me wrong for some way, right? And it just didn't sit right with me. Right. But then, like, My child has an occupational therapist that does a floor time approach was a type of therapy. And I started watching. And I started noticing that like there were times where technically it was, quote unquote, withholding. But they're on the ground. They're playing with each other. She put in a lot of work, understanding how she connects and connected with her in that way to where every day she walks in every time that she walks in. My daughter's like, Oh, yay, she's here and they play and you know, so my daughter would come up with her paw patrol because she loves Paw Patrol, and they play together and she'd have the little paw patrol and she'd be running around. And then she'd like, hover, go up, and my daughter would reach for it and she'd go, Oh, he's flying. He's flying. Where is he? Where is he? And she would like me Make it this like playful, quote unquote game to see if she could elicit whether it was a verbal response or behavior response from my daughter. And then but no matter what, then she gave her the toy. Yes. And she would explain like, it's not like I don't want to induce a distress, what I want to do is give her opportunities where I'm pausing and allowing her to practice something. And that was to me such a lightbulb moment, because you're right, like, it's not about like, withholding understanding what withholding is, it was all these other nuances about like, are they playing? Is there a relationship? What's the even down to like, the tone of voice that each practitioner was speaking to the child in?

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 40:44

    Yeah. And it's like, you know, in the first example, if she's trying to teach requesting, right, she's teaching that she requested, she did the thing, right, she just didn't do it in this very prescribed kind of neurotypical way of this full sentence, right, in this particular tone of voice. But she requested the block, she said, I want the block in so many words, right? She said, the block pointing and asking for it. If we're trying to extend the length of an utterance, there's lots of ways that we can do that we can embed that in play, and I can, you know, make the Paw Patrol say that, and I could say, but I want the block, right? Like and be like, silly and like make them fight so that they're hearing that language over and over again, right? That's totally fine, right. But sitting in front of them and saying, I want say I want and like dangling it in front of them, right is just dressing, any child would be distressed by that. So this is also nuanced. And I think people want a list of like, This is bad. And this is good. And that's I think that's where we fall into that kind of binary of ABA, bad, everything else good when actually we have to kind of train ourselves to understand, you know, actually to be more kind of empathetic, right? of, you know, you can look at your child's experience playing with other therapists and realize she's not distressed, she's not upset by that. It's a opportunity to learn and practice a skill that is well within her kind of zone of proximal development, right to use her for teachers out there. But kotsky. But in the other example, you know, she can one it's not a skill she has, right, so she's asking her to do something, you know, she can't do and then like, how is she teaching her? What does she teaching her? Right? Testing is not teaching. And that's a lot of the problem I have with ABA is instead of giving her opportunities, it's constant assessment, Do this, do this, do this, you do that at the end? Right? Once they've learned it, but how are you teaching them? How to say a longer sentence? are you modeling it for them? How would they know to say I want the block besides you just saying, say I want the block? Right? How are you embedding that in your everyday interactions is really a bigger question. So to me, it's kind of too simplistic on the teaching end, and also really creating a kind of distressing upsetting environment for the kids, because they're not actually being taught to do the skill. They're just being tested on it. And then, you know, motivated to do it in air quotes.

    KC 43:01

    Yeah, it really seemed like in one instance, like, if I was that child, like in the one with like, say, I want the block. What, like what that seems like it's teaching a child is like, if I want to be taken care of, I need to figure out what people want and give it to them. It creates a lot of whereas in the other, yeah, like, but like in the other instance, it seemed like what she was learning was, if I want connection with a person, I need to learn what types of things are connecting for me and for that person.

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 43:38

    The other thing was eye contact, right? It's like people are so focused on eye contacting eye contact, right, but the skill of eye contact is actually about social referencing, right? We need to reference other people, and we need to show other people that we're paying attention to them. And we need to look at other people and see what they're doing because that's what you know, kind of existing in the world looks like right? As we observe other people, we connect to other people. We find ways to, you know, speak to other people and have relationships with them. And

    KC 44:05

    because we want relationships like I will never forget, like listening to an autistic adult on Tik Tok say, there's this myth that autistic people like to be alone. And I always spent time alone and my whole family, we just oh, that's just Maggie. Like, she likes to be alone. She prefers to be alone. The truth is I don't, I am deeply lonely. But I learned very early in my life, that I was just too much. I was just too much of a burden that people were irritated with me people were aggravated with me that I was awkward. And so I just learned to withdrawal. And I think to your point of talking about goals is like, is my goal that I want my child to do social referencing, because like that's what a person should do? Or is my goal like, I know my child wants relationships, and I don't want to change who she is, but I want her to have the skills and the knowledge to know how to engage in a relationship. So she's not Somebody who's lonely and hostile withdrawal. It's so

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 45:02

    true. And, you know, teaching people skills is not a bad thing, right? There's this kind of idea that like, any kind of, you know, teaching of neurotypical norms is bad. But we all have to navigate the world in a lot of different ways. And we have relationships with autistic people, and we have relationships with with neurotypical people, my daughter is nine, and she wants, you know, she has friends. And sometimes there's times where, like, you know, she's trying to do something socially, and it's not panning out the way she intended it to, right. She's not getting the effect that she wants. Am I an ableist? If I say, Hmm, I think you know, could we try it a different way? Maybe don't, you know, maybe don't yell it like that? Or maybe, you know, pushing them is not the right answer. What else could we try? Right? Because she wants to have relationships with kids, she wants to be included. And sometimes something she's doing is bothering somebody. Right? I would be failing her. Right? If I didn't say, I think your approach is a little off in this case. And maybe we could try something different. Let's practice it, right. So here's some things that you can try to say tomorrow, and I'm going to teach her something right. I'm not just going to say, Stop yelling, here's a gummy bear. Right. If you stop yelling for 10 minutes, I'll give you a gummy bear, I'm going to say that really hurts people's ears. And I know you want to be friends with these people, and you're talking really loudly, and maybe it's bothering them. So maybe we can try practicing. Let's do at home. Right lowering our voice and conversations or let's practice how much is the right amount of talking when you're talking to people? Or how do we ask a question about other people? You know, so it's helping her get the effects that she wants. But it's I'm taking my cues from her. I'm not saying everything you do is wrong. And here's how we can make you better I am I kind of looking at her and saying, Yeah, this is not going how she wants to go. And I it's you know, some of it is some autistic stuff that's rubbing people the wrong way. And here's how you can kind of, you know, adjust your behavior to get the result that you want, if you so choose, right. So

    KC 47:05

    when you were talking about social referencing, I don't want to miss that point. Like, can you talk a little bit more about like, what social referencing is? And like, how can we teach that to a child in a way that like is affirming of their, their, like autism versus something that's like dis affirming, like forcing the eye contact? Yeah, so

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 47:25

    like, Okay, so let's take an example of a kid who you know, are hug eponymous is right, the kids who love to hug and touch and you know, hugging people without asking that kind of stuff. I'm touching people's hair. That's a big thing. Like little kids, let's say you have a child who's extremely touchy with other people. And it kind of old school ABA approach might be okay, sit down, quiet Hands, hands to side. Good hands to side. Good job, like, you know what I mean? Like teaching like a kind of behavioral response, right? How I would teach it as I was like, Oh, hold on, look at our friend, her face. Not happy. She doesn't like that. You see she her face? Her mouth is like this. She's going away from you. I don't think she likes you touching her body. How can we say hello? Why don't you show her your toy? Right and giving them options to try and say, Well, I think you're in her bubble. I don't think she wants you to be in her bubble. Right. So giving them kind of cueing them into the signs that it's not going well, right. And kind of doing that think aloud, speak aloud, cueing them to look at the things that are cues that it's not going well, and then giving them tools to do something else, right and say, Oh, if we want to talk to a friend, we can show them a toy. We can tell them a story. We can ask them to play. Maybe I'm even would make like a little visual of like three things to try. And I was like, well, let's check our chart. What could we try? And your maybe I would pre plan it with them? Oh, we're gonna go to recess today? Which one do you want to try today? You want to practice with me first? Right? And then having them try one. And then afterwards being like, did that work? How did it feel? That kind of stuff, right? So I could get any kid to Stop hugging people. Right? Stop hugging people. I'll give you a gummy bear. But what did we actually teach? And how did we help that child to reproduce that result in novel situations?

    KC 49:21

    Okay, and so in the instance, like, with eye contact and social referencing, like, it seems like the point of making eye contact with someone is to signify I'm listening to you, I hear you and I care about what you're saying. Like I'm tuned in. And what I hear you saying is like, hey, there are other ways that people can indicate that they are listening, that, you know, especially if we understand like, there's a reason that they're not making eye contact, either it's uncomfortable for them or something like that, but like, is there a different way that we can signify listening so that you can maintain those relationships Whether it's you know, with a teacher with a friend, right, so

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 50:02

    you know what I do, I'm not a great eye contact or myself, I sit off to the side and I like kind of do like quick eye contact, but I, you know, oftentimes will say, I am listening to you, I just can't make eye contact and listen, at the same time, I don't want to think I'm rude. But I am listening intently to what you're saying. And then I respond in a way that shows that I've listened, right. And so you know, it's also kind of training other people that like, eye contact is a very particular thing that we like look for, to mean like paying attention, but maybe other things mean paying attention, right? So it's not just that it's a kind of both sides need to learn each other's interactional styles, and not always kind of going towards, you know, what neurotypical people do is the right way. You know, what I mean? So

    KC 50:47

    if a parent is listening, and then they're kind of hearing saying, like, the right goals, the right techniques, like what are some things that you would suggest for, like, what would be appropriate goals? And then what in your mind would kind of maybe raise a red flag for you in terms of goals?

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 51:02

    Okay, so goals that are compliance for compliance sake, right? So and so we'll, you know, respond verbally within three seconds with, you know, the desired response of blah, blah, blah, right, where it's adult directed, I decided you should learn this. And so you're going to learn it. And the goal is for you to comply. For what reason? I don't know, right? We create kids that are just so dependent. A good goal comes from a kind of advocacy perspective, right? Is, okay, so this is a behavior that is inhibiting my child from participating in, you know, society life, the things they want to participate in family life, how can we address that goal in a way that is like workable for both people? So you want the goals to be truly beneficial for your child, and not beneficial for the teachers, for you, for everyone around you? Right? I mean, you know, sometimes kids really like to talk about the same thing over and over and over again, right. And I saw a study recently where the behaviors were trying to get the child to stop talking about what they like to talk about topics that the parents had selected. The irony, and that is the now the adult is doing exactly what they just said that the kid was doing wrong. Also,

    KC 52:14

    like what child wants to do that like neurotypical or otherwise,

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 52:18

    what are we going to talk about when we talk about like taxes with my six year old? So now we've just said, No, you doing it? As long as you're autistic? You should talk what I like because I'm not autistic. And my things are right. Okay, like little apple tree situation here. Right? So in that case, right, if a child is dominating a conversation, it's because they're excited about something. Right? And a different approach might be, I see, you're really excited about this. Not everybody likes Minecraft, what do we talk about with other people who don't like Minecraft? Right? What are some topics that you like that they also like, and helping them to kind of navigate that in a more kind of skillful way. As opposed to just saying, if you talk about what I like, you know, I'll give you a token, or you can have an iPad or whatever, it's kind of deeper learning of how do we relate to other people? It's not a triage approach, right? It takes a lot longer to kind of teach these complex social skills, but it's worthwhile work. So I think that that would be the goal. Yeah,

    KC 53:16

    it reminds me of like, I mean, I feel like this is applicable to like, all types of neuro divergence, obviously, not just autism. I mean, so for me, you know, I have ADHD. And one of the question, there's, like, on your self assessment about social stuff is like, do you interrupt people a lot? Do you have trouble taking turns? Do you finish people, sentences and correct people. And when I first took the self assessment, I remember being like, Oh, I don't do that. But then when somebody really dug into it with me, and what I recognized was, I may not do those behaviors. But internally, what drives those behaviors is still happening in me, I'm not listening to you, I'm waiting for my turn to talk. You said something wrong. And that's all I'm thinking about. And so I can't hear you. But the reason why I wasn't doing those behaviors anymore is because when I went through 18 months of behavior, therapy, intensive behavioral therapy, every time I interrupted it was pointed out, and I was told I was being selfish, and I was shamed, and I was punished. And you know, when I listened to people, I was really praised. And they literally extinguished the behavior of correcting and interrupting and not waiting my turn through a system of rewards and punishments. And I came to believe that not only was that behavior bad, but that that's a bad thing about me, that that is my natural tendency. And what I wish would have happened because this is where like, you and I talked about how we get so black and white about it, where we feel like the only it's like, either you extinguish the behavior, it's not right, or you don't get to say anything about the fact I constantly interrupt and correct people, right. But what I wish would have happened because again, like I wanted relationships and like that particular behavior was having an impact. I found people that I didn't recognize and was damaging the connections I really wanted, I wish somebody could have sat me down and say like, Hey, here's these behaviors, like, that's the way your brain works, it's moving really fast that you, that's your style of communication that you enjoy. But not everyone enjoys it. And here's how it's impacting the people that don't enjoy it. And so like, let's think of some ways to, like use different methods of communication for people when you're wanting to have that relationship. And the cool thing about as an adult, I kind of just got to that place by myself. And actually my best friend's autistic, and she will absolutely be bulldozed by that type of communication. And it does not serve our connection to each other for me to communicate with her that way. But I also got to learn that I find people that do like that communication, I find other people that love that overlapping style of communication, and I just let it rip. And I, you know what I mean, and we sit there and we interrupt each other, and we correct each other, and we talk over each other, and everybody around us thinks we're fighting. But it's like, from this place of I understand my behaviors, I don't have shame about my brain, but I understand the impact. And I'm able to choose different things when I need to reach my goals. And that's kind of what it like, reminds me of, yeah,

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 56:21

    it's a toolbox, right? It's a kind of like, it's not exactly the same concept, right? It's totally different routes. But it's analogous, I guess, to the concept kind of, of code switching, right. And I talked to my daughter about social skills, I say, we do it here at like this at our house, because we're all autistic. And so we like to do it like this. Other people don't do it like that, right? Like when you're at people's houses, you know who aren't autistic, right? They want to have like, we just take turns info dumping at my house, basically, it just nonstop of just people. My husband just talks about guitars, I talked about autism and research. And my daughter talks about Minecraft, we just talk at each other, and we are fine with that. But it was just going somewhere else, I'll say, you know, they are not autistic. So they are expecting more of you asking them about their stuff. Right? Here's some questions right? Or maybe say try and say like four sentences about Minecraft, and then pause and ask a question. So I give her like real tools to do if you want that result, if you want to go and you know something about Minecraft and see what happens. That's, that's on you. But I'm going to like, give you the tools to do it and not shame you for that being the way that you want to do it. It's just a different way of doing things. You know, and that's not the case with all behaviors are some that like you just genuinely cannot do, right. It's not just like a preference, whether or not you want to pop your eyeballs out of your socket. But some things are like that. So when we're looking at goals, right, I would say safety, hygiene, there's things that are non negotiable, right, we got to work on those things. And we can work on them in gentle ways, sometimes, but in some cases, we got to kind of get to the root of it very, very quickly, you know, and stop something from happening, that's truly dangerous. That's one case. But there's a lot of cases where it's this kind of these, like, neurotypical way of doing things versus neuro divergent way of doing things. And, you know, people are being pushed into one as if it's just right. When it's really there's different ways of interacting in the world. And people who skillfully can navigate that, you know, are better off.

    KC 58:26

    And when you are talking about like just addressing the behavior and not like the underlying roots, I often see a big difference between like, let's say you have a child that's like grinding their teeth, like so hard and so intensely, like the whole room can hear it. And you're thinking like, Okay, number one, this sounds like nails on a chalkboard number two, like this can't be good for her teeth, or his teeth, right? Instead of having this approach of like, okay, for every, like, five minutes you go without grinding your teeth, you get a reward, or if you grind your teeth while we're playing, we're gonna stop playing and hold until you stop. It's almost like, Okay, why are they grinding their teeth? Like is that giving them a sense of like, sensory input that's important to them? And how can we redirect that like, legitimate need to a more like, conducive way of doing that? So, you know, do they need a chewy to chew on? Do they want crunchy food? Can we offer you know, if a child is old enough? Like, can we offer gum like those type of techniques, I've noticed a difference between someone's approach of like, validating the need, but underneath the behavior, while acknowledging like the behavior itself is either like, not safe, or it's not going to get like it's going to get in the way of that child's goals. And so can you talk a little bit more about like, kind of technique, green flags and red flags that you see?

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 59:46

    Yeah, so I mean, red flags, I would say are things that are unnecessarily physical. There's a technique called errorless teaching where basically let's say I give you three things and you're supposed to pick one of them and you pick the wrong one people will do Physical, the physical prompting, will they'll either take their hand they do hand over hand or whatever, and say, No, it's this one touch red, right? Oh, good touching red, right? So anything that has physical prompting in it, in the beginning, I think is something that I would be is kind of a red flag, it's a soft red, there are cases where we have to kind of physically guide someone because they're learning how to hold a pencil, etc. But if we're using physical prompting for compliance purposes, that's a no for me. Because when we have kids that are getting conditioned to allow people to manipulate their body, it's creates a really dangerous situation, this sexual assault statistics for disabled women are horrific, truly, I mean, it's a majority of women with disabilities that will be sexually assaulted by in their lifetime. And so I truly cannot support a child being conditioned that their body can be manipulated by literally anyone around them. Right for compliance purposes, that creates a very dangerous situation. And so I am against having kids have that be normalized, right, that their bodily autonomy is that they don't have any, I just really can't get behind that. And I would say another one is kind of extinction plans. And there's a small, very, very small, he's like very, very, very dangerous behaviors. But generally speaking, we're doing extinction plans for things that are just minor annoyances, extinction plans are traumatic, you know, when someone is ignoring you, oftentimes they have they call it an extinction burst, that behavior gets a lot worse, right. So if a child is trying to get your attention and you start ignoring them, then oftentimes they'll do something worse, right? They'll get on top of the table, they'll climb on top of the furniture, throw something, right, and then they'll do escalate until you can ignore them because they're unsafe. And that then you have to give them attention at the very apex of the behavior. And actually, you're reinforcing a much worse behavior. So I generally do not support extinction plans. I also don't really like things that are like exposure. So I had a childhood that was working with a family and the child had struggled with changes in their schedule. And so their solution was that every day they were going to purposely mess with the schedule to desensitize them to it. Why, right? Like, that's not helping him. It was just making him a nervous wreck. And he didn't want to go to school because they would purposely tell him he was going to do something and then not do it just to like, help him get over his thing with schedules. You know, he did he need some coping skills. Yeah. But are we going to get coping skills by purposely upsetting the child every day? No. So it mean things that are like kind of intentionally distressing, also overcorrection. That's when they give them like an extra punishment. Like let's say you scribbled on one desk, and now you gotta wash 100 desks or something that's, you know, overly punitive things like restraint, seclusion, conditioning, affection, using a parental affection as a reinforcer or a consequence, period, end of story, making kind of social approval or inclusion contingent on behavior, right? You can't sit with us unless those kinds of things, right these like shame based punitive things you'll know them when you see them truly, I mean, it's not subtle.

    KC 1:03:09

    Let me ask you this around technique. So when it comes to sensory stuff, this is one that I have a question on because it's like, okay, there's nothing wrong with like having a sensory aversion to random things. But I also can see how, like, it could really impair your day to day functioning, right? Like if you don't like to feel certain things, you know, whether Okay, now you can't shower, or maybe you want to play but you don't want to play and things like that. And so how do you feel about when there are sensory goals? Like, okay, we're gonna get the shaving cream out, because this child doesn't, you know, like, fluffy feelings or you know what I mean? Or they don't like wet so let's do water play like, is that like a black and white always this always that? Or is that? Is that a technique issue? Is it a goal issue? What are your thoughts on that?

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 1:04:00

    I think it's a goal issue, right? So you have to think about is this a life skill or not? Showering, you got to shower. So if you have a thing with water, right, we have to do something about that. And that may involve like, you know, slow introductions and to playing with water, etc. Plus maybe some deep pressure before they go in the shower, using a timer favorite. So like, there's all different things that you can do is going to be the kind of holistic approach right? Shaving cream can generally avoid shaving cream. I don't think that touching shaving cream is a life skill. I don't touch shaving cream ever. I don't shave a shaving cream. I don't need to touch shaving cream. So I don't understand that's always a goal for kids that they touch shaving cream. I'm like, Are these kids like becoming barbers? Like I don't? Why? So to me like that. The goal needs to make sense. If it's unavoidable, then yes, you have to do something about it. But if it's just like you think they should for what reason? I don't know. I mean, I had a kid in my class I was petrified of mascots, like drop stopped mascots. And they wanted to desensitize them to mascots. And I was like, I don't know, guys, like, I'm pretty sure we know where they're going to be like, he could just avoid them, like forever indefinitely. He could just not go to Six Flags or parades. And I think he'd be fine. Like, I don't think that this is like a worthy goal. Like we have bigger fish to fry. So my metric is like, is this a thing that is actually impeding them? Or it's just a thing you think they should do? For what reason? And so showering? Yes, we got it. You got to do something with water. My brother used to be petrified of the wind, you couldn't walk outside the door? Yeah, we have to do something about not being able to leave your house because we're petrified of the wind, you know, we got to come up with something that you can put on maybe get a little bit, you know, put a fan practice of putting your face by a fan. But mascots, I'm not going to die on the on that hill. So I think that's what I get, if parents look at and therapists look at is like, what is this goal for? Is this actually helping this child? Why are we doing this as opposed to other things? Like when I see kids, the firt, where speech therapists are drilling that they say mommy, right first, right? Say, mommy say, Mommy, I love you, right? Because the moms want to hear it. That's really sweet. And I hope that all mothers hear that in the way that their child can communicate it. But if we have a child that can has to go to the bathroom, or can't tell, tell that something that someone's abusing them at school, right, then that's what we should be teaching first, like a focus on functional communication, right? If they can't say they're sick or in pain, but they can say, I love you, Mommy, we haven't done our jobs, right? Because that's for the mom. That's so that the parents can say this is good therapy, because they said I love you, Mommy. And I've always wanted to hear that. That's really sweet. But also, this child does not have functional communication. And that's what we're here to teach. Right? And so we have to actually think what is benefiting this child truly, and not at what is not just a thing we wished our child would do if they were neurotypical.

    KC 1:07:00

    I had another question. I want to know if you have any thoughts about this scenario. When I talked to other parents of autistic children, one of the things that happens, you know, cuz there's a lot of therapies, you know, ABA is one therapy, but there's also like occupational therapy, floor time, speech therapy, equine therapy, play there, like all sorts of things. One of our experiences as I talk to other parents, especially with things like OT, like occupational therapy is, so when you talk about like, is there a real life goal, sometimes I feel like occupational therapists will have a goal, that doesn't make sense, where it's like, we want to get them on a swing, and your kid hates swings. And so like, according to what you're saying, it's like, okay, if I can just avoid swings, but they'll have an explanation for how like, the skill of being on a swing will affect other skills or other abilities or other something abilities down the line. And what I find as a parent that's really difficult is that, because I don't know anything about the words and what they're, you know, they're talking about the limbic system. And, you know, your ability to, I don't know, your ability to hold a fork is really about the way the left brain is talking to the right brain. And we learn that with the inner ear, and how gravity affects the blah, blah, blah. And so, you know, getting on the swing will affect their ability to hold a fork, right? It'll be something like, and I'll be listening and be like, I have no idea whether you're full of shit or not, like, this could be like your expertise, and I don't really know anything about it. And like, all these things are interconnected. Or it could be just like, nothingness or could be weird. It could be like, woowoo stuff that people say, I have no idea how to approach those things.

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 1:08:41

    Yeah, I mean, okay, so swinging, that's not Yeah, that is actually true. So it has to do with like core stability, postural insecurity. So if kids can't be on a swing, right, it's vestibular just kind of dysfunction. And that will impact anytime that they feel that they're on shaky ground, right. And it has to do with underlying kind of core strength issues, vestibular regulation, so that's not nonsense. That actually is true. I would say OTs, generally speaking, they have a really scientific, it's a different field, right? They behaviorists training wise, take six classes on a test. It's not a very extensive training. They're not trained in autism. They're trained in behavior and reducing behavior and the techniques of behavior analysis. So they have a very different approach. OTs go through like a lot, a lot of school and it's scientific. So generally speaking, they know what they're talking about. Sometimes they'll get on like weird stuff with like this shaving cream and stuff. I

    KC 1:09:37

    don't know about the brushing either. Like at one point, we had an OT tell us like, you need to brush her skin every two hours with this brush and like, mica doesn't like that. And then I'm going like, I buy this like, okay, the swing thing doesn't make sense. But okay, I trust you. But then it's like things get like, I have no idea. Like, is the brush thing the same as the swing thing? Yeah, that's totally connected, or is it like not,

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 1:09:59

    I mean, it's hard. I just say I can't give like a, you know, every it's kind of a case by case basis. Right? Which is why I think it's important to have like to develop community around you. The brush thing is meant to help regulate them if it's not regulating them. It's not working right, but I think I remember when you texted me you were like, so telling me to brush my kid, that normal? And I was like their hair. You were like, No, it was like, Oh, yeah. Okay, I got you. But I think you can ask, right? What is the purpose of this? What is this doing for her and see what they say? They say, Well, you know, it's just getting her to touch other textures. You say? Does this texture impact her touching other textures? Because this isn't a texture, she encounters a lot. So I'm just curious why we're focusing on shaving cream, when we're actually having a bigger issue with water. Maybe we could focus on that just a thought you can ask like the swinging I'm having trouble understanding is this like developmental skill that she's learning that she like, need to do this to do other things? Or is this more about a preference for swinging or not swinging? I'm just I'm not really understanding what the purpose of this is. And they should be able to give you a competent answer. If the answer is something like, so other kids will like her, so she won't stand out. So she'll fit in better. So your life will you know, so that you can go to do shaving? You can go to shaving cream, um, because kids their age, like shaving cream, those are all kind of like not great answers, right? We don't do therapy things just because other so that other kids won't bully them, right? We address bullies, we for bullying, we don't make our kids have to not get bullied by their behavior. So I definitely ask there's not a hard and fast list, right? Because people can say one thing, they can do something that I say is a good technique for weird reason. So it's go over your behavior plan, like fine tooth comb, and anything that you're like, I don't get why she's got to do that. Then ask right and say, What is the purpose behind this do a little bit of research, right? Like what you know, type and swinging and whatever words they say vestibular system, and learn a little bit about it, the more you know, the more of an advocate you can be for your child. And knowing a little bit about autism really does help. Alright, so

    KC 1:12:12

    my last question that I want to kind of pose to you is, I find that a lot of parents when their kid gets diagnosed, and they first start seeing therapists and being in therapy, there's this really overwhelming amount of like homework that that we are given, that seems unrealistic, where they're like, Okay, they need and I haven't experienced all of this, but I've talked to other parents that do where it's like, okay, they need to be in 40 hours a week of this kind of therapy, they need speech three times a week, they need to you to brush them their skin every two hours every night before they go to bed, put the headphones on and listen to this music therapy thing. And I'm wondering, like, if you can speak to that at all, because as a parent, you know, like, you have this fear of, I have to do everything so that my kid is going to be okay. And it's kind of hard to know what to do when you get hit with that. And you're thinking I have a job I have other children I have like, how do I how is this? How is this manageable?

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 1:13:11

    So I'll tell you what, I don't do any of it. And I'll tell you why. Because her home is her home, she lives here. This is her home, where she lives. And my home where I live, I don't want my boss yelling, I you know that I'm not doing this thing I don't want to be doing, you know, any of that. I just, I want to be relaxing with my family. And that's where I unmask and I spend time with my family. And so I really don't do any of it. I don't allow behavior charts in my house period. If they're like, you know, give her a thing every time she whatever. I'm just not going to do that. Right. So I just don't the way I explained therapy to parents is it's like making a pie crust. If you've ever made a pie crust is you got your like water that you're going to add in, you've got your flour and your butter together. If you add therapy that starts to make it fall apart again, right? Your kid is tired, you're overwhelmed, you're stressed, they're stressed, it's too much, right? You added too much, right? So it's literally just add a little bit at a time. It's not going to you know, fix them, they're going to still be able to stick at the end of it. It's enough to support them that things are going reasonably well and then you can stop. It's okay to leave stones unturned. You don't need to find every weird therapy. There's no therapy, that itself is a magic pill. It is sustained effort over time. That's it, right. And so there's no magic element that's going to really change it. It's creating that supportive environment, getting them some skills and some help in the areas that they need it just enough that they still have a childhood, right. We want kids to have a space where they are not being you know, earning things Write that they can just be. And if your child has no space, and every hour of their leisure time is taken off with therapy, right, then we're denying our kids an opportunity actually one to apply things that they're learning in therapy, and to to have a childhood. And so I think our kids really do have a right to some time, that's not therapeutic parents are told all the time, you should be doing this all the time. I don't, when my kid is nine years old, and I tie her shoes every day, I don't care if she can tie your own shoes. I know she can. And she ties in when she's at school. But she wants me to do it, because she has a heavy mental load navigating her day, and she wants that little bit of connection and care for me. All right, I can make my own coffee, but it's nice when my husband does. And so I'm not going to make her use her skills all the time, I'm going to mother her, because she deserves that. Just because she's autistic doesn't mean she doesn't deserve me caring for her my reinforcing her bad shoe tying behavior, probably I don't care. Because

    KC 1:15:59

    that's been like a big red flag for me, though, is that I have noticed that sometimes there will be expectations on an autistic child that you would never put on a non autistic yet. Yep, like to use full sentences to, you know, never sit a certain way. And I kind of like so like one example is like W sitting. And if people don't know what that it's when you sit on your bottom and you will explai your feet out so that your knees are together and your heels are separate and a little W and it can definitely cause issues in your body if you sit like that forever and ever, right. And so when it comes to like, okay, correcting that like teaching them a different way to sit helping what their core strength, you know, when you talk about, like, letting her have a space that she just gets to be. That's like one tiny example of like, the ways that I've been trying to do that, where it's like, okay, I get that, yes, it's important. And I do if I see it, you know, hey, fix your feet, let's sit crisscross applesauce, let's do it. But I'm also not doing it. Like every time I see it. And there are like specific times where I'm not doing it. Like, if we're in the middle of, you know, a speech session, sit however you want, you've got one thing to focus on at this moment. Or if we're, you know, maybe if we're doing storytime together, it's like, it doesn't have to be corrected every single second of the day.

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 1:17:21

    I mean, it's so true, right? It's like, we all need some downtime. And so it's good to like, let it go. Sometimes. I mean, I talked to schools about this all the time, because they'll be working on you know, a kid learning some scale or whatever. And then at recess, they want to have the speech therapist go follow them around recess to go have them keep doing it at recess. What are the other kids doing at recess? Are they doing schoolwork? No, they're running around. Right? So everyone, recess is leisure time for children at school. It's not more school time, it is actually a break from school. And so if all of the other kids are getting a break from schoolwork, the autistic kids should too. Right? That's why I don't like Lunch Bunch any of this nonsense, right? They deserve a break too. And I don't care what they do. My kids when I was teaching, they would do the weirdest stuff outside, spinning around, sitting under stuff, making piles of wood chips. And you know, people would be like, aren't you going to stop them are going to teach them how to play more appropriately. I was like, He's happy. He likes doing that. If he came to me and said, I want to play with a friend. Or if he was wandering around looking like he wanted to play with someone, then yeah, I would jump in and say, Hey, let's go talk to somebody. But he doesn't want to do that. He wants to do what he's doing right now. And he gets half an hour a day at school to do what he likes to do. Far be it for me to say that that's not a good way to spend your time that looks actually kind of fun. So I'm gonna just let him be because all the other kids are playing. Right? So it's like those kinds of things. Like if other kids are getting that time, right time to just kind of lay on the couch and sit weird and be upside down and you know, stim on the videos or watch this, whatever, I'm not going to take that away from my kid because he's autistic. Right? Not everything has to be a teachable moment. That's my other thing with like these Lego therapy, Minecraft therapy, let's not make everything they like into therapy. Just because they like it. Can they just have a hobby, like something that they like? So it's like, I'm kind of against like therapy using like, literally everything, like, just let them have a break.

    KC 1:19:20

    There's a lot of I find like environmental changes you can do at home to like, let your kid be your kid like, okay, yes. Maybe we don't want them jumping on the couch because they're gonna eventually jump themselves on top of their head and crack their skull open. But like, Can we get a little trampoline? Is there a smaller thing they can jump on? Like jump to your heart's content, right? Like there's a lot of things that I find that we can change about and I feel like this is true for any child like the degree to which you can change the environment first,

    so that there isn't this constant. Don't touch that. Don't do this. Don't go up there. Sit down at the bottom.

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 1:19:54

    I mean, I when parents are like, Oh yeah, when parents are like, oh, like they keep touching the whatever. I'm like, Well, why put it away, like, put it somewhere else, and then they can't touch it. It's like we could solve some of these problems, I think we want to put everything on the kids because people want to like they start thinking autism is the problem, right? We're all united against our common enemy of autism, when actually like, we could solve a lot of these problems, we could just not have an access to that, right, we could just not put that in there I view change our environments quite a bit, we could, you know, I didn't have a coffee table for years, like no coffee table, because she would jump off the couch, and she's gonna crack your head open. So I just moved it. And then I had like, a little like crash pad thing that I would drag out from the garage every once in a while and like, throw in between our sectional and she jumped off the sectional under the cushion. You know, now she's nine. She does want to do that, though. I can, you know, have a coffee table. But make your like, as you you know, you're so amazing at teaching people, like make your space work for you. Make your holidays work for you make your parties work for you. Like just do it in the way that works for you, and for your family and not the way that you think it should be done. That is like the enemy of a lot of people's happiness. You know? Yeah.

    KC 1:21:08

    Well, thank you so much. Dr. Robin, this has been amazing. Can you give your own shout out? Like where can people find you? What kind of things do you do that are accessible to the public? Do you have any recommendations for resources for maybe parents that are looking to understand more? Yeah,

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 1:21:24

    so um, you can find me on Tik Tok, as I'll teach and on Instagram is all teacher official. I'm also on LinkedIn, all teachers on there. And then on there as my regular name there, I do content about like hiring there. And I also have a business or teach. I do consulting for parents, parent courses, education, I'm kind of building some new stuff right now. So I'm gonna have some new announcements soon, some different courses and things for parents. And people can always reach out to me if they want kind of individual support. I do individual consulting for families also. So lots of ways to connect. And I really appreciate it.

    KC 1:22:00

    You also have a really awesome TEDx talk that you can watch on YouTube. Tell everybody the title of it, your

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 1:22:06

    autistic child can have a great life. Here's how. And I talk a lot about a lot of the things we talked about today about letting our children have childhood and you know, how we can accommodate our kids and have a much easier experience kind of with the diagnosis.

    KC 1:22:21

    So awesome. And then I will I'll get with you offline and get maybe any recommendations for like books or podcasts that you have and we'll make sure to drop those in the show notes for sure. So every person that I interview for this series, this episode will make sure that those are all in the show notes for you guys. Super

    Dr. Robin Roscigno 1:22:36

    awesome. Thanks, KC. You have so nice chatting. Thank you.

    Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Christy Haussler
103: Autism (actually) Speaks with Kerry Magro

For several recent episodes, I’ve been interviewing people with autism about their perspectives and experiences. We are discussing the DSM criteria, stereotypes about autism, and how autism affects the lives of both children and adults. An autism diagnosis can have many different nuances, and there is so much more to autism than the DSM criteria. Today’s guest, Kerry Magro, shares his experience in this episode. Join us to learn more!

Show Highlights:

  • Kerry’s growing up years with mostly communication and sensory-based challenges, love and support from his family, and his success as a professional certified speaker

  • Kerry’s various college and graduate degrees

  • Stereotypes about autism

  • Understanding autism as a true spectrum with a wide range of complexities and strengths

  • Kerry’s challenges with eye contact and other social norms

  • Understanding “autism burnout,” masking, representation, and “honoring” the disability

  • Kerry’s perspective on autism and relationships

  • “Repetitive and restricted behaviors” in adulthood

  • Kerry’s experience as an adult, dealing with sensory sensitivities and learning to speak up for accommodations

  • Kerry’s experience with autism and physical touch

  • Advice for parents

Resources and Links:

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC 0:05

    So basically what I have been doing is interviewing people. And the goal of the podcast is to talk about what autism is from the perspective of what it feels like or the experience of having autism from autistic individuals. And so going through the I know, there's much more autism than the DSM criteria. But I also know that when parents are looking at the DSM criteria, they can only really imagine what that looks like. And so what I've been doing is going through the various pieces of the DSM criteria, and asking people, you know, what is this particular piece look like in your life? How does that feel? How do you experience that? Like, what insight can you give us about that part of the experience? Will you start by telling me a little bit about what you were like growing up?

    Kerry Magro 0:57

    Sure. So growing up, I had a lot of challenges. I was nonspeaking, till I was two and a half, I diagnosed with autism at four and Spencer speak in complete sentences till I was seven. So most of my challenges growing up were communication and sensory based, there was still a lot when I was young, that people really just had no clue about autism, everyone just assumed everyone with autism was going to be great at math, that they would have a photogenic memory, they would all be white males. And when they turned 21, they wouldn't be able to when you add $1,000, on the blackjack tables. So we now I think, some of my biggest challenges so we're about those unconscious biases. And then also those people who stereotypically tried to fit autism into a box didn't meet me where I was in my own development. And that became very challenging at times. But thankfully, I had the love and support of my family who helped me reach all my developmental milestones through 15 years of occupational physical speech, music and theatre therapy to get me to where I am today is one of the first openly autistic professionally certified speakers in the country.

    KC 2:03

    That is wonderful. And you have a doctorate Tell me about that.

    Kerry Magro 2:08

    Sure. So growing up, I had some extreme key interest I grew up wanting to be the next Larry Bird. So I got my degree in sport management at Seton Hall University to do something in sports. I later got my Master's in strategic communications also from Seton Hall University. So I could be find a full time career in public speaking, speaking in K through 12 schools, but then also to companies about the IRI benefits of hiring neuro diverse and talented individuals with disabilities and understanding undiscovered talent that we have in many of our companies. And then I went back for my doctorate in education, because I realized that I want to do something to educate young people about those with disabilities, because I wish so much time when I was growing up, I had that education. So I got my doctorate in educational technology leadership from New Jersey City University. So hopefully one day I could teach at the college level as an adjunct professor, while continuing my full time work, professional speaking.

    KC 3:13

    That's amazing. One of the things that you mentioned when you were talking about some of the stereotypes out there, kind of like the rain, man stereotypes, of assuming that, you know, everyone's gonna have photogenic memory, and everybody who's autistic is, you know, going to be able to, you know, recite pi to the 33rd number, or whatever it is. One of my daughters is autistic. And we've just gotten into the age of looking at schools and talking to teachers. And one of the things that I have noticed, and I've remarked to friends of mine is that it seems like everybody over estimates and underestimates her at the same time. I don't know how that's even possible, but it seems like people do both at the same time. They underestimate what you're capable of and sort of infantilize or want to do very heavy, you know, kind of controlling interventions, but then also, there's this overestimation of, well, well, you should be able to do that. Now, that must be just like a behavior issue, or she doesn't need those accommodations, things like that. And so I'm curious what your thoughts are on that, because it's interesting to hear you go right to the stereotypes of sort of like the over expectation, right?

    Kerry Magro 4:20

    Yeah. And I feel like a lot of the times, we really don't take the time to really think about the spectrum of disability, not only autism, but the perspectives of that there are going to be some individuals who are going to have full time jobs, they're going to be other individuals who are going to need 24/7 care for their entire lives. And that is why when I go into schools, and I do staff development, one of the things I really highlight is the importance of inclusive classrooms and curriculum strategies that meet each student where they are in their own development. Being able to get that type of education outdoor educators, I hopefully A Help with what you're talking about that whole over emphasizing and then under emphasizing at the same time, because again, when we really do come down to what universally will help our kids is meeting them where they are. And having that those reports and dialogues with them to be able to help them reach as many developmental milestones as possible. Because we often say in the communities that early intervention is the key, I don't think earlier pension ends, when somebody turns five, I mean, the DSM five talks about that. But when we're talking about our educational system, I think truly that every single day, we should be working towards that progress, nurturing strengths, and then working on those weaknesses also, at the same time,

    KC 5:46

    thank you. Okay, so getting into some of these questions. The first part of the DSM criteria talks about these persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction. So do you feel like that sentence describes you? And would you if you were to write the DSM? Would you write that differently? Well,

    Kerry Magro 6:03

    I think there's still so much debate around the DSM five, I mean, there was so much debate when the DSM four came out. And there are five different diagnosis of autism. And now there's this whole umbrella diagnosis, I think, when we just look at autism, we have to understand that it is a spectrum disorder, it's nothing where I feel like a lot of the times, we, especially with the continuing increasing numbers, we need to really emphasize that spectrum because we pigeonhole our community when we still just realize that communication, social, I mean, especially with the whole rising girls who have autism, girls are more likely to mask different characteristics they have. And you may never know that they are on the spectrum. Like, for example, it made people come up to me today. And they are shocked that I'm on the spectrum because even though I dealt with challenges with communication growing up, I don't have those same challenges anymore. So I think when we talk about the DSM five, we just need to consider it a spectrum disorder or condition and really just emphasize that there are a wide range of complexities and strengths that come along with this condition.

    KC 7:21

    So when the DSM talks about these examples of like, trouble with the back and forth flow of conversation, trouble with nonverbal communication, do you feel like you know, I think when people read that, they sort of immediately go to eye contact, as sort of the number one thing we think of, and then maybe we automatically go to we talk about back and forth flow of conversation, maybe some of that just kind of monologues at you. Those are sort of the two, I think, more prominent examples that people think of, I'm curious, from your experience, is that what it looks like for you? Or are there other experiences that you've had under those sorts of umbrellas? Yeah,

    Kerry Magro 8:02

    I had so many different challenges with eye contact. And that's actually why theater therapy was so beneficial for me growing up, I think that it's way more complex than that. It's it's when we talk about autism and associated challenges. I mean, no babbling before six months are everything from the whole aspect of early access to care to what we have today. I mean, there's so many different major major highlights reputation stemming that can be included, and should be included in our conversations. Because I feel like we as a society, I think we've gone a little bit away from eye contact, and F kind of started now, thankfully, talking about more of those physical movements, the stimming, the meltdowns, the overloads, the sensory challenges, and I definitely hope it will continue to have larger conversations around that because eye contact was so challenging, but all the friends that I have who are on the autism spectrum, have perfect eye contact, you would never even know that they had any associated challenges on the surface. But that doesn't necessarily mean that they don't have challenges. All my friends have that quote unquote, like myself and invisible disability where we get that whole, you must not have autism, you're faking that all this nonsense, so Well,

    KC 9:21

    you know, I've heard from so many people who have taken their child into the doctor to say, Hey, I'm really seeing some autistic traits here, that kind of get dismissed out of hand only on eye contact. Oh, no, they make up they make great eye contact, they make great eye contact. You know, I definitely think that it's good for us to begin to see a wider range, because I think a lot of people also I mean, the DSM is not light reading, and it's not the be all and end all. But even when it does say sometimes, we mistake the examples to be criteria. And a lot of people don't realize that when it says trouble with nonverbal community Asian, it's not just talking about eye contact, like you said, you get a perfect eye contact and struggle more with tone of voice or body language or those sorts of things. So do you recall from when you were younger, and you struggled with eye contact, you know, what was the struggle for you?

    Kerry Magro 10:16

    The struggle was living by the expectations, the social norms of having to go about that, that actual eye contact, I feel like a lot of the times in our society, if somebody's not looking you in the eye, you just say that they're not paying attention, and they're not interested. When I listen fast growing up, it was when I didn't have to look somebody in the eye. That was the time when my active listening was at its highest rate. And I feel like as a society, you know, these social norms that we have can be very, very challenging in our autism community, we I mean, I still see so many different therapies that talk about, like, there's so much backlash around certain therapies because they're talking about taking away somebody's autistic traits with neurotypical ones. And I just keep thinking to myself, it's like, as a community, I feel like should get to the point where we should just embrace some of what makes us who we are, because many of us in the Autistic community consider autism a huge part of our DNA. But like growing up when I was having those challenges, wasn't necessarily any challenge that I was having. Specifically, I mean, obviously, I didn't look people in the eye right away. But once I started theater and started doing that, I was able to do so much better with it. And that was really the key towards some of my progress. But it was very challenging, though, when people would say like, Carrie, pay attention to me. And I'm just like, I?

    KC 11:56

    Yeah, so I've heard some people describe some autistic people will describe eye contact as feeling painful, almost, for you. Was it painful? Or was it more that it just wasn't intuitively what you were, would normally do if you were thinking and it was like someone was asking you to kind of do something counter intuitive all the time,

    Kerry Magro 12:15

    I dealt with burnout quite a bit, especially when I was forced into eye contact, which I was rather frequently until a few years into grade school, it started becoming more of like, I was going into special programs. When I was in mainstream, it was very, look me in the eye versus when I joined a district school for kids with disabilities, it was more just the idea of succeeding in class, regardless of you look someone and I my burnout, because I would consciously and unconsciously, at times, mask my autistic traits by having perfect eye contact. And literally, I would have the goal of looking at somebody in their forehead. Because when you look at somebody, and I learned this in theater, that if you look somebody in the forehead, it's like almost looking them in the eye. But when I was doing that, I would still deal with the same challenges I would have to face that burnout. And I know so many individuals who have so much trouble with that, even to this day, not only in the autism community, but also in the ADHD community as well.

    KC 13:22

    Yeah, so I have ADHD, and I've experienced the ADHD burnout. What I think is really interesting when I listen to people talk about burnout, and really some other things is that there's a lot of things that we observe, an autistic individual experiencing or struggling with, that really isn't necessarily an autistic thing. It's just a autistic person doing a human thing, right, like anyone can burn out if they are asked to, you know, if you told me that I wasn't allowed to speak unless I was balancing a plate on my head. And so I had to use, you know, five times the amount of concentration to do this thing that everybody else is able to do, you know, with a little concentration, I will eventually burn out. And one of the things that I hear a lot is, that's a human experience. But if you force an autistic person to make eye contact, and to have to engage in that masking, which takes so much energy, they're going to have a very normal human experience to

    Kerry Magro 14:20

    that. Yeah, I'd have to agree to an except for the perspective that I feel like a lot of the times when we talk about eye contact, when we talk about all these different things, even though some might associate more as an autistic trait. I feel like it my talks I talk a lot about normalizing the human condition. And I say that because a lot of the challenges that I have are just challenges that a lot of people face regardless of ABA disability now don't get me wrong. I'm not like saying that autism is a disability. It is a disability. Whenever somebody says autism is a superpower, I I kind of get a little I like shiver a little bit because it's like, even though some of my core strengths laser focuses are my autism is the reason I have my career today. It's still a disability. So I definitely get what you're saying, from that perspective from some of us just do it because it's it, we're human. Well,

    KC 15:18

    and I think that we're in that shift right now, where it's been the medical model of, you know, it's a disease, it's pathology for so long, that there's this really empowering shift to looking at a social model of disability where no, you know, everybody, there's neurodiversity. Everybody is different brains are naturally different. It's not about pathology. It's just about differences. And I think one of the things that I'm now learning is that the social model of disability was never meant to replace a medical model, right? Like there, it actually is kind of both and like you're saying, like, there are strengths that come from being autistic from being ADHD from, like, there are ways in which we maybe we don't need to fix someone's eye contact. Right. But like you said, you still have a disability. And I think it's important to honor both sides of that. Yeah, I

    Kerry Magro 16:11

    agree, I think we can spend a much better time in our schools now, really just trying to figure out what type of learner our kids are versus whether they make perfect eye contact, or they follow every social norm in the world. Because at the end of the day, it's like, finding whether or not our students are kinetic learners, where they learn through movement, or they are facial learners and learn through what they say, are auditory learners, from what they hear, I think that should be our goal. I mean, that's why I do in so many staff developments, especially around this time, when schools are getting ready to go back in is that I educate them about the idea of like, let's focus a little less time on that type of information, let's focus more on trying to find how they can learn the best and help them thrive. And through that transition for every single year for the rest of their lives and academia, and then hopefully after academia. Yeah.

    KC 17:11

    So when you mentioned earlier masking, and I know from learning from people, that masking is sort of acting neurotypical or suppressing traits and kind of trying to go along with the way everybody else is acting and maybe fly under the radar a bit. And so I know what it looks like, and I know what it entails. But I'm curious for you personally, what does it feel like?

    Kerry Magro 17:32

    It feels I've always had hypersensitivity. So I've always whenever I mask, it feels like the hypersensitivity goes to an even higher extent, for example, when not necessarily as much anymore, but when I was a kid and I would mask and try to look people in the eyes, I would not be able to pay attention as well because I was always thinking about even those like little noises that would be happening in my classroom people chattering people Becker, egg, people just whispering to one another, and it would feel like all my attention would be going into a million places all at once. And that got very, very frustrating. I had emotional challenges. My parents tried to read diagnose me with a not really diagnosed but tried to diagnose me with an emotional disorder when I was six, when masking kinda was like a new concept that I was learning about because my parents were like, watching all these movies about autism. Now, I like heard the word masking. I was like, oh, okay, I've never heard that. And then I kind of realized even as a six year old child, like, Oh, my God, I'm doing that. It felt so frustrating. It still feels frustrating, even to this day, at some points. For example, if I'm at a speaking engagement for like, a keynote, where like, we have, like 303 150 people, and then they want to do a meet and greet afterwards. And I'm just thinking to myself, like, I actually love getting to meet new people, but the aspect of like, some people, they're there, it's like, don't look them in the eye. And they're like, Oh, he's being standoffish, and then we'll write that as part of their feedback on their form. And I'm just like, it still can get very frustrating when I feel like I have to try to mask to be somebody I'm not especially to stay, even though I don't do it. Like maybe like two 3% of my life is focused on that doubt. And everything really just comes naturally as part of who I am today.

    KC 19:27

    Okay, so last question about the social aspect. I feel like there's this stereotype that autistic people don't want relationships, or that they don't need relationships. And you know, what are your thoughts and experiences in that?

    Kerry Magro 19:41

    So this is really funny, because I actually wrote a book on called Autism and falling in love on Amazon, where I talk about my ongoing pursuit of trying to find meaningful relationships in terms of romantic relationships I have seen especially in the past few years In a real shift, we're learning so much more about autism and asexuality, we're also learning for the perspective of that there are a lot of people in the autism community such as the Temple Grandin, so the world went the leading autism experts in the world whose love of their lives, or their work, and their passions and their careers, and they've never sought out any form of romantic relationship. So I think we have to play it a little bit more under the microscope. Because when I give talks, especially towards adult crowds, we're talking about like the future, a lot of the times his focus on housing, employment, post secondary and guardianship. But what about finding those who are meant to relationships? What about helping individuals find love one day, I was so blessed to have the opportunity to work on the first US season of Netflix series love on the spectrum. And especially in terms of our media representation, it's been nice to see a pivot towards more disabled individuals getting the opportunity to be highlight in entertainment, because representation does matter. But I think it's also helped inspire more upper educators to really think about, like, how we can go about building in social skills programming into our curriculum, or more, if you will, because some do the very bare minimum to really help because we are realizing that more people are wanting to be social and either find romantic relationships or even meaningful friendships.

    KC 21:30

    So you mentioned how important representation is. And I'm curious what your thoughts are, I feel like there's been a lot of representation online, especially recently about autism, and people who are autistic kind of having their own platforms and talking about their experience talking about being autistic. And now more than ever, you can really learn about autism from autistic individuals directly. I'm curious when it comes to the spectrum of autism, one of the things that obviously happens is that if you are very disabled, where you can't use the internet, if you are non speaking, and that section of the community doesn't have an online presence, at least not from a first person perspective, and their caregivers might have an account or something. Do you think that that affects the dialogue and the learning and awkward global understanding of autism?

    Kerry Magro 22:25

    Yeah, it's tough, because at the end of the day, for those who can't speak for themselves, what I try to do is, I try to continue to emphasize the spectrum because there is, and especially in the, I would say about the past year, this term profound autism has becoming a larger conversation that we're talking about when we were talking about autism spectrum disorders. And the idea of talking about those who have high support challenges, we go into all this language conversation about how you're not supposed to say high functioning, and well functioning. And all this talk now about profound autism. So I think it's important when we talk about representation, people should realize that they are the experts most of the time, and there's a great autism advocate. Her name is Eileen Lam herself is autistic and has autistic child. And she says that something similar to this, most people who are artistic, who are advocating are the experts just in their own autism. And I found that so fascinating. Like what it's a great quote, because it's, I can tell you, from my personal perspective, I'm the expert in my own journey, but every individual is going to be an expert in their journey toe. So when we talk about representation, I really hope, especially in the future, not only in the media and entertainment perspective, that we have more self advocates addressing the entire spectrum, to highlight that it's not just those individuals who can speak up, but there are so many individuals who can't today who need to be represented as well. And

    KC 24:03

    I think as a parent, that's really helpful information because you want to learn about autism, and you want to learn about it from anybody that knows about it. And you're right, it's not a one to one correlation of Oh, because this autistic person said that ABC was helpful to them or that they experience something in this way. It's not going to necessarily mean okay, I can copy and paste that for my own child or for my own self even

    Kerry Magro 24:29

    know exactly, I couldn't agree more. So the second

    KC 24:32

    part of the DSM talks about this Restricted Repetitive patterns of behavior interest in activities. One of the reasons why I'm really excited to talk about this section of it is because one of the things I've noticed in the sort of dialogue about autism, especially on social media, where people are talking about, you know, investigating, maybe they are autistic or learning more about how that autism shows up. There's really heavy emphasis on the social experiences where As whenever we talk about repetitive and restrictive patterns of behavior, I noticed that all of the examples that come up are always of children, or children of child, how a child stems or how a child, you know, maybe lines up their toys or how a child does this. And so I'm curious, you know, what does that aspect of your autism look like today as an adult?

    Kerry Magro 25:23

    Yeah, I appreciate you so much for mentioning the whole aspect of the child. Because we see this in so many, even academia, manuals and guides and journals to this day, where it's still focused primarily on not only children, but often the time stat K through three or three through five, where it's still focused very primarily on early intervention, where we're not getting to hear a lot of opportunities for education on not only younger children, but then also those tweens, teens and young adults from the ages of 16 to 24. So I think when I think about the adult perspective, versus the child perspective, it's, there is a huge lack of true, there's so many different misconceptions about the perspective of being an adult, because a lot of the times, if you see, for example, if you see a kid stemming, or a kid who is limited socially, you might think that is a late bloomer, you might think something like on that case, but if it's an adult, you just go, it's like, oh, there's something wrong with that individual. There's two different ways of thinking because of the kid and that adult correlation. And you know, it's challenging, especially as a adult today. I mean, I would not, I mean, my challenges as an adult today are still dealing with challenges with transitions at times, still dealing with challenges making friends at time, as well. And then also some sensory sensitivities, I still wear sunglasses in some indoor locations because of fluorescent lights and bright lights. So but that was always what I dealt with as a child, there's still so much lack of understanding for our adults out there who are going through challenges.

    KC 27:19

    So you mentioned growing up with a special interest in sports is that still your special interest or have there been other ones in your life as well,

    Kerry Magro 27:25

    as sports was definitely one of the biggest ones I grew up wanting to be the next Larry Bird, I could tell you all 30 NBA teams, and every single player or one of those students greyed out. So sports have continued. I'm a diehard Laker fan, even though we're kind of in the middle of the running right now, hopefully towards a championship hopefully, and LeBrons last few years. But my second love is just music. Even though there is something about sensory and loud noises that bothered me there is always something soothing about music. So I still love music, that's still a special interest of mine, and then also theater. That's kind of how I led to finding a way to go into consulting roles, whether your entertainment world from the love on the spectrums to Joyful Noise film that came out to that 11. Jamie wants a boyfriend in 2013, and two upcoming projects that will hopefully be at the end of this year. So this I think we'd probably I would say are my three special interests that you

    KC 28:22

    mentioned, struggles with transitions, even as an adult, one of the things that I've wondered about is, as I've been interviewing people, and hearing about their experiences as a child versus their experience as an adult, is that a lot of the behaviors that maybe a lot of the struggles that we see as an outpouring, as a child come along with those struggles with transitions, those sensory issues. And as people get older, one of the things that happens is they get more and more autonomy, and control over their schedule, over their space over their own clothing over their diet. I mean, you just you kind of grow up and you get more control. And so it changes, right like a child who's sitting in a classroom who doesn't have a choice, but to be there that doesn't have a choice of the lighting doesn't have a choice of the ticking clock that the way that that that their autism manifests in that moment, is not going to be maybe the way that it manifests when they are older sitting in their own apartment where they have lamps, and they're choosing to be there and they have a silent clock and a hit right. And so there's this difference in the way that an adult experiences those things or even the way those things look in adults. I'm curious if you have any thoughts or even really experiences like what are the things that you're able to do now as an adult to accommodate yourself that you weren't able to do as a child?

    Kerry Magro 29:44

    Yeah, I mean, the biggest things are really just being able to speak up about accommodations when needed, for example, such as that I'm going to have to wear sunglasses indoors when there are challenges with bright lights. I mean that that's me talking to them. perspective of when I was very, very young and still minimally speaking to the point where I got a little bit older, and then I was able to speak up and understand that. So I think that's one of the big things, I mean, the other things in terms of those accommodations, being able to go into a company, and I think it's all based on just when getting older, my accommodations now are very, very easier because I'm not in therapy anymore. If when I was in the workplace, working for several different digital marketing companies, I would always have to ask about reasonable combinations, I would always have to ask about this stuff. And sometimes those transitions are very, very challenging. But why I will say about, one of the things I see Well a lot of adults is that even though I mean, they have the ability to have their choices now, especially in our young adult kids who, after the COVID 19 pandemic, it's been really, really hard to help them with those transitions towards making choices because of the social skills that were hindered during the COVID 19 pandemic. And even today, even though we're three years out of COVID-19, it's still quite a challenge for many of our young adults towards making those choices, but then also dealing with the transition of how to go about those choices as well.

    KC 31:25

    Well, I can't help but think that as an adult, people are more likely to believe you when you say that you need something versus I think as a culture, we have some skepticism. You know, when a child says that they want to do something different than what the rules say, are different than what they're being asked to do. We sort of I feel like perpetually believe that children are, you know, manipulative? And we're so afraid that, you know, what if we enable them or what afford this? And so I can imagine that it's much easier for society at large to trust an adult when they say, Yes, I'll come to this speaking engagement that you're paying me for, but here are some things that I need. So it's interesting to hear how that changes as you grow. Okay, so you mentioned sensory sensitivities. I'm curious, what does that feel like? Because ball, it looks like from the outside, you know, sometimes is someone saying I'm uncomfortable, or some people just kind of having a full meltdown over a sensory sensitivity, but I'm curious what the experience is, whether it's pain or irritation or distraction, or kind of, how could you help me understand from the inside out what that experience is like? Well, it's

    Kerry Magro 32:32

    gonna look different for everyone. But from my perspective, it feels like it never feels any pain, but it is a ongoing uncomfort going on. In my head. For example, when I deal with bright lights, that hypersensitivity, makes the world around me feel very, very misplaced. My attention goes almost clearly off the rails. And it just makes it very, very hard time for myself. There are some individuals I know who have low sensitivity, where they have very high pain thresholds where they can deal with any form of pain. But when it comes to sensory, they, especially the idea of not feeling pain, it's like all of a sudden, when they are in an emergency situation, dealing with things that they never knew that they could have expected, where there are some situations that really, really have challenges for them. So my sensory sensitivities, it always just felt like the ability to focus but then also just being uncomfortable, it's really hard to like, put like a scale of what that looks like. But I can tell you, it just feels the uncomfort the inability to focus, the if I'm having a challenge with bright lights, then I'll also feel like my hearing will go very often on it will feel like if there are bright lights, then that one moment, things will be very, very loud, then everything will be really, really soft. And it will never be the same thing twice. So it is very surreal and very just challenging experience. But luckily, a lot of those challenges have been overcome today. To a great extent.

    KC 34:21

    It's interesting to think about what you describe what the audio kind of brings new understanding to the word dysregulate. Like it quite literally the volume doesn't regulate. So I think another kind of stereotype about people with autism is that they that nobody who's autistic likes physical touch. That's like one of the big representations. So I'm curious your experience with that. Yeah,

    Kerry Magro 34:47

    my love language is physical touch. So I can tell you as a kid, the sensory brush that I would carry around which is basically the size of the palm of my hand, that would use for five to 10 minutes at a time because I never liked paint I just people thought that I lacked empathy, because simply I just didn't want to be touched by other people, when in fact, I was one of the most empathetic children you would ever meet a huge misconception that still impacts so many people in our autism community, because many of the kids and adults I know, are artistic aren't the most empathetic people I know. So from the perspective of physical touch, and everything, when it comes to our community, it's, I feel like this is great now that we live in 2023, that it feels like a lot of the time when all of us were growing up, if somebody will come up and give you a hug, it would be no big deal. It's even if you didn't know them that well, if that was okay. But now, we live in a time where it's like, you have to be very, very mindful of if you don't know somebody, even a tap on the shoulder can be very, very triggering for them, especially as we kind of look at our, the me tube movement, especially over the past few years, and the importance of open communication, and the benefits of open communication, because that's how I see so many of the kids I work with thrive and being able to be concise and being able to have open and honest conversations about their wants, their needs, and whether or not they prefer to be touched or not.

    KC 36:15

    There's really several things that you said that made me think about the idea of universal design, where, you know, if we design education, if we design accommodations, if we design technology, if we design things, with people in mind that are disabled, it improves the lives of everyone, even people who are not disabled. You were talking about education and how kids learn. And there are like you said, there are a lot of kids that probably concentrate better when they're not, you know, feet on the floor, eyes forward. And it's kind of that what is the phrase about the tide? That raises all ships? I don't know. But it just is going to improve everyone's life. Okay, so my last question is, so I talked to a lot of families of young children who are seeing some things that they think could be autistic traits. And one of the things that I run into is that a lot of those families feel hesitant to seek out a diagnosis. They one family I talked to talked about, you know, I'm just worried about them getting a label, or I'm worried that they'll be mistreated, or I'm worried that they will think they're different. I'm worried that you know, they will, you know, they they're worried about sort of a negative impact of what a diagnosis would do. And I'm curious if you had any advice for parents who we're seeing some of those traits who were wondering, you know, do I get the diagnosis? Do I not get the diagnosis? Do I push for an assessment? Curious if you have any advice for them, or experience or just thoughts?

    Kerry Magro 37:52

    Yeah, my ongoing comment will be get the diagnosis, as soon as possible. I earlier intervention is the key, I continue to just be amazed by how many people in our society and don't get me wrong, I mean, who wants the best for their child, and when parent is my doctorate, my qualitative research did for my dissertation was focused on early access to care, and how parents went about that formal diagnosis. And what I learned from the qualitative research from semi structured interviews was the fact that, you know, it took a lot of time for some parents to go about getting that diagnosis, because they were looking for a second opinion, say we're looking through all these different research about the developmental milestones when a child should start babbling when they should start speaking in one to three word sentences, or one word and three word sentences. And, again, I can't stress enough we can diagnose autism as early as 18 months. If you are a parent who might be watching or listening to this, definitely think about your child's entire future when you go about that. Getting a quick diagnosis because those first five years are critical, but then also being open and mindful with that child about their diagnosis and never hiding that diagnosis. Because there were so many years when I was growing up that I do not know I had autism, and I feel like it would have been life changing to have known about a little bit sooner. So I could have learned more about my week's strengths and challenges and how I was how that was a part of my learning. Growing up as a kid in school.

    KC 39:48

    I think there's this misconception that if we don't tell kids that they are different than they won't feel like they're different. When in reality, every person that I've spoken to who's autistic has said I knew I was different.

    Kerry Magro 40:01

    Yeah, there is a huge misconception about how we look at that whole difference. I mean, I think that's when we talk about neuro diversity, it's realizing that differences aren't necessarily a bad thing. And if we kind of go on that, I think we could definitely as a society, be able to hopefully have those earlier conversations about those diagnosis. So

    KC 40:25

    last thing I'll say is, I really appreciate you talking about the amount of intervention and therapy that you received and how helpful that's been to your quality of life as an adult. Because we're having I think, some important conversations about what kinds of therapies young kids are receiving. I know, there's a lot of controversy around ABA, for example. And I've seen some people kind of swing maybe too far into, you know, your kid is fine. They don't need anything. They don't need any interventions, leave them alone. They're perfect as they are, right. But the truth is, is that there are interventions that can increase someone's quality of life. And so if you have any sort of closing thoughts on that, I'd love to hear it.

    Kerry Magro 41:06

    Yeah, I still see people considering like, challenges as a rite of passage that all kids have to go through, regardless if they receive a diagnosis or not. I think we just need to do a it's funny, you mentioned ABA, because on my Facebook page today carries autism journey, I was commenting on the fact that somebody wrote a comment about how they were calling that ABA obedience training. And I was just so like, I've never had ABA. I know so many BCBAs, who do a tremendous job who focused primarily on not necessarily turning autistic behaviors into neurotypical behaviors by just trying to help individuals succeed, being able to help them with life skills, being able to help them with their own communication and building communication and helping them succeed in school. I think we also society just need to promote kindness a little bit more. And I think by doing that, and just listening to each other, and always getting the perspectives of others, self advocates and professionals alike, I think we'll be able to evolve as a society to be able to approach things in a better, more unique way, our rising community because we have one in five Americans who have some form of disability today, one of the largest minorities in not only United States, but the world. But we're often one of the most underserved still to this day. And that's really a shame. I think we as a society can if we embrace one another a little bit more, and listen to each what each other after the sad thing will will definitely have a brighter future than the future we currently have right now.

    KC 42:48

    Wonderful. Well, thank you. I really appreciate your time and everything that you've shared. Thank

    Kerry Magro 42:53

    you so much for having me. It's been a pleasure.

    Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Christy Haussler
102: The Controversy of ABA: A Discussion with an ABA Practitioner

If you heard our episode from a couple of weeks ago, you know we discussed Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA). Today, we are looking at the controversy surrounding ABA, why many people are in favor of it, and why many people oppose it. My guest, Taylor, is a BCBA, a board-certified behavior analyst, so let’s discuss this topic and learn more from her.

Show Highlights:

  • An explanation of ABA and the role of a BCBA

  • The language of ABA: desired behaviors, undesired behaviors, behavior contrast, punishment, replacement behaviors, injurious behaviors, tantrum behaviors, etc.

  • Taylor’s story about going to an ABA conference

  • The historical harm that ABA has done to autistic children

  • The dehumanizing aspects of ABA

  • Is the goal of ABA to make an autistic child seem less autistic?

  • Therapies covered by health insurance for an autistic child: speech, occupational, and ABA

  • The side of ABa that no one talks about

  • ABA: helpful, traumatizing, or distressing?

  • Taylor’s path to becoming a BCBA

  • An autism diagnosis does NOT mean that you need ABA.

  • A look at a typical ABA session (even though each session is highly individualized to the needs of each person)

  • Taylor’s top three things that can be done to better serve autistic people

Resources and Links:

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC 0:05

    Okay, so hi,

    Taylor 0:06

    Taylor. Hello.

    KC 0:08

    Okay, Taylor, I asked you to be on the show because you're a BCBA. And actually, somebody recommended you, because in talking about autism, one of the things that I want to kind of cover in the landscape of things was ABA because like, as a parent, it's kind of the first thing that you're given. After that it's like, here's the diagnosis of autism. Here's a pamphlet for ABA. And because I have spent so much time on tick tock around other like autistic adults, I had heard of ABA before and almost always in a negative light. And so I was sort of pushed into this situation where, okay, there's kind of almost like two sides of people talking about this. And I kind of wanted to give like a little bit of a layout in these conversations of, of that landscape. But one of the things that occurred to me is that I don't really even know what ABA is, like, I know what it is in terms of how people have talked about it. Like I've heard people talk about it that love it. And I've heard people talk about it that hate it. But when they describe it, they describe results. So they'll say I love ABA, because my son used to not talk at all. And now he can ask for a glass of water, or you'll have people say, I can't stand ABA, because it's really traumatic. And at the end of my ABA, you know, I couldn't do anything unless, you know, I was on a rewards chart, and I was so afraid of making mistakes. But I realized that I don't even really know, just from an objective standpoint, what ABA is and what it looks like. And that's kind of what I'm hoping that you can talk to us about today.

    Taylor 1:44

    Yeah, so roots of ABA stands for Applied Behavior Analysis, but at the root of it, it's the science of learning and behavior, right. And so when people say, Oh, I don't like ABA, they really mean the application of ABA and how people are applying it. If you get pulled over by police officer get a ticket. That's ABA, right? Our job pays us money. That's positive reinforcement. That's ABA. So ABA happens whether we want it to or not. So when people are saying that they don't like ABA, they really just mean the way an individual applied. There are sites of applied behavior analysis. And it's effective, because if we take data on everything on the behavior, so there's always a graph, we always are supposed to put, you know, the behavior, right, and so and to be a BCBA, right, we were trained in it, we studied it, we had to pass this really difficult tests, do it and be certified to be able to do it with health insurance and everything like that. But it's just the science of behavior. So it was hard getting on tick tock, I've considered getting off tick tock because it has such a negative stigma, and I get so many comments and just negative energy. And I want to talk about how you can be ethical and kind while practicing a pay behavior analysis. But I see the same thing. I see a wall people that had really bad experiences.

    KC 2:56

    So how long have you been a BCBA?

    Taylor 2:59

    I've been in the space in 2021. So just hit two years in January. And

    KC 3:03

    what is BCBA stands for? Yes. BCBA stands for board certified

    Taylor 3:07

    behavior analysis. So it's the highest level you can be a BCBA D, which is somebody that has a doctorate, but BCBA is the person that can assess. So what happens is an individual gets a autism diagnosis, and then they get sent to a BCBA that person can assess the individual and then say whether or not they need ABA or not how many hours they need, what programs, we should be working on stuff like that. I think the key is that just because you've been recommended to get ABA does not necessarily mean that you need ABA, I think that's a big issue. Doctors kind of just say, hey, go get a slice, you know, see what they say. And a lot of these students will just automatically start doing services. And a lot of the time I turned kids away, I'm like, You know what, they're fine. Like, they don't need help. They're perfectly capable, you know, they're not engaging in any behavior that's injured to themselves or others, or attending school. Like there's no issues. And a lot of times, sometimes parents are the ones that fight me to want ABA. And they'll be like, you know, he does this, like when please tell me that he's having a lot. And I was like, well, he's allowed to harm like, and so a lot of the thing is, are we targeting a behavior because somebody finds it annoying? Or are we targeting a behavior because it really is going to benefit that individual, and it's going to get them to be more independent. And I think that's where a lot of the issue is, is that BCBA says target behaviors that may seem annoying or frustrating. But their kids like my son is two and oh my gosh, he is frustrating, but he's too like that's it's typical kids are supposed to be frustrating.

    KC 4:43

    Okay, and how much schooling did you have to get to be a BCBA? Oh, my You have to have a bachelor's degree. It doesn't have to be in anything specific or just a bachelor's degree.

    Taylor 4:53

    Do you have to have a bachelor's degree but your master's degree is what really matters. There has to be something correlated. There's a few of them I listen psychology, it can be in psychology, education, I think social work. And then of course, applied behavior analysis. So my degree is in psychology. So then if it's not in ABA, you didn't have to go to coursework. So I had to do a year of coursework after I received my master's in psychology just in straight applied behavior analysis. And then after, while you were doing your coursework, they just upped the hour. So when I did it, you only had to get 1500 hours of supervision. Now you have to get 2000 hours of supervision under a BCBA. After you do all of that, then you submit your package, they review everything, and then you have to take this very difficult test. It's like four hours, I think the pass rate, I think is like 60%. And if people pass it the first time, after you do that, if you pass, and you get your certification, and then every two years, you have to restart, you don't have to test but you have to have it's called CPUs, do you have to get 32 continuing education units for the rest of the time that you want to hold your certification?

    KC 5:57

    And when a kid goes to an ABA clinic or center? Is it always BCBAs administering ABA? Or is there like a lower level of people that do that also?

    Taylor 6:09

    Yes, so there's a lower level, the registered behavior technicians RBTs. This is another issue that a lot of people have with this field. And then RBT can literally just, it's just 40 hours of training, they have to have a competency exam done by a BCBA. And then they have to pass a test as well. It's not as an extensive test, it's I think the test is like 90 minutes or something. And then they have to be supervised by BCBA. But it's only 20% of their total hours worked. They need to be supervised by BCBA. That is the minimum by the board. So a lot of the issue in this field is when I was an RVT, I'll be completely honest, it was in 2019. I never saw my BCBA I had to figure everything

    KC 6:48

    out. That was my next question is like what is supervision mean? Does it mean because so like, I'm a master's level, licensed professional counselor, and supervision, I think when people hear the term supervision, they think about like, literal, like the other person's in the room, but what I know of supervision is like, No, I was in the room alone with clients, I just like somebody was technically over me, that I had to consult with and things like that, okay, so. So

    Taylor 7:13

    they do mean, you have to have at least two face to face meetings, and one of them has to be a direct observation of you interacting with the clients. So there is seminars around that, it's just, it doesn't happen that much from what I've seen. So whenever I call out to do supervision for an RBT, they're like, Wow, I'm so surprised to see you. Because I know my last PCB Aidells. Like this is literally like what we're supposed to be doing. And then the fact that the RBT is just, it's just a high school level individual, there's a lot of treatment. infidelity is what we call it in terms of what the BCBA says, and then how the plan is administered. So for a lot of my cases, I don't RB keys are hard to come by, especially out here in California. So for a lot of cases where you're doing the programming, which is nice, because then I know what's being done the way I can tell, but it's hard because a lot of health insurance doesn't allow you to work on things outside of the session. So like, if I want to graph something, I have to actually go to the kids home and just sit on my computer, or I have to do outside of the session and paid because I think it's a little cruel to show up to a kid's house and then just ignore them and be on my computer.

    KC 8:18

    And let me tell you, tailor, I think that what we're talking about now, it's an issue that I've had for a long time and not just related to ABA, there are a lot of industries. And situations where I see this, I see it in an occupational therapy where like, you'll go to occupational therapy, and you'll have an occupational therapist do this huge robust assessment. And then you'll come back for a session, and it's somebody else, and then that person's working with you. And then I sort of realized, this person is not an occupational therapist, they haven't been trained as an occupational therapist, they don't have the education as an occupational therapist, they've not been tested as an occupational therapist, they're like, a different. And when I say lower level, I don't mean it in a derogatory term, like, Oh, you're underneath, but I just mean in terms of education and training, a lower it's like a technician who has been taught how to do the exercises. This also shows up in addiction recovery, where you go to rehab, and you're gonna have maybe one hour a week with a licensed therapist. And then you're gonna have lots of groups that if there are clinical group, they're supposed to be run by a licensed therapist, but your day to day interactions with staff that are sort of running the daily flow are typically technicians meaning they have maybe a high school diploma, they don't have any special training outside of what that job on site gave them. And I feel like there's a lot of issues in the addiction world that really break down to the people administering some of these interventions are not equipped to do so. So that's interesting thing that you bring up. Okay, more questions. So If I was a parent coming to you saying like, Hey, I kind of understand what you've said the purpose of ABA is, which is like to extinguish behaviors that we don't want to see anymore. And is it also true that we want to increase behaviors? We're not seeing? Is that part of it?

    Taylor 10:16

    Absolutely. Yes. Yes. So we want to essentially, we want to increase behaviors that we call them desired behaviors. I don't really like the term desired. But that's just kind of the language that we've been using. So we want to increase desired behaviors and decrease undesired behaviors. Now by undesired behaviors me personally as a BCBA. I mean, injurious behaviors, you know, I have clients that bite themselves, bang their head against the wall, stuff like that, I'm not going to I know we have this whole argument on tick tock about eye contact, I don't care if a client makes eye contact with me, I just hear if you're responding to your name, in terms of if I call you, there's some indication that you heard me whether you cheat turns your head, something like that, because that's a safety concern for little kids, especially, you know, self stimulatory behavior, and all of that I don't target it, unless it's something that's interest, something that's really serious or dangerous. So hand flapping, rocking, humming all of that. I don't target but some BCBAs do, because some of them consider it quote unquote, undesired behavior. So that is, the issue is that there's no parameters when we become a BCBA. And it's interesting because ABA has been tied to autism. But really, it's just behavior in general, it's just been so tied to autism, when you're receiving your education and applied behavior analysis. They're not teaching you about developmental disabilities, I'm not teaching you about autism and this and that they're just teaching you about the science of ABA. So individuals applying it sometimes don't understand, like, they don't understand child development, they don't understand ASD, and they need to research it a little bit more, I think. And I wish it was kind of in our coursework a little bit, because you could literally get an undergrad in ABA, a master's in ABA, go take the test and be fine, and not have any education,

    KC 12:01

    and never have any education on what autism is. Unless

    Taylor 12:06

    you took it as an elective, or you took it in. So I thought I'd have like a really good path because my undergrad is in child development, my master's in psychology, and then I have, honestly, ironically, the least amount of education I have is in applied behavior analysis. I only have a year of it. Wow,

    KC 12:21

    I'm gonna have to sit with that. But I mean, that's also I think, true of some other places, too. Like, I don't know, how many occupational therapists have education and autism. Yeah, right. Well, and it's something that I've noticed sometimes is like, we the training and techniques, but not necessarily in the disorder that you're treating. Okay, so I have so many questions that I'm trying to like shell for a different time, because there are other questions I have now. Okay, so that was one of them. So if I were to say to you, okay, if all ABA is is like behaviorism, like offering rewards for desired behavior, and punishments, or consequences for undesirable behavior, well, that just sounds like a like parenting, like what a lot of people do for parenting, right? Like, hey, you know, if you don't clean up the dishes, you can't have TV today. So what is ABA doing that parents can't do, right? Because I could do that at home, like, Oh, if you bang your head, I'm not going to give you your iPad, like, so how is that any different.

    Taylor 13:19

    So a lot of the time, what I've seen is parents are worn out and tired, and they need a lot of more specialized, like structured information. So a lot of the clients I work with, it has to be very artistic, very literally. So you can't say, oh, you know, make sure that you're good at school today. Like what does good mean? Right? Like, I don't know what God I feel like I'm good, or you need to. So it's a lot of us first and statements. So you need to do this. And to do this, um, a lot of visual schedules is what a lot of my clients need an example. I'm working with one client that are working on community outings. The last time we had a community outing, he went up to this pregnant woman said, Why is your belly so fat, and then touched her? Which, you know, thankfully, she was nice about it. But you know, it's not we're trying to teach them to not go up to strangers, because we'll go up to strangers say hi, I'm so and so I live here, this is my phone number, right? It's a safety issue. And also not to touch other. So I had to make a whole visual of, you know, keeping your hands to yourself all of that. So a lot of the time, a lot of the parents I've worked with kind of feel like, well, I shouldn't have to tell them that. It's like, well, you have to, and a lot of my clients need additional praise, more praise than a neurotypical child would need, which is also fine. But a lot of the time they're siblings, right? And they're comparing the two Well, I didn't have to do this with child a, why do I have to do the child B and explain to them like, you're gonna have to do a little bit extra to help them and honestly, half the time when I'm telling the parents this, they're just like, Oh, that makes sense. And I'm like, Wow, I'm getting paid to tell you this. Like yeah, it's, it's what I'm telling is not some super complex thing. It's, hey, every time your kiddo you know, cries for candy at the store and you gave them that candy, you actually just reinforced them. And so now When you stop doing it, they're going to have a huge behavior and you can't give in. And you can't care about what other people are saying or how other people are looking at you. Because, you know, you can't give them candy every single time you go to the store, things like that, or a lot of the time, a lot of parents don't think about negative attention. So some kiddos who engage in behavior to get a verbal reprimand, and they do it more and more, and their parents are like, I keep yelling at them. Why do they keep doing this? I'm like, because they want you to yell at them. They want that. I mean, clearly, if you keep doing it, and you keep yelling at them, and they keep engaging the behavior, you're actually reinforcing it. So actually, you have to take that verbal reprimand away, it really comes down to the way other people were parented. I go through this all the time with my son, we don't like to, we don't spank our kids or anything like that. But I was saved a lot as a child and rewiring yourself while you're parenting is a lot and then rewire yourself while you're parenting. A child that's on the spectrum is probably even a lot more. But it is really just helping them be parent. So

    KC 15:57

    you mentioned spanking, and that's something that I have experienced with as well. We don't spank our kids. And I feel like that's been like a kind of a parenting hot topic lately, especially around, you know, whether or not parents should be spanking. And so my question about it is like, from what you're describing right now, like, it seems like spanking should work, though. Like if the goal is to put in a consequence, to like, make the person not do an undesired behavior. Like let's talk about just any kid, right? Like, let's say your kid is, you know, writing on the walls, right? And you spank them, like, eventually that kid would stop. So then why would we say that spanking is not? Okay, good to do that got the result? Yeah,

    Taylor 16:44

    I have two reasons. My first reason is that personally, I just think it's a little cruel to hit somebody that's smaller than you that can't hit you back. Don't allow them hit you back. And a lot of the time, it's called behavior contrast. You know, we you spank a kid at home, you know, they listen at home, go to school, when the teacher is going to do right, the teachers can't spank them. So then you see a contrast, you see them being really well behaved at home, because they know hey, you know, if I get caught, mom and dad are gonna spank me at school, I can do whatever I want. Nobody can sneak me here. And then we always use we call it punishment in the field of ABA. But in terms of punishment, it's something that decreases the frequency of the behavior, it doesn't necessarily have to be spanking or something like that. It just means it decreased the feature frequency. And so that is a last last last resort in the field of ABA. Because for one for it to be effective, you have to punish every single instance of the behavior. And it's impossible to catch every single instance, let's say drawing on the wall, right? There's going to be times when they sneak away draw on the wall, and you never saw it. And then they got away with it. So they kids and not even catch us adults, they learn to do it in situations where they're not going to receive that punishment. There's a lot of issues to with spanking is are you spanking the child? Because you're trying to get them to stop doing it? Or are you spanking them because you're so angry, you're actually relieving your frustration on the child, which then would technically be free and positive reinforcement. Every time I'm angry with my kid, I spank them. I'm no longer angry. So now I'm more likely to spank my kid because it makes me less angry. So spanking is a lot more about parents and adults not processing their emotions correctly, and then taking it out on their children. In my opinion, I'm not shaming we spank their kids. I'm just saying, in my opinion, that's what it is. Because I do I touch myself. And I think that I'm like, Wow, if I was younger, and wasn't, if I was like five years younger, I would spank you right now. Because I'm so angry. And that's how I was raised. That's what I saw my parents do. But I'm like, Nope, we're not going to do that. Like, it's okay, I need to take a deep breath and walk away a lot of the times. Again, with ABA, I'm teaching the parents coping skills along with their kids, because yeah, you need to take

    KC 18:56

    a deep breath walk away. And it also seems like you know, if you spank a kid, like, clearly, you could make anyone do anything if the punishment was harsh enough, but if they're then going to school, and like, you know, they do the behavior there or whatever. It also seems like there's a difference between like a quote unquote, punishment that just makes them not do the behavior, versus something that like teaches them a skill that makes them not do the behavior.

    Taylor 19:27

    Exactly. That's that we call those replacement behaviors. But yeah, so our goal is we can't decrease their behavior without creating another behavior in terms of behavior. A lot of the time in this field, we say behavior in terms of we really mean maladaptive behavior and desired behavior. But if I'm going to teach somebody, you know, stop screaming for attention. I also need to teach them what to do instead of screaming for attention, you know, raise your hand tap on their shoulder call someone's name instead of screaming, so we can't just look at a bat I'd say this is gonna go down. And we're going to kind of Schmidt like, we can't just do that you need to replace it with something else,

    KC 20:06

    I have to say like, I'm really struck by, first of all, I really appreciate you in this conversation and you sound like a really wonderful provider. Thank you what. And I would need to say that first because I don't want what I'm about to say to seem like it's about you. But one of the things that I'm really struck by is the difference in language between the things that I've learned in my own continuing education, journey around behavior, and just the language that ABA uses when you talk about punishment. So you talk about maladaptive behavior, and you talk about undesirable behavior, you know, I kind of come from the school of thought, where like behavior is communication, and that there's a valid need behind almost every behavior, and that we really have to understand the need and get the need met, and focus on like a relationship that allows that child to do something else so that they don't have to do this other behavior. And I also come from a very, like neurodiversity affirming context. And like, I still remember going through the process of autism diagnosis for one of my kids and the amount of clinicians that when they began to talk about it would say, doctors, clinicians, whatever would say like, Well, I see some red flags. Well, there's definitely concerns. Well, there's a little bit to be worried about, like every behavior, every word, every term that described her autism was, yeah, it was like, it's all bad, it's all desirable. And it kind of also gives the sense like the wording about like, punishments and maladaptive and thing, and I might be alone in this, but like, it makes me feel like we're talking about a child, that's just a bad seed. Like, they're just a bad kid. And we need to, like, intervene and make them not be able to do these behaviors anymore, so that they won't do these behaviors anymore.

    Taylor 22:08

    Yeah, I don't really like the language we use in terms of it's just very clinical is what it it's very objective.

    KC 22:18

    But it's not it's not objective, because I'm using clinical language too. And I would say that that language is not objective.

    Taylor 22:26

    Yes, it's, I would say it's lack of emotion, really. And that's like, what we're taught is when, like, at the end of every session, we have to do notes of what happened. And we're not really even supposed to say the client was happy, or the client was sad, because that's like, you know, how do you know how do you know like, when he was smiling all day, we have to say, you know, client was smiling throughout session, and our client, you know, was falling asleep throughout session client had an increase of tantrum behavior. It's just very, I don't know, like lack of emotion. It's like, when I read a book, I'm like, wow, this is great. And then when I go to work, I just feel very, like doctory, almost about how I have to describe things.

    KC 23:03

    Well, even like the word tantrum, like, the word tantrum has, like very specific connotations for people that are different than meltdown, or different than sensory overload. Right? And like, I know, like, so when you said injurious behavior, I felt like that was a perfect example of like a truly objective descriptive like, yeah, it's just injurious behavior, like something that leads to danger or even like unsafe behavior, like a behavior that's unsafe. So I'm curious, like knowing the sort of some of the pushback that people have had about ABA. Do you think that some of it is that you get providers that are not trained on autism, and trained on behaviorism applied behavioral analysis? We have always seen in our culture, I think autism through the lens of deficit, you know, what's wrong with this kid? And so you know, you're going in with this sort of cultural idea what's wrong with this kid? That's not really being challenged, but you're not learning anything else about autism, you get trained and how to do behavioral analysis. And then most of the interventions kind of get pushed on to somebody that maybe has a high school degree or diploma. And then the language being used is sort of reinforcing that. Like, my job is to, like, fix these bad behaviors. I mean, it's sort of like it seems like those variables put together can be a pretty dangerous combination. Yeah,

    Taylor 24:38

    and I think it really has to do with how the because the BCBA is basically like the leader in terms of this treatment program, I think, has to go off of how that BCBA presents the case to the RBT. And really what the BCBA expects, because I just got a new RBT on a case and I've never worked with them before and I was like, My kiddo, she's only three. And I don't know how you operate. I'm very naturalistic. I'm very Playland. Back in the seat at the table, she's not going to be like food is not going to be used as like a reinforcer or anything like that.

    KC 25:13

    Is that common with ABA? To use food as a reward? From what

    Taylor 25:17

    I've seen, typically No, I usually don't use food for anything. The only thing I've ever used it for is really like an m&m for like, pooping on the potty or something like that, which is pretty, at least from my understanding typical that parents do. From what I've seen, no, and it's even in our taxes, like you shouldn't use food as a reinforcer, because for one, it's creating an unhealthy relationship with food, you know, you shouldn't think that food is reporting in that term.

    KC 25:40

    That's wild, because I feel like anecdotally, I hear that all the time. I

    Taylor 25:44

    know. And so that's why it's hard for me, because I see people talk about it online. But then when I'm out here, and I mean, I'm only exposed to so many BCBAs. So I don't know what is happening. But it says, you know, don't use food as a reinforcer. Also, it's like, you could have some weight issues as well, as you're keeping you give them like candy and all this stuff. I do remember when I had speech therapy in the early 2000s. And yeah, they gave me gummy worms for when I said are right. So it just depends. But yeah, I do think it has to go back to how the BCBA presents the case and what they expect. And if they have a history of even working with kids, because I see a lot of I get a case from like the BCBA left, and I get the I take over the case, I look at the goals and it's like a three year old and the expectation is that they're complying with 100% of instructions. And I'm just like, what, three year old? What human being complies with 100% of instructions? Like nobody does,

    KC 26:38

    I see that like, we end up holding an autistic child to a higher standard, we would even hold a neurotypical child like, especially with like language, like it's normal for little kids to say want milk instead of like, I would like the milk.

    Taylor 26:52

    Yes, yes. Like, you know what they mean? Just

    KC 26:56

    give them the milk. Yeah. And it's unfortunate that it comes down to how the BCBA is presenting the information because it doesn't sound like there's anything in their education that would teach them how to present it in like a person centered way. Like you seem kind of like the exception. Like it's people who step out and take it upon themselves to learn about neurodiversity to learn about autism. Was it you that had the really interesting Tiktok? Where you'd gone to a conference?

    Taylor 27:23

    Oh, my gosh, yes.

    KC 27:26

    Will you tell that story? Because it was kind of an eye opening thing from you. So

    Taylor 27:31

    I went it's called kalaba. I've never been the first one happened. I think on my son's birthday, my first my son's first birthday, so I wasn't going to go. And then so this was the second one that I was a BCBA that I could go to. It's in SoCal. Well, it changes every year, but this year was in SoCal. And it's about like 500 bucks just to get in the door, like 100 bucks to get your CEUs versus continuing education units that we were talking about. So this

    KC 27:54

    is just an ABA conference. Yes.

    Taylor 27:55

    Yeah. So they open to everybody, like there was other people that weren't, you don't have to be a BCBA to go, anybody can go but But who's gonna pay that much money, right? So we go and the first guy, so they have like these keynote speakers, and then there's like other little speakers that you can go see, and you have to pick which one but the keynote speakers everybody's seeing at the same time. And the first guy was like, Hey, guys, I guess he was the president. And he said, Hey, guys, don't make any of the volunteers cry this year, because you guys make them cry every year. And I immediately start looking around, like, who am I next to? Why are you guys making people cry? What are you doing to the volunteers that make them cry every year? I was like, Okay, this is weird. The next keynote speaker talked about how, you know, African Americans have a harder time basically, in the United States, and specifically talking about education. And you know, how children aren't learning how to read and people were blaming the kids, you know, it's their fault. They're not learning how to read. No, nobody's teaching them how to read. And I'm just sitting there like, and people are like, looking like very intently. I'm just like, Okay, another keynote speaker was talking about self stem, and talking about how we should stop targeting self stimulatory behavior and how you know, the autism population is saying, Stop making us do this. There's a function to this behavior. And I'm just sitting here like, yeah, like ABA. It's called the four functions of behavior. And essentially, every behavior has a reason for it. And so easiest one is C. So it's sensory, which is the self stem. I like the way it feels escape or avoidance, which means I'm trying to get out of something, a tension, obviously, I want the tension and tangible which is like candy, food, money, anything that's like something I can physically hold. So we already know that there's a function to the self stimulatory behavior. So why would you try to decrease it? I don't understand. But they're saying that and then I remember he said something along the lines of autism or people with autism are whole people, and they should be treated as such. And I'm telling you, everybody stood up and it was like a standing ovation. Like he said, like he just explained like the, like gravity. And I'm just like, yeah, they've always been hold people. And I just keep looking around like, I paid this much money. For this information, this is not just common sense to you guys. It was alarming to me and I was I felt bamboozle people were saying other BCBAs were commenting and saying, you know, there's other ones that actually teach you stuff like actually show you studies. And there were some, like keen, like other speakers that were giving me some studies about things. But the fact that the keynote speakers that was the narrative kind of shows that this is what the BAC B, which is our board is trying to tell provides what to do, essentially. And the fact that that wasn't common sense. It almost reaffirmed everything people are saying on Tik Tok that I haven't experienced because, you know, I see a lot of comments about some really bad BCBAs. I'm just like, are you making this up? And then when I had to go to that conference, and then that was the narrative, I was like, no, they're probably telling

    KC 30:53

    the truth. It made me really emotional to hear that because like, the idea that somebody would be giving services to my kid, and like, not see her as a whole person with like, valid needs, and that she's some sort of like, not human like it, that's really stunning to me, like, first of all, I applaud even the idea that they're trying to listen to the Autistic community in saying that, but you're right, like, why isn't that the basis of I mean, master's degrees? That's what was, yeah, you shouldn't go through a whole master's degree and then have to be told at some CTU like autistic people are real human people hold people. That's wild.

    Taylor 31:38

    Yeah, I was like, why is this news to you guys, so

    KC 31:43

    and then let me also say, I think that even the word attention, like really grates on me, and that's from my own experience working in addiction, because like, we in the addiction industry, are notorious for, I think, dehumanizing clients, by way of Oh, they're so entitled, they're just attention seeking. When in reality, like you said, like, there's very real human needs going on behind those behaviors, they just have ways of trying to get those needs met, that are not working for them, and that are creating problems in their lives and kind of staying in the way. And I once heard someone say, and it was actually a teacher, because they're talking about kids, because that language gets thrown around with kids a lot. Oh, she just wants attention. She just wants attention. And if you give her that attention, she'll keep doing it. So you should ignore them. Oh, she just wants attention. And I heard this teacher say one time that like, the word attention has a now has like a derogatory connotation. And she challenged the teachers to replace the word attention with the word connection. And she would not let them use the word attention anymore. And so instead of saying, like, today, Jeremy, like, threw his chair across the room. Well, why do you think he did that? Well, I think he was just looking for attention. She required them to say, Well, I think he must have been looking for connection, and like, humanized those kids. Yes,

    Taylor 33:07

    yeah. The language is very dehumanizing. And I had a someone that was pursuing their BCBA. And I was working with me when I worked at a clinic, and one of the kids was upset, and it was at the clinic, and he was younger, and I was upset, and he was crying. And I picked him up, and I gave him a hug. And like, let him sit on my lap and like we talked and stuff, and she was like, I have never seen a BCBA ever do that. And I was like how the child you've never seen it before you have the child. She's like, well, he's seeking attention. And I was like, Yeah, and you can give it to him. Like if he's a child who's upset his caregiver is on their way. But they're not here. Yeah, I think the caregiver was like running late. And so he saw all the other kids leave and was waiting. So he's a kid that's upset. And then she was like, Well, I was always taught, you know, if they're seeking attention, you and it's not appropriate, then they have to ignore it. And I was like, it's appropriate for a child to be crying when their caregiver is late, and they're waiting for them. And you know, they might not understand that they're on their way. Because it didn't have a high level of functional communication, like vocal communication. And then she was like, oh, and then like, not just being a human being, I've been told so much. Oh, you're just soft, because you're a mom. That's what they would tell me. Like, that's why you're so nice to the kids. And I was like, No, I'm nice to the kids because they're kids. And they're going to be adults soon. And they deserve hugs. It's okay to hug. Like I've had people say, Is it okay, if I give the kid a hug? Like RBTs? And I'm like, yeah, why would you lie? I don't understand their kids. Yeah. So yeah. So I

    KC 34:39

    don't know how much you have, like learned about this. But I did want to ask you the question like, What is your understanding of like the historical harm that ABA has done to autistic children, and now autistic adults? Yes.

    Taylor 34:52

    There's one big case I think it's in Florida that they teach us about where they just it was almost is like an institution kind of thing. I think it was like decades ago. That's the number one. That's one that they talk about. But I've heard of old old school, referred BCBAs, where even BCBAs right, because the board is new, I think it came out in like the 90s. So it's new. But before that when people were treating children with autism, you know, hand flopping, they would tie their hands to the table, or they would tie them to the chair. I think this is also back in the day where they were also literally allowed to, like hit kids with rulers and stuff like that as well. They did stuff where they would like physically restrain the kids for engaging in self stimulatory behavior. And so I think that slowly faded to terms of you know, don't restrain kids. But from what I've seen, it's a lot of people almost call it like, over programming, where you made this kid do this so many times that it's like, embedded into their head, like they respond like, like you teach them greetings, and the child would be like, Hi, my name is so and so. And then you'd be like, Okay, how's your day? Hi, my name is so and so like, you did it so many times for that kid that they just, that's all they know, they just repeat it and repeat it and repeat it because a lot of the field unfortunately is tied to health insurance. And health insurance doesn't want to pay for things. Unless they're seeing a change in a lot of language, especially TRICARE I can't I work with TRICARE. And I can't stand the way they describe their the clients and the assessment tools that they have to make me and the parents fill out. The questions are so derogatory, one of them is like this the child repeat things annoyingly, like a parent's is what they have. And we have to say like yes or no, does the client have tantrums for no reason. And I was like, nobody does anything for no reason. So just the language that TRICARE uses.

    KC 36:49

    It's it sounds like a really like dehumanizing system, like you take someone, you put them through school, they learn about behavior, they don't get any education on autism, they don't see autism as whole people. And then they have to fill out assessments that compare them to animals, and say that they do things for no reason. And you know, you're sitting with this child who maybe does have behaviors that you find annoying, that you find frustrating. And one of the problems that we had a lot in the addiction treatment centers that I worked for is that, you know, you get someone who has a high school diploma, and maybe they themselves just got sober recently, and like they themselves don't have great emotional regulation skills. And now they're in charge of giving interventions to someone else who doesn't have good regulation skills, but one of them is in a place of power. And just like you sort of talked about with the spanking like, it seemed to me like so many times, they were enacting an intervention that looked correct on paper, but they were coming from a place of like, I'm frustrated, you aren't supposed to be doing this. And I have more power than you. So I'm not going to allow you to have this thing. There was a story one time that I saw on Tik Tok of a woman who had asked that her child and the like special education plan, she had put like no food rewards. Like she didn't want that as a part of his education. And there was a teacher that ignored that. And she didn't know it. And for during this semester, or for several weeks, every time he would get a question, right, she'd give him a Skittle. And if he stayed in his chair, he'd get a Skittle. And like, that was the easy way for her to manage this autistic child. And once the mom found out about it, she put a stop to it. And it only happened for a few weeks. And she says that, to this day, four years later, when her son makes a mistake, she hears him under his breath. When you talked about being like over programmed. That's what it made me think of,

    Taylor 38:57

    I think people don't realize how I guess important, but how easily we could influence a child and how that's going to last like the rest of their lives. And you have to make a choice, like, yeah, there's some of my clients, I could do a program that's gonna be effective, and it's gonna decrease something or increase something. Sure. And it's going to look great on paper health, and TRICARE is going to be so happy with me, but it's going to have damaging effects for the rest of that child's life. And as a BCBA, you have to choose, you have to pick your battles, you have to choose what's really important and something that we have to target no matter what. And for me, that's that injurious behavior because I worked with group homes as well of that adults who didn't get ABA who people let you know, engage in, obviously, and now it takes three people to restrain the guy because he's trying to knock himself out by beating his head against the wall. So there's certain things that we have to target but as a BCBA, you have to figure out which ones are the most important and what might have damaging effects. And looking at you know, 10 years ago would I have thought Have forcing people to make eye contact would have had damaging effects. No. But now research shows and everybody's saying it does. So then stop doing it. Like that's it. It's easy. So,

    KC 40:08

    So research is now showing that forcing autistic children to make eye contact when they don't want to is harmful. Yes, I've

    Taylor 40:16

    read articles. I don't know if they've been peer reviewed. But I've read articles, it's saying that it triggers a flight, a fight or flight response and the individual and forcing them to do it. So I'm like, Okay, well, what then?

    KC 40:27

    So one of the more like, strong wording, things you'll hear people criticize ABA is that they will say ABA is abuse. And that is a very loaded term. And I don't want to go into that right now. But particularly because I often hear it from people that never went through ABA, so I'm like, Let's just hang on. That's, it's a lot to say that I'm not even necessarily saying it's not true in some cases that it created trauma. But it just, that's what I thought of when you said that where it was like, Okay, so the goal was to get this child to make more eye contact, which to me just kind of sounds like let's make this autistic kids seem less autistic. But maybe there was a different goal that somebody thought was a more noble goal than that. But so for people that don't know, like, the reason, you know, when we experience something, and that fight or flight kicks in, that is ripe ground for trauma, it doesn't mean that you get traumatized every time your fight or flight goes on. But every time there is trauma, there is fight or flight. And it kind of made sense to me for the first time, because obviously, when you talk about tying a kid's hands down, I'm like, well, that's abusive, but even the more subtle aspects of like, I'm forcing you to do this behavior, that is creating fight or flight. And also like creating you, like forcing you not to trust yourself, like do this thing that is harmful for you internally, because there's this external pressure on you. So it's either I don't want to look, but I don't want to lose my iPad, or I don't want to look but I do want that m&m. And it's like this weird splitting that you can really create in someone. And that fight or flight is going off. And I can see how that would be traumatic for someone and I can see how that would be abusive for someone, even though that was not the intention of probably the person giving that intervention. Okay, so going back to the other thing, I felt like you mentioned those two things together. And I feel like that illustrates almost perfectly like the two sort of sides. One of which is like you said, you know, the goal of ABA is about behavior. What behavior do we want? What behavior do we not want? There are many times where that over emphasis on just the behavior misses, like something more important. And so you know, we're applying these sort of like heavy rewards and punishments to try and elicit a behavior we want. And we end up harming the child, or we end up targeting a behavior that doesn't, why did we do that. And that makes sense to me why we would say like, there are other ways we can help this child with communication, there are other ways we can help this child with a stimulation or social skills or making friends. Because that's the other part is like, for a child that already has difficulty understanding social cues and using communication. And so you put that together, and that may be a child that struggles to connect, but then we put them in an environment where all the connection is based on doing the right thing, performing the right thing. And maybe I'm projecting a little because I went through such heavy behaviorism therapy as a child where that was kind of the result for me. And it seems like that's kind of what the criticism boils down to, is, you know, has heavy emphasis on just seeming normal at the expense of a child having quality of life. Yeah,

    Taylor 44:04

    and I so the one of the main things I teach now, the first thing I tried to teach a kid and call it the gate, told me no. And I took over a case and I was trying to go over a greetings with one of my clients and I was at their home and he was getting out of his chair, he walked to his caregiver, things just kind of clearly antsy. And I was like, if you don't want to do this, just say missing, I don't want to do this right now. And he repeated me and I was like, okay, and then we moved on in the mom was like, you're allowed to do that. And she was like all of the ABA have ever received, he would have had to sit at that chair and go through those greetings to get out of his chair. And I was like, why? If he doesn't feel comfortable with me doing the greetings and that goes back to what you were saying is I don't have a good relationship with with him right now. And we need to film that we need to focus on pairing and building that relationship and it goes back again. The issue is like, TRICARE sees it at Oregon I always say TRICARE cuz I'm Working with TRICARE but health insurance sees it yeah.

    KC 44:59

    But insurance, that's what the other part is like to get access to. So a lot of people don't know this. But if you have commercial health insurance in the US, and you have a child with an autism diagnosis, typically what that gives you access to the insurance will cover is speech therapy, occupational therapy and ABA. And what a lot of people don't know is that like your speech therapy is anywhere from one to maybe five hours a week, your ot could be anywhere between one to five hours a week. But ABA, you can get up to 40 hours a week. And so if you have a child that can't really go to school, or you know, can't function can't, you know, is hurting themselves, and they need that much therapy, that's your only option unless you are able to pay out of pocket for a different kind of therapy. So I just wanted to mention that because it's the health insurance that I think I don't think created the problem, but certainly keeps the problem going. Because their emphasis on show me the behavior change, not show me how this child is better able to communicate their needs, show me how this child made a friend today. So that's interesting. But then I want to go to the other side of it, because you said something that I think is really poignant. And I think sometimes gets lost in this conversation. You said, you know, there are adult autistic adults that maybe they're living at home, maybe they're living in a group home. And because they did not get access to anything that helped them either extinguish or redirect injurious behavior. They are now 35 year old 250 pound men who are being restrained by three people, because they can't not bash their head on the wall until they become unconscious.

    Taylor 46:59

    Yeah, and I think that's the side of ABA that nobody talks about, especially on tick tock is what happens when somebody becomes an adult, right, and what happens, like, you know, parents, typically, you know, the kids outlive the parents, too. So I understand, like, you know, every beaver doesn't need to be targeted. But we do need to do our best to make these visuals as independent as possible. Because eventually, they're gonna get pushed out to the real world, or they're going to be in these group homes. And the group hubs are lovely, I go, when I give them consulting advice, I help them out. But it's hard for some of them because their parents come and visit them, and then they leave. And then you know, the person is still there, because they can't handle their behaviors anymore. Like they can't push like, I can't have you be that aggressive, and my home, and you outweigh me at this point. And it is sad. It is sad. And it's hard. I've had some clients that are 56 years old, that still nobody took the time to teach them to go to the bathroom, and they're still in diapers at this point. And it's so much we call it a history of reinforcement. But it's so difficult at this point, to try to teach them how to use the bathroom when it's been six years of them in diapers. So it's difficult. And I guess in California, what's happening is they weren't in state hospitals, and the husband explained to me is there's been so much trauma associated with the state hospitals, that the governor has started shutting them down. And they're pushing them out to the community, because what was happening is, you know, they're isolating these individuals, instead of allowing them to be within the community. And that happened to me when I was a kid in school. I never saw any of those special needs students, they were in the back corners, like segregated, basically, from everybody. And I think a lot is changing in the world. And people are way more accepting of individuals that have any type of neurodiversity than we're trying to give them like all of my clients have community out of goals, where they just go out into the community, whether it's a park, Target, whatever, they just go out once a week, get out of the house, stop segregating people. But yeah, it does happen. And it's hard. And I don't like to talk about because I don't want to scare parents into it thinking that their kids going to end up in a group home. And I don't want to scare them into receiving, quote unquote, bad ABA or bad providers either. Because you have to pick as a parent, you have to pick and you have to see, hey, is my kid gonna benefit from ABA? Or are they going to be traumatized by the ABA, and it really depends on the provider. And I tell families do not pick the first provider just because they gave it to you. If you don't like them, tell them you want a different one, if you don't agree with them.

    KC 49:25

    You know what I also asked myself as a parent, though, and this is something that I think about with, you know, my own experience with behaviorism. But I've heard that before of that question about like, okay, is ABA going to be helpful to them? Or is it going to be traumatizing to them? And I think there's even like a third door, which is like, maybe it will be distressing to them. But it's the only way to prevent them from hurting themselves or running into the street or being killed. And I don't know that that's the case. Right? So maybe there are other ways but You know, I have to say, like, especially I think when we bring in issues of race, you know, a black autistic boy is not in the same situation socially when it comes to danger as a white autistic girl. And we unfortunately saw with Elijah that, you know, if you're going to be black boy acting strange in front of police that could get you killed. And I think that there's a lot of this space that sometimes I think there's a lot of very vocal things coming from the sort of low support needs adult autistic community, a lot of the late diagnosed community. And I think it's really valid. Like, I can't overemphasize how much that has helped me listening to autistic adults, but I think it does just by the nature of who can communicate and who struggles to communicate doesn't quite give you the big picture about like, what does the spectrum look like. And if you're a family, and I think also, it's like, we can have theoretical conversations about like, this is ideal for a child, this is not ideal for a child. But then as a parent, you go in go, oh, wait, but my insurance will only pay for ABA. And, you know, we're a family of color, and my child is already at high risk of violence, and they're biting themselves until they bleed every time, you know, they have to be around the sound they don't like. And, you know, like, it's kind of like the realities of it are a little more nuanced. And as a parent, it's difficult to engage in those realities, when sort of like everyone's screaming at you from both sides, both saying like ABA is abuse, and then people being like you're abusing your kid by not putting them in ABA. And so let me ask you this. How do you and you've, I feel like you've answered this all along. But you know, when you're practicing? Well, first of all, knowing all of that, what made you want to be a BCBA?

    Taylor 51:59

    So it's a good question. So actually, one of my he's my cousin, but it's almost like my dad's best friend, not blood related, but his kid anyways, he's autistic. And so I think he's maybe like four or five years younger than me, I spent so much time with him. I always knew I wanted to work with kids. And I always wanted to work with kids that have developmental disabilities. So when I was doing my undergrad, I was looking at being a special ed teacher. And I'll be frank, I looked at how much they got paid. And I was like, I don't know, if the amount of work I'm going to have to do is worth that much money, because it wasn't that much. And we call that ratio strain in this field, but the amount of work and the amount of reward that I was going to get, I was looking at it, and I was like, that's not it. So then I was like, maybe I'll do you know, child psychology. So that's why I then started doing psychology during this time that was in the military. And so I did my time I got out of the military. And I was on indeed looking for entry level jobs. Because when I was in the military, I was a police officer, right, that doesn't translate. So I need an entry level job to restart. And I found RBT. And I literally had my master's degree already. And I applied to be an RVT. And I was like, Oh, this is great. I love this. And then I started pursuing it. It was great working under so many BCBAs because I saw what was really good. And I saw some really, really not great BCBAs. And I really learned very quickly, what kind of BCBA I want it to be and what things we could do, but they're just choosing not to do because of some weird rule that they kind of made up like, you know, you have to ignore all the attention seeking behaviors. I was like, but nobody said that nobody, nobody, the text didn't say that. The test didn't say that. Nobody said that. So it's almost like the stigma in this culture that some PCBs have and they call them bcva holes is what some people refer to us as because they can be very cold, clinical and unkind to kids. So yeah, that's how I got here.

    KC 53:54

    Okay, I have another question. But before, you know, one of the things that happens a lot when you talk about ABA is people who are pro ABA will often say, Well, you know, yeah, there are some bad BCBAs out there. But there are also some good ones like the issue isn't the system of ABA. The issue isn't the philosophy of ABA, like the issue is just, it's like any profession, there are good doctors and bad doctors, there are good therapists and bad therapists. To me. That seems like an oversimplification. Like I would agree that there are definitely I mean, I think one is right here on with me on the phone, right like there are BCBAs, who have made it their job to be informed to not do harm to understand autism. But I don't know Do you agree with me like is that too much of a simplification? I

    Taylor 54:44

    think a better comparison, honestly, as an African American, I'm going to say this would be to compare us to police officers. I think there are some really good police officers. And I think there's some really bad police officers and based off of the culture of being a police officer and And then we go back to the power that police officers have, some of them choose to do good with it. And some of them treat and dehumanize human beings and treat them like like trash. And I feel I don't even like telling people I'm obese, I took my tick tock down for like a month, and then I went to kalaba. And people were coming up to me, and they were like, You should bring it back, blah, blah, blah. And because I just didn't even want to tell people I was a BCBA. Because I don't even want to be associated with this like, negative segment. Like I have autistic adults coming in my I had to block one because she's like, you're an ableist this out in the third. And I'm like, I don't think you've watched three of my videos, you would know, I'm not an analyst, but they just assume because I am a BCBA. Just like when I see a police officer, I tense up and I get nervous around them. That's the comparison I would make. I wouldn't compare us the teachers or doctors because there's not a culture like there is at least to my understanding about teachers and doctors like there is for BCBAs Yeah, I

    KC 55:55

    think that what I've been learning feels like a really apt and frankly, I think it is kind of a nuanced comparison. Because, yes, like, I can find individual police officers that aren't going to be black people. And the police officer that stands outside of my kid's school and directs traffic is like a real human being. And you know, he might be doing the best he can to, you know, be just in whatever, whatever. And I know I'm oversimplifying the metaphor, so forgive me for that. But right, the system itself tends to create, like, you have to go so against the grain. And I think when you describe like, the way that BCBAs get trained the way things that they're not trained on the language that gets used the dehumanizing language, the gaps in skills, the lack of sort of affirming neurodiversity, and then the influence of the insurances. Like, it creates bad actors. But I also think that, you know, a lot of parents might be in the situation where ABA is the only kind of therapy they can access. And I think to your point, though, is that like, all hope is not lost. Right? And that there might be a time when a family decides the most important thing right now is that we extinguish this behavior, because it is so dangerous to this child, or to my other children, or whatever. And they might choose to use ABA. And it sounds like, you know, you can definitely find someone who can operate within that framework, with respect and without trauma. And so you were talking about some of the ways that you mitigate harm that you try to do those sort of things. So tell us a little bit more about that. Yeah, so

    Taylor 57:43

    when I get a new client, the first thing is I try to so by the time I get a parent, I already know that they had to talk to the doctor about everything that their kids going through, they had to then talk to the the case manager, they've had to fill out all these questionnaires. So the first thing I ask is, what are your child's strengths? What are some things you're really proud about your child? What are some things you know, that you're really happy about? Like, try to frame that conversation to be a little positive? What's something that you want to see more of? Right? And then I explained to them whether I can or cannot work on that one of my most recent clients, the parents say, hey, you know, is she ever gonna talk? Right? And I'm like, I can't tell you yes or no, I can't give you that information. I can tell you, I can do my best to like reinforcer for speaking. But I recommend you know, you get a speech therapist and a lot of people on Tik Tok don't realize that, like you're saying, a lot of families don't have access to all these providers, especially in California, my client, she's too, she didn't get speech therapy until she turned three. She's on the waitlist for a year. And we know how crucial language development is, at these early years, there is a waitlist for everything and California. It's like

    KC 58:51

    that here to tailor like I'm trying to get we moved to a different county. So I'm trying to get this county to do an assessment so that my kid can go to school, and they're telling me they're on a year long way.

    Taylor 59:02

    So that's what I do first, and then we talk about, you know, things that need we call them maladaptive behaviors, so anything, you know, behaviors that are occurring that you would like to see less of, and this is where as a DC, I have some tough conversations, some of the behaviors, I'm like, hey, look, I'm not concerned with that. And I tell them, and they're like, Well, I don't want to see it anymore. And I was like, I have had I told my mother, I was like, my job isn't to make your child neurotypical passing, right. That's not my job to teach your child all the skills that can make them as independent as possible for them specifically, right if your kids humming weather watching their iPad in the comfort of their home now I can target that because she was like very annoyed by like

    KC 59:43

    tell them to go to just weird because like kids are annoying kids are an omen on my like that is not a trait of autistic children. Okay, kids are annoying. My son

    Taylor 59:53

    is in the mama face. He will not stop saying mama and it drives me up a wall. I get overstimulated by noise the mama Ma'am, I'm so yeah, I have to have some real conversations. And I think this is the part as a BCBA. Where somebody CPAs but yeah, we're target that. Yeah, we'll target that for change, right. And you have to say no as a BCBA. Yeah. Can I target that for change? Sure. And can I create a program that's going to make that decrease? Sure, is not going to be frustrating, because there was some type of function and probably a self stimulatory function that I just removed from that client. So now I need to replace it. But why do I need to replace it? Right? Just let them be. So for me, less is more. I've seen reports had like 40 goals for kids. That's insane to me, like no more than like, 15 to 20 goals. And that's like a max, for me. Less is more. And honestly, the less goals you put on for health insurance, then the less work you have to really do as long as you're making progress on these little amount of goals. But BCBAs they like big numbers, big progress, and it's too much, it's too much while you're not going to teach a three year old 40 things in six months. That's a lot like why are you putting that pressure on yourself? So yeah, it's a lot of conversation. And it's a lot of back and forth. Sometimes I'm like, Hey, your kids fine. And I like while he does this, he has tantrums. And I was like, does he have tantrums and near typical level, right? Because kids have tantrums. Kids have outbursts, kids have meltdowns. They're human beings, they have emotions. And like, or is it happening at a high frequency? Is it happening five times an hour? Or is it happening for like six hours in a row? Right, where he's just upset all day long? Or is he having is he upset because you said he can revise things for dinner? Five minutes later, he's fine. If so that's pretty typical. Like I'm not going to. So I also don't hold on a lot of these days will hold on to kids just to Bill, I'm not going to do that. If a kid doesn't need ABA, the kid doesn't need ABA, I had a 15 year old, he came up to me was an assessment and I was doing this assessment in school pletely vocal doesn't have any mouth, self interest behaviors. And the parents were like, well, we just want him to make friends. And I was like, wouldn't take into a social skills group are

    KC 1:02:07

    taken to the park or taken

    Taylor 1:02:08

    to the mall I was like, and then the 15 year old was like, I don't really want to make friends. And I was like, well, then he doesn't have to, if he doesn't want to make friends right now, I'm not going to provide an ABA therapy as a woman and take him somewhere and force him to go talk to somebody and make a friend. Like that's just inhumane. Like if he wants to be a recluse and play his games and be left alone. Let him be. So a lot of the times it's parents putting expectations on their kids for what they want them to be,

    KC 1:02:37

    instead of just letting like the therapist and me is like, Okay, why don't you want to make friends because maybe he does not feel a need for those connections. He's got got enough connections in my life, or maybe, right, because he's a 15 year old, he does want friends. But he's now had so many negative distressing interactions with kids that have pushed him back picked on him, not including him, that he's just decided it's more simple to not want friends than to get my heart broken over and over and over and feel so weird, right? And it's like, Okay, if that's really the issue, then like you said, taking him to a mall and giving him praise every time he talks to someone is not going to

    Taylor 1:03:20

    solve that issue. And it's gonna be awkward and just weird like for me to do that with him. And I was like, go and I was like, as a parent, you can enroll him in something that he might not want to participate in. He really I really liked video games, and they like card games. And they have those like, gatherings where they play like Magic the Gathering and stuff. So those are the recommendations I made. I was like, enroll them in something, maybe haven't go see like a psychological therapist, but I was like, and it was at a clinic and all the kids at the clinic were like five and below. And I was like, I'm not gonna like he's not gonna sit here with five year old 15 year old and make friends. Like that's just not we call it client. That's not maintaining client dignity at that point in forcing him to walk around a mall with me is also not maintaining his dignity, because it's just weird. Stuff like that. So I do I turn families away. I'm like, I understand you've got an autism diagnosis, and the doctor said ABA, but it's literally just an assessment. It doesn't mean that you need ABA.

    KC 1:04:13

    What does a typical ABA session look like? Like if somebody has no idea they've never seen it? Or is there a typical, like what kinds of things might I see in an ABA session? So

    Taylor 1:04:24

    there should not be a go ABA session.

    KC 1:04:26

    There isn't ABA, as you said, there should not be a typical, yeah, it's

    Taylor 1:04:30

    individualized. So every child, every setting is going to be different. But I can talk about the three main setting. So the first is in home, right? So the that means the RBT and PCA, they come into your home and they run the session. Typically the first couple sessions, we call it pairing and that just means I'm not reading any program. I'm not seeing any demands. I'm just getting to know the kid right? We'll just play it's basically play pairing in other words,

    KC 1:04:57

    why don't have to call it something so we yours. Listen, when

    Taylor 1:05:01

    I'm teaching RVTs about ABA, I literally say I'm like a bunch of older, highly educated, Caucasian men came up with all this jargon, to overcomplicate

    KC 1:05:12

    it pairing pairing. It's like, okay, it blows my mind that like, we think that the problem is like autistic kids ability to interact with people, when clearly someone with no social skills at all was like, Hello, I'd like to pair with you just pair it with the specimen. So

    Taylor 1:05:35

    it's so much jargon. It's so much jargon, but it basically just means playing and getting to know the kid, right? That's gonna be with the

    KC 1:05:41

    first time God, why can't they just call it playing or rapport building

    Taylor 1:05:45

    rapport building as well, they call it rapport building.

    KC 1:05:47

    They're not a Bluetooth device. Yeah, I know. I know. But that's what

    Taylor 1:05:50

    it typically looks like. So it's just playing, right? Yeah.

    KC 1:05:57

    I have to have one other outburst about this. It is so bizarre to take something as natural and human as trust and connection and turn it into this cold clinical transaction is very transactional, the language I don't want you to pair with my kid, I want you to think she's cool. And like her and enjoy her and have you know, and I want you to connect with her not she's not a project. She's not a Bluetooth device. Yeah, that's

    Taylor 1:06:31

    why people say ABA can be manipulative. And I think it's based off that language. Like I'm playing with you. I'm pairing with your for the intent that you're like me. And after then we can work on these things later. But yeah, so that's what it will look like. It's basically playing and then your start running session. So I always advocate for net, which is natural environment teaching. That just means you continue to play with the kid, but you find natural opportunities to run certain targets. So let's say I'm teaching the kid to identify No, I'm sorry. I'm teaching the kid. Let's say I'm teaching the kid identify blue, right? We're teaching colors, natural environment teaching, I'd be like, Hey, can you hear me the blue dinosaur? And then they have a good time. So Oh, thanks. Yeah, that's cool. Cool. Done. Right. The other one is called dTT, which is discrete trial teaching. This is the one the internet hates, I am strongly opposed to it. And this is the one that internet hates. But it's basically I wish to have any stimuli. It's called stimuli. But usually, the kid I was sitting at the table was a token board associated, they have to earn a certain amount of tokens. And then it's very clinical. So there might be two pictures, ones, blue ones green, and it's like touch blue. They touch blue. Oh, that's blue. You got to token. It's very like you're saying it's actual, it's not as natural. No clinic should be all dTT are on that. Because some kids I've worked on, they don't want me to ask them questions. When they're playing. They're literally say I don't want it. They're literally say, Can we do this, and then I can play by myself, right? Some kids can do it naturally. And they want to actually just be playing the whole time. Some of them really want to earn a token really want to be done and left alone.

    KC 1:08:09

    Like for my kids, I don't want token boards used. But my kids love a quiz see exactly like they would love to sit there and be like, Hmm, flashcards, like I don't know, we're just kind of a nerdy family. But like, they genuinely really enjoy that. And they don't need a token board. They don't need like, extra stuff. They just think it's fun to learn stuff. And so they'll sit there with flashcards and go, Oh, that's the blue one, two, and three. I mean, you know what I mean, I've got a kid, like, Let's do math games. So I see what you're saying where it's like, some kids might like that, or might enjoy that some kids might get frustrated if you try to do it via play. Because they're kind of like, no, that's you're not letting me lead the play or whatever, right. And then some kids might be more frustrated at the table. So that makes sense to me.

    Taylor 1:08:55

    So yeah, that's why it should be individualized. So I've worked at clinics where it was straight dTT at the table, and you're causing more behaviors that way, like the kids having a meltdown, because you have these little kids who a neurotypical child would not be sitting at a table for four hours, but you expect a child with autism to be sitting at the table for this long, and they get to leave the table to play. And it's like they have to earn the right to play, which I don't prove up. So typically what I do if I'm doing in home, and if I happen to be doing dTT, I bring my own toys that I paid for, right? I control these toys that are mine, if you want to play with my toys, and we have to do this, if you don't want to play with my toys, that's fine. We'll come play with something that you want to play with, right? So that way, it's not like I can't control your stuff in your house. Like it's your stuff. You're not

    KC 1:09:39

    taking away their toy and saying you get it back when you tell me what blue is. That makes sense.

    Taylor 1:09:44

    I control access to my stuff. And if they're if they call it negate if they say for me if they say I don't want to do that, okay, what do you want to do instead? Well, I want to play with this. Oh, well, if you want to play this, then we have to do that. But if you don't want to, that's fine. We can go do something else. Right? And a lot of people have a You heard that, but it really comes down to if you want to get paid, you have to go to work, you can call out and do whatever you want. But if you will get paid and get a paycheck, you have to go to work. So it's just, it's teaching them like you have options.

    KC 1:10:13

    Well, my I will say that like, occupational therapists, will do that as well, like, you know, when they're working on maybe encouraging flexible thinking, and, and a child's doing the same thing over and over and over, you know, I've seen that occupational therapists say, Okay, let's say the kids putting the Paw Patrol under the hat, and then going to the kitchen, and then coming back over drawing on a board and then coming over and taking it out and putting it into the hat and kind of doing that over and over, I've seen occupational therapist go, Okay, I'm gonna take it out from under the hat. And I'm going to put it over here, like, I'm going to make a small adjustment. And let's see how she does with that. Let's see if that distresses her. And if it doesn't, cool, let's try introducing small changes to work on that flexible thinking to work on that emotional regulation. And they do it in a really respectful way. Like, I think, to your point of saying, like, there, it's not that anytime we're seeing behavior reinforcement, it's like, oh, that's bad, and traumatizing, you know, but you're saying that we're finding a way to work on the skills that will, you know, increase their quality of life, and we can do it in a way that

    Taylor 1:11:21

    different in not snatching things out of their hands. I always have never said anything, unless it's like scissors. You know, unless it's dangerous, of course. But you're not, you need to figure out another way to get something or get them engaged or take a break, like let kids have breaks. And I just remember being trained as an RVT. There, it's called a trial or trial is I'm presenting whatever it is that I'm working on. And I were being trained that I had to present, whatever I'm working on, like I target one time per minutes of a session. So if it's an hour session, I have to ask them something 60 times, which is insane. Don't ask me something 60 times at an hour, and I'm 29 years old. That's how I was classically trained. And I had to rewire myself to be like, this is a lot of questions like, can we just chill out for a little bit?

    KC 1:12:14

    So going back to let's like, okay, you can find good BCAAs. But what makes them good is that they're completely negating their training as a BCBA. So I know that's an oversimplification. But yeah,

    Taylor 1:12:25

    but again, I'm looking at my textbook right now, that was never in the text. Nobody ever said to do a trial a minute. Nobody ever said that somewhere, or somebody said that. And that was that was the culture of that job that it worked out. But I was like, who said that? That when he said you had to do that. So again, it's like when somebody somewhere made up all these roles that don't even exist, and now everybody's following them, will

    KC 1:12:48

    tell you this has been a really great conversation. Let me ask you this as your sort of parting question. What do you see as, like, give me like three things that you think that the industry as a whole needs to do to better serve autistic people? I

    Taylor 1:13:06

    think the first thing is RVTs needs to either be supervised more frequently in terms of the minimum requirement needs to increase. Right now it's at 20%, which is not that much, I honestly feel like it should be at 50 over 50%, that would be my first thing and in the education, whether or not to say that they need a higher level of education. But in terms of more training, 40 hours is not a lot of time, that's all they need is 40 hours. And that's not a lot of time, I think there needs to be a lot more training for RBTs. If these are the people that are actually implementing the programming, they need a lot of training. That's the first thing I would say needs to change. The second thing I think, is some type of different education required for BCBAs in terms of working with this population of individuals needs to be a requirement to I know it requires ABA coursework, I think it needs to require if you're going to work in the field with people with developmental disabilities, you need to have some type of education on that maybe some empathy classes to I'm not sure, I don't know, maybe I feel like everybody just needs to study a little bit of psychology to be a little bit, you know, more empathetic, that would be the next thing, I would say new change, and then just some type of education where BCBAs to identify biases within themselves. And to understand if they're targeting a behavior for change, like we said, because I find it annoying, or am I targeting a behavior for change, because it's going to benefit the individual. And I think we have to look at ourselves as BCBAs as human beings because there's certain things that we expect other people to behave in and other people to be, but we need to take that out and look at this individual and say isn't going to benefit them yes or not? Or am I just pushing on my bias onto them and what I think they should be what I think they should act, but I think they should like you know, or is it going to benefit them? And I think we would learn as a field. There's a lot of stuff that we don't need to be working on. We don't.

    KC 1:15:04

    That's such a hard one. Because like, especially when you think about the eye contact, like, I totally can picture what the reasoning was when the when it started, right? Well, well, it's about that we want them to have relationships. And you know, in order to have relationships, you have to learn to look at people, because that's how you know what I mean. Like, I can totally see the justifications you really do have to, like you said, be trained on looking for that bias, and keeping up with current research about, like, what are the effects of some of these applications?

    Taylor 1:15:37

    Definitely, yeah, I definitely think just being aware, looking into these things, and just kind of just being a nice person, I don't know how to tell people to be good people, but just be a good, nice person and just treat people with respect and kindness. And just be nice. I think it's weird when people say I have an a progressive approach to providing ABA, because I just feel like, it makes the most sense to me. I don't understand why you would do it differently. Yeah, people say you're very liberal. And it's like, well, am I liberal? Or am I just being nice to people in

    KC 1:16:10

    general by just showing basic respect to other human beings? Yeah.

    Taylor 1:16:14

    So it's odd to me that it's such a negative stigma. So yeah, I've literally like after that conference, I was like, what else can I do? I was literally contemplating just leaving the field. Because I was like, I don't want to be associated with these people. But then I was like, again, I'm just, I'm not trying to be the, you know, the change, you know, if I just leave, because I was like, I could go back to school and do something else. Because I was like, how do we even be a BCBA? Afterwards, those people.

    KC 1:16:41

    And to be fair, like the attitudes that you're describing, they could be anywhere, like, you could have someone who's an occupational therapist, who has all those biases, who is using punishments and rewards, who is targeting the wrong behaviors, I think it does seem to be more prevalent, with BCBAs and with ABA, but I also think that, you know, the other confusing thing is like, because insurance will only do ABA, I think, now you have a bunch of clinics and settings that are calling themselves ABA, but you go in there, and they're not really doing ABA. And so it's like, oh, this is maybe an environment that is going to be helpful to my kid. And then you could go to a place that says all we do is, you know, floor time or whatever, and you go in, and it's like, these are all the same interventions and approaches and biases and goals. And you know, so it's difficult, especially as a parent when you just hear ABA is great. Aba is abuse. And you're going oh, not only is that confusing, but then if you even come to your own conclusion about what isn't isn't good for your kid. You can't even go based on what they're calling themselves.

    Taylor 1:17:50

    I agree. Yeah. And I think a lot of the issue with ABA is like we call it socially significant behavior, right? That's what we're looking, what does that mean? There's no definition. And so with speech, right, it's literally like they have, like, whatever, I don't know if it's syntax or whatever. But speech, it's very clear cut what you should be working on, it's very clear cut, there's a speech delay or a speech impediment, and how to change that. And there's no type of issue with changing that, like you're trying to change their speech, maybe the way you do it. But for us, we're doing socially significant behavior. And that's so gray. And it's so weird, because they in ABA, they're always like, you need to be objective, you need to be measurable, but then they tell us to target socially significant behavior. And that's the greatest thing possible. So yeah, I think back in like the 80s and 90s, you know, eye contact was a big deal. And now we're seeing these autistic adults saying stop doing that, because that was really significant back then. And so I think just the way we treat people with disabilities has changed as well. And we're much more accepting and I think that's why the field has changed since then. I'm assuming it's hard because I'm so new. So. So it's also funny because people like, You're the problem with ABM like I just got here. I don't know what you're talking about. I didn't do all of that stuff. I was in school. I was in high school when that happened. So it's hard but yeah, I feel like people like my friends are like, you're the martyr of tick tock for BCBA it sounds like I'll be it if I need to be it's fine. Because I don't want parents to go on tick tock type and ABA see all the negativity and then they're like, I'm not gonna do it. Right. And if they just see one of my videos and say, Oh, it can be nice, you know, I might be changing a child's life. I've never even in a meet moving in to see you when I was a parent and I went on tick tock and research ABA. I would not put my son in it if I didn't know any better. Yeah, it's scary. Well,

    KC 1:19:41

    this has been a great conversation. I thank you so much for your time. I know it took him an hour and a half of your time, but it was such a good conversation.

    Taylor 1:19:48

    Thank you so much.

    Transcribed by https://otter.ai

Christy Haussler
101: Bonus Episode: Autism (actually) Speaks with Kathleen Walker

As we continue with our series on autism, I’m joined by Kathleen Walker for today’s bonus episode. We discuss the basic criteria for autism, her experience as a child with an early diagnosis, what it’s like for an autistic person to “play by the rules” of business etiquette in the workplace, and her advice for parents of autistic children. Join us to learn more from Kathleen!

Show Highlights:

  • The first criteria for autism: “persistent deficits in social communication and social interaction”

  • Kathleen’s perspective on her social communication and interactions as an early-diagnosed child

  • Examples of how an autistic person might “miss things” in interaction and communication

  • Challenges for the autistic person in a professional career vs. in personal relationships

  • Masking and modified behaviors to be accepted

  • Kathleen’s suggestion for rewriting the DSM criteria based on communication/interaction

  • Helping autistic kids feel comfortable and navigate the world in their own ways

  • Kathleen’s experience with social difficulties around conversations, nonverbal cues, and anxiety

  • For an autistic person, connection in relationships might not be a top priority in life.

  • Kathleen’s experience with “repetitive and restrictive interests, rituals, and schedules

  • Kathleen’s advice for parents of autistic children

Resources and Links:

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • KC 0:10

    The first criteria for autism is persistent deficits and social communication and social interaction. So just taking that statement like at face value, do you feel like that applies to you.

    Kathleen 0:25

    So I do feel like there are ways that I communicate differently from allistic people or neurotypical people. And I've always felt that other people have some sort of internal programming in their head that is kind of telling them what the rules are, and what the boundaries are, and the social interactions that I just don't have that programming. But for me, personally, it's really hard to tell how much of that is really true. And how much of that is really based in my experience growing up as an autistic child, because I was diagnosed so early and put into social skills focused training so early, that it was kind of drilled into me that there are these things around you that you don't know about, you have to be on the lookout for them all the time. Be hyper aware of everyone's emotions, and however, what is reacting to you and then be able to adapt your behavior according to that. And so it's really hard to say, because that was so early on, for me how much I would feel that way, you know, without having had that training. But I know it is a really common experience, especially for autistic women and people who are assigned female at birth to grow up feeling like, you know, there's an aspect of these interactions that I'm just missing. And I think another piece of that is, I think a lot of the DSM criteria are framed in terms of deficits, obviously, because they're kind of clinical symptoms. And I work in health communications. So I have that perspective on some of this language, too, which has been really interesting to unpack some of my childhood experiences, you know, in terms of that language over the past few years. But I think the deficit framing makes it seem like there is a correct way to have these social interactions and a correct mode of communication, and you're not doing it correctly. And so that's the criteria for the diagnosis, when if you look at it objectively, at least in for my experience, just speaking for myself, I think one way of communicating is not more correct than the other, it's just that I'm being asked to assimilate into what the expectations are of people around me. And I think some people that pressure is put on them more than others. And because of my family situation that came pretty early in life. So

    KC 2:36

    you do feel like sometimes there's maybe something in the conversation that you're missing, but you're not really sure, like, am I feeling that because I was so conditioned to look for it, or to be anxious about it, or to expect there to not be something there? Or how much of this would I be feeling if I hadn't had that kind of programming?

    Kathleen 2:58

    That's exactly it is I know, at this point, and it's interesting, I've been going through therapy the past few years, and really learning about myself as an autistic person. And now that I have that perspective, I understand what that is, well, I was trained to look for these things. And sometimes there are things that part of it for me is when there's a lot of things going on, it takes me longer to process the stimuli that are happening. And there are times that I miss things, but also, why does that have to be the end of the world for everyone around me? And why do I need to be made to feel like I have to cover that. And so I think being really aware of that now I'm in a much different place that I was for most of my 20s I just felt anxious all the time and didn't understand why it was happening. Because I had this treating and this awareness of being different. But I'd point I just wanted to run away from being autistic. Because it was so much the focus of everything growing up that it was like, I can't acknowledge that nothing is about that. I'm just anxious all the time in these social situations. And there's no reason to have any context around that. And so it's really interesting now, looking back and understanding, you know where that conditioning comes in. And also, there are this aspects of how I process things differently. And both of those things can be true. And I think for a long time, it was hard to hold that both of those things can be true, if that makes sense. So

    KC 4:17

    can you give an example like if someone's listening, and they're like, Well, what do you mean miss things? And like they miss things socially? Like do you have maybe an example that you could give that might sort of illustrate that for us? I

    Kathleen 4:31

    think there's a few situations where I tend to feel more self conscious of these type of traits. And there's a lot of situations where you know, people might be just implying, I think it honestly it comes up most often in work situations for me because that's where I tend to be really most self conscious of these things. Often there's an implication of oh, we're not supposed to tell this person this thing or this person isn't supposed to have this information or we're just all going with this polite fiction, but we're not going to acknowledge that or say what we're doing. And and I think I've learned to recognize is patterns of the way people communicate, especially within organizations. I think that's tricky for me. Because my instinct is to say, well, everyone needs all the information, or else we're wasting time. And that doesn't make sense to me. And I feel like I know a more logical way to do things. I ran into trouble earlier in my career, because I would just say what I thought the problem was, and you weren't supposed to acknowledge the problem, or things like that, depending on your job, it can be a big gray area, and there can be situations that would be challenging for anyone to navigate. But for me, it feels like I'm coming into that situation without understanding what these unspoken boundaries are. And as I've learned to advocate for myself more and actually share my opinion as part of my job. I think there's this interesting thing that happens, where when you're not making every decision based out of fear or trying to hide or cover up, then you have to decide, well, then what is it worth it to speak up about these things? And you know, when is it worth it to take the risk and know that people might think I'm annoying, because I'm pointing out the elephant in the room, the

    KC 6:17

    professional world would be harder, because at least in personal relationships, there's like a degree of intimacy you can get with someone where you're speaking really freely, whereas professionally, there really are so many unwritten rules about what you do out what you don't talk about, I have worked in a couple of places where I was an executive, and it really hit me when you were talking about like, oh, this person isn't supposed to know that. Because you could talk about somebody's job performance. And it's like, understood that you're not going to walk out of this room and talk to that person about it, right? might become an official thing at some point, or like, Hey, we're really thinking that this person is not gonna make it or like, Hey, we're gonna make some internal chefs. But obviously, you're gonna do a bunch of work in the background before, you know, six months later, roll that out to whatever staff, it totally makes sense to me. I mean, we're just so over the top I think it workplaces with being with with etiquette,

    Kathleen 7:13

    I think it's interesting the ways that that shows up because it leaves out a lot of people. And it's not only autistic people, though, I think that's a big part of it. But people that didn't get socialized into the the corporate etiquette or business etiquette or, you know, people that didn't have that internship experience that is often unpaid in college, or all of those things. We're not giving everyone the rulebook. And that's really frustrating to me, I think I do have a pet peeve about kind of unspoken expectations. And that's a thing that shows up and showed up for me when I was growing up as well, I think my family often just expected me to kind of pick up on things and you know, guess when I'm supposed to go help out with the tours or something like that. And when it didn't happen, I would be lazy, or, you know, I'm not complying with the rules or, and, and it's so weird to me looking back on it, because they were so hyper aware of autism. And yet, it's like, they didn't understand the internal experience of that, to the point that they're just focusing on, you're not coming to wash the dishes, you know, you're you're focused on your buck, and you don't want to get up and interact with B or whatever it is,

    KC 8:26

    you know, it's when you're talking about that, you know, I took both of my girls to the pool yesterday, we have like a neighborhood pool. And, you know, trying to help your kids learn social skills is really nuanced. Like, yeah, you know, my, my five year old is not autistic. But even then it's like, okay, so you know, she's playing with a friend. And there's another kid that's kind of like, doing the what I call like, the distance, which is like, Okay, I want to be close enough that you can see that I want to play, but not so close that you feel like I'm intruding. I'm just hoping you notice me and tell me I can, right? And so sort of letting her know, like, hey, when you see someone kind of standing there and just looking at you, they're probably waiting for you to ask them if they want to play. So she's like, okay, great. So we talk about like, oh, including, including, including, but then like, you know, there'll be a little girl that will start being kind of mean, I'll be like, Okay, so when someone's mean to you, we don't You don't have to play with them. And then you can see her like looking at me like yeah, so that gave me one instruction, like always be inclusive. But then there's this other instruction about like, don't play people that are mean, you can just like see her

    Kathleen 9:39

    being like, like, how do those two How do I reconcile these two things? Yeah, exactly.

    KC 9:45

    Because for I think for many non autistic adults, there's a part of understanding how those two quote unquote rules go together. That's just intuitive. Yeah,

    Kathleen 9:54

    totally. Yeah.

    KC 10:00

    For kids, it's not intuitive, but I could see how it never becomes intuitive.

    Kathleen 10:05

    So early in childhood, I think I kind of learned to build a really sophisticated mask is that I think a lot of people pick up masking just, you know, naturally in terms of oh, people respond better to me when I do XYZ behaviors. But for me, that was explicitly taught. And so that was very much, you know, you have to pick up on all these rules, and you need to be constantly watching what other people are doing and modifying your behavior. And it's, so it feels like such a double edged sword, because I think, you know, I can't guess where I would be, if I didn't learn those skills, you know, I might not be able to basketball enough to have a full time job, because there are so many pieces of the workplace that are those type of expectations, just in terms of culture, and understanding how to navigate the workplace. And, you know, I might not be able to do a lot of the things that I've done if I haven't, hadn't had that sort of training. But at the same time, it really was traumatic in a certain way, that has caused a lot of problems. For me with being able to maintain relationships and being able to maintain communication, I think I was just alienated from myself, in a really profound way that is hard to really explain. It's so interesting, watching kind of the dialogue about masking the last couple of years, especially on social media, I don't think we really had that term. When I was younger, I know people used to talk about, you know, imitating other people or social rules and all of that, but I don't, I wasn't aware of the term masking, you know, as a kid. And it's so interesting to watch the ways that people talk about it. But it's also a really complex choice. Because, you know, once you're no longer making every decision out of this subconscious, like, I have to cover everything up and not let anybody know that I have these certain traits, then it becomes kind of this complex decision process of is it okay, if this person thinks that I'm a little strange? And you know, is it okay that I'm, they don't like my body language, or whatever it is. And that's a different calculus for everybody. And I think I'm seeing a lot more nuanced conversation about it now, which is great. Because I think, you know, I do have certain privilege that protects me, just being a white woman out in the world that other people have a lot greater risks, if they were to look unusual, or behave in certain ways. But there is a risk for me just especially, you know, going back to the workplace, like, a few people know that I'm autistic, I haven't officially disclosed and, you know, I, I ended up kind of having opportunities to share my perspective on disability topics at work working in health communication. And people seem to really appreciate that perspective, but then they often don't realize when they're perpetuating kind of the invisible rules of the workplace in the same moment. So yeah, it can be tricky, because, you know, I've gotten feedback on things that I'm like, Well, that's an autistic trait, and I don't know how much I'll be able to change that. And, you know, I can learn, but I've already been learning for 30 years. So you know, I don't know if that's really going to improve. And so there can be this reality that you can be really good at your job. And, you know, in certain situations, if people don't like you, that's going to be a problem. And, you know, you have to figure out how to respond to that. So it can be really complicated.

    KC 13:28

    How would you write that statement differently? Like, as I'm listening to, you kind of describe, like, how you experience maybe like, that different form of communication and trying to interact with that, like, neurotypical sort of prevailing culture, you know, if if you had to write like that line of the DSM, you know, what would it like? How could you rewrite that that would better describe your, whether their difficulties or your relationships or your interaction with that aspect of your autism?

    Kathleen 14:01

    I would say it's a direct communication style. It's a way of communicating that focuses on content, rather than subjective emotional responses or context, I would say it's just a different communication style, rather than, you know, necessarily being a worse communication style than the norm.

    KC 14:25

    What I find sort of interesting whenever I talk to people who are autistic, and there's there really is that heavy emphasis on like, you know, something that's literal, something that's concrete, the content of what we're talking about, I'm not really tuned in to the emotional aspect. And one of the things that I've noticed I noticed this more with like younger autistic people, is that they'll say like, I'm not, you know, the the emotional stuff doesn't make sense to me. I only care about the content and only focus on the content. And sometimes that almost morphs into this. I idea that like, I'm above irrational emotional experiences. Yeah, the truth is like, even if you're autistic, you have emotions and emotions are always logged on. So like, you might experience some of that dysregulation or defensiveness or feeling uncomfortable or awkward, like any of those things that don't make sense. And so I'm curious from your perspective, like, if you've seen that on maybe on social media, or with other artistic brands, or even in yourself, and kind of how do those two things play where it's like, well, you know, I just prefer content, but at the same time, it doesn't make you not an emotional human being.

    Kathleen 15:44

    There's a couple of sides to that. And I think one is, I also feel like I'm a really intuitive person, and I do pick up on people's emotions really strongly. And I think, especially when I was growing up, you know, I was born in 1991. And that was really the beginning of the public understanding of autism. And a lot of ways in there was this perception of autistic people just don't have feelings. I think there's been a little bit more nuance with that over time, but it's still kind of a stereotype. And I felt kind of confused by that, because I felt like I was picking up the emotions of everyone around me, and I'm really, you know, strongly connecting with whatever is going on in the household, I'm feeling those emotions. So to me, it seems like they're almost two different systems, like there's an emotional system, and I might really connect with how someone is feeling. But there's the separate system of communication in terms of the words and the content of speech. And I guess, things are just kind of in two different buckets. For me, it's, it's not always the same pathway. Because of of having that social skills training, I

    KC 16:45

    think I do pick up on a lot of emotional cues and conversation, it's really interesting that you say that, because I think that your that's you like hit the nail on the head in terms of, it's not that you don't possess the emotional aspect of it, where you have emotions, you see emotions, you understand emotions, you pick up, there is that intuitive, emotional stuff. But I think for like a neurotypical person, those pathways are like entwined, right, the content, you know, pathways. And so the ability to kind of understand something in like this big kind of bundled up wire that has all those different wires in it, like the communication is going through all of that at once. And it's interesting, your description of it's not that I can't do both of those things. It's that like, they are in two separate wires. And I'm not really processing a piece of information through both of those channels simultaneously, like other people sometimes appear to be,

    Kathleen 17:45

    it feels like kind of two separate processes for me. And I can understand what you mean about people maybe having a kind of a sense of superiority or a sense of, oh, I'm rational, I'm not emotional. And, you know, I think sometimes that can go to a place that's not productive. And I can see how that could lead to, you know, really dangerous thinking. And I do see that sometimes on social media. But I think I had a little bit of that perspective, when I was a teenager, probably, because I think the way that I reacted to, you know, learning, Oh, you, you really have to watch out for all these things and take care of other people's emotions all the time and make sure everyone else is comfortable. And it wasn't about me at all. The way I reacted to that was, well, I'm different. And I'm going to be who I am and to claim any type of autonomy that I could have. And one way that that showed up was, you know, I always love learning. And, you know, I'm not as great at memorization, which is one way that I think that's common among some autistic people that I was, quote, unquote, gifted in certain areas. And I'm a writer, and I would get a lot of commentary from teachers and students about my writing and how talented I was, and etc. And I think that was something I really clung on to because it was like that something positive about my self identity that I can build, you know, my sense of self around, and I didn't feel like well, other people are stupid, why are they communicating this way?

    KC 19:21

    Every teenager, you know, has this, here's what I'm good at. And so let's lean into that, because that feels good. And so, yeah, I appreciate that perspective. And I wonder too, like, when you talk about having an intuitive sense of people's emotions, how much of that do you feel like is maybe inherently intuitive? And how much of that do you feel like was perhaps a result of, for lack of a better term and some low grade trauma where it was almost like a survival like you had to sort of pattern recognition, things that are happening? anything so that you could kind of keep a hold of what was happening? Yeah, I

    Kathleen 20:04

    think that's intertwined in an interesting way for me, because it's, I do think I've always just had an intuitive sense of what other people are feeling. But I think what I really learned to recognize was those external cues in terms of how was this person responding to me? You know, how is this person? What face are they making? What behaviors are they doing, etc. And that almost comes down to maybe the split between content and emotion too, because it's kind of like that's the third thing is recognizing the body language cues, or, you know, how this person is acting. Whereas I think the way that I maybe naturally feel emotions is more just really intuitive in terms of picking up on their, almost their vibe, I know a better word for it, but just picking up on their energy, and their vibe, and maybe not necessarily being able to label that. But feeling like I'm on their wavelength, and I'm feeling what they're feeling. versus, you know, I think what I really learned how to do was to pick up on those cues that they're giving off. And I think what was really interesting when you mentioned, you know, teaching kids to understand social skills, is I do think that's important for all kids. And I think everybody was doing what they could with information they had, I look at it as kind of a bad game of telephone, in that it was very early. And like our cultural understanding of autism, they were really damaging messages out there, you've probably heard like some of the Autism Speaks commercials with the scary voiceover like that's what was out there. And these vaccine claims that were being legitimized about vaccines causing autism, which is fascinating from a public health perspective to me now. But all of that was kind of what was circulating out there. And then based on my mother basically raised me almost as as almost as a single parent, and based on her own context, and her own, you know, emotional situation and personality, the way that she interpreted those things was, you have to give this child a normal life, which is, I think, a thing that a lot of parents of disabled kids think, but to her that meant, everything has to be about that kind of masking and presenting to a social standard and behaving normally. And I think that's just what was out there in the water at that time. And she wasn't alone in that. But the way that she interpreted those things through her own lens, was what caused a lot of that damage. And so it's really hard to put your finger on, you know, oh, there's this, of course, I shouldn't have gone to speech therapy or something like that, because I'm sure aspects of that were helpful. But it also, you know, that's where that that double edged sword comes in of, you know, I think, looking back on it now, and seeing a lot of the messaging that's out there today, I think a lot of it could have been presented more as let's help this child be successful in the way that they want to be successful, or maybe be independent, which is even a loaded concept in and of itself. I think a

    KC 23:08

    lot about that, well, how can I teach my daughter to understand the people around her so that she has the information without imparting that she needs to conform to the people around? Yeah, I think because, you know, you want to them to understand, but you also don't want to give this message that, you know, you can't be who you are,

    Kathleen 23:35

    I actually enjoy reading young adult and middle grade books. And you know, I've read some some of those books recently that are by autistic authors and about, you know, autistic kids stories. And one thing that I've noticed is a common theme is when you see supportive parents in the story, they're kind of playing this role of, you know, how can I help this kid be successful? And also, you know, help them feel comfortable in the world and help them navigate the world on their own terms, but also, you know, walk this line of teaching the social skills. And I think it's really about the framing, and that, you know, is it we're trying to support this child and help this child or are we help trying to help them fit in, and I think that's really a mindset. But at the same time, I know, it's such a gray area, because until that bias leaves our society and I think that's really hard to accomplish. Kids are when they grow up, they're going to have to navigate you know, if they want to work in a corporate environment, or if they want to, you know, fit into certain parts of society. They do have to navigate like, these are the ways that people are going to respond to you and you need to pick up on some of these behaviors. To me,

    KC 24:47

    I sort of think of it as the difference between communicating, you should say thank you versus when neurotypical people interact, and they give you something they typically expect to hear. Thank you. And if they don't, they typically read that as, as you're not seeing gratitude. Like you could explain what's going on without making it like you're a new shoe holder is wrong if you don't do this, but that's such a high level of thinking that it's like, okay, you could have that conversation with a 12 year old problem. Yeah, like Canada. Meantime, how do you help your four year old, though? So it gets really tricky. Did you do ABA?

    Kathleen 25:25

    So the therapies that I went to were not my family doesn't remember them being labeled as ABA, I had speech therapy that was very social skills focused, and then occupational therapy. But just based on the time period, I think it's really unlikely that there were not aspects of ABA in that, you know, I think that's that's also an interesting distinction that I think a lot of the narratives that I see, you know, from autistic adults today are either late diagnosed, which is, I think it's really important to share those experiences and focus on you know, the trauma of not knowing that you're autistic is really important. And then there's people who are survivors of ABA. And I don't see a lot of people me that, you know, were harmed by these systems, but it wasn't explicitly called ABA. I've definitely learning about people's experiences in ABA, I think that's, it's kind of a similar conditioning, if that makes sense. Well, and

    KC 26:24

    it sounds like, at the end of the day, being an autistic person and interacting in a neurotypical world is inherently traumatic. And so yeah, I think that's there's, there's no like, perfect parental response or perfect therapy or perfect, like, oh, and so there's this sort of like, okay, well, even even when you get maybe the best out that that's possible, as far as a parental response, or a therapy or an environment or whatever, there's still going to be trauma and difficulty and they're still going to be and I don't mean, like life ending trauma, but like, you're still going to look back and go. It's unfortunate, like, there just was no way for a for me to get shepherded into this particular world, in a way that wasn't going to leave some, like, significant bumps and bruises in my psyche.

    Kathleen 27:23

    I think for me, just because of the time period that I grew up, it was so unusual for girls to be diagnosed at that time, and I was diagnosed as a toddler really early. I have wondered, you know, what would have happened if I just wasn't identified? And that's a sliding doors moment that we can't know. Yeah, I see a lot of people that were late diagnosing, Oh, if only I knew, you know, everything would have been better. It would have been this great experience of knowing myself, it is traumatic not to know yourself. And I can only imagine, it's also a really hard experience to have people reacting to you negatively and not understand the reason why or not understand where those differences are coming from. That's just a different type of trauma to unpack. But there's also I think a lot of people don't realize the ways that diagnosis can cause harm, and especially in the historical context of Yeah, what information did parents really have at that time? And you know, what was really going on in her culture at that time? That was like, just a lot more bald faced ableism, then, you know, we're not, I think now, you know, a lot of organizations are kind of trying to look, clean up their image or look like, Oh, we're listening to disabled people. And there, we weren't there yet. There was none of that. It was very much just, you know, how are we going to save these kids? And like, I think about, you know, what, I would love to do a study on, like, what does it do to people to just screw up with that on the TV? You know, knowing that this is a disability that you have, and that was just the background noise of like, Oh, why? Why do all these kids exist? And is it vaccines and like, what do we need to do about it? And not really even processing? You know, what that means at the time, but looking back on it, and now working in public health and like, oh my gosh, that was the most communication

    KC 29:22

    nightmare. Okay, so let me ask you this when it comes to the what the DSM says about their examples of social difficulties, quote on you, they mentioned a trouble with the back and forth flow of conversations, trouble with nonverbal communication, eye contact, tone of voice, body language and difficulty making and maintaining relationships. So do you relate to any of those examples? And if so, what is that like?

    Kathleen 29:52

    Yeah, I think the back and forth is something that I struggled with and that's probably the one thing that is most straightforward. As an autistic treat, rather than the conditioning, because I think that's something that I've always kind of struggled with. And it's just really, I think, again, it's kind of picking up on those nonverbal cues and like, those signs that someone's not done talking and things like that, that can be hard to pick up on. The other part that I can relate to is definitely the difficulty maintaining relationships. And I think that's where it's harder to tell, you know, how much of that is autism, and how much is just my experience. And, you know, I thought of myself as somebody that had social anxiety starting as a teenager. And now I've learned that a lot of those anxiety symptoms that show up are symptoms of complex trauma that are showing up and how I interact with people. I've had for a long time, I've kind of struggled with this pattern of ghosting, or, you know, just kind of disappearing from people's lives because I want to make those connections. And, you know, I've had some really deep friendships in my life, and I've had that level of, of intimacy. And then it's like, I get to a certain point, and I think, oh, no, people can see me, and you know, I can't live with that. And I can't let people see who I am. And I just have this pattern of running away. And so that's really the, the cycle that I'm working on now. And trying to understand that and try to figure out, you know, a better way to live with that. Well, when you

    KC 31:35

    think about like, difficulty in relationships, the more I talk to people, the more I wonder, like, you know, it's not like they're some objective autism, God that, you know, imparted this DSM criteria and all of its infallibility, right, like this was clinicians observing autistic people, and autistic children. And it's interesting because this one in particular difficulty maintaining relationships, it's written as if the difficulty is inherent in the autistic person. And not that the difficulty comes from the broader society, not understanding autism, not tolerating autism, not understanding autism, because so many people that I talk to when they talk about their difficulty in maintaining relationships, it's very commonly the same pattern of the idea that autistic people don't want relationships is a stereotype. I do want relationships, I do need connection. But the ways in which I have attempted to make connection with people are so often rejected so often traumatic, so often have become obvious to me that I'm a burden or that somebody doesn't want to put up with it, that it's just easier to give up, it's just easier to pull back, it hurts to know that real friendships kind of fall out, or someone gets in and sees me and I kind of back up a little because I don't know what to do. And then those become difficult. And it's like, you know, is this really a trait of autism? Or is this a commentary on the autistic experience?

    Kathleen 33:13

    That's another one of those things where it's saying the trade has difficulty in relationships, but a relationship is a two way communication. And you're looking at one side of that, there's a way that you know, humans are inherently social creatures, or that's the narrative that we hear all the time. And I do, I feel like I need connections, maybe maybe less than some neurotypical people, but I still need social connection to. But I think there's a way that that autistic people kind of challenge the expectations of what it means to be human. Because we may experience that connection differently. Or, you know, maybe it's not our top priority in life, maybe our interests are more of a top priority. And connection shows a different place in our life. I think when people have these biases, they don't realize that their biases because they're, it's like, that person just seems weird, or that person, you know, rubs me the wrong way. Or they have they seem shady, or whatever it is, can show up in funny ways. It can also be really dangerous because that bias can come up in dangerous ways depending on who is who is judging the interaction. I've seen some people saying online like people will say like, I'm such a great ally, and I support autistic people and then make fun of that

    KC 34:33

    even the things that people are making fun of on their face be something you would see in an autistic exactly especially like they're not recognizing that after learning about autism, looking back at my childhood and thinking about those students that were always picked on or those students that were always seen as weird. Not a one of them. Can I now think is neurotypical like when you look back at Oh, yeah, yeah, that's always just reading books. It's never talking to anybody just sitting in the corner at recess and girls would go, and you'll invite her to learn a dance. And then she wouldn't realize they were actually making fun of her like, and so then she would go back to her book. And that's all she did. It's like, oh, she was probably autistic, following the pack of kids around and, you know, didn't really catch the social cues, and it was talking way too much. And it's like, oh, it really does challenge those ideas of like, who is weird? And who can we just put out and who can we write off and, and who's okay to think that about

    Kathleen 35:33

    one thing I found really interesting in, you know, going back, and really kind of starting to accept myself as an autistic person, and reflecting on my childhood, and all of that is reading other people's experiences, there are traits or you know, common experiences that autistic people share, that I never picked up on as a part of autism or a common trait until I heard other people describe their own experience, even though my family grew up with, like all the books of the house, and you know, all the all the education. And, you know, learning about that, in the early days of the internet was a whole other thing. We had all the information that would have been available to parents pretty much at that time. And yeah, a lot of it was that focused on how to train your kid. Like, that's a piece of it. But I didn't really get that sense of, you know, other people's internal experience until I started, you know, reading memoirs and reading fiction and in reading, you know, social media accounts by other autistic people with understanding like, oh, that's what this is what I'm having, you know, I think, Have you have you seen Helen Hwang's? She's a romance author, autistic author that writes about autistic characters. And I think her books were some of the first that kind of broke through as like, pretty popular like fiction books with autistic characters. And there was a scene in one of her books where the main character, when he gets bad news, he kind of gets overwhelmed and he becomes clumsier. Like, he starts dropping things. And, you know, he's not able to complete these like tasks that require manual dexterity. And that's a part of how he's shutting down. And I had always heard the term shut down growing up. And I think there's, maybe the language is evolving a little bit around that. But we used to say, You're shutting down if you're like, not capable of interacting or not capable of doing what you need to do. That's kind of an artistic shutdown. And that's what this character was going through. But I had never recognized like, oh, yeah, I do start dropping things. And like, it's harder for me to focus on those type of manual tasks. When I'm upset or overwhelmed, or, you know, I get lost more easily. When I'm overwhelmed. I have no sound direction. So that's already not great. But I didn't recognize that until I heard that description of that character's experience. And it's so interesting, like how shifting that perspective can change the way you think about your own internal experience. Okay,

    KC 38:11

    I want to be respectful of your time and close on time. So I just have one more question. In the DSM, it talks about repetitive and restrictive interests, rituals, schedules, things like that, tell me if and how you relate to that, or see that in your life.

    Kathleen 38:28

    The main way that that shows up for me is if I get interested in a topic, I just want to learn everything about it. So I'll do a real deep dive, and I'll learn everything that I can about that topic. And usually those things will go on for months or years at a time. So I have some things that are kind of lifelong, like, I've always had a really strong connection with animals, and especially cats. And so that's something that's really stuck with me, throughout my life. And I also get into just random, random topics for a long period of time now. So especially now, I love podcasts, you know, I love reading and learning new things. Recently, I've gotten really into learning about multilevel marketing, and that has no relevance to my life at all. It's just psychologically fascinating to me,

    KC 39:14

    and talk about that, yeah, we're ever by the way. What about like flexibility and in flexibility in your life? Do you have things in your life that have to be the same every day or activities that need to be the same that you get distressed if they're different?

    Kathleen 39:28

    I benefit from having a consistent routine. I don't think I have as much of a strict routine as as some autistic people that I've heard. Some people really need to do things at the same time every day. I think that's not as much a piece of it for me. Sometimes people might see me as rigid in the way I communicate or my thought process and that's something that is really difficult for me, because it doesn't feel that way. internally. It's just, you know, expressing the way that I'm processing information. You know, for example, just the other day, I was talking to a friend, and we kind of had a different perspective on a certain topic, basically, it was, you know, I saw two categories is really mutually exclusive. And she was more Well, obviously, those are connected, and they're part of the same thing. And I thought, well, I just never saw it that way. And some people will look at that and say, That's rigid, that's black and white thinking, you know, and that's automatically lessor. And I don't, I don't know that it is, I think it's just a different way of looking at concepts. But people perceive that as being rigid or being inflexible. And I think that can be really frustrating for me, because I caught myself kind of getting nervous and thinking, Oh, is this person going to notice that I'm not flexible enough, or I'm thinking about this in a black and white way. And that doesn't really matter. But that's just that, you know, that hyper vigilance, it's been kind of ingrained that I'm focused on that. So there's a part of that that's really rewarding to recognize those moments and unpack it and say, Okay, in this discussion, it doesn't matter. But there are some situations in life where you might be people might look down on you, or, or, you know, treat you differently because of that. So I think that's more where the rigidity aspect shows up for me. So

    KC 41:16

    in closing, do you have any advice that you would give parents of autistic children?

    Kathleen 41:22

    One thing I've seen a lot more in the past few years is just Parents Learning from autistic adults. And I think that communication really didn't exist when I was a kid. And that's honestly the the best thing to start with is just be willing to learn from people and learn from autistic adults with very different experiences. It doesn't have to be all people that were diagnosed when they were two, in the order, you know, people in a certain group, I think it's important to learn from people with very different experiences and perspectives. As somebody that works in health communication, I see, there can be a big divide between parents and autistic adults. And I completely understand the reasons for that I think a lot of it is rooted in traumatic experiences, and on both sides really, in the fact that the information that parents are getting is still largely that medical model, you know, very strict definition of these external facing behaviors. And for parents who are not autistic, I think it can be hard to relate to that internal experience, if what you're hearing is, oh, they talk too long about this topic, or they're not playing with the other kids appropriately at school, or whatever it might be. So I really have empathy for parents and for the autistic adults who have experienced harm. And for the autistic kids that are growing up today, with the world changing as fast as it is, and our perspective on autism changing as fast as it is. What I would say to parents is just be willing to listen to different perspectives, and don't immediately get defensive or stop listening. If someone acts in a way that seems rude or seems like they're angry. And I think it's important to be willing to listen to people who are not speaking to you politely or, you know, expressing themselves in a politically correct way. Because that will that's kind of a artistic experience to be speaking in a way that people don't expect that's outside of the norm. But also, all the sides are coming from a place of having had some negative experience or some difficult experience. And I think the more self aware everyone can be in that conversation, the better. Because it gets worse when people don't understand where they're coming from, if they don't understand like, Oh, I'm reacting this way, because I really had a hard time growing up or I'm reacting this way because my child was diagnosed and all I've seen about autism is raised man and I don't know what to do about it for a period understanding where autistic adults are coming from and being willing to listen to those uncomfortable conversations or statements is a really good place to start.

    KC 44:09

    Well, thank you so much again for being willing to talk to me and Stuart, thank

    Kathleen 44:13

    you so much.

Christy Haussler
100: The Controversy of ABA: A Discussion with a Psychologist

In this episode Psychologist Lesley PsyD discusses Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapy, particularly in the context of autism, during Autism Awareness Month. This conversation aims to provide a neutral and factual overview of ABA, exploring its principles, applications, and the diverse perspectives surrounding it. Lesley explains ABA's focus on understanding and modifying behavior through reinforcement and environmental adjustments. They address the benefits and risks of ABA, emphasizing the importance of individualized approaches and naturalistic learning.

Show Highlights:

  • Overview of Applied Behavior Analysis (ABA) therapy and its relevance to autism.

  • Clarification of ABA terminology and its practical applications.

  • Discussion of the emotional and controversial nature of ABA therapy.

  • Examination of the challenges parents face in accessing appropriate therapies for children with autism.

  • Importance of understanding behavior in context, including antecedents and consequences.

  • Exploration of the benefits and risks associated with ABA practices.

  • Critique of the focus on compliance and neurotypical standards in ABA.

  • The role of reinforcement in behavior modification and its implications for intrinsic motivation.

  • Discussion of the need for individualized approaches to therapy that respect children's unique experiences.

  • Advocacy for a compassionate and nuanced understanding of autism and behavior analysis.

Resources and Links:

Connect with KC: Website, TikTok, Instagram, and Facebook

Get KC’s book, How to Keep House While Drowning

We love the sponsors that make this show possible! You can always find all the special deals and codes for all our current sponsors on our website: www.strugglecare.com/promo-codes.

  • Automatically Transcribed With Podsqueeze

    KC Davis 00:00:05 Hello, sentient balls of stardust. Welcome to Struggle Care. I'm your host, KC Davis. And welcome to the best worst little podcast. I sometimes see people on TikTok and they have, like, clips of their podcasts, and they're sitting in, like, real studios with, like, makeup on. And, like, I'll talk to other people that have podcasts and they'll be like, oh, I'll have my assistant and my producer and my this and my that talk to you. And I'm like, I am still a lady in a closet. It's it's such an amateur hour here. And I hope that you guys still enjoy enough of the content that you'll stick around. For my amateur hour, I'm here with Lesley, my favorite psychologist. By the way, do you consider yourself a child psychologist? No.

    Lesley PsyD 00:00:44 I mean, that's a good question. Actually. Not necessarily. My training is clinical, so it's all over the lifespan. I, I tend to focus on issues related to kids, but actually because of that, I work a lot with adults, so I don't know what I am.

    Lesley PsyD 00:00:57 I'm just here existing.

    KC Davis 00:00:59 Well, I'm so glad you're here and you're one of my favorite guests. And as you know, it is Autism Awareness Month. And I just wanted to do a quick little chat about ABA therapy. I'm going to get into it with some other people, but I just it's such a big topic, and it is such an emotionally charged topic that I want us to just sort of like, lay out what it is in a very like, matter of fact, neutral way so that people have an understanding of what we mean when we say ABBA therapy. so that some of the opinions and perspectives that I'm going to present later will make more sense. And so that's kind of our goal here. Are you up for it?

    Lesley PsyD 00:01:48 That sounds great.

    KC Davis 00:01:49 Okay. So first, can you regale us with your expertise in this area? Sure.

    Lesley PsyD 00:01:55 So as a part of clinical psych, which is just our fancy way of saying, I learned about all the different parts of psychology before specializing, we talk about the different lenses that we can look at behaviour or existence through.

    Lesley PsyD 00:02:09 And so some people would look at things through this lens of like understanding your earliest relationships. And some people would look really at emotions. And in the process of my training I did a lot of work understanding behaviour. So I started in neuropsychology, understanding brain based behaviour. And then I worked actually in ABA. Now I worked a long time ago. It's a very different field back then, but I worked in ABA both one on one with kids, and then I went on to supervise other people who worked with kids. I did that for about 8 to 10 years somewhere in there.

    KC Davis 00:02:43 And then also, I think I feel like this is relevant, like somewhere along there. You also have worked closely with people doing like special education and IEPs. And even I think you said you were also like an expert witness. Tell me about that.

    Lesley PsyD 00:03:00 Yes. That makes me sound very fancy. you are so fancy. In the process of doing all of my neuropsychology training, what really ended up happening is most of the kids that I was working with were also interfacing in the educational system, so they were coming to us for testing, but they needed someone to then explain what we were finding with their schools and with their families.

    Lesley PsyD 00:03:21 And so over many years, I got a lot of practice working inside of schools, so on teams, working with special education teams. And then for a few years, I really hyper specialized in working with families who had had difficulty getting their children's needs met. And so we're now in litigation. They had lawsuits pending against schools. And so I would learn about a case, a situation that was happening with a child and all of their history. And then I would make some expert witness recommendations to the court. And I did that for about five years.

    KC Davis 00:03:54 Excellent. Okay. So what is ABA.

    Lesley PsyD 00:03:59 That sounds like such a deceptively simple question. So we'll start there. So ABA stands for Applied Behavior Analysis and it is exactly what it says. It is the applied version. So the real world version of a field of psychology called behavior analysis.

    KC Davis 00:04:15 So behavior analysis is a theory like a way of thinking about something.

    Lesley PsyD 00:04:24 Yes.

    KC Davis 00:04:24 Is that what you're saying. And applied behavioral analysis refers to the techniques of how that, like theory turns into an actual therapy that gets delivered to people.

    Lesley PsyD 00:04:40 That is correct. Yep.

    KC Davis 00:04:42 Can you give us a is there a metaphor that that people at home might be more familiar with using other kinds of like therapy language?

    Lesley PsyD 00:04:51 That is a great question. in terms of something being like a theory and then applied.

    KC Davis 00:05:01 Oh, we thought about one like, like what's what's the theory where we talk about, like how the brain processes trauma, like literal, like the physical places in the brain and like, having to, like, reconnect neurons and things like that.

    Lesley PsyD 00:05:16 So there is a theory actually, this is I don't know if this is what you're talking about, but I'm gonna talk about neuroplasticity. So neuroplasticity is is an idea is a thing that we understand is happening where if you have an insult or a trauma to the brain or an emotional trauma that we used to believe that that was use it or lose it. So if those neurons are or pathways are damaged, you're done. That's it. And over time we've learned that actually that those patterns can regrow.

    Lesley PsyD 00:05:42 So that would be an idea process that we see. But when we want to say, well, how do we what do we do about that in real life, then we move into things that we can do with children to encourage neuroplasticity or post-traumatic growth therapy that can encourage us to reconnect. so it's a way to take that idea and then apply it.

    KC Davis 00:06:01 So like, would eMDR be an example of like. It's based on the ideas in like neuroplasticity theory. But then there's this like specific technique in eMDR where you sit down and there's like a light and the person puts the light back and forth and like your your eye follows the light and you may or may not talk about traumas. And is that kind of like a decent enough metaphor?

    Lesley PsyD 00:06:30 I think so, and I think that that's a great way to think about it, too, because eMDR as a practice is something that is very specific and it comes from this larger concept, and that is what we talk about with behavior analysis, where behavior analysis actually is a huge field of research and thought and theory.

    Lesley PsyD 00:06:51 But ABA is a very narrow scope of procedures and activities that are done with a therapist.

    KC Davis 00:07:00 And I think that's important because when you hear someone talk about like, does ABA work? Or maybe they have criticisms of ABA, I oftentimes feel like people don't necessarily get specific about what it is they're criticizing. Like are they criticizing the practice of ABA or are they criticizing like the theory behind how and why people work according to like, behavior analysis theories?

    Lesley PsyD 00:07:30 Yeah, I would agree. And I also think that that's not people's faults either. One of the challenges with ABA is that it is we don't think of it in this way, but it is relatively young in the scope of therapies. It's not that old. And ABBA is still growing and changing, and so is applied very differently depending on the individual circumstances. The company you work for, the philosophical lens through which they view things. And so it can be really hard to talk about it. And I think that's why this conversation is so helpful. And it is important if people have criticisms or positive things they want to talk about with ABA to be incredibly specific, because it's a really big umbrella.

    KC Davis 00:08:14 And I think one of the most important reasons why this is important is because, I mean, the reality is there are a ABA is like what was quoted to me right when we got our diagnosis, it's like, this is the number one therapy for autistic kids, and it's often one of the only therapies that insurance will cover. And even when insurance covers things like speech therapy and occupational therapy, those are typically 1 to 2 to three hours a week, whereas private insurance companies will cover sometimes up to 40 hours a week of ABA. Yeah. And what this means is that if you are a parent and you have to work to live, but your child is disabled in such a way that private preschools will not take them and they are not old enough for public school. It may be that the only choice that you have in order to pay your bills is to find an ABBA center for your child to go to as a form of child care. And so I think that that's important to keep in mind for the audience and for everyone listening.

    KC Davis 00:09:32 And and people have really strong feelings about it. And there are people that have had their own personal experiences with ABA that are positive. And a lot of people that have had personal experiences with ABBA that are really negative and and might feel some trauma about it and might feel very activated and triggered by conversations about how to engage with ABBA. And so I just like to put that out there. That part of part of discussions about psychology and therapies is like what I call like coffee house talk, which is just like, yeah, it would be great if we did this and it would be great if we did that and this, that and the other. But then, like, it's very different when you look at it from a harm reduction standpoint where you look at like, okay, but if a person has no other options, how do they reduce harm or how do they get the best experience and things like that? So I just wanted to throw that out there. Okay. So if you had to teach me what like the theory of behavioral analysis is if you had a cliff note for me, what would you say?

    Lesley PsyD 00:10:28 So that's another great question.

    Lesley PsyD 00:10:29 So behavioral analysis always starts with with the basics of how we think behavior is initiated and maintained. Increase or decrease. And remember as we're talking about this, this is a lens through which you can view behavior. This is no longer even the way that I the lens that I use at work. But it is one of the lenses through which we can view things. So in basic.

    KC Davis 00:10:52 What do we mean by behavior by the way?

    Lesley PsyD 00:10:54 Yeah. So. And everything. Everything. If you're if you're alive, if your heart is beating, you're behaving. I think that's also one of the things that can make it challenging for new parents of newly diagnosed kids to understand what we're talking about in this area, because Ava has its own language, they have their own terms and their words that we use, but they don't mean the same thing. So in that case, behavior is really anything an organism does. And there are also, you know, internal behaviors, including thoughts and feelings and emotions.

    KC Davis 00:11:27 Weight, thoughts and feelings are considered behaviors.

    Lesley PsyD 00:11:31 Depending on the field of behaviorism that you were to ask. There are some folks that are pure behaviors that would say something has to be observable to be a behavior for an organism to engage in a behavior. But there are lots of fields within behavior analysis that include everything in all the internal experiences as well.

    KC Davis 00:11:53 That makes sense to me. I do remember one of the first things I learned was like, you know, so you have like a kid sitting at a desk and he's like jumping up out of the desk and he's standing up, I think. Calling that a behavior like the behavior of standing up is like, yeah, of course the behavior. But what I had to learn was that, like the kid not standing up is also a behavior. Like, that's the behavior of not standing up, the behavior of sitting. And so it's like the not doing something is just as much of a behavior as the doing something.

    Lesley PsyD 00:12:26 Yeah. And if, if we can skip ahead and then come back for a second, that's one of the keys to knowing whether if, if your best option is utilizing an ABA service, providers that understand that are one of the biggest green flags, that not all behavior is easily observable.

    Lesley PsyD 00:12:47 And we will have to kind of enter into the experience or try to connect with the experience of the child that you're working with. Viewing children in this very black and white manner of only behaviors that are observable matter is falling out of favor, even within behavioral circles. But if we're thinking about it in that way. To start, the idea behind behavior analysis is that some behavior changes frequency or intensity and goes up and some goes down. And the reason that that happens is the things that come before that behavior and the things that come after. And basically these series of events that happen a million times a day are slowly shaping our behavior and developing patterns. And sometimes the patterns that we get into are not helpful to us. And it would be helpful to change that pattern by changing what comes before or after. That's the cliff notes.

    KC Davis 00:13:43 Okay, so if a kid is standing up from their desk over and over and over and over, then that lens would say, okay, the behavior is standing up over and over and over and that whereas some other fields of psychology might focus more on, they stand up because when they were a child, standing up was the best way to get their mother's attention.

    KC Davis 00:14:03 Right? Or they're standing up because, you know, they went through something traumatic and the neural pathways are now, you know, standing up is this response whatever. But when you look at it through this lens, it's interesting because you could obviously use more than one lens at a time, like kind of like an overlapping microscope. But this lens would say the kid is standing up because something happened right before that action that led to the standing up. So the kid felt restless, and so they stood up, or the kid felt uncomfortable, so they stood up, or the kid wanted to had to go to the bathroom. So they stood up. Is that kind of.

    Lesley PsyD 00:14:44 Part of it? Yeah, that could be one of the more theoretical lenses to view it through in behaviourism. And ABA practitioner would do even more. So they would take data. So ABA is incredibly data centric and focused, which we could talk about has positives and negatives to it. So the the ABA practitioner might observe that child in that class for seven days, and they might make little tick marks whenever that child was standing up and they would say, what is the pattern? I'm seeing what's coming right before standing up and what happens as a direct result.

    Lesley PsyD 00:15:15 And so maybe what we're going to see is that the child is only standing up out of their seat in math and is only standing up in their seat in math two minutes before the bell goes off. And when they stand up, the teacher is doing something or saying something, and then the next day they stand up even sooner. So now we're seeing a pattern of there's something called an antecedent that's coming right before. And in that case, it would be something about being in math or being right close to the end of the bow, and then something's happening afterwards to make that behavior more, frequent. And we would say that that's reinforcing that behavior because it's making it happen more often. So if we don't want to see that, then we would have to break that chain somehow.

    KC Davis 00:16:02 Okay. All right. So that makes sense. It's sort of like I've always heard people talk about. It's like this. It's a theory about how people learn. which is confusing to a layperson's ears because we think of learning as like learning facts.

    KC Davis 00:16:19 Yeah. but when we talk about how people learn in an applied behavioral analysis perspective, we're talking about how people learn to choose behaviors, right?

    Lesley PsyD 00:16:30 We're yes. And we're we're talking about learning that is happening outside of the awareness of the person. We're talking about learning and context, more modern applications. So that was really simplistic way to look at it. More modern applications in behavioral science take into account a bunch of things, including like what is the evolutionary benefit of this behavior and what language has become a cue for that behavior. So one of the ways to think about how ABA views behavior is almost like math equations. They very much will view things as discoverable patterns that we can figure out and change. And that's a very unique, different way compared to other parts of psychology, which would maybe talk about we need to connect so that kids can get their needs met. we're not necessarily trying to hack the puzzle. ABBA is very much about figuring out that puzzle and breaking that chain.

    KC Davis 00:17:27 So like, if I'm trying to potty train my child and I'm noticing that, like, they're not getting it, they're not getting it, and they're not getting it.

    KC Davis 00:17:37 And in some ways, do we as parents or teachers, kind of like intuitively sometimes do this where we're going, okay, well, you know, maybe it's because they're still wearing the diaper, maybe wearing the diaper, like, prevents them from like learning to go to the potty. And so like, let's change this antecedent of like, wearing the diaper. And then we look at the back end and we go, well, what if we changed the reinforcement. And we had a sticker chart where they got a sticker every time they went to the potty. And maybe if we changed this antecedent and this reinforcement like that would change this middle behavior of like going potty in a diaper versus going potty on the potty.

    Lesley PsyD 00:18:14 Yeah. And that's another way of talking about that. Behaviorism is not necessarily doing something different. It's about viewing what's already happening in a different way. So behaviorists or ABA practitioners would view What you're doing through their own lens. So they would break down that sequence and say, great job, mom here.

    Lesley PsyD 00:18:37 But what we're noticing, I'll give you a really good example of how this happens. My oldest daughter, who would be horrified if I if she knew I was telling you this story, or maybe not when she was potty training, was super into princess things and she was too small to get up on the potty. So I bought her a princess potty and the first time she went in there, she was so excited. And then she was going to go in there when she used the potty. I didn't know that the potty made a loud fanfare noise yay! When you actually went potty! So she went willingly on to the potty, went to the bathroom, and when that loud noise happened, she was horrified, jumped off off the potty and didn't go back on it for another three months. So there's lots of ways to look at that. But an ABA practitioner might say she engaged in a target behavior, a behavior we want to see sit on the potty. But what happened afterwards was a punishing event.

    Lesley PsyD 00:19:33 So something happened and it made that behavior go down in frequency. So it's just their way of viewing it. So they would say, if we want her to go back to the body, we might have to provide reinforcement for smaller steps. Like she came in the room. Great job. Little sticker or praise. And then we might have to shape that behavior back up and also take the batteries out of the body.

    KC Davis 00:19:55 Okay, so I have two questions. And I don't want to forget either one of them because I want to ask you what are some of the like, positives to that kind of thinking about behavior and then like what are some drawbacks or what are some things we could miss about that kind of thinking. And then but the first thing I want to ask is that so if thinking that way about getting my kid to go to the potty is thinking through a lens of behavior analysis, does that mean that the act of taking off the diaper and using a sticker chart is me doing ABBA with my child?

    Lesley PsyD 00:20:33 That depends on who you ask.

    Lesley PsyD 00:20:35 So one of the challenges about communicating about ABBA is that an ABBA practitioner would likely say everything is ABBA. That's a very common thing we hear from that field. In my opinion, no, because ABBA itself is is an actual skill that you have to get training on. And it's a it's not just doing a thing, it's about taking data. It's about understanding the reason you're choosing a procedure and measuring change. So it's not really doing ABBA, but someone might look at that and say, well, you're using the principles of behavior analysis. And in that case we you know, I guess we all are all the time.

    KC Davis 00:21:16 And it's funny that we picked eMDR as our metaphor earlier because this fits right in. I actually read the other day that when you experience a traumatic event or a high stress event, one of the best things that you can do is as quickly as possible, go and play Tetris. Because there's something about the way that the game of Tetris causes your eyes to move. that stimulates that, like neuroplasticity in the two parts of your brain sort of talking to each other.

    KC Davis 00:21:49 And it's similar to the same types of things we're trying to accomplish with eMDR. Right? Interesting. So, to me, that kind of lays over perfectly where it's like, okay, so is going to do Tetris, doing something through the thinking lens of neuroplasticity? Yes. Would we ever say that playing Tetris is doing eMDR? No, no. You have to go through so much certification to do eMDR because it's a very technical thing. And it's not just like this intuitive, I understand this, so I'm going to go do this like it's very technical. you have to go through certain phases. You have to have certain markers and feedback and all those sort of things. And so I kind of feel like that's a good like just because you're making informed decisions based on a way of thinking about something doesn't mean you're engaging in like the therapy of that thing. Yeah. So I feel comfortable saying like when people say everything is ABA that I, I, I'm going gonna, I'm gonna rule on that and say, no, it's not okay.

    KC Davis 00:22:58 So that's helpful. So that's the way of thinking about things. So what are the positives or what can be helpful about thinking behavior in this way? If we have and we can use some real life examples if we if we have a child, an autistic child that is running into the road or we have an autistic child, that is, you know, not making eye contact or an autistic child who is maybe hitting themselves, or maybe they, you know, won't sit down in a classroom environment. Those are just going to throw out some behaviors there. I have no commentary on those behaviors except that they are behaviors. What are some helpful things that could come from thinking that way? And what are some risks that could come? Yeah.

    Lesley PsyD 00:23:43 And I think this perhaps may be one of the most important questions we talk about, because we often don't slow down and had to have this conversation in public forums. In my opinion, the most positive thing about thinking in this way, especially about children's behaviors, but also about adults, is that ideally it takes blame and shame out.

    Lesley PsyD 00:24:06 So it removes the idea that what's wrong with you? Why would you do this? It takes that away and it says every behavior makes sense. Everything is adaptive. The reason things happen is because they've been set into motion to happen. And so if we want them to be different, we don't lambaste the individual. We change the environment to assist them to get to where they need to go.

    KC Davis 00:24:32 So this is you know, it's not that they're a problem child, right? It's not that they're disrespectful or rebellious. It's not that, you know, and I also can see where people get tripped up on like the word punishment because like it that has a very technical therapeutic term, but it also has like a layman's term. And I want to talk about the layman's term for a minute. There's this idea that if I punish someone, which is just I bring them pain and discomfort. They will not want to do that thing again because that pain and discomfort is so awful. And I think, like the sloppy, layperson's way of applying that is like, if I shame this child, if I yell at them, if I lecture them, if I embarrass them in front of the class, like that will make that will like dissuade them from doing that behavior again.

    KC Davis 00:25:24 Right. And I think what I hear you saying is that one of the benefits to thinking about behavior analysis is to go, okay, but if you're not looking at the antecedent, if you're not looking at what's coming before this behavior, if you're not looking at ways that there are other like reinforcing factors happening in this behavior, then like you're not going to actually help that kid change their behavior or learn something different, right? Would you say that's accurate?

    Lesley PsyD 00:25:57 Yes. Like, theoretically speaking, it should release us from the need to find blame inside of the child, because a core foundation of behavioral analysis and ABA is that all behavior makes sense. So it should help us remove that. And we'll get to the we'll get to the downsides of why that doesn't always happen.

    KC Davis 00:26:20 Is it it does it. It almost seems like in theory that behavior is just this puzzle. Right. And if you figure out how to manipulate the what comes before, whether that's the environment or the emotion or the stressors or what somebody else is doing, and if you figure out exactly what to do afterwards to like, reinforce or not reinforce, you know, whatever, then you could change anything, right? Yes.

    KC Davis 00:26:53 And certainly when we're talking about my kid running out into the road and really dangerous situations, like as a parent, like I want that the idea that there is a formula that if we just figured out the formula, we can stop that behavior from happening is very much something that, as a parent, I would want.

    Lesley PsyD 00:27:10 Yes. And and for certain things, it's incredibly powerful. Like when I work with teachers, one of the most simple things that we talk about is I want this kid to speak up more in class. Great. What I want you to do is take some data this week on every time they make an attempt. And what happens right after. And many, many, many times teachers will come back and say they get sneered at. They'll try or they'll and they'll stutter or they'll say the wrong thing. And so we can talk about in that very simplistic scenario. What else would you expect that child to do? They behave a certain way. Something happens that causes an internal experience.

    Lesley PsyD 00:27:49 They pull away and then they're safe. Of course, they're not going to speak up. So we can't keep expecting them to do something that's being punished in their environment. We have to create. So in that way, it's it's a very lovely formula and it can be very helpful as long as the behaviors are straightforward.

    KC Davis 00:28:08 Okay, so that being said, let's move into what are the risks in thinking about everything in this way.

    Lesley PsyD 00:28:17 So I think the biggest liability, with thinking from a very purely ABA lens is the oversimplification of behavior. And at this point, you know, I'm not shy when I talk about this field, that there was a reason I left this field. There's a reason that I no longer work in this field. That does not mean that there are not incredible ABA practitioners. I have several friends who, if I needed to, if I would, they would work with my kid in a second. But I have chosen to move away. And one of the one of the risks that we run is to oversimplify behavior down into just a simple ABC format and antecedent, a behavior and a consequence.

    Lesley PsyD 00:28:54 When we do that, we can miss very important things like internal experiences, like histories of trauma, and we can run into a scenario where a slippery slope happens. And what we're reinforcing is actually compliance training. That is one of the risks is that we ABA can sometimes over develop compliant children rather than regulated children if applied in that way.

    KC Davis 00:29:22 Yeah. It also occurs to me like, you know, there's a reason I chose those, like for behavior examples of like running into the street, like hitting yourself, not sitting down in school and eye contact. Right. Because it seems like one of the risks is like how you're even identifying the behaviors to target. Because one of the bigger criticisms about ABA is that for a very long time and and in much of ABA today, there was a lot of focus on things like eye contact and not stimming. Right? Like not doing hand flapping, things like that. And so people were applying this and everybody keep in mind we have not even gotten into the therapies.

    KC Davis 00:30:07 So we don't know what ABA looks like yet. We just know about the thinking that we're applying to it. Right. So you go into, okay, this kid's not looking at people in the eyes. We want this kid to look at people in the eyes because that's what people do. And we want them to listen, right? Because how could you listen if you're not looking people in the eyes, and we want you to look more normal so that, you know, you can, you know, function in society. And so. Okay, well, why aren't they looking in the eyes and then like, what can we do to either reinforce someone looking in the eyes or like clinical term here punish or, you know, try to influence someone to not look in your eyes. Right. So it's it's not that you couldn't get the correct formula to force that kid to change that behavior, it's that the whole thinking process of why that behavior was chosen to be targeted. So can you tell us, like what? What is some of the fallout that has happened historically with ABA when it comes to what behaviors they choose to try and modify or change?

    Lesley PsyD 00:31:09 So there's a strong history in, in ABA itself of encouraging behavior to move towards what we would call the neurotypical.

    Lesley PsyD 00:31:19 So if it's typical for a 12 month old to be saying one word and to be able to hold eye contact for 20s and to be able to exchange a toy back and forth, then historically, Ava would take the child that is not doing that and view that as the goal. And we're going to move the behavior towards that, which for many children is not only inappropriate, it can actually set them back emotionally. Not all children can develop in that way. the suppression of stims is a is a major one that we've seen for many, many decades now that when ABA is applied to suppression of traits that are associated with autism, the long term emotional effects aren't great. We get more anxious kids, or we get overly compliant adults who then are not able to advocate for themselves, who are not able to say no. That would be another risk, I think, of using a pure ABA intervention. Is there is a risk there that what we are teaching children is that when the adults manipulate your environment, you follow the directions, period.

    Lesley PsyD 00:32:28 And that is not helpful for a lot of our kids who struggle with self-advocacy and communication.

    KC Davis 00:32:33 Yeah, because if you're, you know, if you're stimming because you feel anxious or because you're under stimulated or because you're overstimulated or because it's a self-soothing behavior or something like that, if you you absolutely could manipulate environments and reinforcements and punishments to get a kid to stop those behaviors. But if those behaviors were serving an important purpose and you don't like, give them any other way to serve that purpose, then it seems like you're making the internal experience of the child's distress even worse. And they're almost like learning, okay, stuff the discomfort and give the behavior.

    Lesley PsyD 00:33:21 Yeah. And it can in certain circumstances, especially for children who are not verbally able, who don't have access to spoken language, it can create new behaviors that are much more serious, like self-injurious behavior, hitting self, biting self. And so we have to be so careful with a therapy or even just a thinking process that encourages us to manipulate the environment.

    Lesley PsyD 00:33:46 We can do that. We do that to ourselves all the time. But when we're doing that as our primary way of changing things, we have almost taken the agency of that person out. So that is one of the risks that we have to be vigilant for when your child is in, in a therapy.

    KC Davis 00:34:04 I remember learning from autistic adults about like their individual experiences with eye contact and and hearing stories like, you know, when I look at someone in the face, there are so many details in the face that I'm overwhelmed and I can't hear what they're saying. I remember hearing stories about them, about people saying like, it is physically painful for me to look at somebody in the eyes. And, you know, if you're a young child that can't verbalize that because even if you're a speaking child, like there's a level of introspection and language that that requires that you usually don't get till you're an adult to, like, put those things into words. Right. That is, is a little backwards, right?

    Lesley PsyD 00:34:45 Yeah.

    KC Davis 00:34:45 And we have this like emotional fallout. So well let's let's kind of summarize some of the, the benefits is taking the blame off of the child, trying to, you know, change environments that are best adapted to the child for them to make choices and learn things. And some of the risk factors or liabilities is oversimplified. First of all, the decision process on what behaviors are chosen. So choosing a behavior because it needs to look more normal, or choosing a behavior because like it's going to decrease distress for this kid or it's going to increase their quality of life. It's almost like the difference between choosing what will increase this child's experience versus like what will bring convenience to adults. What will make the what will make them easier to manage, will be less taxing or easier to manage in a in a classroom setting or whatever. So there's like the how we choose the behaviors. And then it also seems like there's a lot of risk in how you are sort of taking your data. Like, I remember reading a book about ABA and it was trying to say like, it's simple, you know, like when Susie goes outside and it rains, you know, she gets cold.

    KC Davis 00:35:57 And then, you know, Susie learns that she needs to take a raincoat the next time she goes out. And if we look at the antecedents of of Susie being cold, right. And that like, went through. And I remember reading that and being like, it's not that that's necessarily a wrong way to think about it, but it's that you're missing a bunch of these antecedents here, like observable. You're going, well, if we wanted to teach. So it's like, okay, Susie goes out into the outside and it rains and she gets cold. And so she makes a choice to bring a raincoat next time. And so if we look at that and then we go, okay, so if we have a kid that we want to teach to choose the behavior of bringing a raincoat with us, all we have to do.

    Lesley PsyD 00:36:49 Is.

    KC Davis 00:36:49 Create a scenario that mimics the way a person might naturally learn this. So when Susie goes into this room without her, raincoat will turn the air conditioning down to 50 degrees where it's so cold, Susie will receive this reinforcement, reinforcing or dis enforcing information, and she will go and choose a, you know, raincoat.

    KC Davis 00:37:19 And I remember reading that and thinking, but there there are so many variables that we just skipped over. Chief among them, the difference between rain falling from the sky and looking at a caregiver. Inflict discomfort upon you on purpose, like children can understand the difference And that is a completely different antecedent than rain.

    Lesley PsyD 00:37:47 Yeah. And there's there's even more when when we get into talking about the actual therapy, there's even more than antecedents. There's setting events and there's language that functions as an antecedent, and there's so many complex behavioral phenomena that are happening. And the more contrived the scenario, the less applicable that will be to the outside world. And so one of the other risks, especially if your child is is attending ABBA center based activities, is what they're learning generalizable at all. So are they going to bring those skills out? So are we teaching them to be quiet, compliant participants in their class, or are we teaching them to self-regulate so they can engage in groups? That's very different. And so that when we talk more specifically, we'll talk about that.

    Lesley PsyD 00:38:34 But that's one of the risk factors is there's a lot, unfortunately, that caregivers need to be vigilant for and aware of to know what quality of ABA their child is receiving.

    KC Davis 00:38:43 So let's talk about the therapies for a minute, because the reason I bring up the raincoat example is because one of the things that I saw a lot in ABA are things like, okay, what is a possession this child really values? And let's bring it into the session and then let's ask them to do something and let's withhold that item until they do it. So whether it's we're learning colors today or we're learning to make eye contact today, or even something that might be a more quote unquote noble pursuit, we're learning how to not self injure today, or we're learning how to stay and hold a hand before we run across the street today. And so like, here's this thing you really want, and I will withhold it from you until you do the thing, and then you get the reward. Right. And that's that's why I think about, like, how different this contrived scenario where an adult withholding from you is a variable in and of itself that's not there with something like I learned that in order to watch TV, I must turn the TV on.

    KC Davis 00:39:41 Right. Those are different variables. Then I learned that in order to watch TV, I must do this task that this adult has asked me to do. So talk to me about what the actual therapies looked like. Like, I know some of the terms, but I don't know what they mean. So like, I know the term discrete trial teaching. What is that? Yes.

    Lesley PsyD 00:39:59 So ABA can take many formats. It can be in a group setting. It can be one on one with a therapist. It can be in a center. It can be with mom and dad, with the therapist at home and the I don't want to say older, but it is older. DTT discrete trial training is a way. It's actually a method of teaching. It's not specific to ABA and it's not specific to autistic individuals. It is a rapid presentation of these tasks to learn something new. And there's a lot of nuance and detail, but the way that we present things reinforce. And sometimes I don't think punishment is used as much, or response cost is another thing that can happen anymore.

    Lesley PsyD 00:40:40 But in the past, and certainly when I started, there was a lot of rapid shaping of this learning behavior. And that occurs at a table. So it might look something like, look at me and there might be a visual prompt. And if they look great job. And then there would be some kind of reinforcement. So some sometimes it's something to eat, like an M&M, which again I think we've moved away from somewhat, but it's still in use. Or it could be a sticker or they could be earning stars for a break. And so it is a very DTT is incredibly contrived, but it's purposefully done so and that I think it's best utilized for skill acquisition. So for learning actual little skills, sometimes it's over applied.

    KC Davis 00:41:20 So when I when I got diagnosed with dyslexia, one of the things that happened, like the summer after I got diagnosed was my parents took me to this center where for like a few hours a day, I would sit with a, I guess, a tutor, and I would do like workbooks, like phonics workbooks and writing workbooks.

    KC Davis 00:41:37 And every time I finished one, I got a gold star. And then when I had a certain number of gold stars, like, I got to go to the prize box. Is that discrete trial teaching?

    Lesley PsyD 00:41:48 So that would that is a phenomenon that is used in discrete trial training. But that's just reinforcement. So that is reinforcement which means you something happens and then something occurs after. And that makes the behavior more likely to occur. And once you've learned this symbology of like star five stars equals this thing I want, then you can hold that in your brain and the little sticker becomes reinforcing. But you have to be trained to get to that point.

    KC Davis 00:42:16 So let me pause for just a second, because I don't want us to forget this question. I do want to talk about reinforcers and the benefits and risks of like you, because my understanding and you can correct me as like ABA is very heavy on reinforcers and I want to talk about benefits and liabilities of this idea of do it, get a star, do it, get a star like these kind of disconnected value ads, versus something that's a little more innate, like, you know, learn how to use a straw, get to drink something really delicious because, like, that's literally how you access the delicious drink or something.

    KC Davis 00:42:50 Okay. So so what's what is it about discrete trial teaching that makes it unique? Then?

    Lesley PsyD 00:42:56 It's unique because it is at a table. So it's table based and it's based on a skill. It's not very relational. It's not really focused on a lot of external environmentally appropriate skills. And if you ask somebody else, you may get a different answer than me. I'm kind of meta processing what I'm saying and hearing them say, yes, it is, but it's unique because it's a rapid style of teaching. It's at a table. And DTT is typically only used for new skill acquisition. So usually younger kids or adults with more significant disabilities and they need to acquire what are colors. Sometimes DTT is used to train safety signs so that there's this rapid recognition of what that means. The downside, I think, of DTT is that it's very difficult to generalize skills learned at a table to anything. So many kids and adults participating in DTT are going to effectively learn what they're being taught, they're going to learn it, but they're going to learn it at the table with that individual with this reinforcement system.

    KC Davis 00:43:58 Is it like heavy on the flashcards? Because I feel like that's what I see where you'll have like a flashcard with a stop sign. And we're learning that the stop sign means to stop. But what we're doing is just like showing that card and having the kids say stop, and then they get like a cheerio, and then we show a different one and that one's go. And then they get a cheerio or like colors, like, what color is this? Tell me what color this is. Tell me what color this is.

    Lesley PsyD 00:44:19 Yeah. And they can use the method of DTT. Can be used to then build skills. So at first we might start with put with same which is like match the color. And then we could use you know find the blue or we could have other distracting things there. So it can it's, it's an effective way to learn skills, to learn brief skills. You might see a lot of PT in speech. So it's not only in ABA therapy. You may see it in speech therapy and you may see it with speech sounds.

    Lesley PsyD 00:44:47 So you may have a speech therapist saying, make your mouth look like mine. Oh, and then if they do it, great job and try again. It's a very rapid way of skill acquisition. It's not the only thing you would see in ABA. So ABA you would also see usually hopefully naturalistic skills too. So let's say if there is one of the challenges is the child is really afraid to join circle time. They are not doing it. In fact, they're running away. There might be something in the environment. And let's just use the example of again, using like stickers is assuming the sticker is reinforcing to the child where if they get close, they get a sticker, and then they'll get to have a break and come back. And then if they go and sit with their friends and they might shape their behavior in that way in an ABA session.

    KC Davis 00:45:36 Okay. And so what is the benefit of like what does that help with. You said just like rapid like it's just more helpful because someone is like going over the same thing over and over and over with you.

    KC Davis 00:45:49 Yes.

    Lesley PsyD 00:45:51 This is a tough one for me to answer because the true, honest answer for me, the psychologist person, is, I think it's very useful for a very limited amount of things. DDT is most useful when we are talking about a very small skill that needs to be acquired before we can build to other things, but beyond that, it's so not naturalistic that it is not something. If I was referring a client, I would say use DTT minimally in your ABA sessions.

    KC Davis 00:46:20 And then so that's like that's like the issue with the practice when it's done perfectly. Yeah. What are the issues that you see with the practice. Because it's rarely done perfectly.

    Lesley PsyD 00:46:32 So I think the easiest way for me to explain this is again, the behavior analysis is this field of study. It's a scientific field and it has progressed way past basic ABA. There's things called relational frame theory, functional contextual ism. There's things ahead of where we were meaning.

    KC Davis 00:46:51 That there's a better way of understanding behavior and how to change behavior.

    Lesley PsyD 00:46:55 Oh yes.

    KC Davis 00:46:56 Oh yeah. Like the the literal psychological science has advanced past everything we were talking about right now.

    Lesley PsyD 00:47:03 Absolutely. But what happened is insurance companies latched on to ABA because it is an evidence based practice. It comes with data. So that's helpful for insurance companies. And they made it reimbursable. And it was really the first therapy that was kind of taken. It wasn't developed for autistic people. It was just a theory of science, but it was applied to autistic children. And because that happened, it has become a way to make a lot of money. And unfortunately, what we see happening, not in all ABA but in some, is that the bcba you might hear that term, those are the supervisors. Those folks have a master's degree or a doctorate. They are typically very educated. They've been doing this a long time. Are not the ones actually delivering the therapy. It is maybe bachelor's level folks, maybe master's level folks, but rarely who have received training. That is highly inconsistent depending on where you live.

    Lesley PsyD 00:48:02 And so when you are taught the very basics of how to manipulate a child's environment, but you don't have all of the education and all of the other mental health education, you could end up just basically manipulating a child's environment for your own benefit.

    KC Davis 00:48:19 Yeah. So we call them Bill Mills, where it's like the quality is it's not really about the quality. It's about like how many services can we get with people that we can pay? Not a lot so that we can reimburse a ton. And you know, you've also mentioned to me, you know, when I've asked questions about like, kids sitting at tables for hours on end and that it's just not developmentally appropriate. And I'll never forget listening to an autistic man on TikTok one time. And I wish I could remember who it was, but he was non-speaking as a child, but then was able to communicate through speaking as an adult. And one of the things he said was I hated ABBA because I was nine, ten, 11, 12, and they kept forcing me to do these elementary tasks pick the colors, pick the colors, pick the colors.

    KC Davis 00:49:10 And I was bored out of my mind. And he said, it wasn't that I didn't know the colors, it was that I couldn't communicate to my limbs on where to put my hand at the right time. And there were other variables. I'm overstimulated. There's something else happening. There's something else that I'm experiencing. And I know what you're asking, and I know what the answer is. And I'm bored out of my fucking mind that you're asking me questions that you would ask a baby, but I can't make my body cooperate with what you're asking me to do. And I can't demonstrate my competence with this information. And that's like, seared into my memory.

    Lesley PsyD 00:49:57 And unfortunately, a lot of times. And we can talk about well applied ABA as well. But poorly applied ABA often happens because the folks that are delivering the services again don't have the experience and background to understand all that nuance. And so they're also set up to fail. These aren't, you know, evil people. They're just don't have what you would need to truly understand.

    Lesley PsyD 00:50:20 And so they're doing what they're supposed to do in their mind, and it's not working or it is working, but the child's not getting better. And that's when we see these very overly restrictive, overly simplified. So that would be one of the red flags to watch out for if you have your child in ABA, is that the team has a very simplistic, clear explanation for all of your child's behavior that seems like it should be a green flag. No child's behavior is that simple, and no one, no one knows all the things. That's just not how humans work.

    KC Davis 00:50:51 So then talk to me about like, there's a couple other things that I've heard about ABA. Like they talk about like hand over hand and full body prompting. What are those things?

    Lesley PsyD 00:51:00 So there are some things that we used to use quite a bit in this field that have not only fallen out of fashion, but, you know, legitimately, I really probably should not be utilizing one of those is edible reinforcement unless absolutely necessary, which is like giving kids food when they do something that we want them to do.

    Lesley PsyD 00:51:18 Another one is hand over hand modeling or support, which is like I want them to touch the blue square, so I'm going to pick up their hand. Apologies for the motorcycle. I'm going to pick up their hand and physically touch the blue and then say, good job and reinforce that behavior. There's some gray area in there because there are kids with physical disabilities who perhaps need in an occupational therapy session, they they might need the hand over hand. So we're not talking about kids that need that. We're talking about kids who don't want to do it. Forcing a child's body to do anything and then giving a contrived reinforcement sticker or high five really has the potential to have very negative outcomes. They're losing the autonomy of their body and then being praised for giving that over.

    KC Davis 00:52:07 Okay. What other things would we see like in an ABA therapy. Like that's always the hardest part for me is that there's a lot of discussion about it. But I always like, okay, what does that mean? What does it look like.

    KC Davis 00:52:20 And then I kind of understand, like I understand what hand of a hand is. Now I understand about the reinforcements and I understand about the discrete trial teachings. And and let's talk about reinforcements for a minute, which is like what is the risk?

    Lesley PsyD 00:52:36 There's a couple of big risks, and one of them is we have to be really clear that reinforcement is an idea. It's not a thing. So anything could be a reinforcer of of a rock, could be a reinforcer. If they did something I presented a rock and then they did that thing more often or more intensely. Then that rock is a reinforcer. The more contrived object that we tie to that behavior as reinforcement, the more difficulty that child is going to have. Doing it for any other reason. So if our goal is we're going to greet people and I'm just using this as a random example. So we're going to teach the skill of greeting people. But the only thing we ever reinforce that with is a sticker chart to earn a break.

    Lesley PsyD 00:53:21 Then we may end up creating a very frantic child who says hi, hello, hi. Because we're just worried about getting to the break we want. Ideally, we want reinforcement to occur in the most naturalistic way possible. We we don't want to have to do an extra procedure to generalize this out into the real world and that, unfortunately, Sticker charts are notorious for that. Also, kids get bored of sticker charts, disabled or not, and so they often will satiate. And then when a child is bored and acting out, that's a brand new behavior we have to fix now.

    KC Davis 00:53:53 So what is the difference between, like what happens in an ABA center or an ABA therapy session? And just like general classroom management in a first grade class, because sometimes it seems similar. And so it's hard when people are talking about like the, the risks and benefits and, and it seems like, well, okay, well, gosh, my neurotypical kid has a sticker chart in her kindergarten class. You know what? You know, I think a lot of times people will almost like deflect criticisms by being like, well, they do it in schools too.

    KC Davis 00:54:26 And it's every time you give your kid a consequence, you're doing ABA, you know,

    Lesley PsyD 00:54:31 So the biggest difference is that ABA is a purposeful thing that tracks data and has targets that everything that's occurring, ideally, everything that's occurring in an ABA center is all therapeutic. So it's not, in a classroom classroom is happening. And then we also have things like a sticker chart or fist bumps or a color chart. But those are like things that happen in the classroom. We're not necessarily the teacher is not taking data on whether your child's responding to that. In fact, that's why I hate sticker charts and, and clip charts and color charts and classrooms. And I wish we could get rid of all of them in an Ava center. That's all planned. So the interventions they're going to use are, are thought through in advance, ideally, and matched with your child rather than just part of their environment.

    KC Davis 00:55:18 So is part of it just like the intensity level of some of these, like tech behavioral modification techniques?

    Lesley PsyD 00:55:28 Yes.

    Lesley PsyD 00:55:28 So it would be ABA is where everything that happens in the center is done for a reason specified by the team. Data is taken and the plan is adjusted. Everything is purposeful in a classroom. Those things may co-occur, but they're not. It's not for that purpose necessarily. The other thing.

    KC Davis 00:55:48 Why is that? Why is that important? Because I can't put my finger on it. But something about that seems really significant, like it seems significant to be in an environment as a developing child Where I'm learning, I'm learning how to learn in other ways, or like I'm learning how to be. I'm learning how to exist. I'm learning how to relate in a way where I don't. Not every moment is this targeted emphasis of me trying to figure out what is expected next, or I don't know, am I on to something here?

    Lesley PsyD 00:56:42 Yes. And and as always, I'll leave a little caveat in that. Every child is different. So these are generalizations. There are absolutely kids who benefit from being in an Eva Ava center and doing that very contrived work.

    Lesley PsyD 00:56:56 There are kids who benefit. I don't want to dismiss or minimize the families that need that service. But in general, yeah, there's more. And that, again, that's one of the criticisms of ABA as it's applied today, is that it's this idea that doing everything in this way is better, but there are naturalistic learning opportunities for children. And also children's success is not always where learning happens, so sometimes doing things in the wrong way naturalistically results in learning too. And also, I think this expectation that all the kids are moving towards gaining competence in all these areas is not super realistic for anybody.

    KC Davis 00:57:44 Yeah. Here's the last thing I want to ask, because when you said that, what I thought about is how like in a lot of like preschools, you know, you'll have like they're teaching kids how to color in the lines, but that's not developmentally appropriate. And there's a lot of really important learning on a neurological level, on a spatial visual level, on a like all these other even cognitive level that happens when a child colors without having to figure out how to put it in the lines.

    KC Davis 00:58:15 Right? Yeah. which we just some of the stuff we just mess up about childhood in general, but also like, where does the influence of just ableism come in? Because sometimes I feel like things are expected of autistic children that aren't even expected of non-autistic children. Like my. My non-autistic child could not sit at a desk for that long. She could not drill colors like that. She could not color in the lines all the time.

    Lesley PsyD 00:58:49 And I think that's one of the challenges also that I have with the language that ABA tends to use and not just them. We see this in other areas too sometimes in education is that things like, oh, Billy, he just he just shouts out all the time. He's so excited becomes for a child who is autistic with the same behavior, one of Billy's target behaviors is waiting on his turn to be called, where we tend to medical eyes and symptom wise things that are part of being a human being. and with Billy the fifth grader, the goal is not to eliminate all aberrant behavior.

    Lesley PsyD 00:59:26 We don't talk about non-disabled kids that way, but sometimes in therapeutic settings, we do. As soon as someone is disabled, then we immediately talk about, well, how are we going to rid them of all their problem behaviors and fill in their skill gaps? And I think, I think it raises a lot of the humanity of our kids, and then it causes them to reach adulthood and have to try to rediscover that, they don't, you know, one of the criticisms, that a lot of autistic adults who become verbally able after being nonverbal for so long is that they speak robotically. And I think some of that is, is diagnostic. We can see that in some, people with autism. But a lot of folks gain that from therapy because they're taught to speak in this very rote, singsong way, and then they have to spend years undoing that. Yeah.

    KC Davis 01:00:17 I will never forget to watch the young lady that I saw. She was like 18 or 19 making a video, and she was talking about how, like, she was going to therapy and she was trying to, like, I forgot what it was.

    KC Davis 01:00:30 There was something she wanted to do that was like a self-care act. She wanted to either journal or she wanted to, like, utilize a planner. And she made this video where she was like, I had an epiphany. You know, I, I realized I can't make myself do anything when there's not a sticker, when there's nobody there to give this, like extra reinforcement. I like my motivation. Systems are broken. I never learned how to have, like, innate motivation in a way that mattered to me because I was just conditioned. And she's like crying on the video of like, I really now struggle as an adult because not enough people paid attention to other ways of learning that might have set me up better for long term success versus just sort of like short term behavioral modification.

    Lesley PsyD 01:01:23 Yeah. And so people forget sometimes that these things that seem like they're naturally occurring to us, we most of us learned you have to be exposed to open ended learning opportunities that don't have a goal to develop internal motivation.

    Lesley PsyD 01:01:37 That's that's part we need that it doesn't just happen overnight. And so it's one thing to say well this child's learning mechanisms are not functioning. So we're going to teach them this very specialized way so they can get the skill. But you can't then ignore opportunities for naturalistic exploration. And you know playing with playing making messes. Frankly, a lot of kids who get diagnosed with autism in their therapies, I've seen over the years, there's a huge emphasis on, like, always cleaning up, always being clean. Don't make a mess. And it's not what kids are meant to be anyway. and I so I think on a positive note, if you're looking for high quality services, if you're if you're saying to yourself, well, then what the heck, what would good, you know, good therapy look like, it's always going to be high and warmth and high and naturalism, it's going to be in kids natural environments using the toys that they already own or things in their environment. It's going to include their caregivers.

    Lesley PsyD 01:02:34 It's going to include regular sounding voices, not something like this we don't like unless we're talking to very young children, which that's a normal speech tone. Yeah. and ABA can occur in those settings. It doesn't have to become to table point to same. It can be this other version.

    KC Davis 01:02:52 Well, Leslie, this was very enlightening and very helpful. Do you know of any like, next steps for someone that's listening, that's a parent or maybe even an adult that went through ABA, or someone who is just trying to make sense of all of this, like where they could learn more or where they can read about it, something that is maybe a layperson's level.

    Lesley PsyD 01:03:12 Yeah, I think a lot of that those connections are still at the local level and they are still on the good old Facebook. There are a lot of good Facebook groups looking for groups of former folks that have gone through ABA, or just looking for adults on the spectrum. Some folks can connect to larger organizations, but I will tell you that big organizations like Autism Speaks and some of the other ones are still not autistic led.

    Lesley PsyD 01:03:36 And so a lot of times people will try to connect to those and not really vibe and not find people that have gone through what they've gone through. So typically starting I think very locally and usually on Facebook, maybe Instagram, I'm getting old, maybe that's old info.

    KC Davis 01:03:52 Yeah. Okay. Well, thank you so much Leslie. Thank you.

KC Davis